Truth/Lies
All posts tagged Truth/Lies
Genesis 1:27
“So God created man in his [own] image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.”

‘While the Bible teaches us that sex is a wonderful gift of God, evolutionists believe that sexual reproduction should not have evolved. According to evolutionists, if sexual reproduction were to develop, evolution is supposed to get rid of it.
To make matters worse, immobile plants use sexual reproduction. This creates a problem in transferring the male genes to the female for fertilization. Just to confound things even more, God uses insects and even mammals to transfer the pollen. Since evolutionists believe that plants were around for many millions of years before animals, evolutionists have yet another problem.
The European family of the Arum lilies attracts beetles and flies. When one of the insects lands on a flower, he finds a slick, oil-coated surface and ends up sliding down into a chamber filled with small hairs. Imprisoned, he finds a sweet sap that makes good eating. While he is gorging himself on the sap and getting sticky in the process, the male part of the flower showers him with pollen. The next day, the sticky, pollen-coated insect finds that the doors to his prison are open. So he flies off to another flower to unwittingly deliver his load of pollen!
It sounds like science fiction to say that a flower figured out how to do this. And it certainly doesn’t sound very scientific to say that nobody designed and made this complex arrangement. As we learn more about these arrangements in nature, it becomes even more clear that an all-wise Creator designed these beautiful, symbiotic relationships between different members of the living kingdom.’https://creationmoments.com/sermons/creative-procreation-2/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=creative-procreation-2&mc_cid=58dfbbd8f7&mc_eid=00c1dcff3c
‘I have not been vaccinated for COVID-19 and will not do so, but not because I am anti-vaccine. I have had dear friends die of COVID who had not been vaccinated, and others died who got the jab, dying of COVID.
Others did not get COVID but were sick in bed for weeks because of the vaccine.
One 64-year-old friend died a few days after being vaccinated. His death was listed as a heart attack, but can anyone guarantee the shot had nothing to do with his death? There have been thousands of such cases within hours of the jab, yet state and federal governments are forcing free citizens to take the jab without dealing with all the fall-out from failed, even fatal vaccinations.
It is shocking that any government official, especially liberals, would demand that free people be forced to permit their bodies to be injected with an unwanted, untrusted, and unneeded substance. What has happened to Liberals?
Some experts think the missionary zeal to vaccinate everyone is totally unnecessary, if not unlawful. Dr. Michael Yeadon, former Vice President and Chief Scientist of Pfizer, declared, “There is absolutely no need for vaccines to extinguish the pandemic. I’ve never heard such nonsense talks about vaccines. You do not vaccinate people who aren’t at risk from the disease. You also don’t set about planning to vaccinate millions of fit and healthy people with a vaccine that hasn’t been extensively tested on human subjects.”
However, on with the crusade to convert everyone into a participant in the biggest power grab since Attila the Hun saddled up for his ride across Europe in the fifth century.
Everyone should know what happens to the body at the time of vaccination. Political physicians in Washington tell us the vaccines will protect against COVID or won’t be as severe if you get the disease. Well, not necessarily.
We are told the COVID-19 vaccines are different from others. The CDC website says, “to trigger an immune response, many vaccines put a weakened or inactivated germ into our bodies. Not mRNA vaccines. Instead, they teach our cells how to make a protein—or even just a piece of a protein—that triggers an immune response inside our bodies.” So, when the Chinese coronavirus vaccine is shot into a body, it is supposed to trick the body into thinking the disease is present; then produce antibodies to fight it off.
The Moderna website goes to the heart of the matter by saying, “COVID-19 mRNA vaccines give instructions for our cells to make a harmless piece of what is called the ‘spike protein.’ The spike protein is found on the surface of the virus that causes COVID-19.” The pitch is that vaccinated people get protection “without ever having to risk the serious consequences of getting sick with COVID-19.”
Alas, if only that were true.
It is commonly known that the vaccine protects no one from getting COVID. But the vaccine does not protect from COVID but causes COVID infections it is supposed to prevent! Yet, Moderna’s website promises mRNA, also called messenger RNA, “delivers the instructions your body needs to potentially prevent, treat, or cure a disease.”
Not in the real world. A shocking Israeli study revealed vaccinated individuals were 27 times more likely to get a symptomatic COVID infection than those with natural immunity!
Moreover, why should those who survive a COVID infection get a dubious, untested vaccine that doesn’t work when a study by the Yale School of Public Health offers the latest evidence that “the immunity acquired by COVID-19 infection is superior to the immunity from vaccination.”
Scientists tell us mRNA is naturally found in every cell in the body and carries genetic information from DNA in the highly protected nucleus to the rest of the cell. Structures called ribosomes can then build proteins according to the DNA blueprint.
Medical experts tell us, “mRNA medicines are sets of instructions. And these instructions direct cells in the body to make proteins to prevent or fight disease.” The body is tricked into creating its own defense by pulling the trigger of your body’s immune system. Your body has the blueprint it needs to kick in its defense mechanism to fight off the invading virus. Moderna likens this to test answers. Whenever your body is attacked, it pulls up the answers to solve your health problem.
As is sometimes true in education, the answer sheet is wrong!
The mRNA stores genetic instructions our bodies need to produce proteins that permit the body to function. Without mRNA, there would be no proteins made, and the body would not perform.
We are told that the danger is the spike protein in the COVID-19 virus, and with the vaccines, the threat is the spike protein itself. However, while the spike protein found in the virus is bad, the spike protein your body produces in response to the vaccine is far worse. That is because the synthetic mRNA in the vaccine has been programmed to instruct your cells to produce an unnatural, genetically engineered spike protein. Specific alterations make it far more toxic than that found in the virus itself.
Dr. Vladimir Zelenko says the whole body “becomes a spike protein factory,” many times more than if you were to get COVID. The infected cells produce spike proteins that travel to every single cell in your body. Zelenko also declared, “According to a paper published by the Salk Institute in San Diego, they’ve discovered that the spike protein that’s generated through the vaccination itself has negative health effects. It’s toxic…There’s plenty of evidence that shows that it spreads from the injection site and goes to the bloodstream, and basically comes into every single cell in the body.”
The vaccine does not stay in the shoulder but is distributed throughout the body via the bloodstream within hours. Dr. Byram Bridle, a Canadian immunologist, also cites recent research showing the spike protein remained in the bloodstream of humans for 29 days. He declares that both the vaccine and the spike protein are expelled in breast milk and could be fatal for babies. Bridle says vaccinated breastfeeding women are in danger of feeding a baby contaminated milk. Mothers are not doing good by transferring antibodies but are transferring the vaccine itself, as well as the spike protein, which could result in bleeding and/or blood clots in their child.
It is shocking and unprecedented to vaccinate pregnant women with an unproved vaccine, but that is the reality. Recently, the New England Journal of Medicine declared pregnant persons (women) “are at risk for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19), and infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) during pregnancy is associated with increased risks of preterm birth and other adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes.”
Additionally, there have been “1,969 fetal deaths recorded following COVID-19 shots as of October 1, 2021. What sane woman would take such risks with her unborn child?
When the mRNA is injected into an arm, it hits the bloodstream and lodges in various organs, bone marrow, and females’ ovaries. Carried with it is the spike protein to the organs where blood clots or bleeding can take place. The spike protein and the vaccine are also expelled to a vulnerable child with deadly results in breast milk. Blood transfusions are dangerous since the vaccine and the spike protein are transferred to an unknowing victim, sometimes killing him rather than saving him.
In light of the above, the CDC still recommends COVID-19 vaccination “for people who are pregnant, breastfeeding, trying to get pregnant now, or who might become pregnant in the future.”
But it gets worse.
Drs. Mike Yeadon, Luc Montagnier, and Vladimir Zelenko believe the COVID-19 shots could reduce life expectancy several decades. “There is an absolute effect on fertility,” Zelenko says, “We just don’t know to what degree yet.” Drs. Stephanie Seneff and Judy Mikovits agree with that claim.
Dr. Joseph Mercola reported that Byram Bridle, Ph.D., a Canadian immunologist and vaccine researcher got access to Pfizer’s biodistribution study from the Japanese regulatory agency. He discovered previously unknown facts of a “huge problem with all COVID-19 vaccines.” Bridle found that Pfizer’s vaccine’s mRNA and subsequent spike protein are “widely distributed in the body within hours” rather than remaining near the vaccination site. Since the spike protein is a poison, it can “cause cardiovascular and neurological damage.” This can result in the toxin accumulating in the ovaries of females who received the injection, causing blood clots, abnormal bleeding, infertility, pain at the injection site, heart inflammation, heart attacks, severe allergies, diarrhea, etc. Additionally, 30,000 women reported their periods being altered after getting the COVID-19 vaccine.
“We made a big mistake,” Bridle said in an interview with Alex Pierson. “We thought the spike protein was a great target antigen; we never knew the spike protein itself was a toxin and was a pathogenic protein. So, by vaccinating people we are inadvertently inoculating them with a toxin.” It appears to a non-medical person that it is strange to purposefully instruct the body to create the very thing (spike protein) that will destroy the body.
“We made a big mistake” is an honest confession not heard often from the soothsayers in Washington. Now, the world is living with their mistake. But then, medical mistakes are the third biggest cause of American deaths (250,000 annually) as reported by a Johns Hopkins study, while other reports claim the deaths could be as high as 440,000. If independent COVID physicians are correct, the total will be in the millions next year.
Now we are told vaccinated people may be more vulnerable to severe illness than previously thought. Bloomberg reported, “Scientists from the US have said vaccinated people appear to be contracting the coronavirus at a surprisingly high rate, according to a report in Bloomberg.” It went on to say that there is a concern of more severe injuries being reported from the vaccinated. Vaccinated patients report serious reactions such as Bell’s palsy, herpes, blood clots, bleeding, heart attacks, paralysis, shingles, etc., following COVID-19 vaccination.
In short, when you get the COVID-19 vaccine, you are being injected with an agent that instructs your body to produce a bioweapon in its own cells. Dr. Peter McCullough, a COVID expert at Baylor, declared it is “bioterrorism by injection.”
The latest government vaccine reporting system reveals there have been a total of 875,651 “adverse events.” Consisting of over 127,000 doctor visits, 18,461 deaths, 83,000 hospitalizations, 92,000 urgent care visits, 26,000 disabled, 12,131 Myocarditis, 10,981 Bell’s palsy, 8400 heart attacks. 2,887 miscarriages, plus many lesser effects.
Americans are surrendering their freedom, jobs, common sense, etc., for the possibility of an ounce of safety.
You now know that there is a mass of contradictory information regarding COVID. The thoughtful and concerned reader will not be bullied, badgered, browbeaten, or blackmailed to get the jab without a thorough knowledge and thoughtful consideration.
Each person must be awake, aware, alert, alarmed, and active in protecting their health. If not, they will not be alive if a cadre of independent physicians is correct.
I think they are right.
Man is a free being who chooses between good and evil, beauty and ugliness, truth and error, and must live with the free choice he makes.
However, it must be his choice.’https://donboys.cstnews.com/what-harm-does-the-covid-vaccine-do-to-your-body
‘They tell us to listen to the scientists, until a scientist says something which goes against their agenda.’https://rumble.com/vpkq8k-they-tell-us-to-listen-to-the-scientists.html?mref=6zof&mc=dgip3&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=tonyheller&ep=2
What kind of man do people look for in a pastor/leader? Then consider, what makes people attend churches that have men with not so good a reputation?
Does the Bible have anything to say concerning the pastor of the church? Yes, it does.
1Timothy 3:1-7 This is a true saying, If a man desire the office of a bishop, he desireth a good work. 2 A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, vigilant, sober, of good behaviour, given to hospitality, apt to teach; 3 Not given to wine, no striker, not greedy of filthy lucre; but patient, not a brawler, not covetous; 4 One that ruleth well his own house, having his children in subjection with all gravity; 5 (For if a man know not how to rule his own house, how shall he take care of the church of God?) 6 Not a novice, lest being lifted up with pride he fall into the condemnation of the devil. 7 Moreover he must have a good report of them which are without; lest he fall into reproach and the snare of the devil.
Then in 2 Timothy 3 God describes another type of man.
2Timothy 3:1 This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. 2 For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, 3 Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good,
4 Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God; 5 Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away. 6 For of this sort are they which creep into houses, and lead captive silly women laden with sins, led away with divers lusts, 7 Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth. 8 Now as Jannes and Jambres withstood Moses, so do these also resist the truth: men of corrupt minds, reprobate concerning the faith. 9 But they shall proceed no further: for their folly shall be manifest unto all men, as theirs also was.
‘The “cultic” activities of Mark Driscoll and The Trinity Church have escalated to a whole new level. On this edition of The Roys Report, two former members of Driscoll’s security detail – Chad Freese and Ben Eneas – share their firsthand knowledge of this cult of personality.’ https://julieroys.com/podcast/inside-the-driscoll-cult?mc_cid=063dadc6c4&mc_eid=b13d34ad49
‘The existence of humans suggests that, at some point, there must have been a first human. Neither evolutionists nor creationists deny this. However, creationists believe that Adam (Genesis 1–2) was the first human. But whether the first human was Adam or some unnamed, recently-evolved person, where did that person learn to speak?
Evidence suggests that humans do not learn to speak unless they are taught by someone who already knows how to speak. Additionally, the archaeological record indicates that fully-developed languages have been in existence as long as humans have been (Elgin 1973, 44). For these reasons, Curtis, in a 1990 article, argues that a personal creator was responsible for the existence of the first human.
Linguistic Evidence
Linguistic research suggests that languages have not evolved from a prehistoric development period (Eglin 1973, 44). Rather, languages have always existed with the same communication potential as they currently possess. In fact, it is possible that they even held greater communication potential in the past.

Archaeological Evidence
The archaeological finds from the past 100 years of excavations have demonstrated that written language appears well developed in the earliest records of civilization. For example, the Ebla tablets date to about 2000 BC. These tablets contain writing in a fully-developed, phonetic language.
How Do People Learn How to Speak?
Some Darwinian anthropologists have suggested that if, in the process of evolution, there was a transition from animal to man, this transition would have included the acquisition of language. However, one of these anthropologists, Humbolt, realized that man cannot speak without already being human. For him, this created an unsolvable problem regarding the origin of speech (Lyell 1873).

Another problem with determining the origin of speech from an evolutionary perspective is that in so-called primitive cultures, the languages tend to be more complex than in more advanced cultures. Furthermore, animals with the physical capability to use logical speech do not do so. Studies have shown that animals that respond to commands do so based on vocal tones rather than the spoken words. Thus, all attempts to solve the evolutionary origin of language have failed.

Every child that learns how to speak learns from someone who already knows how to speak. There do not seem to be any exceptions to this rule. Feral children who grow up without contact with spoken language did not learn to speak until they came into contact with speaking individuals. Once they had heard speech, they were able to learn how to speak (Tomb 1925).
What Does this All Mean?

Since multiple languages appear to have existed in fully developed forms in the earliest known civilizations, it appears that the languages do not have one common root. Rather, each language appeared independently of the others.
This evidence aligns well with the biblical account. From the creation of Adam until the Tower of Babel, there was only one language on earth (Genesis 11:1). Curtis suggests that God taught the first man, Adam, to speak. It is clear that Adam spoke a well-developed language because he was able to name the animals (Genesis 2:19). From that point on, each generation learned to speak from the previous one.
Later, when God confused the languages at the Tower of Babel (Genesis 11:7), He miraculously created a number of additional unrelated, fully-formed languages. The pattern of language learning continued. Each person learned to speak from the previous generation.
Conclusion
The scientific evidence obtained through linguistic and archaeological studies suggest that the first human who learned how to speak must have learned from someone who already possessed the capability of speech. This first person must have learned from someone of a higher order than humans. This correlates well with the biblical account of God’s creation of Adam. Adam must have received the ability and knowledge to speak from God himself. The study of language demonstrates that there must be a creator God. No human can speak a language unless that person has been taught. Furthermore, languages have not arisen from some lesser forms of communication. They appeared early in history, fully developed. The languages present today do not share a common root, suggesting that they appeared as separate, well-developed languages. This accords well with the account of the Tower of Babel.
References
Curtis, William M. 1990. “Human Language Demands a Creator.” The Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism 2:1, 69–72.
Elgin, Suzette H. 1973. What is Linguistics? Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall Inc.
Lyell, C. 1873. Antiquity of Man, 4th Ed., 518.
Tomb, J. W. 1925. “On the Intuitive Capacity of Children to Understand Spoken Language.” British Journal of Psychiatry 1, 553–555.’https://newcreation.blog/how-did-humans-learn-to-speak/?mc_cid=c226022714&mc_eid=2abe4a38b0
