A good question for all of us to ask is ‘Did the eye evolve from a simple layer of photo-sensitive cells into the eyes that we have today? Darwin remarked that … “several facts make me suspect that any sensitive nerve may be rendered sensitive to light” … but how do photo-sensitive cells work? Is the invertebrate eye really wired the wrong way round? Dr George Marshall an expert in anatomy, who specialised in the human eye for several years answers these questions and many more.’ This video is from http://edinburghcreationgroup.org/video/12 which has many more excellent videos that declare the glorious work of our Creator.
Paul Taylor of Creation Moments has ‘…discussed in previous Creation Moments how those who believe in the Big Bang Theory (let’s call them Big Bang Believers) have a sophisticated model of star formation into which they plug a number of interesting observations which could easily be interpreted in another way. For example, they would claim that certain gas molecule clouds, such as the Eagle Nebula, which contain small, bright stars, are, in fact, nurseries where stars are born. They then make the claim that they have observational evidence for the birth of stars, but this is, logically, a circular argument. The observed nebula is interpreted as the birth of stars only because it is interpreted according to their Big Bang Belief. The nebula cannot then be offered up as evidential proof for the very theory which is used to interpret it.
from the University College London. The “climate change” professor tweeted a photo of his son holding a placard at a climate protest with the words “Proud of my son Arthur at the school climate strike today in Cambridge – huge turnout”. This protest was calling for a complete abandonment of fossil fuels and reforming the global energy market – including Australia’s. And Mr Grubb used his child as a pawn in that argument before going back to doing his independent “science”. Mr Grubb’s ideology also creeps into his work. He runs an academic climate change website which calls again for wealth redistribution to poorer nations blaming the evil west. And despite the Chinese government refusing to cut back on emissions – which are expected to increase by 2912 mega tones by 2030 – his researchers continue to defend the dictatorship. “By pledging to peak its carbon dioxide emissions by 2030, the latest in a series of deals struck with the US a few months before the Paris Agreement was adopted, China asserted itself as a climate diplomatic power,” his researchers wrote in an article. Grubb is praising China for refusing to reduce emissions, but he is selling it as a win because China has promised to reassess its financial position in 2030. “China can take pride in these remarkable achievements,” the researchers wrote. “Yet more obligations and higher expectations come along with the new status of green power China now claims for itself.” Yes, communist China should be proud. It has simultaneously become the world’s largest polluter and earnt gushing praise from IPCC scientists for doing absolutely nothing. It truly is a political masterstroke. The fact those who are attempting to dictate Australia’s climate response would make this argument is absurd. If Mr Grubb had any integrity, he would be seeking to lobby the nation responsible for pumping 13000 megatonnes of CO2 into the atmosphere each year. But then, of course, that would be contrary to his narrative that the evil west is to blame for every problem in existence.’ 
whatyareckon 