Truth/Lies
All posts tagged Truth/Lies
| ELEPHANTS LOSE TUSKS “BY EVOLUTION” claim media reports. During the civil war in Mozambique (1977-1992) ivory poachers killed elephants and sold the tusks to finance their war. During this time the population of elephants declined drastically. The elephant population is now making a comeback, but with a change – more female elephants are lacking tusks. Before the war about 18.5% of females were tuskless, but 33% of females born since the war do not have tusks. A group of scientists led by Shane Campbell-Staton and Robert Pringle of Princeton University studied the elephant population of Gorongosa National Park in Mozambique, using records from an elephant conservation organisation and videos taken in the park from before the war. They found tuskless mother elephants had equal numbers of daughters with and without tusks, and had twice as many daughters as sons. They then analysed genomes of the elephants in the park and found the tuskless females carried mutations in two genes named MEP1a and AMELX. The AMELX gene is on the X chromosome, and mutations of it in humans are known to cause defective tooth growth in females and are lethal to males. This pattern of inheritance, known as X-linked dominant, male-lethal, would explain the skewed sex ratio of the tuskless mother’s offspring and the number of tuskless daughters. Putting these genetic and population studies together, the research team, along with all the reports in the news sources, claim the increase in tuskless females is a case of rapid evolution. The research team entitled their research paper “Ivory poaching and the rapid evolution of tusklessness in African elephants”. They summarised their findings as: “This study provides evidence for rapid, poaching-mediated selection for the loss of a prominent anatomical trait in a keystone species”. References and Links: Science (AAAS) News 21 October 2021, Nature News 21 October 2021, ABC News 22 October 2021, and Science 22 October 2021, doi: 10.1126/science.abe7389.ED. COM. The summary is correct, but the headlines are all wrong. This is a classic case of selection, but nothing has evolved. Poachers selectively killed elephants with tusks which allowed the already existing tuskless elephants with the tuskless gene to survive, and increase in numbers. But that did not make them evolve. This is unnatural selection at work, but it is no different from legitimate farmers using selective breeding to increase the number of animals that have a desirable trait, such as hornlessness, in farm animals. However, in this case, the increased trait is a defect, since tusks help elephants to push over branches and trees and dig holes as they forage for food and minerals, so loss of them is a negative. Overall, this study is a good reminder that the world has changed, but it has not evolved. It has gone from good to bad to worse – the opposite of evolution, but exactly what the Bible tells us. |
| https://mailchi.mp/creationresearch.net/creation-research-email-update-3rd-november-2021?e=ce21bf0337 |
‘William Pitt, The Younger, warned in 1783, “Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants. It is the creed of slaves.” And that’s where we are at this time in history. Political and medical totalitarians, tyrants, and ordinary thugs tell us we need to get vaccinated for everyone’s good; we need to wear masks; we need to close businesses; we need to close churches; we need to listen to our betters. Just do what we are told to do.
Such demands are reminiscent of mass rallies in Berlin in the 1930s although back then the flags were black and white, their shirts were brown, and everyone drove a Volkswagen.
Totalitarians can never be trusted and must understand—we are not their slaves.
Sen. Ron Johnson stunned the U.S. Senate declaring 63% of Britain’s Delta deaths in the last 7.5 months “were fully vaccinated while Biden and other health experts tell us we need to get the vaccine to keep from getting COVID!” The medical tyrants disregard scientific facts and demand we must be vaccinated even though the vaccines do not protect from the virus.
Health officials and politicians demand the jab, and many Americans are saying, “No.” Obviously, we are experiencing a major train wreck.
Years ago, a vaccine was defined as something that prevented disease and they seemed to work. However, vaccination has been re-defined to mean something that promotes “antibodies or immunity.” It seems someone is changing the rules of the game to confuse us or to guarantee themselves a minor victory jerked from the jaws of disaster.
I’m not going to submit to slavery. I don’t like slave masters whether they were black chiefs selling fellow Blacks in west African ports; Jewish and Arab ship captains on the Middle Passage from Europe, to Africa, to America, then back to Europe; or Bible-quoting Simon Legrees sipping mint juleps on the front porch of a Memphis plantation.
I for sure don’t like government slave masters on the public payroll who think they are endowered with authority to command lowly citizens to obey their unscientific, unnecessary, and unhealthy mandates.
I won’t consent.
Furthermore, there is scriptural basis in Proverbs 1:10 for refusing to obey. “My son, if sinners entice thee, consent thou not.” Solomon tells us after asserting that the fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom, we are not to consent to do evil even if required by elders and rulers. An official requires a dangerous mask or forbids church attendance, we are told “consent thou not.” Not even the Devil himself can lead one astray if he does not consent.
In calm, determined dignity one does his duty even if he stands alone in his devotion and discretion firmly saying, “I will not consent.”
When I was young, the pitch was to get vaccinated so you would not get measles, whooping cough, diphtheria, etc., and they seemed to work; however, Americans are being forced to take a vaccine that does not work and was rushed into production, with no long-term testing results!
A retired California nurse asked her Board of Supervisors, “Why do the protected need to be protected from the unprotected by forcing the unprotected to use the protection that didn’t protect the protected in the first place?” Not sure how they answered her.
To make matters even worse, some health experts assert that the vaccines create the variants. World-renowned Nobel winner virologist Luc Montagnier explained, “(H)istory…will show that (jabbing) create(s) variants” that could be resistant to current treatments. Note, this famous expert claims the shot causes different COVID variants.
Dr. Peter McCullough, Baylor epidemiologist, and COVID expert declared, “I think this Delta outbreak that we have right now is the product of mass vaccination.”
Wow, that means the vaccines are spreading the disease they are supposed to cure.
Remember, the vaccines are not effective. Even the dullards among us have noted the “breakaway” cases where many fully vaccinated people have been infected with COVID and died! I thought the reason everyone was to get the shot was so they would not get COVID. Biden promised us we would not be hospitalized or die if we took the shot.
According to the British government, the infection rate in fully vaccinated people in their 40s was 100% higher than in the unvaccinated.
But it’s worse than that. It seems the vaccines are often causing disease, disability, and death. Yet we are told this is “not a sign of vaccine failure.” Well, it’s sure a sign of some kind of failure.
Health Impact News reported September 29, 2021, that Dr. Gérard Delépine from France, recently published a study based on public data from the countries with the highest vaccination rates that clearly shows that “the COVID-19 shots are hospitalizing people and killing people at higher rates than countries who have adopted early treatment protocols without the use of vaccines.”
Maybe I don’t know the definitions of fully and protected.
The statistics are difficult to accumulate and are often hidden in a mass of other data. Still, even the CDC reports that approximately 74% of new COVID cases in at least one situation were in fully vaccinated individuals.
A news reporter for Detroit’s ABC affiliate WXYZ sought reports of relatives who had died of COVID-19 after refusing to be vaccinated. Shockingly the station’s Facebook page was flooded with stories of loved ones who were injured or died after getting the jab.
According to the World Tribune, the station received “more than 39,000 angry and often heartbreaking responses as of noon Monday after posting the request Friday.” The number of pitiful responses now numbers 182,000, proof the adage is true: murder will out. Atrocious crimes can be hidden for a while, especially by famous and influential men, but they cannot be suppressed, denied, or remain undetected forever.
Just wait another three months!
Israel is resorting to deception to force all Israelis to get the jab. Israeli politician Health Minister Nitzan Horowitz admitted on a “hot” microphone that Israel’s green pass COVID rules were not for medical reasons but to pressure citizens to get vaccinated. The Minister was speaking with Channel 12 News, not knowing he was being recorded for the world to hear.
Many Israelis and Americans are losing their jobs because of a government and business mandate: no jab, no job, no joke.
Yet, more shots for Israelis are required even though the Israeli Peoples Committee reported in April of 2021, about the Pfizer shots: “there has never been a vaccine that has harmed as many people.” While Israel has the highest vaccine rate (Pfizer) in the world, Pfizer vaccine is linked to more deaths in Israel than AstraZeneca is in the whole of Europe.
Israelis are balking at what seems to be a shot-of-the-month club.
All politicians have an obsessive tendency to control people, and deception is a well-worn tool used for that purpose. Americans are being manipulated into doing what their political masters demand.
Not long ago, the young (now old) were told to “question all authority.” Now, they meekly roll up their sleeves to get a vaccine that they don’t need and doesn’t work. They close their businesses at the command of a governor, even if it means bankruptcy. They obey an order to stay away from church services, while strip clubs are permitted to remain open.
We are no longer people but sheeple.
Is it possible that all the pressure to accept the COVID-19 vaccination is all about money? If so, that is equivalent to a vast criminal enterprise.
National and international health officials have been selling vaccines to gullible people. It is called a “sales pitch,” and make no mistake about that fact. The vaccine manufacturers have spent billions of dollars (much of it from American taxpayers) to produce the vaccines, so they must fly off the shelves to pay billions of profits for Big Pharma. Recently, Moderna announced their COVID vaccine brought in more than $4 billion in second-quarter sales. Moderna officials also tell us people need a vaccine booster to protect against future mutations of the coronavirus.
Follow the money.
Pfizer’s data shows it made $3.5 billion in revenue during the first three months of 2021 and Whistleblower, June 2021reports Pfizer and Moderna will “generate $32 billion in COVID-19 vaccine revenue” this year.
Well, that’s no surprise. That’s why every company has a sales department, often without impressive marketing titles. CNN reported on May 21, 2021, Covid-19 vaccines have created at least nine new billionaires associated with the vaccine companies. Big money is involved as well as big reputations, so everyone must take the shot whatever the science reveals.
It makes one think that the drive to get everyone vaccinated is not to save lives but to sell vaccines and control citizens. And it is working.
Don’t go to those with a vested interest in the vaccines’ success to get an opinion on the shot’s effectiveness. Of course, the vaccines are safe and effective and free, says the pharmaceutical companies’ pitchmen.
Federal health officials have a close relationship with Big Pharma. Indeed, Bill Gates, who has no medical training or experience, admitted in a CNBC interview that he turned an initial $10 billion investment in vaccine manufacturing into $200 billion.
Follow the money.
When judging a person’s veracity, one must know about his credentials, reputation, experience, and any conflict of interest (COI). Many public health officials own patents on various drugs and vaccines while others get federal grants, and still others write peer-reviewed articles in medical journals. The record is replete with health officials not admitting their COI.
In 2020, former director of the FDA, Dr. Scott Gottlieb was paid $338,587 by Pfizer and also earned $525,850 as a director if Illumina. Furthermore, as a member of Pfizer’s Board of Directors, he is well paid to attend board meetings each year. Moreover, three people at the head of Moderna, were recently listed on Forbes’ list of 400 wealthiest people in the nation.
The money tree will go bare if it is not manured and protected by the pharmaceutical and health products industry, so they spent $171,262,239 billion so far this year in lobbying to keep the money flowing. Pfizer and Merck were among the top five patrons.
In October of 2021, Merck announced a new pill to supplement the vaccines. Molnupiravir was produced under a $1.2 billion contract with the federal government. The government has options to purchase $3.7 billion of the pill. Ivermectin and HCQ are inexpensive, over-the-counter drugs that have proved their safety and effectiveness for many decades. Merck is also the producer of ivermectin and their patent has expired. I wonder if Merck simply tweaked it to produce a new pill that could be patented and sold for an outrageous price. The new drug will sell for $700 per treatment as compared to $30.00 for ivermectin and HCQ including azithromycin and zinc!
Merck denies the charge that Molnupiravir is a remake of ivermectin.
Merck is asking the FDA for emergency approval of their new drug, but isn’t it interesting that the FDA refuses to recognize the two available drugs with excellent safety records as a COVID-19 treatment? Why gamble on a new drug with no long-time safety studies when the answer is in every pharmacy in most nations of the world?
But then, nothing must be done to queer the sale of the rushed vaccines. Plus, a new high-priced pill would add much more income in everyone’s bank account, except the patients.
Those of us who refuse to be shot with an unproven, rushed vaccine are being demonized as domestic terrorists. The Washington Post reported anti-vaccine extremism is akin to domestic terrorism. We become second-class citizens who must be put on a “no-fly” list.
Biden issued a National Strategy for Countering Domestic Terrorism on his first day in office, yet he nominated eco-terrorists and BLM terrorists for federal positions! And irresponsible, irrepressible, and infuriating politicians approved them to high government positions.
We only think we have liberty; and we will not struggle in our chains as long as we think we are free.’https://donboys.cstnews.com/americans-forced-to-get-vaccines-that-dont-work-but-do-produce-billions-for-big-pharma
This guy is NUTS!
Even the Marxist Left get it right sometimes.
Isaiah 55:8-9
“‘For My thoughts are not your thoughts, nor are your ways My ways,’ says the Lord. ‘For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts.’”

‘Our Creator’s work reflects some of His incredible inventive creativity. In Matthew 6:30 Jesus reminds us how God provides for all the needs of all His creatures. Each creature is perfectly suited for its life, even if that requires special creativity from God.
Many of the creatures that live in the deepest and darkest parts of the sea are equipped with lights. One has a very bright headlamp to light its way. Others have lights on their tails, jaws or sides. The light they produce, as the light produced by the firefly, is a cold light. The light is generated when chemicals manufactured by the creatures are mixed together.
Or consider the small bird that has an “engine” powerful enough to allow it to fly for 10,000 or more miles. The construction of the bird’s heart differs from yours and mine in important ways. However, we couldn’t get by with the bird’s heart just as it couldn’t get by with ours.
While it seems strange to think of the penguin as a bird that flies under water, that’s exactly what it does. The penguin can reach speeds of 30 miles per hour underwater, as fast as the fastest marine mammal, the dolphin.
All of us would benefit from looking at the creatures around us a little more closely. If we do, we will learn a little more about the magnificent creativity of our God. As we learn about their lives and how they are provided for, we will, as one early scientist put it, learn to think God’s thoughts about the natural world after Him!’https://creationmoments.com/sermons/thinking-gods-thoughts-after-him-2/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=thinking-gods-thoughts-after-him-2&mc_cid=e895113b6c&mc_eid=00c1dcff3c
“You might think the shark is the most ravenous creature in the ocean, but this might change your mind.”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-D9_sQDCh4
Here in the Land Down Under the all knowing Federal Government has banned using Ivermectin and HCQ but has recently approved vaccines from China and India. Is the Australian Federal Government willingly ignorant or is there another agenda? The Australian Government has banned these two treatments in spite of the fact that ‘There is abundant evidence that hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and ivermectin will cure COVID-19 if simple protocols are followed, making dangerous, rushed vaccines unnecessary. Moreover, any vaccination could be deadly so why are children forced to have them when they are almost totally without risk of COVID.
The abundant positive evidence in the treatment of COVID-19 with HCQ and ivermectin is thrilling, truthful, and troubling. It’s troubling because many federal officials refuse to admit it, resulting in needless deaths.
On March 23, 2020, Dr. Vladimir Zelenko reported he had treated about 500 Coronavirus patients with HCQ and had an astonishing 100% success rate. “Since last Thursday, my team has treated approximately 350 patients in Kiryas Joel [Orange County, NY] and another 150 patients in other areas of New York with the above regimen. Of this group and the information provided to me by affiliated medical teams, we have had ZERO deaths, ZERO hospitalizations, and ZERO intubations. In addition, I have not heard of any negative side effects other than approximately 10% of patients with temporary nausea and diarrhea.”
Wow, that’s impressive; however, the political physicians respond by saying it is “anecdotal evidence, not scientific.” Hey, if I am gasping for breath with COVID, the above is impressive evidence from dedicated physicians on the frontlines who have far more experience than the non-practicing physicians in federal ivory towers. In the same vein, the federal physicians only have at best “anecdotal evidence, not scientific,” for the “vaccines.” No actual scientific proof.
Dr. Zelenko declared, “All I’m doing is repurposing old, available drugs which we know their safety profiles, and using them in a unique combination in an outpatient setting.”
His critics always run to the negative study done by the VA showing HCQ was ineffective; however, for political reasons, the study results are often quoted but not the fact that the protocols were not followed! HCQ must be given early in the disease along with azithromycin (or doxycycline), and zinc be a lifesaver for the elderly. That was not done. Doctors waited until the Angel of Death was standing outside the patients’ rooms before the HCQ (alone) was finally administered in the study. We must discover who is responsible for those orders.
Even Junior High school kids would not be so irresponsible and dishonest.
Critical articles concerning HCQ often mention it was used in various trials that failed, but they think we are too stupid to point out they did not use azithromycin. Other trials did not use ordinary zinc, yet both are required for success.
I have been taking HCQ, azithromycin, and zinc once per week as a prophylactic, but I did not get it from my PCP. During a visit more than a year ago, I said to him, “Because of my advanced age and lung disease making me high risk, I would like a prescription for hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin in the event I get COVID-19. Since it has been used for 65 years for other afflictions, I realize it will be an off-label prescription, so I have put this request in a letter for documentation to be placed in my medical records.”
My young doctor’s immediate reply was, “No, it is a dangerous, a very dangerous drug.” Of course, he spoke before thinking which everyone has done at times. I told him, “No, it is not dangerous, let alone a very dangerous. It is even sold over the counter in all African nations except 6, many South American nations, most European nations, and Mexico.” Evidently, it is not dangerous, although aspirin can be dangerous for some people. Since then, I discovered that my eldest daughter was prescribed HCQ for arthritis a few years ago.
I have also discussed this with some of my friends of 40 years and subscribers who are medical doctors. They have confirmed the wisdom of my request. Furthermore, I have friends and subscribers in Zambia and South Africa taking HCQ for decades for malaria, testifying to its safety. I am taking it now as a prophylactic, and my minor arthritis shoulder pain of ten years ceased within a week of taking only three or four pills that week.
Most people would agree it is wonderful I lost my arthritis pain; however, the nonthinkers suggest that it would be very dangerous to use it against COVID! I hope my critics don’t mind if I receive two benefits from the harmless drug.
Many famous physicians have used HCQ successfully without losing a COVID-19 patient! Also, renowned epidemiologist Dr. Didier Raoult, leader of a French research team, administered HCQ and azithromycin to 80 patients and observed improvement in EVERY CASE except for a very sick 86-year-old with an advanced form of coronavirus infection.
Harvey A. Risch, M.D., Ph.D., a professor of epidemiology at Yale School of Public Health, provided very positive HCQ information in Newsweek. The Newsweek article was similar to his article in the American Journal of Epidemiology. His information justifies the lengthy quote.
“As professor of epidemiology at Yale School of Public Health, I have authored over 300 peer-reviewed publications and currently hold senior positions on the editorial boards of several leading journals. I am usually accustomed to advocating for positions within the mainstream of medicine, so have been flummoxed to find that, in the midst of a crisis, I am fighting for a treatment that the data fully support but which, for reasons having nothing to do with a correct understanding of the science, has been pushed to the sidelines. As a result, tens of thousands of patients with COVID-19 are dying unnecessarily. Fortunately, the situation can be reversed easily and quickly.
“I am referring, of course, to the medication hydroxychloroquine. When this inexpensive oral medication is given very early in the course of illness, before the virus has had time to multiply beyond control, it has shown to be highly effective, especially when given in combination with the antibiotics azithromycin or doxycycline and the nutritional supplement zinc.
“On May 27, I published an article in the American Journal of Epidemiology (AJE) entitled, ‘Early Outpatient Treatment of Symptomatic, High-Risk COVID-19 Patients that Should be
Ramped-Up Immediately as Key to the Pandemic Crisis.’ That article, published in the world’s leading epidemiology journal, analyzed five studies, demonstrating clear-cut and significant benefits to treated patients, plus other very large studies that showed the medication safety.
“Physicians who have been using these medications in the face of widespread skepticism have been truly heroic. They have done what the science shows is best for their patients, often at great personal risk. I myself know of two doctors who have saved the lives of hundreds of patients with these medications but are now fighting state medical boards to save their licenses and reputations. The cases against them are completely without scientific merit.
“Since publication of my May 27 article, seven more studies have demonstrated similar benefit. In a lengthy follow-up letter, also published by AJE, I discuss these seven studies and renew my call for the immediate early use of hydroxychloroquine in high-risk patients. These seven studies include: an additional 400 high-risk patients treated by Dr. Vladimir Zelenko, with zero deaths; four studies totaling almost 500 high-risk patients treated in nursing homes and clinics across the U.S., with no deaths; a controlled trial of more than 700 high-risk patients in Brazil, with significantly reduced risk of hospitalization and two deaths among 334 patients treated with hydroxychloroquine; and another study of 398 matched patients in France, also with significantly reduced hospitalization risk. Since my letter was published, even more doctors have reported to me their completely successful use.”
However, HCQ is not the only drug that is cheap, safe, effective, and available. The June 1, 2021 issue of Desert Review reported incredible success with another common drug, ivermectin, with COVID patients in India’s capital, Delhi. That state experienced a 97% decline in COVID while the state of Tamil Nadu’s cases tripled to the highest in India without it, and their deaths skyrocketed ten-fold! Justus R. Hope, M.D. wrote, “It is an absolute vindication of Ivermectin and early outpatient treatment. It is a clear refutation of the WHO, FDA, NIH, and CDC’s policies of ‘wait at home until you turn blue’ before you get treatment.”
Dr. Brian Tyson, co-owner of All Valley Urgent Care in El Centro, California, and Dr. George Fareed have treated over 6,200 COVID patients and made ivermectin a part of their standard regimen since October. “Dr. Fareed and I have treated over 6,200 patients for COVID and have not lost a single patient who was treated before day seven,” Tyson said in an interview with TheBlaze.
All right, the thinkers will wonder why federal and state health officials push COVID vaccinations with missionary zeal when they are so problematic, especially when there are common, cheap, harmless drugs that make vaccines unnecessary. That, my friend, is the problem: Cheap drugs would make vaccines superfluous. No doubt, there are many answers, such as there are buckets of billions available to the insiders. There are also massive egos involved. So, who will get the glory as well as the gold? If HCQ or ivermectin knocks out the coronavirus, then Fauci’s vaccines are unnecessary. Remember the Salk polio vaccine; how about a Fauci covid vaccine.
After doing COVID research for almost two years, I had a shocking thought today: I have read of no refutations of the major critics of the vaccines, only generalized declarations about the dedication of federal health workers, the great health care system because of vaccine success, the threat of millions of people dying if everyone doesn’t get the jab, etc. Why has no one gone after Drs. Peter McCullough, Vladimir Zelenko Didier Raoult, Harvey A. Risch, Brian Tyson, and others? The reason is those physicians are all heavyweights, and the federal health critics are over-matched and outclassed, so they refuse to confront, contradict, or have conflict with them.
Many state health officials are simply deficient, distant, and even dumb while the average physician who may be expert in surgery, family practice, OBGYN, etc., cannot be an expert in virology, immunology, or epidemiology.
All of us are dependent upon a few highly educated people in a very narrow specialized field to decide about this health issue.
The mainstream media consider Dr. Fauci the font of all wisdom, maybe like the Oracle of Delphi, but the oracle was a sham. It seems Fauci’s purpose in life is to annoy people when he is not involved in bat or puppy research.
He is very successful at that.
Is COVID a sham, a scam, or a scheme? It is for sure a scare. You have the right to decide for yourself after looking at the available information.
I’ve made up my mind, and my life depends on my decision.
The evidence indicates the COVID-19 vaccines are not safe and effective but dirty and dangerous! However, there is impressive proof that HCQ and ivermectin will cure COVID when protocols are followed.’https://donboys.cstnews.com/impressive-proof-that-hcq-and-ivermectin-will-cure-covid-when-protocols-are-followed
‘As I write this, I’m finishing A Shot to Save the World, the new book about the hunt for a Covid vaccine.
Which – surprisingly – I don’t hate. Written by Gregory Zuckerman of the Wall Street Journal, the book is a serious look at the decades of scientific work that helped produce the mRNA and DNA/AAV Covid vaccines.
Even better, it contains this line about Stephane Bancel, Moderna’s chief executive, from Derrick Rossi: “He was asking me to steal from a hospital that treats children. Stephane is someone without a moral compass.”
Who’s Derrick Rossi? Some crazy ivermectin-loving anti-vaxxer, no doubt!

Cofounder of Moderna? Oh, that was my second guess. Meantime, Stephane has $10 billion in Moderna stock to buy a new moral compass.
But to read this book is to see that these new biotechnologies are to ordinary small-molecule drug development as a manned mission to Mars is to a cross-country road trip. They are so complicated that even explaining them coherently is hard.
Old-school small-molecule drugs like aspirin are usually relatively simple chemicals with atomic structures that can be sketched out on a napkin.
Aspirin:

In general, these drugs work in straightforward ways, by attaching to receptors on the surface of our cells and either activating them or blocking them from being activated.
The body then breaks them down, usually quite fast, and their cellular effects wear off. They must be dosed again after a few hours or a day. At this point, after generations of developing them, scientists and physicians understand how they work quite well. Even so they need to be carefully tested because they can have off-target effects or be toxic in unexpected ways.
But we’re pretty good at making them. In fact even 20 years ago we were so good at making them that we had hit most of the obvious targets for them, like cholesterol and blood pressure and diabetes.
Unfortunately, fiddling with cell receptors can only do so much. Most cancers, brain diseases, autoimmune diseases, and genetic disorders are simply not amenable to small-molecule treatments. Treating them requires larger and more complicated proteins and enzymes that mimic the body’s existing proteins, attach to specific parts of deranged cells (cancer or other), or have other effects.
For decades, those proteins were generally grown outside the body and then injected into it.
Artificially produced erythropoietin, or EPO – a molecule our own kidneys make to help stimulate the production of red blood cells – is a relatively simple example of such a treatment.

But mRNA/LNP and DNA/AAV vaccines go still further.
They involve not using a simple chemical to interfere with a single receptor or injecting a protein we have grown in specifically purified cells but hijacking the body’s own fundamental processes of biological creation.
AND OUR BODIES DO NOT LIKE HAVING THEIR FUNDAMENTAL PROCESSES OF BIOLOGICAL CREATION HIJACKED. NOT BY VIRUSES, AND NOT BY SCIENTISTS. They fight the process at every step. This is why we have immune systems.
Thus using mRNA or DNA to make our cells produce proteins carries risk at every stage. At the moment of injection, the mRNA must be both disguised AND hidden inside a tiny ball of fat (and the DNA attached to a cold virus), or our bodies will likely destroy it before it can even reach our cells.
As Zuckerman explains in his book, “The [Moderna] scientists ran into a huge new problem… subsequent administrations saw the protein production plummet. It was as if the body’s defenses had learned to fend off the injected molecule and its genetic payload.”
Moderna wound up turning away from making mRNA drugs for repeated dosing and focusing on vaccines for just this reason; a successful vaccine should need only one or two doses to produce a sustained if not permanent immune response, thus eliminating the need for regular dosing.
But the problems don’t end there. If the injected particles drop their genetic payload into the wrong cells, they can also do damage.
Scientists have also now repeatedly demonstrated that the spike proteins the mRNA Covid vaccines create can be toxic – especially to blood vessel cells – all by themselves, without the rest of Sars-Cov-2 attached. (See, for example: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2021.687783/full)
Which doesn’t matter, the Covid vaccine fanatics told us, because the spike protein the vaccines generate doesn’t circulate.
Except it does.

But wait, there’s more.
We know that in the short run, mRNA vaccines lead to a drop in crucial white blood cells called lymphocytes – Pfizer and BioNTech themselves acknowledged this problem.
(SOURCE: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2814-7)
Now the British government is warning that people who receive the vaccines appear to have a less complete immune response to Sars-Cov-2 after infection.
Maybe even more concerning, scientists now have found evidence the vaccines may produce worrisome longer-term changes in the immune system:
The BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 reprograms both adaptive and innate immune responses
(SOURCE: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.05.03.21256520v1)
To be clear, evidence is not proof. These changes may not matter to our overall immune response. Even the severity of the risk is an immensely complex question that I am not qualified to discuss in depth.
But neither is almost anyone else.
And many of the people who understand these issues best have an enormous financial stake in the success of the Sars-Cov-2 vaccines. Zuckerman’s book makes clear that Moderna was facing real problems in 2019, before Covid hit. Bancel had spent too many years making promises that hadn’t come true, and Moderna was burning through money at a stunning rate without any marketable drugs to show for the spending.
Now, of course, both Bancel and Moderna have no such worries.
As for the regulators, they had a hard enough time back in the small molecule days. In 1999, they were unable to figure out that Vioxx caused heart attacks even when Merck presented them with clear data showing that Vioxx caused heart attacks.
—
This is not to say that the mRNA (and DNA/AAV) Covid vaccines are necessarily dangerous, or that their risks outweigh their benefits. But we should all understand just how radical these therapies are, and how many unknowns they carry.
The only solution to these unknowns is very large trials conducted for long periods.
A 40,000-person clinical trial may sound large, it is not, not in the context of a drug that governments are going to give (or more accurately force) on BILLIONS of healthy people. In 1954, the Salk polio vaccine trial covered almost two million children – yes, 2,000,000 – including 400,000 who received the vaccine. And polio was far more dangerous to children than Sars-Cov-2.
But an equally large sin against science was the fact that regulators allowed Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna to unblind and thus destroy their pivotal trials within weeks after they presented early data.
Now we are stumbling in the dark.
And that might not matter much if the Covid vaccines had ended the Covid epidemic. But they have not. Not even in places where nearly every adult has received them – like Waterford, Ireland, where 99.7 percent of all adults are fully vaccinated.

Now the public health authorities and the rest of the media are pushing “boosters” – again, for a biotechnology that was repurposed as a vaccine BECAUSE IT FAILED UPON REPEATED DOSING.
Meanwhile, they are simply ignoring the odd increase in all-cause non-Covid mortality that many countries are now seeing.
Where this journey ends I do not know.
But I know this: we invented about the most complex product imaginable, tested it in a relative handful of people for a few months, a far shorter timetable than is typical for drug development. Now we are shoving it on every human we can reach – to prevent (or more accurately fail to prevent) an illness that is not particularly dangerous to most of them.
Not aspirin:

