This video concerns the policy of the Climate Scammers!
Truth/Lies
All posts tagged Truth/Lies
‘A jaw-dropping, peer-reviewed paper shows China’s old-school vaccine produces a far stronger T-cell response to the coronavirus than the Pfizer/BioNTech mRNA jab.
China’s CoronaVac shot caused people to make far more T-cells targeting the coronavirus than those who received Pfizer’s mRNA shot, scientists in Hong Kong have found.
Though it is only one datapoint, the study hints the Chinese shot – which is based on older, well understood principles of vaccinology – may ultimately provide longer-lasting protection than the hastily developed mRNA jabs from Pfizer and Moderna.
The study was published in a peer-reviewed journal called Respirology in November, but has (unsurprisingly) received no attention. It offers a rare head-to-head look at the immune-system effects of the Chinese and Pfizer Covid vaccines, which work in very different ways.
“Humoral responses” are antibodies, the body’s first-line defense against infection; the mRNA vaccines are known to produce supra-natural levels of antibodies, giving rise to short-term protection that fades within months.
T-cells are a part of the immune system crucial for producing long-term immunity and reducing severe disease in people who are infected. The mRNA jabs have been shown to produce relatively limited T-cell protection, but this study appears to have been the first time anyone directly compared them to the Chinese vaccine.
The scientists compared the immune responses in more than 700 people who had received either CoronaVac or mRNA shots, matching them by age and demographic data.
As expected, they found very high levels of anti-spike protein antibodies in people who received the mRNA shot. The mRNA jabs force our cells to make large amounts of the spike protein that sticks out of the shell of the coronavirus. Those proteins then cause the immune system to produce antibodies against it.
The CoronaVac recipients had lower levels of anti-spike protein antibodies. But they also had antibodies to other parts of the coronavirus. Even more importantly, when the scientists ran further tests on a smaller group of about 100 people, they found the CoronaVac shot had sharply increased the level of their coronavirus-targeting T-cells, which last far longer than antibodies.
The new T-cells targeted both the spike protein and another important part of the virus. They included both CD4+ T-cells – which stimulate the overall immune response to infection – and CD8+ T-cells – which directly attack infected cells. Meanwhile, the mRNA jab produced an equally good response in only one of those four types of T-cell.
“The average magnitude of post-vaccination responses was higher in CoronaVac subjects for structural and S-specific T-cell responses,” the researchers explain.
The research was possible because Hong Kong offers its citizens both the CoronaVac shot and the BNT162b2 mRNA jab – the Pfizer/BioNTech shot. (In Hong Kong, BNT162b2 is distributed by a Chinese drugmaker called Fosun, but it is still made by BioNTech and is identical to the shot Pfizer sells elsewhere. A Beijing-based company called Sinovac Biotech makes CoronaVac, which is not approved in the United States.)
CoronaVac’s advantage in producing a T-cell response probably occurs because it presents the body with an invader that is far more like the actual coronavirus than the mRNA shots do.
The CoronaVac shot is a traditional “inactivated virus” vaccine. It contains whole Sars-Cov-2 particles grown in kidney cells and chemically treated so they cannot reproduce. They are then injected alongside an “adujvant” meant to boost the immune response.
In short-term trials, the mRNA vaccines reduced infections far more than the CoronaVac and a second Chinese vaccine called Sinopharm BIBP, which is also an inactivated virus vaccine.
The early results led to considerable chest-pounding about the superiority of Western vaccines and biotechnology in general.
The New York Times, Jan. 13, 2021:
—
But the real-world data from the last year has made clear that the mRNA shots lose their protective effect quickly. Because they focus the body’s immune response on a small part of the coronavirus, they are also very vulnerable to new variants such as Omicron, even after a third “booster” dose.
In fact, Western countries have faced a much harsher Omicron wave since December than countries such as Indonesia, which used more Chinese vaccines than any country except China (although in the last two weeks Omicron cases have risen sharply in Indonesia).
The Hong Kong study may also help explain China’s apparent reluctance to move forward with mRNA vaccines – either its own or those from Moderna and Pfizer/BioNTech. Fourteen months after Fosun announced a deal to make the BNT162b2 mRNA shot available in mainland China, Chinese regulators have refused to approve it.
Don’t worry, though, China will no doubt be glad to set up CoronaVac clinics at pharmacies across America if we ask nicely!’https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/no-wonder-china-isnt-using-mrna-shots?utm_source=url
This is the link to Grand Jury Day 3 – PCR Test https://odysee.com/@GrandJury:f/Grand-Jury-Day-3-en-online:7?r=8RX6HARnXSbREAsiYBRJNSbo9RZ9T7j1&t=0
How many lies does a person tell before it is known he/she is a liar? ‘White House chief medical adviser Dr. Anthony Fauci said COVID-19 booster shots may only be necessary for some people every few years rather than annually.
“It will depend on who you are,” Fauci told the Financial Times in an interview published on Feb. 9, “but if you are a normal, healthy 30-year-old person with no underlying conditions, you might need a booster only every four or five years.”
Fauci had suggested in an interview with NBC News last month that it might be necessary for people to receive booster doses every year.
“We’ve only recently boosted people. We will find out if the booster gives you a degree of durability of protection and actually should be the standard regimen of three doses of an mRNA and two doses of [Johnson & Johnson’s vaccine],” he said last month. “Or—and it’s a big ‘or’ right now—will we need to boost people every year or so?”
According to a study released on Feb. 12 by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the efficacy of mRNA vaccine boosters starts to decline after about four months. The study didn’t include an age breakdown and only focused on individuals who sought treatment when the Omicron variant was spreading.
“There may be the need for yet again another boost—in this case, a fourth-dose boost for an individual receiving the mRNA—that could be based on age, as well as underlying conditions,” Fauci told reporters on Feb. 9.
Recommendations for a fourth dose of the vaccine likely will not be made across the board, he said.
During the Financial Times interview, Fauci, who has headed the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases for nearly 40 years, suggested that the United States is moving out of “the full-blown pandemic phase.”
It came as several Democrat governors moved to rescind statewide mask mandates, although some local municipalities have decided to keep them intact.
Meanwhile, Swedish health officials said on Feb. 14 that they are recommending a fourth COVID-19 vaccine shot for individuals aged 80 and older.
As with the first round of booster shots, those boosters should consist of the Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna vaccines, the health agency said.
The recommendation also covered all people living in nursing homes or who receive assisted living services at home. The second booster shot should be administered at least four months after the first booster jab, the agency said in a statement.
COVID-19 is the illness caused by the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus.‘https://www.theepochtimes.com/fauci-covid-19-boosters-may-have-to-be-taken-every-5-years_4276673.html?utm_source=newsnoe&utm_campaign=breaking-2022-02-14-2&utm_medium=email&est=6EDUorc9WyCslH0uSUt%2F4hXCKGcoALHZO%2FbpizBfbDcVYZ9DcVFY6roWTBevJkhjxQ%3D%3D
If the Police had allowed this truck to just go through all would have been fine. This is the way tyrannical governments rule over the people!
‘Several influential speakers and medical professionals told stories of their experiences with the vaccines. Dr. Kent Denmark from Tulsa, Oklahoma was among them. In this video Kent talks about the drastic increase in deaths of airline pilots featured in the obituaries of the October/November issue of the Airline Pilot magazine after vaccine mandates went into effect. Deaths increased from one death of active pilots in 2019 to 6 deaths of active pilots in 2020 and 111 deaths of active pilots in the first 9 months of 2021.‘https://rumble.com/vu8gy3-dr.-kent-denmark-talks-about-increase-in-deaths-of-active-pilots-since-vacc.html?mref=6zof&mrefc=2
The Doctor is a little hard to hear but the statistics are as above.
‘In light of the Pfizer Vaccination now being available for kids, I would like to encourage all my friends who have children to think twice and do your own research.
I type this message from the hospital CCU (Cardio Care Unit) on my 3rd day here! Where I myself have been diagnosed with Myopericarditis from my Pfizer Injection. I was told it’s a very rare side effect and yet this ward is full of people of all ages with very similar diagnosis.
I did my research and knew my risks, but still would not wish this on my worst enemy!
A friendly reminder that there are over 100’000 adverse reactions reported on the AusGov database.
The injury compensation scheme is active, has an unlimited ceiling, and is funded by taxpayers $. Because why would Pharma Companies be responsible for the damage that their all-for-profit product causes?
There are over 10’000 claims already made in Australia as of early November, could be 5x that by now?
But DON’T WORRY, the procedure is perfectly safe….until it’s not!
If you subject your child to the largest medical experiment in the history of mankind despite the available information, may God save your soul.
PS – if you are going to faint due to a bad reaction – make sure you are sitting down!’https://nomoresilence.world/pfizer-biontech/jannrs-estrhuysen-pfizer-severe-adverse-reaction/
‘On February 15, the FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) is scheduled to meet to deliberate granting Emergency Use Authorization to Pfizer’s BioNTech SARS-CoV-2 vaccine for babies aged six-months and children up to five years old despite the lack of safety and efficacy to support its use.
If the committee grants the EUA to Pfizer for this age group, nearly 20 million American infants and preschool-aged children could be at risk of vaccine injury based on the indicators we’re seeing in the published medical literature.
There is no COVID emergency for children under five years old. Children have a 99.995% recovery rate, and a body of medical literature indicates that almost zero healthy children under five years old have died from COVID.
- A large study conducted in Germany showed zero deaths for children under 5 and a case fatality rate of three out of a million in children without comorbidities.
- A Johns Hopkins study monitoring 48,000 children diagnosed with COVID showed a zero mortality rate in children under 18 without comorbidities.
- A study in Nature demonstrated that children under 18 with no comorbidities have virtually no risk of death.
- Data from England and Wales, published by the UK Office of National Statistics on January 17, 2022, revealed that throughout 2020 and 2021, only one (1) child under the age of 5, without comorbidities, had died from COVID in the two countries, whose total population is 60 million.
- Another study in Nature from April suggests children’s bodies clear the virus more easily than adults.
- This study published in December in Nature demonstrated how children efficiently mount effective, robust, and sustained immune response.
Not only is this injection medically unnecessary for this younger age group, but there are clear signals coming from U.S. government sources that the risk to human health is real, and that adverse events to this vaccine are not rare.
- The risks demonstrably outweigh the benefits of COVID vaccination in young children. A study out of Hong Kong showed one out of every 2,700 12 to 17-year-old boys being diagnosed with myocarditis following the 2nd dose of Comirnaty vaccine, or 37 per 100,000 vaccinated. A study from Kaiser found the same rate of myocarditis in 12 to 17-year-old American boys, 1/2700.
- While the CDC says that myocarditis is a mild disease, cardiologists know otherwise. CDC’s own preliminary data, reported at the February 4 ACIP meeting, revealed that nearly half of the young people diagnosed with myocarditis still had symptoms 3 months later, and 39% had their activity restricted by their physician. We know this serious adverse event frequently occurs in teenagers. But no one knows how often it occurs in younger children. This is of major concern for babies and younger children.’https://childrenshealthdefense.org/child-health-topics/health-freedom/protect-the-kids-demand-the-fda-vote-no-on-eua-for-6-month-olds-up-to-5-years/
It has always been that vaccines are supposed to work against the diseases they are produced for. However, that’s not true of these Covid vaccines.
‘Under ATAGI’s latest advice, a person must have all doses recommended for their age and individual health in order to be deemed “up to date” and those who waited more than six months to get their booster shot would be classified as “overdue”.
It was also recommended that anyone aged 16 years and older receive a booster dose three months after their primary course.’https://www.news.com.au/technology/science/human-body/how-much-protection-wanes-from-without-booster-against-omicron-revealed/news-story/4e545999b3a6c55c821c8c965b1d242a
How many jabs will a person have to have before these ‘experts’ admit these vaccines are not working?
whatyareckon 