Only in the land of fruit and nuts.
Truth/Lies
All posts tagged Truth/Lies
‘I have not been vaccinated for COVID-19 and will not do so, but not because I am anti-vaccine. I have had dear friends die of COVID who had not been vaccinated, and others died who got the jab, dying of COVID.
Others did not get COVID but were sick in bed for weeks because of the vaccine.
One 64-year-old friend died a few days after being vaccinated. His death was listed as a heart attack, but can anyone guarantee the shot had nothing to do with his death? There have been thousands of such cases within hours of the jab, yet state and federal governments are forcing free citizens to take the jab without dealing with all the fall-out from failed, even fatal vaccinations.
It is shocking that any government official, especially liberals, would demand that free people be forced to permit their bodies to be injected with an unwanted, untrusted, and unneeded substance. What has happened to Liberals?
Some experts think the missionary zeal to vaccinate everyone is totally unnecessary, if not unlawful. Dr. Michael Yeadon, former Vice President and Chief Scientist of Pfizer, declared, “There is absolutely no need for vaccines to extinguish the pandemic. I’ve never heard such nonsense talks about vaccines. You do not vaccinate people who aren’t at risk from the disease. You also don’t set about planning to vaccinate millions of fit and healthy people with a vaccine that hasn’t been extensively tested on human subjects.”
However, on with the crusade to convert everyone into a participant in the biggest power grab since Attila the Hun saddled up for his ride across Europe in the fifth century.
Everyone should know what happens to the body at the time of vaccination. Political physicians in Washington tell us the vaccines will protect against COVID or won’t be as severe if you get the disease. Well, not necessarily.
We are told the COVID-19 vaccines are different from others. The CDC website says, “to trigger an immune response, many vaccines put a weakened or inactivated germ into our bodies. Not mRNA vaccines. Instead, they teach our cells how to make a protein—or even just a piece of a protein—that triggers an immune response inside our bodies.” So, when the Chinese coronavirus vaccine is shot into a body, it is supposed to trick the body into thinking the disease is present; then produce antibodies to fight it off.
The Moderna website goes to the heart of the matter by saying, “COVID-19 mRNA vaccines give instructions for our cells to make a harmless piece of what is called the ‘spike protein.’ The spike protein is found on the surface of the virus that causes COVID-19.” The pitch is that vaccinated people get protection “without ever having to risk the serious consequences of getting sick with COVID-19.”
Alas, if only that were true.
It is commonly known that the vaccine protects no one from getting COVID. But the vaccine does not protect from COVID but causes COVID infections it is supposed to prevent! Yet, Moderna’s website promises mRNA, also called messenger RNA, “delivers the instructions your body needs to potentially prevent, treat, or cure a disease.”
Not in the real world. A shocking Israeli study revealed vaccinated individuals were 27 times more likely to get a symptomatic COVID infection than those with natural immunity!
Moreover, why should those who survive a COVID infection get a dubious, untested vaccine that doesn’t work when a study by the Yale School of Public Health offers the latest evidence that “the immunity acquired by COVID-19 infection is superior to the immunity from vaccination.”
Scientists tell us mRNA is naturally found in every cell in the body and carries genetic information from DNA in the highly protected nucleus to the rest of the cell. Structures called ribosomes can then build proteins according to the DNA blueprint.
Medical experts tell us, “mRNA medicines are sets of instructions. And these instructions direct cells in the body to make proteins to prevent or fight disease.” The body is tricked into creating its own defense by pulling the trigger of your body’s immune system. Your body has the blueprint it needs to kick in its defense mechanism to fight off the invading virus. Moderna likens this to test answers. Whenever your body is attacked, it pulls up the answers to solve your health problem.
As is sometimes true in education, the answer sheet is wrong!
The mRNA stores genetic instructions our bodies need to produce proteins that permit the body to function. Without mRNA, there would be no proteins made, and the body would not perform.
We are told that the danger is the spike protein in the COVID-19 virus, and with the vaccines, the threat is the spike protein itself. However, while the spike protein found in the virus is bad, the spike protein your body produces in response to the vaccine is far worse. That is because the synthetic mRNA in the vaccine has been programmed to instruct your cells to produce an unnatural, genetically engineered spike protein. Specific alterations make it far more toxic than that found in the virus itself.
Dr. Vladimir Zelenko says the whole body “becomes a spike protein factory,” many times more than if you were to get COVID. The infected cells produce spike proteins that travel to every single cell in your body. Zelenko also declared, “According to a paper published by the Salk Institute in San Diego, they’ve discovered that the spike protein that’s generated through the vaccination itself has negative health effects. It’s toxic…There’s plenty of evidence that shows that it spreads from the injection site and goes to the bloodstream, and basically comes into every single cell in the body.”
The vaccine does not stay in the shoulder but is distributed throughout the body via the bloodstream within hours. Dr. Byram Bridle, a Canadian immunologist, also cites recent research showing the spike protein remained in the bloodstream of humans for 29 days. He declares that both the vaccine and the spike protein are expelled in breast milk and could be fatal for babies. Bridle says vaccinated breastfeeding women are in danger of feeding a baby contaminated milk. Mothers are not doing good by transferring antibodies but are transferring the vaccine itself, as well as the spike protein, which could result in bleeding and/or blood clots in their child.
It is shocking and unprecedented to vaccinate pregnant women with an unproved vaccine, but that is the reality. Recently, the New England Journal of Medicine declared pregnant persons (women) “are at risk for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19), and infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) during pregnancy is associated with increased risks of preterm birth and other adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes.”
Additionally, there have been “1,969 fetal deaths recorded following COVID-19 shots as of October 1, 2021. What sane woman would take such risks with her unborn child?
When the mRNA is injected into an arm, it hits the bloodstream and lodges in various organs, bone marrow, and females’ ovaries. Carried with it is the spike protein to the organs where blood clots or bleeding can take place. The spike protein and the vaccine are also expelled to a vulnerable child with deadly results in breast milk. Blood transfusions are dangerous since the vaccine and the spike protein are transferred to an unknowing victim, sometimes killing him rather than saving him.
In light of the above, the CDC still recommends COVID-19 vaccination “for people who are pregnant, breastfeeding, trying to get pregnant now, or who might become pregnant in the future.”
But it gets worse.
Drs. Mike Yeadon, Luc Montagnier, and Vladimir Zelenko believe the COVID-19 shots could reduce life expectancy several decades. “There is an absolute effect on fertility,” Zelenko says, “We just don’t know to what degree yet.” Drs. Stephanie Seneff and Judy Mikovits agree with that claim.
Dr. Joseph Mercola reported that Byram Bridle, Ph.D., a Canadian immunologist and vaccine researcher got access to Pfizer’s biodistribution study from the Japanese regulatory agency. He discovered previously unknown facts of a “huge problem with all COVID-19 vaccines.” Bridle found that Pfizer’s vaccine’s mRNA and subsequent spike protein are “widely distributed in the body within hours” rather than remaining near the vaccination site. Since the spike protein is a poison, it can “cause cardiovascular and neurological damage.” This can result in the toxin accumulating in the ovaries of females who received the injection, causing blood clots, abnormal bleeding, infertility, pain at the injection site, heart inflammation, heart attacks, severe allergies, diarrhea, etc. Additionally, 30,000 women reported their periods being altered after getting the COVID-19 vaccine.
“We made a big mistake,” Bridle said in an interview with Alex Pierson. “We thought the spike protein was a great target antigen; we never knew the spike protein itself was a toxin and was a pathogenic protein. So, by vaccinating people we are inadvertently inoculating them with a toxin.” It appears to a non-medical person that it is strange to purposefully instruct the body to create the very thing (spike protein) that will destroy the body.
“We made a big mistake” is an honest confession not heard often from the soothsayers in Washington. Now, the world is living with their mistake. But then, medical mistakes are the third biggest cause of American deaths (250,000 annually) as reported by a Johns Hopkins study, while other reports claim the deaths could be as high as 440,000. If independent COVID physicians are correct, the total will be in the millions next year.
Now we are told vaccinated people may be more vulnerable to severe illness than previously thought. Bloomberg reported, “Scientists from the US have said vaccinated people appear to be contracting the coronavirus at a surprisingly high rate, according to a report in Bloomberg.” It went on to say that there is a concern of more severe injuries being reported from the vaccinated. Vaccinated patients report serious reactions such as Bell’s palsy, herpes, blood clots, bleeding, heart attacks, paralysis, shingles, etc., following COVID-19 vaccination.
In short, when you get the COVID-19 vaccine, you are being injected with an agent that instructs your body to produce a bioweapon in its own cells. Dr. Peter McCullough, a COVID expert at Baylor, declared it is “bioterrorism by injection.”
The latest government vaccine reporting system reveals there have been a total of 875,651 “adverse events.” Consisting of over 127,000 doctor visits, 18,461 deaths, 83,000 hospitalizations, 92,000 urgent care visits, 26,000 disabled, 12,131 Myocarditis, 10,981 Bell’s palsy, 8400 heart attacks. 2,887 miscarriages, plus many lesser effects.
Americans are surrendering their freedom, jobs, common sense, etc., for the possibility of an ounce of safety.
You now know that there is a mass of contradictory information regarding COVID. The thoughtful and concerned reader will not be bullied, badgered, browbeaten, or blackmailed to get the jab without a thorough knowledge and thoughtful consideration.
Each person must be awake, aware, alert, alarmed, and active in protecting their health. If not, they will not be alive if a cadre of independent physicians is correct.
I think they are right.
Man is a free being who chooses between good and evil, beauty and ugliness, truth and error, and must live with the free choice he makes.
However, it must be his choice.’https://donboys.cstnews.com/what-harm-does-the-covid-vaccine-do-to-your-body
‘They tell us to listen to the scientists, until a scientist says something which goes against their agenda.’https://rumble.com/vpkq8k-they-tell-us-to-listen-to-the-scientists.html?mref=6zof&mc=dgip3&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=tonyheller&ep=2
What kind of man do people look for in a pastor/leader? Then consider, what makes people attend churches that have men with not so good a reputation?
Does the Bible have anything to say concerning the pastor of the church? Yes, it does.
1Timothy 3:1-7 This is a true saying, If a man desire the office of a bishop, he desireth a good work. 2 A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, vigilant, sober, of good behaviour, given to hospitality, apt to teach; 3 Not given to wine, no striker, not greedy of filthy lucre; but patient, not a brawler, not covetous; 4 One that ruleth well his own house, having his children in subjection with all gravity; 5 (For if a man know not how to rule his own house, how shall he take care of the church of God?) 6 Not a novice, lest being lifted up with pride he fall into the condemnation of the devil. 7 Moreover he must have a good report of them which are without; lest he fall into reproach and the snare of the devil.
Then in 2 Timothy 3 God describes another type of man.
2Timothy 3:1 This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. 2 For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, 3 Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good,
4 Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God; 5 Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away. 6 For of this sort are they which creep into houses, and lead captive silly women laden with sins, led away with divers lusts, 7 Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth. 8 Now as Jannes and Jambres withstood Moses, so do these also resist the truth: men of corrupt minds, reprobate concerning the faith. 9 But they shall proceed no further: for their folly shall be manifest unto all men, as theirs also was.
‘The “cultic” activities of Mark Driscoll and The Trinity Church have escalated to a whole new level. On this edition of The Roys Report, two former members of Driscoll’s security detail – Chad Freese and Ben Eneas – share their firsthand knowledge of this cult of personality.’ https://julieroys.com/podcast/inside-the-driscoll-cult?mc_cid=063dadc6c4&mc_eid=b13d34ad49
‘The existence of humans suggests that, at some point, there must have been a first human. Neither evolutionists nor creationists deny this. However, creationists believe that Adam (Genesis 1–2) was the first human. But whether the first human was Adam or some unnamed, recently-evolved person, where did that person learn to speak?
Evidence suggests that humans do not learn to speak unless they are taught by someone who already knows how to speak. Additionally, the archaeological record indicates that fully-developed languages have been in existence as long as humans have been (Elgin 1973, 44). For these reasons, Curtis, in a 1990 article, argues that a personal creator was responsible for the existence of the first human.
Linguistic Evidence
Linguistic research suggests that languages have not evolved from a prehistoric development period (Eglin 1973, 44). Rather, languages have always existed with the same communication potential as they currently possess. In fact, it is possible that they even held greater communication potential in the past.
Archaeological Evidence
The archaeological finds from the past 100 years of excavations have demonstrated that written language appears well developed in the earliest records of civilization. For example, the Ebla tablets date to about 2000 BC. These tablets contain writing in a fully-developed, phonetic language.
How Do People Learn How to Speak?
Some Darwinian anthropologists have suggested that if, in the process of evolution, there was a transition from animal to man, this transition would have included the acquisition of language. However, one of these anthropologists, Humbolt, realized that man cannot speak without already being human. For him, this created an unsolvable problem regarding the origin of speech (Lyell 1873).
Another problem with determining the origin of speech from an evolutionary perspective is that in so-called primitive cultures, the languages tend to be more complex than in more advanced cultures. Furthermore, animals with the physical capability to use logical speech do not do so. Studies have shown that animals that respond to commands do so based on vocal tones rather than the spoken words. Thus, all attempts to solve the evolutionary origin of language have failed.
Every child that learns how to speak learns from someone who already knows how to speak. There do not seem to be any exceptions to this rule. Feral children who grow up without contact with spoken language did not learn to speak until they came into contact with speaking individuals. Once they had heard speech, they were able to learn how to speak (Tomb 1925).
What Does this All Mean?
Since multiple languages appear to have existed in fully developed forms in the earliest known civilizations, it appears that the languages do not have one common root. Rather, each language appeared independently of the others.
This evidence aligns well with the biblical account. From the creation of Adam until the Tower of Babel, there was only one language on earth (Genesis 11:1). Curtis suggests that God taught the first man, Adam, to speak. It is clear that Adam spoke a well-developed language because he was able to name the animals (Genesis 2:19). From that point on, each generation learned to speak from the previous one.
Later, when God confused the languages at the Tower of Babel (Genesis 11:7), He miraculously created a number of additional unrelated, fully-formed languages. The pattern of language learning continued. Each person learned to speak from the previous generation.
Conclusion
The scientific evidence obtained through linguistic and archaeological studies suggest that the first human who learned how to speak must have learned from someone who already possessed the capability of speech. This first person must have learned from someone of a higher order than humans. This correlates well with the biblical account of God’s creation of Adam. Adam must have received the ability and knowledge to speak from God himself. The study of language demonstrates that there must be a creator God. No human can speak a language unless that person has been taught. Furthermore, languages have not arisen from some lesser forms of communication. They appeared early in history, fully developed. The languages present today do not share a common root, suggesting that they appeared as separate, well-developed languages. This accords well with the account of the Tower of Babel.
References
Curtis, William M. 1990. “Human Language Demands a Creator.” The Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism 2:1, 69–72.
Elgin, Suzette H. 1973. What is Linguistics? Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall Inc.
Lyell, C. 1873. Antiquity of Man, 4th Ed., 518.
Tomb, J. W. 1925. “On the Intuitive Capacity of Children to Understand Spoken Language.” British Journal of Psychiatry 1, 553–555.’https://newcreation.blog/how-did-humans-learn-to-speak/?mc_cid=c226022714&mc_eid=2abe4a38b0
‘One way to get a Nobel prize in something, you’ve got to break some new ground or discover something no one has ever seen. In the world, the making of a printing press or light bulb changes everything. People still try to invent a better mousetrap. It happens. The phone replaced the telegraph and now our mobile devices, the phone.
Everyone can learn something new from scripture. You might even change or tweak a doctrine you’ve always believed. On the whole, you don’t want to teach from the Bible what no one has ever heard before. The goal is the original intent and understanding of the Author.
From the left comes progressivism. The U. S. Constitution, just over two hundred years old, means something different than when it was written. Loosely constructed, it has a flexible interpretation into which new meanings arise. Hegelian dialectics say a new thesis comes from synthesis of antithesis and a former thesis. Everything can be improved.
Early after the inspiration and then propagation of the Bible, men found new things no one ever saw in scripture. Many of these “finds” started a new movement. People have their fathers, the father of this or that teaching, contradictory to the other, causing division and new factions and denominations. Some of these changes become quite significant, a majority supplanting the constituents of the original teaching.
At the time of the Reformation, it was as if the world first found sole fide and sole scriptura. Men often call justification the Reformation doctrine of justification. This opened a large, proverbial can of worms. Many could read their own Bible in their own language. Others now dug into their own copy of the original languages of scripture. Skepticism grew. “If we didn’t know this before, what else did they not tell us.” It became a time ripe for religious shysters and this practice hasn’t stopped since then.
Socinus
The Italian, Laelius Socinus, was born in 1525 into a distinguished family of lawyers. Early his attention turned from law to scripture research. He doubted the teachings of Roman Catholicism. Socinus moved in 1548 to Zurich to study Greek and Hebrew. He still questioned established doctrine and challenged the Reformers. Laelius wrote his own confession of faith, which introduced different, conflicting beliefs. They took hold of his nephew, Faustus Socinus, born in 1539.
Faustus rejected orthodox Roman Catholic doctrines. The Inquisition denounced him in 1559, so he fled to Zurich in 1562. There he acquired his uncle’s writings. His doubt of Catholicism turned anti-Trinitarian. The Reformation did not go far enough for Socinus. His first published work in 1562 on the prologue of John rejected the essential deity of Jesus Christ.
Socinus’s journeys ended in Poland, where he became leader of the Minor Reformed Church, the Polish Brethren. His writings in the form of the Racovian Catechism survived through the press of the Racovian Academy of Rakow, Poland. His beliefs took the name, Socinianism, now also a catch-all for any type of dissenting doctrine.
Socinianism held that Jesus did not exist until his physical conception. God adopted Him as Son at His conception and became Son of God when the Holy Spirit conceived Him in Mary, a Gnostic view called “adoptionism.” It rejected the doctrine of original sin.
Socianism denied the omniscience of God. It introduced the first well developed concept of “open theism,” which said that man couldn’t have free will under a traditional (and scriptural) understanding of omniscience.
Socinianism also taught the moral example theory of atonement, teaching that Jesus sacrificed himself to motivate people to repent and believe. His death gave men the ability to be saved by their own works, who weren’t sinners by nature anyway.
Unitarians
The work of Socinus lived on in the belief of early English Unitarians, Henry Hedworth and John Biddle. Socinian belief was helped along also by its position of conscientious objection, a practice of refusing to perform military service. This principle was very popular with many and made Socinianism much more attractive to potential adherents. The First Unitarian Church, which followed Socianism as passed down through its leaders in England, was started in 1774 on Essex Street in London, where British Unitarian headquarters are still today.
As the Puritans of colonial America apostatized through various means, Unitarianism, a modern iteration of Socinianism took hold in the Congregational Church in America. After 1820, Congregationalists took Unitarianism as their established doctrine. The doctrine of Christ diminished to Jesus a good man and perhaps a prophet of God and in a sense the Son of God, but not God Himself.
Spirit of Skepticism
I write as an example of the diversity in the history of Christian doctrine and why it takes place. When you read the beliefs of Socinians, you easily see them in modern liberal Christianity. They influence on religious cults that deny the deity of Jesus Christ.
A limited amount of skepticism wards away the acceptance of false doctrine. Better is a Berean attitude (Acts 17:11), searching the scripture to see if these things are so, and what Paul wrote in 1 Thessalonians 5:21, proving all things, holding fast to that which is good.
As I grew up among fundamentalists and independent Baptists, I witnessed regular desire to find something new in the Bible. Many sermons espoused interpretations I had never heard and didn’t see in the text. A preacher often said, “God gave it to me.” You should know God used the man because no one had seen such insights into scripture.
The same spirit of doctrinal novelty continues today in many evangelical churches. The same practice led Joseph Smith in his founding of Mormonism. Many cults arose in 19th century America under the same spirit of skepticism of established historical doctrines.
The Temptation of Novel Teaching
The temptation of novel teaching preys on anyone. Faustus Socinus accepted many orthodox doctrines of his day. He rejected Christ as fully God and fully human because it was contrary to sound reason (ratio sana). This steered Socinians toward Enlightenment thinking, where human reason took the highest role as arbiter of truth.
Warren Wiersbe wrote that H.A. Ironside, longtime pastor of Chicago’s Moody Church, said, “If it’s new, it’s not true, and if it’s true, it’s not new.” Elsewhere I read that Spurgeon first said that. I don’t know. Clever new interpretations, teachings, and takes on and from scripture corrupt and overturn scriptural, saving doctrines in the hearts of men. They condemn them through all eternity.’https://kentbrandenburg.com/2021/11/22/the-regular-history-of-clever-new-interpretations-teachings-or-takes-on-and-from-scripture-socinianism/
‘I wanted to tell you what I am doing about ongoing and proposed medical segregation and workplace jab mandates by state governments and private corporations. You might have heard that Liberal Senators Gerard Rennick and Alex Antic and One Nation Senators Pauline Hanson and Malcolm Roberts have announced they are withholding their votes from the government in the Senate until Australians are given protection from vaccine discrimination.
An attempt was made by One Nation in the Senate this morning (Monday) to bring in a bill which would have ended vaccine discrimination. Senators Rennick and Antic as well as Matthew Canavan, Sam McMahon and Concetta Fierravanti-Wells voted for that bill. The bill was sadly defeated. As I am not a Senator, I did not get a vote. However, the One Nation bill is very similar to the one I have co-sponsored with Craig Kelly in the House of Representatives, titled the No Domestic COVID Vaccine Passports Bill 2021. I have already voted for this bill in the House of Representatives (unsuccessfully sadly) and will vote for it again and again and again, if and when the bill is given a chance to go forward.
But here’s what I’m doing now.
Earlier today, I informed Nationals leader Barnaby Joyce (and the Nationals Party Room of which I am a member) that, unless we act to stop state governments and private corporations from discriminating against non-vaccinated Australians when it comes to either employment or clientele, then I intend to not be beholden to party room discipline when voting in the House of Representatives.
To be clear, until federal action is taken against vaccine discrimination, I will be voting according to my conscience (or abstaining from votes) on bills and substantive motions rather than just voting with the government as MPs usually do.
As I was elected as a member of the Liberal National Party, I will continue to support the government with confidence motions and supply as well as procedural motions (except if they relate to ending vaccine discrimination). My support is not guaranteed on bills or substantive motions. When action is taken to stop vaccine discrimination, I will go back to the normal process of voting with the government on most, if not all, bills and substantive motions.
I have no doubt this stance will result in personal attacks on me. But far more important than my political and personal reputation is the prospect of ending the tyranny, the discrimination, the segregation, the job losses and the negative business impacts that are all being wrought (or are about to be wrought) on my fellow Australians.
You can support my stance at www.georgechristensen.com.au/vax
Here’s hoping we see some action soon.
God bless you and your family.
Take care,
George Christensen MP‘https://nationfirst.substack.com/p/-alert-what-im-doing-to-stop-vaccine
‘I have heard from multiple people now that Comcast is sending Unreported Truths emails to spam no matter how many times users mark them otherwise.
And this just came in.
I have also heard that some hospitals are blocking all access to Unreported Truths on their networks. Because science! Sciency-sciency-science! is all about making sure people can’t have access to data that might make them question dogma for themselves.
I email fairly frequently (for better or worse), so if you don’t see something from me for a couple of days, make sure to check your spam box.’https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/the-censorship-from-email-providers/comments?token=eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjo0MjUyOTI1MiwicG9zdF9pZCI6NDQ0MjIxMjEsIl8iOiJEbU9udiIsImlhdCI6MTYzNzYxMzY4OSwiZXhwIjoxNjM3NjE3Mjg5LCJpc3MiOiJwdWItMzYzMDgwIiwic3ViIjoicG9zdC1yZWFjdGlvbiJ9.wqu89QCSpNl_fQDOL_dxWgpt_VnDfZB-J3WBjMdb2Eg
whatyareckon 