‘Hiding under the dead body of a woman shot during the initial attack, Saadon smeared her blood on himself to convince passing terrorists he too was dead.
An hour later, Saadon witnessed a young woman begging to be killed as she was gang raped by at least eight Hamas terrorists.
Sweden today a girl stabbed as the terrorist screamed Gd is great in Arabic . Members of the public caught and wrestled him to the ground. pic.twitter.com/USDigqZnCK
— Eye On Antisemitism (@AntisemitismEye) March 2, 2023
‘The Youtuber known as Aussie Cossack has sensationally claimed counter terrorism police intercepted a call from his wife to Rebel News.
Simeon Boikov was released on parole last month after being jailed for breaching a suppression order after he revealed the name of an accused paedophile to his legion of online followers.
Boikov, who was deemed a threat to national security, said he was placed in a tiny prison wing reserved for terrorists and murderers.
“They slapped a national security risk designation designed for the most dangerous prisoners on me,” he said. “I’m in there for saying a name!”
Boikov said he wanted to get a message to me about the way he was being treated in prison.
He said he called his wife and told her “get a message out to Rebel news”. “I said it in a cryptic way.”
He said the next morning he was visited in prison by counter terrorism officers who said they had “intercepted a message from your wife to Avi Yemini of Rebel News”.
“This is direct proof that the government is deploying counter terrorism tactics, resources and legislation against journalists,” he said.
He said he was charged with passing an unauthorised message to a third party.
Boikov said that when he pleaded guilty to breaching a suppression order he never expected to be jailed for 10 months.
“No-one expected me to receive such a massive sentence for it. I did say the name of an alleged paedophile. I can’t talk about what was the context … I know this person. I know victims.
“When I’m walking through the jail and there are other prisoners looking at me – murderers – and I’m in there for saying a name.”
The new King has said he will follow the steps of his mother and not be political but will he?
‘In a 1997 Middle East Quarterly article titled “Prince Charles of Arabia,” Ronni L. Gordon and David M. Stillman looked at evidence that Britain’s crown prince might be a secret convert to Islam. They shifted through his public statements (defending Islamic law, praising the status of Muslim women, seeing in Islam a solution for Britain’s ailments) and actions (setting up a panel of twelve “wise men” to advise him on Islamic religion and culture), then concluded that, “should Charles persist in his admiration of Islam and defamation of his own culture,” his accession to the throne will indeed usher in a “different kind of monarchy.” The whole article may be read at https://www.danielpipes.org/blog/2003/01/is-prince-charles-a-convert-to-islam
‘I am starting to think I need to file a First Amendment lawsuit over that insane bulletin from the Department of Homeland Security on Feb. 7.
In case you’ve forgotten, that report – a public declaration of the federal government’s official view of terrorism – called the top terrorist threat to the United States:
false or misleading narratives, which sow discord or undermine public trust in U.S. government institutions.
Their words, not mine.
Trying to “undermine public trust in U.S. government institutions” is now a terrorist act?
Then I’m a terrorist.
Especially since the bulletin specifically mentions COVID-19: there is widespread online proliferation of false or misleading narratives regarding unsubstantiated widespread election fraud and COVID-19.
There’s that word “misleading” again. As this White House has made clear, “misleading” facts are those that lead people to opinions of conclusions it doesn’t like.
No, no one has knocked on my door or threatened to arrest me.
But that does mean the government is not targeting me – along with other prominent Covid and vaccine skeptics. Per the bulletin, the Department of Homeland Security in 2021 expanded its evaluation of online activity as part of its efforts to assess and prevent acts of violence.
The government has other tools against people it classifies as terrorists too, including plenty of secret ones.
And remember, to be a terrorist under these terms, your speech simply has to “potentially inspire acts of violence.”
Potentially.
If this isn’t a government effort to discourage lawful speech, I don’t know what is. The question is whether it is so broad and dangerous that I can prove it will have a chilling and unconstitutional effect on me (and other people) even if I do not know I am being targeted. It feels like a form of prior restraint, all the worse for being so broad.
Will courts agree? There may be only one way to find out.
