‘Gates Honored Doctor: “We’ll just get rid of all the whites in the United States” Chair of Advisory Committee on Immunizations floats racially-based depopulation plan op Center for Disease Control official was caught on tape in 2016 saying that society should “get rid of of all the whites in the United States” to reduce the number of people who refuse vaccines. Dr. Carol Baker made the alarming remarks during the “Achieving Childhood Vaccine Success in the U.S.” panel discussion sponsored by the National Meningitis Association in New York City on May 9, 2016. “So I have the solution. Every study published in the last five years, when you look at vaccine refusers,” Baker told the panel. “I’m not talking about…hesitance, most of them we can talk into coming to terms. But refusers. We’ll just get rid of all the whites in the United States…Guess who wants to get vaccinated the most? Immigrants.” Notably, Baker was appointed Chair of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization by Obama’s Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius in 2009. The Houston doctor was also honored with the Sabin Vaccine Institute’s 2019 Albert B. Sabin Gold Medal at a Washington D.C. ceremony sponsored “in part by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and Pfizer.” Is it really that surprising a Bill Gates-connected CDC official openly suggested depopulating whites who don’t cooperate with their mandatory vaccine agenda?’
This video is from way back in 2005 but very pertinent for today. Gates is talking to members of the CIA about vaccines for use against the ‘religious’ extremism gene. This man is anti-God and is listened to by the leaders in the free world.
My wife and I (who are in our 70’s) went to the GP yesterday and the China virus vaccine will be available to us in late March. It isn’t the Pfizer vaccine but who knows the long term effect these vaccines will have on the body? Well, here’s another article on the vaccine that China caused.
March 1, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) — While in January a group of independent doctors concluded that experimental COVID-19 vaccines are “not safer” than the virus itself, a new analysis of vaccine-related death rates in Israel demonstrates that this may indeed be the case to dramatic levels.
A re-analysis of published data from the Israeli Health Ministry by Dr. Hervé Seligmann, a member of the faculty of Medicine Emerging Infectious and Tropical Diseases at Aix-Marseille University, and engineer Haim Yativ reveal, in short, that the mRNA experimental vaccine from Pfizer killed “about 40 times more (elderly) people than the disease itself would have killed” during a recent five-week vaccination period. Among the younger class, these numbers are compounded to death rates at 260 times what the COVID-19 virus would have claimed in the given time frame.
While the full mathematical analysis may be found in the article itself, the authors demonstrate how among “those vaccinated and above 65, 0.2 percent … died during the three-week period between doses, hence about 200 among 100,000 vaccinated. This is to be compared to the 4.91 dead among 100,000 dying from COVID-19 without vaccination.”
“This scary picture also extends to those below 65,” the researchers continued. During the five-week vaccination process “0.05 percent, meaning 50 among 100,000, died. This is to be compared to the 0.19 per 100,000 dying from COVID-19 (who) are not vaccinated … Hence the death rate of this age group increased by 260 (times) during this five-week period of the vaccination process, as compared to their natural COVID-19 death rate.”
As reported by IsraelNationalNews (INN), Seligmann is of Israeli-Luxembourg nationality, has a biology degree from Hebrew University of Jerusalem, and has written more than 100 scientific publications. INN reports the researchers “have no conflicts or interests other than having children in Israel.”
Yativ and Seligmann stipulate that even these “estimated numbers of deaths from the vaccine are probably much lower than actual numbers as it accounts only for those defined as COVID-19 deaths for that short time period and does not include AVC and cardiac (and other) events resulting from the inflammatory reactions.”
Nor do these numbers “account for long-term complications,” they write.
In addition, within several months they expect “mid- and long-term adverse effects of the vaccination as ADE (Antibody-dependent Enhancement)” begins to become manifest in those who have received the experimental Pfizer vaccine.
As explained by America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS), ADE “is when anti-COVID antibodies, created by a vaccine, instead of protecting the person, cause a more severe or lethal disease when the person is later exposed to SARS-CoV-2 in the wild. The vaccine amplifies the infection rather than preventing damage.”
AFLDS provides an example of a vaccine produced to fight the Dengue fever, which resulted in deaths of 600 children in the Philippines due to ADE, and the filing of criminal charges against the decisionmakers in 2019.
For these reasons and more, AFLDS and many other doctors strongly discourage the use of these experimental vaccines for most people while only acknowledging that it may be plausible for those over 70 years of age, yet acknowledging that such injections are “a higher risk than early or prophylactic treatment with established medications” (sources here, here, here, and here).
Given these death rates, Yativ and Seligmann also have harsh criticism for the severe pressure being imposed upon the population by Israeli authorities to receive these shots. According to INN, the researchers call these draconian efforts “a new Holocaust.”
In the past weeks, Israel’s government made headlines when they a “green pass” system, allowing people who have been injected to receive a green code, which then grants them entry into places such as entertainment and leisure facilities.
As the country reopens after a two-month lockdown, the green pass would be given only to those who had been injected, not to people who tested negative for the virus. The proposed benefits include access to “non-essential” businesses as well as not being required to self-isolate if identified as a close contact of a confirmed case of COVID-19, and not having to self-isolate after a return from a what the government calls a “red location.”
Despite there being no proof that these experimental vaccines actually prevent transmission of the virus, Israel’s minister for health, Yuli Edelstein, said upon the release of the vaccine “passport” that “(g)etting vaccinated is a moral duty. It is part of our mutual responsibility.” He went further, declaring, “Whoever does not get vaccinated will be left behind.”
The green pass needs renewing every six months, and despite holding one, an individual must still abide by masking and physical distancing rules. The Jerusalem Post also reported that legislation is being considered to grant employers the right to refuse unvaccinated people entry into the workplace.
Such measures prompted Business Insider to describe the country as “waging a war on the unvaccinated.” Meanwhile, Dr. Anthony Fauci, chief medical adviser to President Joe Biden, has styled Israel’s vaccination response as “extraordinarily good.”’ https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/experimental-vaccine-death-rate-for-israels-elderly-40-times-higher-than-covid-19-deaths-researchers
‘Chalk up another victory for America’s innovative pharmaceutical sector in the battle against Covid-19. An FDA analysis has found that Johnson and Johnson’s vaccine is both safe and effective, setting up a likely emergency-use authorization for the product. This would add a third vaccine to the American market, following the introduction of vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna in December. The J&J vaccine will not only add much needed supply but also offer some significant advantages over the other two shots.
The top-line number for the J&J vaccine—67 percent effectiveness in decreasing moderate to severe Covid-19 illness—might seem to suggest that it is inferior to the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, which boast more than 90 percent effectiveness. But the vaccine trials are not directly comparable. The Pfizer and Moderna trials were conducted earlier, when fewer and probably less dangerous virus variants were extant. More importantly, J&J’s vaccine is very effective at preventing severe illness: 77 percent effective in reducing cases occurring 14 days after vaccination and 85 percent for cases 28 days after vaccination. Notably, no deaths or hospitalizations occurred among the trial’s vaccine recipients. As with the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, side effects were mostly minor and brief.
The J&J vaccine also offers important advantages. First, it is a single dose rather than the currently required two doses for Pfizer and Moderna. This makes it far more likely people will sign up for it, since a single dose is less of a time commitment and inconvenience than a two-dose regimen. A single dose also eliminates the logistical difficulties of scheduling second doses and ensuring that they are given.’https://www.city-journal.org/advantages-of-the-johnson-and-johnson-covid-vaccine
The purge of anything not held by the Left in America and in most if not all of the West has begun. That purge is against not only conservatives of all stripes but I believe conservative Christians especially. The Left hate, literally hate God and His Word, the Bible. Censoring truth is the ultimate aim in dictatorial governments. In this article we read about the censoring by YouTube of Ivermectin, a medicine that works as a treatment for the China virus. YES, ‘THE PURGE HAS COMMENCED Dr Lawrie’s urgent appeal to the British Prime Minister to consider ivermectin against Covid-19 has been censored by youtube. Yesterday I received a call from a representative of FaceBook ‘requesting’ that I remove a post that contained comments (referenced with links) made by Australia’s Professor Tom Borody commenting about Ivermectin as a treatment Covid – otherwise by FaceBook would have ‘restrictions’ placed upon it. I have since removed the post containing Professor Borody’s comments under protest. He have entered a very dark time in human history when scientific debate and freedom of speech is being suppressed. Here’s the link that has now been suppressed https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pXV42xkk8cMIvermectin poses a threat to the ideology of ‘’we must inject everyone with the vaccine” perhaps that’s why there is such extraordinary suppression of free speech to shut this down.’https://www.facebook.com/CraigKellyMP
China is on the move militarily, medically and politically.
Craig Kelly is one of the few Australian Federal politicians willing to speak the truth! Oh, and by the way he is hated on both sides of politics.
‘If (and that’s a very big IF) it is prudent to set out to inject the entire Australian population with one or more of the covid vaccines – what level of information is the public entitled to know about the risks ?One school of thought, that appears to be advocated by Labor’s Shadow Health Minister Chris Bowen (given his name-calling and personal attacks on me for posting factual data from US Center for Disease Control) is that the public should be treated like mushrooms. Just line up, roll-up your sleeve, don’t ask questions, don’t think for yourself – leave all the thinking to us experts, for we know better. The alternate, is that he have a fully informed debate, free from censorship will all the facts in the table, including the pros and cons of the vaccines and the option of Ivermectin. I believe in the latter. That’s why I’m posting a link to this report, published in the International Journal of Clinical Practice which warns that there is a; ‘’specific risk that COVID‐19 vaccines could worsen disease upon exposure to challenge or circulating virus’’. And; ‘’Given the strong evidence that ADE (antibody‐dependent enhancement) is a non‐theoretical and compelling risk for COVID‐19 vaccines and the ‘laundry list’ nature of informed consents, disclosure of the specific risk of worsened COVID‐19 disease from vaccination calls for a specific, separate, informed consent form and demonstration of patient comprehension in order to meet medical ethics standards. The informed consent process for ongoing COVID‐19 vaccine trials does NOT appear to meet this standard.’’https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/ijcp.13795I believe that public needs to be informed of the quantum of this risk with empirical evidence – or honestly told; ‘’we don’t know, and are only guessing what the risk might be’’.’https://www.facebook.com/CraigKellyMP/photos/a.251794581681850/1714483885412905/
New Zealand is probably only one more election from being totally controlled by the CCP. The following is from a new NZ political party dedicated to freedom; Advance New Zealand. https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/advancenzpp/pages/409/attachments/original/1609040299/The-Real-News-Issue1.pdf?1609040299.
‘Here are nine facts backed up with data, in many cases from the CDC itself that paints a very different picture from the fear and dread being relentlessly drummed into the brains of unsuspecting citizens.
1) The PCR test is Practically Useless
According to an article in the New York Times August 29th 2020, testing for the Covid-19 virus using the popular PCR method results in up to 90% of those tested showing positive results that are grossly misleading.
Officials in Massachusetts, New York and Nevada compiled testing data that revealed the PCR test can NOT determine the amount of virus in a sample.
(viral load) The amount of virus in up to 90% of positive results turned out to be so miniscule that the patient was asymptomatic and posed no threat to others. So the positive Covid-19 tests are virtually meaningless.
2) A Positive Test is NOT a CASE
For some reason every positive Covid-19 test is immediately designated a CASE. As we saw in #1 above
up to 90% of positive Covid-19 tests result in miniscule amounts of virus that do not sicken the subject. Historically only patients who demonstrated actual symptoms of an illness were considered a case. Publishing positive test results as “CASES” is grossly misleading and needlessly alarming.
3) The Centers for Disease Control Dramatically Lowered the Covid-19 Death Count
On August 30th the CDC released new data that showed only 6% of the deaths previously attributed to Covid 19 were due exclusively to the virus. The vast majority, 94%, may have had exposure to Covid-19 but also had preexisting illnesses like heart disease, obesity, hypertension, cancer and various respiratory illnesses.
While they died with Covid-19 they did NOT die exclusively from Covid-19.
4) CDC reports Covid-19 Survival Rate over 99%
The CDC updated their “Current Best Estimate” for Covid-19 survival on September 10th showing that over 99% of people exposed to the virus survived.
Another way to say this is that less than 1% of the exposures are potentially life threatening. According to the CDC the vast majority of deaths attributed to Covid-19 were concentrated in the population over age 70, close to normal life expectancy.
5) CDC reveals 85% of Posi- tive Covid Cases Wore Face Masks Always or Often
In September of 2020 the CDC released the results of a study conducted in July where they discovered that
85% of the positive Covid test subjects reported wearing a cloth face mask always or often for two weeks prior to testing positive. The majority, 71% of the test subjects reported always wearing a cloth face mask and 14% reported often wearing a cloth face mask. The only rational conclusion from this study is that cloth face masks offer little if any protection from Covid-19 infection.
6) There are Inexpensive, Proven Therapies for Covid-19 Harvey Risch, MD, PhD heads the Yale University School of Epidemiology. He authored “The Key to Defeating
Covid-19 Already Exists. We Need to Start Using It” which was published in Newsweek magazine on July 23rd, 2020.
Dr. Risch documents the proven effectiveness of treating patients diagnosed with Covid-19 using a combination of hydroxychloroquine, an antibiotic like azithromycin and the nutritional supplement zinc. Medical doctors across the globe have reported very positive results using this protocol particularly
for early stage Covid patients.
7) The US Death Rate is NOT Spiking
If Covid-19 was the lethal killer it’s made out to be one would reasonably expect to see a significant spike in the number of deaths reported. But that hasn’t happened.
According to the CDC as of early May 2020 the total number of deaths in the US was 944,251 from January 1 – April 30th. This is actually slightly lower than the number of deaths during the same period in 2017 when 946,067 total deaths were reported.
8) Most Covid-19 Deaths Occur at the End of a Normal Lifespan
According to the CDC as of 2017 US males can expect a normal lifespan of 76.1 years and females 81.1 years. A little over 80% of the suspected Covid-19 deaths have occurred in people over age 65. According to a June 28th New York Post article almost half of all Covid suspected deaths have occurred in nursing homes which predominately house people with preexisting health conditions and close to or past their normal life expectancy.
9) CDC Data Shows Minimal Covid Risk to Children and Young Adults
The CDC reported in their September 10th update that its estimated Infection Mortality Rate (IFR) for children age 0-19 was so low that 99.997% of those infected with the virus survived. For 20-49 year-olds the survival rate was almost as good at 99.98%. Even those 70 years-old and older had a survival rate of 94.6%. To put this in perspective the CDC data suggest that a child or young adult up to age 19 has a greater chance of death from some type of accident than they do from Covid-19. Taken together it should be obvious that Covid-19 is pretty similar to typical flu viruses that sicken some people annually. The vast majority are able to successfully fight off the virus with their body’s natural immune system. Common sense precautions should be taken, particularly by those over age 65 who suffer from preexisting medical conditions. The gross over-reaction by government leaders to this illness is causing much more distress, physical, emotional and
financial, than the virus ever could on its own. The bottom line is there is NO pandemic, just a typical flu season that has been wildly blown out of proportion by 24/7 media propaganda and enabled by the masses paralyzed by irrational fear. State and local governments in particular have ignored the rights of the people and have instituted outrageous attacks on freedom and liberty that was bought and paid for by the blood and sacrifice of our forefathers.’
REFERENCES AT SOURCE: http://www.
Another video worth watching is at https://freedomplatform.tv/dr-sherri-tenpenny-face-masks-are-not-effective-against-covid-19-how-masks-are-being-used-to-control-the-population/.
How far do you trust the EXPERTS and would you be microchipped if they (the experts) said that was necessary for the health benefit of you and others?
‘People need “immunity passports” if they want the economy reopened. At least, that’s the crazy idea The Washington Post decided to push.
The two authors argued that “as more and more people are vaccinated, it’s time to carefully design a system of ‘immunity passports.’” As the op-ed stated, “These passports would serve as a form of proof of immunity, allowing people who have immunity to engage in some activities others cannot.” A Big Government tracking system that is necessary to shop or travel. I think we all read about that somewhere.
The authors were giddy that “immunity passports” were already being developed:
Immunity passports for covid-19 — although controversial for scientific, practical and ethical reasons — are already being developed. We need minimum standards to get this right.
They spewed that “we need practical and universal standards to verify who has been vaccinated.” The United States, said Schwid and Frieden, “currently uses a paper-based system (upon receiving the vaccine, people receive a coronavirus vaccination record card with basic information on it) with few security features that could serve as a trustworthy, official certificate.” Oh, but “[n]othing prevents these documents from being lost or stolen, and the opportunities for and consequences of fraud are high.” [Emphasis added.]
Not to fear, said Schwid and Frieden. One option is for citizens to just go “digital” to solve these “security” problems: “Technology can solve some of these issues. Recipients can opt for a digital certificate in some jurisdictions, but this creates its own challenges.” The authors said “[t]he personal data collected raise privacy and security concerns, and the potential for misuse of data could dissuade some people from getting vaccinated.” No, really?
It’s a wonder if microchipping people is part of the authors’ “technology” option.
The op-ed concluded on a chilling note that would make George Orwell cringe from his grave:
As vaccination is rolled out and we learn more about immunity after natural infection, providing the option of an immunity passport to those who choose to receive one can increase freedom of movement for passport holders and accelerate broader social and economic recovery. As universal vaccination becomes available, passports will help everyone, not just the lucky few, move from fear to freedom, [emphasis added.]
Make it stop.
Conservatives are under attack. Contact The Washington Post at 202-334-6000 and demand they stop promoting New World Order propaganda.‘https://papundits.wordpress.com/2020/12/29/nuts-washpost-op-ed-wants-immunity-passports-before-opening-economy/