Science
All posts tagged Science
‘Dr. Peter McCullough, C-19 global expert, cardiologist, intensivist, epidemiologist, & academic, currently practicing in Dallas, TX. Dr. McCullough reviews the latest research, observational findings, and answers vaccine-related questions with Jodi O’Malley, MSN, RN Project Veritas whistleblower, and April Snipes RNFA & Owner of The Surgery Studio.’https://rumble.com/vrj4gh-dr.-peter-mccullough-informed-consent-with-covid-jab-potential-side-effects.html?mref=6zof&mc=dgip3&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Red+Voice+Media&ep=2
‘A man in Finland has blown up his Tesla vehicle with 66 pounds of dynamite in defiance over the cost of a new battery after he claimed to face a $22,000 repair bill.
Tuomas Katainen, who lives in Jaala village in south Finland’s Kymenlaakso, exploded his 2012 Tesla Model S at a former quarry in a video uploaded to YouTube.
The Tesla S model 2012 cost around $57,400 to $77,400 when it was released.
Tesla’s warranty covers battery replacements if the capacity drops below 70 percent within 150,000 miles or eight years of purchase, leaving some owners of the older models facing large repair bills.
The video, which is over eight minutes long, shows Katainen and a group of people loading the car with the dynamite before notably placing a dummy with Elon Musk’s face on it inside the car.
The vehicle then explodes into pieces amid a rather serene and picturesque scene of snowy mountains.
“When I bought that Tesla, the first 1,500 km were nice. It was an excellent car. Then error codes hit. So I ordered the tow truck to take my car in for a service. So the car was at a Tesla dealer’s workshop for about a month. Finally, I got a call that they cannot do anything for my car and that the only option is to change the whole battery cell,” Katainen said in the YouTube video.
He didn’t reveal the total miles the car has been driven or show proof of the would-be repair bill in the video.
The Epoch Times reached out to him for comment.
“The cost would be at least 20,000 € ($22,000), and permission to operation has to ask Tesla. So I told them that I’m coming to pick up the Tesla. Now I’m going to explode the whole car because apparently there is no guarantee or anything,” he added.
Tesla didn’t respond to a request for comment.
Tesla Chief Executive Officer Elon Musk—who has said he will pay more than $11 billion in taxes this year—is the world’s richest person with an estimated net worth of $244.2 billion, according to Forbes’ real-time billionaire’s list.
Battery issues are not the only problems Tesla vehicle users have encountered, as safety issues have also been raised over a number of the vehicle’s features, including its autonomous driving features.
In August, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) opened a formal probe into Tesla’s Autopilot and full self-driving (FSD) systems following nearly a dozen crashes with parked emergency vehicles that left one person dead and injured 17 others.
According to an NHTSA document issued on Aug. 13 (pdf), the agency’s Office of Defects Investigation was probing 765,000 Tesla vehicles—Models Y, X, S, and 3, from model years 2014 to 2021. On Aug. 31, that investigation was expanded to cover a 12th incident (pdf).
In October, Tesla withdrew its latest version of its FSD beta software just one day after it was released after noting “some issues,” and said it would roll the software back to version 10.2 for now.
While Musk didn’t specifically mention what the issues were, he noted that Tesla’s internal quality assurance had found problems with some left turns at traffic lights.
“Regression in some left turns at traffic lights found by internal QA in 10.3. Fix in work, probably releasing tomorrow,” Musk said at the time.
Earlier this month, the NHTSA said it was in discussions with Tesla to replace cameras in some U.S.-made vehicles after it was made aware of an issue related to faulty Autopilot cameras.
The Tesla CEO said this month that no other CEO on the planet cares as much about safety as he does and insisted that he had not misled Tesla’s customers about the company’s self-driving technology, including Autopilot and FSD, and any potential risks to their safety.
Musk has sold nearly $14 billion worth of Tesla stock since November and the electric vehicle maker is worth about $1 trillion.’https://www.theepochtimes.com/finland-man-blows-up-his-tesla-car-after-facing-22000-replacement-battery-bill_4176175.html?utm_source=newsnoe&utm_campaign=breaking-2021-12-28-1&utm_medium=email&est=Ksk228T6t39OedYi267Srne8RessemG7NrtiY6cZ1Cz0bB2rvwzdA%2Bs%2BvYTDFPXtcg%3D%3D
Genesis 1:21
“And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their kind, and every winged fowl after his kind: and God saw that it was good.”
‘The pseudo-science of climate change is replete with scare stories. New Scientist recently contained a most disingenuous example, with the headline: “Climate change will make world too hot for 60 per cent of fish species”. “Fish are at a far greater risk from climate change than previously thought,” the article opined.
Yet, in the very next sentence, the article conceded that the figure of 60% of species becoming extinct was only a concern in the “worst-case scenario of 5°C of global warming.” A rise of 5°C is equivalent to a 9°F rise. Previous warming models – which have still over-estimated global temperature rises by more than 200% – have suggested rises of 2.3°C. The New Scientist article suggests that a 1.5°C rise would kill off 10% of fish species. Actual temperature rises have stayed below 1°C, with no noticeable reduction in species of bony fish.
The article is fallacious on many levels. Evolutionists have made great play in the past of criticizing creationists for referring to “fish”, as evolutionists have concluded that former fish class is actually three classes – bony fish, cartilaginous fish and jawless fish. Yet, this climate-change article, purporting to be scientific, uses the old fish classification. Also, the extraordinary ability of fish to adapt to different environments has been overlooked.
God made the oceans to teem with fish. And His promise to continue the seasons as they are has not been superseded.’ https://creationmoments.com/sermons/a-fishy-climate-change-scare/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=a-fishy-climate-change-scare&mc_cid=3923d50855&mc_eid=00c1dcff3c
“Now also when I am old and greyheaded, O God, forsake me not; until I have shewed thy strength unto this generation, and thy power to every one that is to come.” (Psalm 71:18)
‘One tends to grow resentful against the limitations and increasing infirmities associated with aging, even complaining to God and others about growing old—at least until one considers the alternative! We need to remember that as long as the Lord preserves our lives, He has some ministry for us to perform for “this generation” and “to every one that is to come.”
The Scriptures abound with promises of blessing in old age, so growing old should be an occasion for rejoicing and deepened commitment to whatever the Lord enables one to do. “The righteous shall flourish like the palm tree:…Those that be planted in the house of the LORD shall flourish in the courts of our God. They shall still bring forth fruit in old age” (Psalm 92:12-14). But if there develops a tendency to grow spiritually cold with age, the admonition of Paul is appropriate. “Aged men [should] be sober, grave, temperate, sound in faith, in charity, in patience. The aged women likewise, that they be in behaviour as becometh holiness,…teachers of good things” (Titus 2:2-3).
Thus, the heartfelt prayer of the psalmist in our text is still appropriate today, for all who will, sooner than they think, enter the time of old age. Note also the following prayer: “Cast me not off in the time of old age; forsake me not when my strength faileth” (Psalm 71:9). That God will answer such a prayer, offered in faith and sincerity, was affirmed by David when he said: “I have been young, and now am old; yet have I not seen the righteous forsaken, nor his seed begging bread” (Psalm 37:25). The time of old age can be a time of happy harvest if we have sowed the seeds of good fruit.’ https://www.icr.org/article/13129/?utm_source=phplist9748&utm_medium=email&utm_content=HTML&utm_campaign=December+28+-+The+Time+of+Old+Age
‘The New York Police Department has been filmed removing a mother and her crying child from a restaurant for allegedly failing to show proof of vaccination cards.
The distressing video shows half a dozen officers surrounding a booth occupied by the woman and her visibly distressed young son, as the police inform diners that anyone who is eating without a vaccination card will be arrested for trespassing unless they leave voluntarily.
“Unless you have vaccination cards you have to exit the restaurant. If you leave voluntarily, there will be no charges pressed against you. Otherwise, you will be arrested for trespassing.” pic.twitter.com/2uDsdCPH45— Ben Davis (@BenDavisCP) December 27, 2021
Patrons in the restaurant can be heard admonishing the officers, branding their behavior as “disgusting” and “disgraceful.”’https://caldronpool.com/police-remove-unvaccinated-child-from-restaurant-threaten-to-arrest-anyone-without-vaccination-cards/
‘Fifty-one million doses of Novavax lined up to be purchased by the Australian government have been in a holding pattern since June.
Although the protein-based, non-mRNA COVID-19, “traditional” vaccine, looks likely to be the best in a series of questionable options, governments have been less than enthusiastic about expediting Novavax or its equivalents to the battlefield.
This strongly suggests that those great defenders of liberty elected to represent us, appear more concerned with protecting Big Pharma’s investments than our best interests.
If the “vaccine” is not Pfizer, Moderna, or Astra-Zeneca, the government doesn’t appear to want to know about it.
Their apathetic response to Novavax raises questions about why global leaders have been so lax in supporting what could likely be the unsung heroes of the CCP-19 pandemic.
When the facts about protein-based vaccines are weighed, it is nowhere near good enough to hear – as we did from New South Wales Health Minister, “Boomer” Brad Hazzard: “Well, we have more than enough “vaccines,” why bother? You get what you get, you don’t get upset!!!” (paraphrased)
With the urgency of the emergency constantly being forced down our throats by legacy media, you are right to wonder why governments haven’t done more to deliver the best and safest possible options in a sea of questionable ones?
We know that Novavax is a potential star.
We also know that governments are aware of its efficacy.
For instance, the non-mRNA option is now slated by the Australian government to be used as a “booster”.
The NY Times has explained:
“Novavax has proven to be highly effective in clinical trials in the United States and abroad. In a trial involving about 30,000 people, the vaccine demonstrated an overall efficacy of 90.4 percent, according to results published Wednesday in the New England Journal of Medicine. Novavax’s efficacy against moderate or severe disease was 100 percent.”
Novavax has also just won emergency approval from the World Health Organisation to “increase the vaccine supply for low- and middle-income countries.”
Reasons for authorities budging and finally approving Novavax included ‘low numbers of vaccines available’ in majority world countries, Novavax can be transported without refrigeration and new concerns over the impact of the (so far relatively mild) Omicron variant.
Novavax is not the only “traditional” style vaccine facing significant obstacles from a torpid bureaucracy clearly infected with the dissonance of “we’re in an emergency, but there’s no urgency to clear these vaccines for use!”
It would seem that the vaccines preferred by people practicing informed consent are not the ones preferred by powerful people bulldozing informed consent.
For example: Director of Endocrinology at Flinders medical centre with a conjoint position as professor of medicine at Flinders University, Professor Nikolai Petrovsky, developer of the Australian made COVAX-19, has been pushing for a piece of the government’s taxpayer-funded support since its inception.
Petrovsky wrote on Twitter:
“Crazy, right? Our Covid-19 vaccine is effective against delta in Phase 3 trials. Now approved in Iran. Fabulous safety. But no support from our govt. Warp-Speed gave US vaccine developers a billion dollars each. We are relying on crowd funding.”
COVAX-19 was the centre of controversy after Petrovsky inoculated himself with the vaccine in 2020.
In October this year, The Spectator recounted how Petrovsky was then fired ‘by his university and threatened with arrest if he sets foot in his office’, because Petrovsky refused the current “vaccines” okayed by the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA).’
The Speccy added:
“The TGA [has] recognised the Chinese Sinopharm and the Indian Covaxin vaccines as effective. Yet the TGA refuses to look at Petrovsky’s Australian vaccine until he pays a fee of $350,000.”
Even more noteworthy:
“Before injecting the vaccine into a single person, Petrovsky injected it into himself to demonstrate his confidence in the product. Compare that with the CEO of Pfizer, Albert Bourla who began dosing people with its experimental vaccine on April 23, 2020. Bourla didn’t get his first shot of the Pfizer vaccine until 21 March 2021…Petrovsky was sacked even though he may well have better immunity than those who are sacking him.”
The article’s author, Rebecca Weisser, suggested two potential reasons for the Canberra cold-shoulder.
First, Petrovsky was one of the original Westerners to state that scientific evidence links CCP-19 to the CCP via a ‘lab leak’ in Wuhan. This was a finding that was bound to make powerful and influential people uneasy.
The second is probably related to the first, Petrovsky won’t get any hearing in Canberra unless it is through referral and the ‘doors are opened by lobbyists.’
This is despite mRNA inventor Dr. Robert Malone backing Petrovsky, who wrote on Twitter in response to The Spectator article: “I consider Nikolai Petrovsky a good personal friend. The corruption is deep and wide.”https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?creatorScreenName=rod_lampard&dnt=true&embedId=twitter-widget-0&features=eyJ0ZndfZXhwZXJpbWVudHNfY29va2llX2V4cGlyYXRpb24iOnsiYnVja2V0IjoxMjA5NjAwLCJ2ZXJzaW9uIjpudWxsfSwidGZ3X2hvcml6b25fdHdlZXRfZW1iZWRfOTU1NSI6eyJidWNrZXQiOiJodGUiLCJ2ZXJzaW9uIjpudWxsfSwidGZ3X3NwYWNlX2NhcmQiOnsiYnVja2V0Ijoib2ZmIiwidmVyc2lvbiI6bnVsbH19&frame=false&hideCard=false&hideThread=false&id=1459254507435610117&lang=en&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fcaldronpool.com%2Faustralian-government-refuses-to-fund-australian-covid-19-vaccine-you-get-what-you-get-you-dont-get-upset%2F&sessionId=bccce1ba51e9eada48df0b342cbd7da68ed0faf0&siteScreenName=caldronpool&theme=light&widgetsVersion=9fd78d5%3A1638479056965&width=550px
I consider Nikolai Petrovsky a good personal friend.
The corruption is deep and wide.https://t.co/xLwu7uJAgZ— Robert W Malone, MD (@RWMaloneMD) November 12, 2021
In a December 20 update, the TGA said it has:
“Granted provisional determination to Vaxine Pty Ltd. The granting of a provisional determination means that the TGA has made a decision that Vaxine Pty Ltd is now eligible to apply for provisional registration for the vaccine in the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods (ARTG).”
However, The Therapeutic Goods Administration noted:
“Provisional determination is the first step in the provisional registration process. Importantly, registration and supply in Australia will only commence should the vaccine be approved as safe and effective by the TGA.”
The TGA did not stipulate reasons for the apparent backflip.
The Australian immunologist’s GoFundMe campaign currently has over 8,300 donors, with over 11,561 signatures on a related Government petition, asking the Australian government, “to act in the interests of Australians and provide the necessary financial support and advance purchase commitments to Vaxine Pty Ltd to ensure the availability of COVAX-19 in Australia.”
The fundraiser setup by Sharen Petrovsky, Vaxine Pty Ltd’s business manager, states:
“You might think that the government would be throwing their full support behind this safe and effective locally-developed vaccine. Unfortunately, nothing could be further from the truth.”
The GoFundMe page blurb continued:
“Apart from a token grant provided more than a year after the pandemic started, the govt has failed to support our vaccine while allocating potentially billions of dollars in support to our wealthy competitor, CSL, who produce the AstraZeneca vaccine that has been linked to deaths from central venous thrombosis.”
A well-versed, anonymous frontline source, told Caldron Pool:
“This is a real Australian Story… I have to say from working on the front line, in my opinion many of these facts [adverse effects] are real, hence the medical staff are waiting for a safe vaccine such as Professor Nikolais.”
They added:
“No one [pushing the mRNA “vaccines”] are prepared to pay out on income protection, especially to many Doctors, Nurses, allied health workers, and carers, who are immobilized and health impaired from adverse reactions due to being forced to have unsafe vaccines.”
Professor Petrovsky’s petition ends on the 22 December, with the GoFundMe campaign already reaching $849,272 of its 1-million-dollar goal.’https://caldronpool.com/australian-government-refuses-to-fund-australian-covid-19-vaccine-you-get-what-you-get-you-dont-get-upset/
whatyareckon 