The Massachusetts senator and 2020 presidential candidate said she would work to end the Hyde Amendment if elected. The Hyde Amendment prohibits taxpayer-funded elective abortions in Medicaid. It has had strong bipartisan support for years, and continues to have strong support from voters. But the abortion industry and Democratic Party now want it gone, and many presidential hopefuls do, too.
Warren then falsely claimed that “three out of four” Americans support Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court case that essentially allowed abortions up to birth.
Three in four Americans (75 percent) say abortion should be limited to – at most – the first three months of pregnancy. This includes most of those who identify as Republicans (92 percent), Independents (78 percent) and a majority of Democrats (60 percent). It also includes more than six in 10 (61 percent) who identify as “pro-choice” on abortion.
Sometimes it doesn’t take much to get a little irritated, does it? The weather bureau said no rain for at least the next 6 days so we put our faith in the weather person and applied the first coat of three coats of sealer on our deck yesterday. Well, the climate scammers spout they can guarantee what the climate will be in ten or so years if society doesn’t do certain things BUT the weather bureau cannot tell us with 80 to 95% accuracy the weather for the next two days! Unbelievable! Well, it rained the day after we put the first coat of sealer on so we are now waiting for that dry day to apply the second coat of sealer. THANKS weather bureau.
Now, that I have that off my chest the real purpose for today’s blog is the story below. It is Unbelievable; or is it? The Western world has gone crazy with this gender bending hysteria. Here’s the story out of the UK.
‘A Christian doctor who refused to refer to a biological man as a woman has lost his court case, with a British court ruling that belief in the Bible is “incompatible with human dignity.”
Dr David Mackereth, a doctor with over two decades experience with the National Health Service, was dismissed by the Department for Work and Pensions on the grounds that refusing to call a patient by their preferred pronoun was “harassment” under the UK’s Equality Act.
Dr Mackareth has previously said that “Christians must be able to hold and express their faith in private and public and to uphold Biblical and scientific truths without fear of losing their livelihoods”.
But a British court ruled against the doctor.
“Belief in Genesis 1:27, lack of belief in transgenderism and conscientious objection to transgenderism in our judgment are incompatible with human dignity and conflict with the fundamental rights of others, specifically here, transgender individuals”, said the court.
The court went on to say that “in so far as those beliefs form part of his wider faith, his wider faith also does not satisfy the requirement of being worthy of respect in a democratic society, not incompatible with human dignity and not in conflict with the fundamental rights of others.”
Dr Mackarth said he was not alone in being disturbed by the court’s decision.
“Staff in the NHS, even those who do not share my Christian convictions, are also disturbed as they see their own freedom of thought and speech being undermined by the judges’ ruling.
“No doctor, or researcher, or philosopher, can demonstrate or prove that a person can change sex.
“Without intellectual and moral integrity, medicine cannot function and my 30 years as a doctor are now considered irrelevant compared to the risk that someone else might be offended”, he added.
Andrea Williams, the chief executive of the Christian Legal Centre, said that “it is deeply disturbing that this is the first time in the history of English law that a judge has ruled that free citizens must engage in compelled speech”.
Dr Mackereth says he will appeal the decision.
“I believe that I have to appeal in order to fight for the freedom of Christians – and any other NHS member of staff – to speak the truth.
That story of Dr. Mackereth is going to be repeated here in Australia. A few years ago the Australian public voted in favour of same sex marriage. Today, the Federal government is seeking to work out a so-called Religious Discrimination Bill! Watch this space!!
‘These five words printed in plain text on an A4 leaf and duck-taped to a signpost constitute what is possibly the most powerful, and important, meme of 2019.
“Islam is RIGHT about women” has sparked what anyone with an IQ above 130 would have immediately predicted upon reading these words: “confusion and anger” from the NPC class of Homo sapiens sapiens. At least that’s what they call it. We player characters (men and women of agency) call it cognitive dissonance.
You see, to come out and decry this poster as an attack on women is to acknowledge that Islam subjugates women, which is in direct conflict with the feminist egalitarian ideals of the West. But to come out and call this an attack on Islam, through the irony of saying the religion is “right”, is to (again) highlight the incompatibility of the Islamic patriarchy with the Western feminarchy. In five simple words, this meme destroys the narrative of inclusivity and diversity.
Many on the Right will notice this cognitive dissonance, and find it amusing. But few will be brave enough to go a layer deeper and point to what this meme truthfully predicts for women.
THE WEST MUST CHOOSE:
Everyone who isn’t completely ignorant of the difficulties we are facing in the West today will recognise that Islam is stronger, growing faster, and maintaining its local hegemony in the Middle East far better than Western Civilisation is managing in its own geographic centres. The Islamic population in the West steadily grows, by both immigration and procreation, while our own birth rates continue to decline, and we don’t seem to be migrating into Islamic nations at all. It’s not hard to work out where this goes, even at current rates, with a bit of time passing.
Islam is objectively stronger in the West than Christianity right now.
No, I’m not saying that I’d like to live in an Islamic nation, or under Sharia Law, or within a global Caliphate. That would be disastrous, especially when one considers the peripheral drawbacks to the Islamic world, and the social ramifications of their religious superstitions.
But the fact remains that Western Christianity has failed to stop the globohomo spread through our societies, media, and schools. We have failed to prevent the mass-slaughter of innocent babies in abortion clinics. We have failed to maintain basic Christian morality, which is the very foundation of what makes the West the most desirable place for human beings to reside on the planet. The Western lifestyle won’t be so desirable for much longer, if things don’t change.’
Barnaby Joyce is a Federal Politician from northern New South Wales, Australia and has been very vocal against the present fight to kill the unborn. Below is a recent email he sent out bringing us up to date on what has occurred in the New South Wales Parliament.
‘I commend the parliamentarians who fought so hard to stop the arbitrary classification of a section of humanity to be without human rights. I want to thank those state politicians who fought for a person to be respected with the rights they have by reason of being alive.
Most importantly, I would like to thank you so much for putting your shoulder to the wheel and not sitting, saying and doing nothing.
Tragically, the overwhelming disgrace of this bill has passed through the NSW Parliament, though with the mollified amendment that abortions after 22 weeks can be carried out only if there is serious danger to a woman’s physical or mental health. This is the current law; the status quo for a person after 22 weeks – so it poses the question: what was wider purpose of the other changes and their motivations?
Prior to 22 weeks of life, pets covered by the RSPCA have more rights than a person. It would be safer place to be a dog in a yard than the protections this new legislation allows.(Emphasis added)
I am so bitterly disappointed that we are now saying it is OK to kill a person in the month they would otherwise be born and walk this beautiful world like you or me. I believe it is barbaric that a person can be mutilated without pain relief because delivering that child would acknowledge that they are a person.
This bill does what it was designed to do – sanitise the perverse logic that someone is subhuman.
They will now try and cover this disgrace with the distraction that this was merely about decriminalising abortion – which has in fact been legal for decades.
The reality of what they have just done is to take, by all intents and purposes, a large step to the removal of any prohibition on the killing of a person to full term. A person inside another person is not a person under this new legislation.
Now however, they will try and rid you from the public forum. You spoil their story and you inspire guilt with your advocacy of the truth of this matter.
They will try and say it never happened, they were never there, they couldn’t make it, it was not their business.
More than anything else, they will try and make you forget this day where a vote in favour of legislation by one group in a building on Macquarie Street allowed a person who could of been born to be killed.
But we will fight on.
Kind regards,
Barnaby Joyce MP,
The Nationals Member for New England’
Society is in trouble and a major problem in all this is the disintegration of the family. Sadly, many families are or have already disintegrated through unfaithfulness ending in divorce. However, children are not the only ones affected by this disintegration of the family but the nation is affected as well. Here are three songs sung by Gayle Edward Russ that should encourage us in building strong families and marriages. May they be as much of a blessing to you as they were to us.
“Ye therefore, beloved, seeing ye know these things before, beware lest ye also, being led away with the error of the wicked, fall from your own stedfastness.” (2 Peter 3:17)
False teachers are prominent in almost every field of study including science and religion. Dr. Henry Morris aptly writes that; ‘Peter’s final epistle, especially chapters 2 and 3, is the classic New Testament passage on the false teachers that would plague the church in the “last days” (v. 3). In addition to the characteristics listed in the introductory verse, 2:1 (e.g., slipping in surreptitiously heretical teachings, denying the redemptive work and Lordship of Christ), a number of their attributes are predicted for our guidance, as follows:
They will “wrest the scriptures” (3:16), distorting their literal meaning to conform to their own philosophical preferences. This involves using “feigned words” (2:3)—that is, plastic words, with devious meanings to make them say what their users wish to convey. They may well be very eloquent and seductive in their speech, “when they speak great swelling words of vanity” (2:18).
They will deny the doctrine of special creation and the judgment of the worldwide Flood (3:5-6), teaching instead that “all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation” (v. 4), and will scoff at the Second Coming. They “despise government” and are “presumptuous” and “selfwilled . . . not afraid to speak evil of dignities” (2:10).
They both practice and defend immoral acts, “having eyes full of adultery” (v. 14). Yet they maintain their religious ties because they have hearts “exercised with covetous practices” (v. 14), seeing nothing evil in taking money for personal gain from those whose faith they seek to undermine.
This is, indeed, a fitting description of many modern liberal theologians, religious bureaucrats in the big denominations, “New Age” preachers, college teachers of religion, etc. Although this is not a pleasant subject, Christians urgently need to awaken to what is happening and “beware”!’ https://www.icr.org/article/11469
They want you to just keep quiet if you do not agree with their Leftist, Marxist, anti-Christian, anti-capitalism, climate scam ideologies. A video is pasted at the bottom of the article. Note at about 5 minutes and 22 seconds the clown coming in to cause as much disruption as possible. These are the supposed leaders of tomorrow!?
‘Campus police force entire room to evacuate after protesters refuse to comply with officers’ requests
WASHINGTON, D.C. — An effort Thursday night by the Georgetown University College Republicans to host climate scholars to rebut 2020 Democratic presidential candidates’ climate alarmism descended into chaos after dozens of student protesters crashed the event and continually disrupted it to the point that campus police shut down the forum and evacuated the room.
Student hosts and the climate scientists and policy experts were eventually let back into the room to complete their discussion, but the first 20 minutes of the panel was so frequently interrupted it culminated in its temporary halt as campus officers worked to gain control of the situation.
At the start of “Climate Forum: A Rebuttal,” protestors packed the room and, beginning with the introduction of the first speaker, shouted talking points, various obscenities, and hostile chants.
Despite campus free speech policies announced clearly by the hosts at the start of the event, the harassment continued. Amid the frequent disruptions, a protester dressed as a clown intermittently honked a horn.
The College Republicans called campus police, who tried to remove those interrupting the event, but the students refused to comply. They argued with the officers, refused to show the officers their student IDs, and declared the room an “open forum.”
Eventually, police had to clear the room entirely in an attempt to gain control of the situation. The hallway flooded with protestors — as well as students who appeared genuinely interested in listening to the panelists. Numerous campus administrators and even more officers arrived as the event remained postponed.
The panel finally restarted after police had blocked all but one doorway and refused entrance to anyone with signs. But some hecklers made it through, including one protester who had to be escorted out, but not before ensuring all attendees they are “on the wrong side of history.”
Meanwhile, dozens more activists slammed on and yelled through the windows, screaming for “environmental justice.” The police officers guarded the building’s entrance, but allowed the outside shouts as the discussion inside proceeded.
The event finished an hour late, with many fewer people inside than at the start.
The panel was scheduled in response to the Georgetown Institute of Politics and MSNBC hosting of a “Presidential Climate Crisis Forum” this week. Candidates including Senator Bernie Sanders, Mayor Pete Buttigieg, businessman Andrew Yang, and Senator Cory Booker will make their climate policies clear in hour-long discussions moderated by Chris Hayes and Ali Velshi.
Earlier in the day, the Georgetown University College Democrats had issued a statement “condemning” the Georgetown University College Republicans’ event as “promoting the conspiracy of climate change denial.”
Rowan Saydlowski, vice president of Georgetown University College Republicans, stated in a news release that “our goal is to provide an alternative perspective in response to the echo chamber presented by the candidates coming to our school.”
The speakers included: Marc Morano of ClimateDepot.com; Dr. Caleb Rossiter and Dr. Patrick Michaels of the CO2 Coalition; Paul Driessen of the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow; and Kenny Stein of the Institute for Energy Research.’ https://www.thecollegefix.com/climatealarmismdebunked/
Genesis 4:8 And Cain talked with Abel his brother: and it came to pass, when they were in the field, that Cain rose up against Abel his brother, and slew him.
Matthew 15:19 For out of the heart proceed evil thoughts, murders, adulteries, fornications, thefts, false witness, blasphemies