‘Transcript of Dr Dan Stark to the Mt Vernon Community School Corporation
Friday August 7th 2021
Mt Vernon Indiana
Guilty as charged.
Dr. Dan Stark, [redacted
The address you’re about to see is hard to believe 18 months into this and still
having a problem. And I would suggest the reason we still have a problem is
because we’re doing things that are not useful and we’re getting our sources of
information from the Indiana State board of Health and the CDC who actually don’t
bother to read science before they do this.
I’m actually a functional family medicine physician. That means I am speciality
trained in immunology and inflammation, regulation.
And everything being recommended by the CDC and the State Board of Health is
actually contrary to all the rules of science.
So things you should know about coronavirus and all other respiratory viruses, they
are spread by aerosol particles which are small enough to go through every mask.
By the way, the literature that supports all of that is in a flash drive that we
presented to you. It’s been given to the secretary.
As a matter of fact, it quotes at least three studies that’s sponsored by the NIH to
that exact fact, even though the CDC in the NIH have chosen to to ignore the very
science that they paid to have done.
That is why you keep struggling with this, is because you cannot make these
viruses go away.
The natural history of all respiratory viruses is that they circulate all year long
waiting for the immune system to get sick through the winter or become deranged,
as has happened recently with these vaccines. And then they cause symptomatic
disease because they cannot be filtered out and they have animal reservoirs.
And this is a very important point. No one can make this virus go away. The CDC
has managed to convince everybody that we can handle this like we did smallpox,
where we could make a virus go away.
Smallpox had no animal reservoirs. The only thing it learned to infect was humans.
That’s why we’re able to make that virus go away. That will not happen with this any
more than it will with influenza, the common cold, respiratory syncytial virus,
adenoviral respiratory syndromes, or anything else that has animal reservoirs.
So the reason you can’t do this is because you’re trying to do something which has
already been tried and can’t be done.
Equally important is that vaccination changes none of this, especially with this
vaccine. And I would hope this board would start asking itself before it considers
taking the advice of the CDC, the NIH and the state board of health, why we are
doing things about this that we didn’t do for the common cold, influenza, or
respiratory syncytial virus?
And then ask yourself, why is a vaccine that is supposedly so effective having a
breakout in the middle of the summer when respiratory viral syndromes don’t do
And to help you understand that, you need to know the condition that is called
antibody mediated viral enhancement. That is a condition done when vaccines
work wrong, as they did in every coronavirus study done in animals on
coronaviruses after the SARS outbreak and done in respiratory syncytial virus
where a vaccine used in a vulnerable individual, done the wrong way, which why it
cannot be done right for respiratory virus, which has a very low pathogenicity rate,
causes the immune system to actually fight the virus wrong and let the virus
become worse than it would with native infection.
And that is why you are seeing an outbreak right now. In fact, in that flash drive
you’re going to have coming to you in the emails with six extra [??obiate] studies
showing that 75 percent of people who had covid-19 positive symptom cases in
Barnstable, Massachusetts outbreak were fully vaccinated.
Therefore, there is no reason for treating any person vaccinated any differently than
any person unvaccinated. You should also know that no vaccine, even the ones I
support and would give to myself and my children, ever stops infection.
In 2014, there was outbreak of mumps in the National Hockey League. The only
people who came down the symptoms were the people who were unvaccinated or
unknown vaccine status. Boy, that sounds like a great argument for vaccines, but a
question that you should ask yourself, knowing that half of the people who came
down with symptomatic disease had no contact with an unvaccinated or unknown
vaccine status individual, where did they get the disease?
And the answer was “from the vaccinated individuals.” No vaccine prevents you from
getting infection. You get infected, you shed pathogen. This is especially true of
viral respiratory pathogens. You just don’t get symptomatic from it.
So you cannot stop spread. You cannot make these numbers that you’ve planned
on get better by doing any of the things you’re doing, because that is the nature of
viral respiratory pathogens.
And you can’t prevent it with a vaccine because they don’t do the very thing you’re
wanting them to do.
And you will be chasing this the remainder of your life until you recognize that the
Center for Disease Control and the Indiana State Board of Health are giving you
very bad scientific guidance. And instead read the articles that are coming in the
email and on this flash drive and listen to the people in this audience here tonight
who actually have recognized the advice they are getting from the CDC and the NIH
And that’s why you’re still fighting this with this vaccine that supposedly was going
to make all of this go away. But it suddenly managed to make an outbreak of covid-
19 develop in the middle of the summer when vitamin D levels are at their highest.
By the way, the other thing that would be necessary, any vaccine restriction to be
considered is if there were no other treatment available. And I can tell you, having
treated over 15 covid-19 patients, that between active loading with vitamin D,
ivermectin and zinc, that there is not a single person who has come anywhere near
And we already have studies that show that if you achieve a 25 hydroxy vitamin D
level greater than fifty five, your risk of covid-19 death will drop down to one quarter
of the population average for the United States.
And there are active treatment trials included on that flash drive that the show the
same is true. So if you were going to discriminate based upon vaccine, you should
also discriminate based upon 25 hydroxy vitamin D level, zinc taste test
response ,and probably previous infections.
Since there are also studies like Flash Drive that show that people who have
recovered from covid-19 infection actually get no benefit from vaccination at all, no
reduction in symptoms, no reduction in hospitalization and suffer two to four times
the rate of side effects if they are subsequently vaccinated.
Therefore, the policies that you are basing on are totally counterfactual.
I don’t blame this board for that because I know you aren’t scientists and you’ve
thought it was reasonable to listen to the CDC, NIH and the Indiana State Board of
Health, but I would encourage that instead, you listen to the people out here in this
audience and read what’s on that data drive.
And if anybody here in this board has any questions about anything on that, I will
happily come back and sit with you individually. If you would like to explain the
science behind this and if you’re worried about being sued by somebody because
you don’t follow the guidance of the CDC and the NIH, I will tell you have a free pro
bono expert testimony at your disposal.
I will testify in defense of this court turning down all these recommendations for
free at any time, in any court. Thank you.
Dr Dan Stock’https://drive.google.com/file/d/18W8zgNSigsZVQE7sSDOd4VvD5UJ0YGZR/view
A short video may be viewed at https://hancockcountypatriots.blogspot.com/2021/08/dr-dan-stocks-presentation-to-mt-vernon.html?m=1
‘Gates Honored Doctor: “We’ll just get rid of all the whites in the United States” Chair of Advisory Committee on Immunizations floats racially-based depopulation plan op Center for Disease Control official was caught on tape in 2016 saying that society should “get rid of of all the whites in the United States” to reduce the number of people who refuse vaccines. Dr. Carol Baker made the alarming remarks during the “Achieving Childhood Vaccine Success in the U.S.” panel discussion sponsored by the National Meningitis Association in New York City on May 9, 2016. “So I have the solution. Every study published in the last five years, when you look at vaccine refusers,” Baker told the panel. “I’m not talking about…hesitance, most of them we can talk into coming to terms. But refusers. We’ll just get rid of all the whites in the United States…Guess who wants to get vaccinated the most? Immigrants.” Notably, Baker was appointed Chair of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization by Obama’s Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius in 2009. The Houston doctor was also honored with the Sabin Vaccine Institute’s 2019 Albert B. Sabin Gold Medal at a Washington D.C. ceremony sponsored “in part by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and Pfizer.” Is it really that surprising a Bill Gates-connected CDC official openly suggested depopulating whites who don’t cooperate with their mandatory vaccine agenda?’
Is President Trump correct when he said ‘The W.H.O. really blew it. For some reason, funded largely by the United States, yet very China centric. We will be giving that a good look. Fortunately I rejected their advice on keeping our borders open to China early on. Why did they give us such a faulty recommendation?’
Well, yes, he was even though ‘The WHO at first glance seems an innocent bystander to Chinese obstruction until one considers the story of SARS in Taiwan. Taiwanese health officials attempting to inform the WHO of their cluster of cases were rebuffed and asked to report their findings to the central government in China instead.
You see, the allegedly apolitical, humanitarian, and guided-by-science WHO doesn’t think Taiwan exists because China doesn’t recognize Taiwan’s independence. The WHO even refused to publicly report Taiwan’s cases of SARS until public pressure prompted numbers to be published under the label of “Taiwan, province of China.”
Clearly these matters are worthy of debate, but why would the WHO put its thumb on the scale? The answer, increasingly obviously, is that the WHO is a political organization that attempts to give its political preferences the veneer of objectivity using the label of science.
WHO Also Failed in the 2013 Ebola Outbreak
The Ebola outbreak of 2013 provides yet another window into the WHO’s lethal failings. One of the important controversies at the time related to how the virus spread. An excellent 2015 New Atlantis article dissects the controversy of transmissibility, and concludes the available evidence at the time could not rule out through-the-air transmission.
Of particular concern was evidence from the field about health-care worker infections. Health care workers who did not wear maximal Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) in the form of respirators to filter out airborne transmission were infected with Ebola at a high rate.
Rather than err on the side of safety, the WHO ignored this evidence. Local health officials and administrators followed their lead for a similar approach in their hospitals. First responders paid the price. The SARS outbreak in Canada was notable for the number of health workers who were infected and succumbed to the disease, in part, because the initial responders to the crisis relied on PPE guidance that wasn’t adequate.
The CDC Is In on This Action
To be fair, what’s on display here is a broader institutional malady. The U.S. version of the WHO, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, took a similar stance with another controversial topic—quarantines for health-care workers returning from treating patients with Ebola. Four states—New York, New Jersey, Florida, and Illinois—instituted policies to quarantine anyone who had contact with someone infected with the Ebola virus while in west Africa, including medical personnel who cared for patients.
No less than the Obama administration, backed by the CDC, attempted to quash these policies, arguing this would serve as a disincentive for U.S. health workers to travel to Africa to combat the disease at a time this help was sorely needed.
The argument made by many, including the now famous Dr. Anthony Fauci, was that Ebola could only be transmitted by those who were symptomatic, so it was anti-science to consider mandatory quarantines. Of course, crossing the threshold from asymptomatic and not infectious to symptomatic and infectious isn’t a sudden process, and as the history of science repeatedly shows, theories have a way of evolving with time.
The head of the CDC at the time, Tom Frieden, had initially recommended that health-care professionals not use respirators when taking care of patients with Ebola. It took two health-care workers in Dallas contracting Ebola from a patient for the CDC to change its recommendations in October 2014.
An important recurring theme with viruses may be to follow what people do rather than what they say. This is Tom visiting a Doctors Without Borders Ebola treatment center in August 2014, at a time the CDC was saying a surgical mask was adequate to care for these patients.
More Concerned about Population Control than Illness
The charitable take is that institutions like the WHO and CDC are simply coming down on the wrong side of contentious scientific debates. But there is a persistent directionality to these mistakes that betrays a current of ideology. A review of the timeline of announcements by the WHO after the COVID outbreak shows an organization more concerned with avoiding panic and stigma than the virus.’ The whole article is at https://thefederalist.com/2020/04/09/why-the-who-is-a-danger-to-public-health/