‘Belief in alien life is predicated upon the evolutionary concept of a big bang. But even if true, where are all the alien races? And if there was no big bang what happens to the concept of intelligent, alien life. This episode features Gary Bates and Dr Robert Carter.’https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-7MEzJF2s-k&t=68s
News
All posts tagged News
One could NEVER ask for someone’s medical records for HIV, Hepatitis or some sexually transmitted disease! Yet, providing proof of receiving the Wuhan Flu vaccine is mandated in California and other WOKE states. Now, ‘An In-N-Out in Contra Costa County, California, has been shut down permanently for refusing to ask patrons for proof of COVID-19 vaccination or a negative test within three days of dining in.
The fast-food branch was told to close indefinitely on Tuesday according to The Hill.
“The Pleasant Hill In-N-Out location received four citations in recent weeks and fines totaling $1,750, all for the same health order violation, before today’s action,” Contra Costa Environmental Health (CCEH) said in a statement.
The location was served with a notice of violation on Oct. 5, and subsequently fined $250 on Oct. 14 and $500 on Oct. 19, a spokesperson for Contra Costa County’s health department told SFGate, adding that the In-N-Out faced “repeated complaints from members of the public.”
Arnie Wensinger, chief legal & business officer for the In-N-Out chain, said that the store “properly and clearly” posted signs that outlined the vaccination requirements for indoor diners, but said that the store refused to act as “the vaccination police for any government.”
“It is unreasonable, invasive, and unsafe to force our restaurant Associates to segregate Customers into those who may be served and those who may not, whether based on the documentation they carry, or any other reason,” added Wensinger.
As of Sept. 22, restaurants, gyms, and some indoor businesses operating in Contra Costa County were required to check vaccine records and the photo ID of customers dining indoors.’https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_breakingnews/california-in-n-out-shut-down-permanently-for-refusing-to-check-customers-vaccination-status_4071086.html?utm_source=newsnoe&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=breaking-2021-10-27-2&mktids=8fad7d3c419cbc705c54928a13445e7d&est=KtWoqLk3DW3iykoKP1Xpk1wFByDKtp%2Br5z1OhqixbDchn%2FjrlceFgYoHZyIds4ZoPg%3D%3D
Now, I know I am old and even old fashion to some folk, but church use to be where you went to hear the Word of God preached/taught and have fellowship with other believers. Most of the churches I was a member of were anywhere from 150 to 1200. Even with the larger congregation one eventually knew who were the regulars and visitors. Well, today it is different. It’s not only the government keeping track of you but the local church!
‘Facial Recognition Software by Churchix for Biometric Attendance
Facial recognition software by Churchix identifies people in videos and photos. This biometric attendance system identifies members, suspects, employees, students and basically anyone you have interest in. All you need to do is enroll photos of your members into the software, then connect a live video USB and/or IP camera and Churchix facial recognition software will identify your members! You can also upload recorded videos or photos.
Churchix facial recognition software is designed for Churches, Classrooms, T&A and basically for anyone who wants to save the pain of manually tracking attendance.
First of its kind, Churchix face scanner provides you with accurate data on event attending members in your events and services. The software also allows you to sort and manage your videos and photos.
What are Reference Photos in a Face Recognition Software?
Facial recognition software requires reference photos, and Churchix is no different. Reference Photos are the photos of your members which you enroll into the data base of Churchix.
Reference photos serve as an anchor and therefore should be of high quality. You can think of them as high quality passport photos. The enrollment and registration are done automatically and Churchix allows you to manually edit each member details.
Reference Photos Requirements
– Sharp image
– Lighting is spread evenly on the face, without any hot spots
– Size: Minimum of 50 pixels between the eyes
– Visible frontal face pose with no more than +/- 15 degrees from frontal position
– No facial expression
What are Probe Photos in a Facial Recognition Software?
Probe Photos are the photos coming from an event either as still images or video frames, and they are fed into Churchix face recognition software. The probe photos are matched against the reference photos. Naturally, probe photos have lower quality since they are sometimes taken in the field in dynamic conditions. If you manage to obtain high quality probe photos your accuracy results will be great!
For more details on facial recognition software photos please refer to our photo guide.
Expert Advice
In order to achieve high accuracy, you need to locate the camera where it would capture fully frontal visible faces.
Of course by zooming in you will lose range, but you will gain high quality images.
Don’t forget to make sure your lighting conditions are good.
Also, do some testing and adjust the camera location / zoom until you find the best spot for high accuracy.
Camera Type
Churchix can work with any camera type, however if you run Churchix under a surveillance mode, we recommend you use GigE cameras. GigE cameras transmit uncompressed video which keeps maximum face data, and handle motion bluriness very well. Facial recognition software requires decent face images in order to guarantee high accuracy and Churchix is no different.
Who is it for?
Churchix is designed for churches, classrooms, hotels, T&A and event attendance, and for tracking suspects and criminals. it can be used by event managers who want to track event attendance, or by anyone who wants to identify known guests from live or recorded video. If you are looking for another face recognition solution please visit Face-Six.’ https://churchix.com/
Mark 10:6 But from the beginning of the creation God made them male and female. This stuff that Biden and others are pushing would be laughable if they weren’t in positions of such influence. Now, ‘The Biden-Harris administration has released a 42-page document, titled “National Strategy on Gender Equity and Equality.”
Identity politics feature heavily in the new policy that conflates biology and ideology.
The guidelines lump women, “gender nonconforming” and transgender people all in the same category. Nothing in this so-called document distinguishes women from males who appropriate womanhood. So basically, it is a policy for anyone.
This strategy reflects a commitment to address gender broadly. Our work is deeply motivated by a commitment to women and girls, in light of longstanding systemic discrimination and barriers which continue to affect their full participation and access to opportunity. We also combat discrimination and harmful gender norms that affect people of all genders: women and girls—including transgender women and girls—gender nonbinary and gender nonconforming people, as well as men and boys.
There’s no definition of the terms “women” or “girls” or “female”. There is a strong emphasis, however, on males who pretend to be women by donning a costume, popping pills or undergoing surgical mutilation of healthy body tissue.
On the surface it may seem like an attempt to achieve equity or equality. Unfortunately, statements such as “The transgender athlete who dreams of the chance to compete, free from discrimination”, proves that there is no regard for the safety, fairness or privacy of women in sport.
Binary spokeswoman, Kirralie Smith, said it was purely a virtue signalling exercise.
“Equity and equality will never be achieved if you cannot even define the term woman. These concepts are meaningless if anyone can be a woman,” she said.
“Sex-based rights and responsibilities are essential for a fair and functioning society to operate.
“This document denies science, rejects biological reality and furthers the oppression of women. It will do nothing to advance equity or equality, but will only succeed in elevating an extremist political ideology.”’https://www.binary.org.au/anyone_can_be_a_woman_according_to_biden_s_national_strategy_on_gender?utm_campaign=2021_10_25_weekly_enews&utm_medium=email&utm_source=binary
1 Corinthians 15:22
“For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ all shall be made alive.”

‘If God created, but He did so by evolution, it means that there were many generations and billions of deaths before the first man appeared on the scene. Does Scripture say anything about this?
Indeed it does! In fact, the whole plan of salvation rests on the fact that there was no death before the first man. This truth is found throughout Scripture, but nowhere is it more clear than in 1 Corinthians 15:22. Here we read, “For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ all shall be made alive.” This means that if death did not begin with, and because of, Adam’s sin, then by the same token no one is made alive in Christ. The way it is phrased in this passage, one depends on the other. If there were generations of death in the world before Adam, then death is not tied to Adam’s sin. And if death is not tied to Adam’s sin, then life is not tied to Christ.
In other words, if there were death before Adam and therefore generations before Adam, Christ’s work turns out to be of no effect. So you see, even evolution with God added to it questions the Bible’s message about the saving work of Christ.
The good news is that there is no fact that demands our rejection of God’s account of creation. No scientific fact has been established that forces us to reject what the Bible says about the first human beings or the origin of sin. There is no fact that has been established that rules out the Bible’s account of creation, the origin of sin, or death. These truths are fact and the foundation upon which the Gospel rests!’https://creationmoments.com/sermons/death-before-adam-2/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=death-before-adam-2&mc_cid=50714d658e&mc_eid=00c1dcff3c
When I was in college in the early 70’s Cornerstone University was then Grand Rapids Baptist College and Seminary. It was considered by many to be one of the more liberal schools in the General Association of Regular Baptist Churches (GARBC). Today, the school is no longer an approved school of the GARBC, the name has been changed and the school seems to have become even more liberal in that diversity, equity and inclusion are now the HOT TOPICS! It is so very true that many (Christian) organizations do not become stronger but weaker (less conservative and more liberal) as time passes!
‘About 15 students and one alumnus gathered Friday outside the chapel at Cornerstone University in Grand Rapids, Michigan, to protest the inauguration of Cornerstone President Gerson Moreno-Riaño.
The student-led demonstration is the third protest this week concerning Moreno-Riaño, a Colombian-born immigrant who was hired in May to replace retiring president, Joseph Stowell.
On Thursday, Cornerstone’s faculty voted no confidence in Moreno-Riaño. Earlier in the week, 299 alumni submitted a letter to the board, accusing Moreno-Riaño of reversing progress the university had made regarding diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI).
Drew Parker, a recent alumnus and one of the organizers of the protest, said the student protesters didn’t feel like they knew what was going on at the university and called for transparency and inclusivity. The students also urged for a return of several faculty and staff who advocated for DEI and disappeared during Moreno-Riaño’s first four months in office.
Parker said he and others wanted to protest peacefully and respectfully and in a way that loves even those with whom they disagree.
Give a gift of $25 or more to The Roys Report this month, and you will receive a copy of “Fractured Faith: Finding Your Way Back to God in an Age of Deconstruction” To donate, click here.
The group of protestors held signs that read: “Education with Representation”; “We love our school but still need changes”; “Students need to be included in decisions regarding us students”; “a President for the People”; “We demand transparency and inclusivity”; and “DEI unifies.”

Meanwhile, the inauguration proceeded as planned. And even though he recently resigned from his role assisting with fundraising a couple weeks ago, former president Joe Stowell participated in the program.
Stowell prayed the Lord would equip students “to love mercy, do justice, and to walk humbly with the Lord.” And he prayed for the board, faculty, staff, and administration for the “transforming presence” of God in their responsibilities.
The event was livestreamed but experienced an apparent technical issue when Moreno-Riaño took the microphone. There was no audio for the first minutes of Moreno-Riaño’s speech. All the other speakers were broadcast without issue.
A couple of nationally known conservative speakers were no-shows at the inauguration. Former Heritage Foundation president Kay Coles James and author Peter Wood were originally listed as speakers.
Instead, local community leaders and pastors, a few of whom are minorities spoke. They welcomed the new president, asking for the university to welcome him, too.
“Be there for him, support him,” said Bill Pink, the African American president of Grand Rapids Community College. “He doesn’t mind being challenged. He doesn’t mind questions. He will need your support. He will need your encouragement.”

No mention was made of the faculty’s vote of no-confidence at the inauguration nor the protest. But Carole Bos, board chairman, said in her speech that the search committee was unanimous in supporting Moreno-Riaño as the university’s next president.
“Know this, at every turn, we were committed to the Lord’s will,” she said.
She added that while transitions are hard, the university’s leaders would not move forward “in a spirit of fear.”
“It’s not easy to live in America right now,” she said. “I hope they see us with one voice, unified, praising the One who created us.”
Moreno-Riaño spoke on Moses and said that God uses imperfect people to accomplish his purposes for the sake of his glory.
“It’s amazing to consider the fact that our Great Lord chooses to accomplish His great purpose on earth through the lives of fallen, sinful, fragile and imperfect people,” he said.
Concerns about alleged ‘social justice agenda’
The recent conflict is the result of several years of turmoil at the school due to diversity and social justice initiatives begun under Stowell. While many celebrated the initiatives, others felt they went too far.
Cornerstone University has increasingly adopted a “social justice agenda,” said Deborah Hirschhorn, a student who transferred out of Cornerstone last year.
Hirschhorn said staff and students were encouraged to read “White Fragility,” a book on racism by Robin DiAngelo, a professor of multicultural education at Westfield State University. Conservative students felt like they couldn’t express their opinions, and the director of diversity would walk around campus wearing a Malcolm X hat, she said.
The “straw that broke the camel’s back,” said Hirschhorn’s mother, Lisa, was a Jan. 27, 2020, chapel address by Michelle Higgins, an advocate for Black Lives Matter.
In response, Ryan Hoogerheide, a student resident assistant, crafted a letter, arguing that chapel services no longer “centered on the Word of God.”
Hoogerheide shared his letter with six people, but the letter quickly spread to 150 people and 40 signed it, he said at a university meeting in February 2020. A recording of the meeting was given to The Roys Report.

Soon after, the university held a town-hall meeting, attended by students, faculty, staff, and parents. At that meeting, Hoogerheide apologized for the hurt the letter caused, and encouraged students to listen to other perspectives and study the issues.
Susan Burner, the director of campus ministries at the time, said at the meeting that students wouldn’t be given an opportunity to publicly discuss the issues at the town hall, but could do so at follow-up meetings. She urged a time of learning. But the university had to close for COVID soon after the town hall meeting.
According to Diana Whan, whose son attends Cornerstone, the town hall meeting failed to alleviate the concerns of some parents and students.
“You started seeing arguments and disagreements happening,” she said. “And it kind of broke up that camaraderie, that culture of acceptance.”
Shift under Moreno-Riaño
When Moreno-Riaño was hired, the school shifted away from its prior focus on social justice and equity, the alumni letter submitted this week alleges.
In the past four months, eight faculty or staff involved in DEI initiatives suddenly left Cornerstone, including two vice presidents, the director of diversity, two professors, a director of campus ministries, the campus pastor and an associate dean. These were the employees who collectively spent “decades” working towards inclusivity, the alumni letter states.
Bob Sack, Cornerstone’s vice president for advancement, would not comment on whether the employees were fired or resigned.
“We are troubled by news which suggests that Cornerstone, under the new presidency of Dr. Gerson Moreno-Riaño, is headed in a direction which goes against our stated mission statement,” the signers wrote.
The departure of the faculty and staff has driven students of color to seek support outside the university, the alumni letter states.
Cornerstone, however, has recently hired a new diversity director, its website states, and plans to hire a chief diversity officer.
Despite current disagreements on how things have been handled in the past, Parker insisted the conversation over diversity doesn’t have to be contentious. Instead, he said protesters said they hope to be a part of respectful dialogue.
“We want to exemplify Christ on this endeavor,” he said. “We want to love one another with our actions.”’https://julieroys.com/cornerstone-university-student-protest-moreno-riano-racial-issues/?mc_cid=2f34b190bd&mc_eid=b13d34ad49
I thought I would introduce Dr. Boys’ article with some info on snake oil! ‘Snake oil is a term used to describe deceptive marketing, health care fraud, or a scam. Similarly, “snake oil salesman” is a common expression used to describe someone who sells, promotes, or is a general proponent of some valueless or fraudulent cure, remedy, or solution.[1] The term comes from the “snake oil” that used to be sold as a cure-all elixir for many kinds of physiological problems. Many 19th-century United States and 18th-century European entrepreneurs advertised and sold mineral oil (often mixed with various active and inactive household herbs, spices, drugs, and compounds, but containing no snake-derived substances whatsoever) as “snake oil liniment“, making claims about its efficacy as a panacea. Patent medicines that claimed to be a panacea were extremely common from the 18th century until the 20th, particularly among vendors masking addictive drugs such as cocaine, amphetamine, alcohol and opium-based concoctions or elixirs, to be sold at medicine shows as medication or products promoting health.’https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snake_oil
Now, Dr. Boys’ writes that ‘With so many deaths, diseases, and disabilities resulting from COVID-19 vaccinations, why have the failed vaccines not been discontinued? Instead of being removed from the shelves, they are being pushed by the world health officials and world governments! Moreover, highly educated medical people and others are ridiculed for asking reasonable questions. Furthermore, if these vaccines are safe, why do the vaccine producers have legal protection from being sued when shots result in disability or death?
As of today, there have been 16,766 reported U.S. deaths following COVID vaccination. And they are supposed to be “safe and effective.” Roll up your sleeve at a Walgreens or CVS and get an injection that may help you. Or, to be honest, it may kill you, disable you, or only cause Bell’s palsy or bleeding problems. Or, if female, it may cause your period to start again at age 80. Or it might make it impossible for young females to get pregnant.
Is the rushed vaccine worth the risk? After all, you may not get infected, and if you do, you probably won’t die. Furthermore, you can still get COVID after full vaccination.
Whatever the situation, you alone are the one to make that decision since it is your life. Additionally, who gave the government the authority to force any American to take any drug or vaccine? If a woman has the legal right to kill her unborn baby, then surely I have a right to full disclosure of all medical procedures and to refuse them for whatever reason.
I don’t need a medical, religious, or philosophical reason not to be injected with an unproven, unreliable, and unnecessary vaccine. I am not a guinea pig.
Free people have a right to refuse any drug or vaccine, especially if it is untested, dangerous, and irreversible. “Yes, but the odds are so great. Only one in a zillion die.” But I could be that one. However, there have been many deaths caused by the rushed vaccines.
No one on earth can say for sure that any vaccine or medical treatment is “safe” or “effective.” If any health care worker tells you otherwise, you should run from them as if your hair is on fire.
That might be less dangerous than getting a dubious, dangerous, even deadly vaccine.
No vaccine maker or drug maker can be held legally responsible if a drug or vaccine harms or kills a patient. Big Pharma is the only entity with such a benefit. If these companies are trustworthy, ethical, and beneficial to society, why did they ask for unusual legal protection?
Why would legislators be so stupid to give them such protection at the expense of innocent people? I believe I already answered that.
Immunity from accountability is not common sense or biblical. No principled person seeks relief from responsibility. In ancient Rome, bridge builders stood under a new bridge at its dedication and lost their lives if they did a poor job. The Jews were held accountable if they dug a hole without warning signs or if a bull, known to be dangerous, was unfenced and harmed someone. Society has always demanded accountability—until now.
Accountability is an attribute of honorable men.
Everyone believes health officials should be super careful in the tests to discover the vaccine’s long-term consequences, especially when it is literally being forced on the world. But no one can speak authoritatively about long-term safety because it was a rush job. Even if there were not thousands of deaths shortly after the shot, no one could guarantee there won’t be multiple deaths next year because of the vaccines.
According to a whistleblower, the actual deaths from COVID-19 vaccinations are not realistically reported by the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) site [at that time]. Instead, there were more than 45,000 deaths! A female whistleblower has sworn under penalty of perjury “according to medical claims submitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), there are ‘at least 45,000’ vaccine-related deaths due to experimental COVID-19 vaccine injections.”
Therefore, the harmful results are far worse than the reported numbers indicate.
In the history of vaccines, medical scientists have always been careful to stop testing if there were deaths, blood clots, miscarriages, enflamed hearts, and other injuries. Under normal circumstances, 50 deaths reported to VAERS would result in a drug being taken off the market immediately. Congress provided VAERS for people to report any adverse vaccine reactions, and all healthcare workers must make such reports. Very few do since “it takes too long to fill out the reports.” Shockingly, a 2011 report by Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare stated that fewer than 1% of all vaccine adverse events are reported on VAERS!
But the actual deaths are many times the reported number based on physician/patient financial claims, according to the whistleblower mentioned earlier.
A group of independent doctors formed AmericasFrontlineDoctors.com to challenge the horse and pony show from the CDC. The physicians state, “A typical new drug at about five deaths, unexplained death, we get a black-box warning, your listeners would see it on TV, saying it may cause death. And then, at about 50 deaths, it’s pulled off the market.” During the 1976 Swine Flu epidemic, America tried to vaccinate 55 million Americans, but the program was halted when the shot caused 53 deaths. The flu shot causes 20-30 deaths a year out of 195 million cases. According to the whistleblower, there have been far more than 12,000 CDC-admitted COVID-19 vaccine-linked U.S. deaths.
Why are COVID vaccines being treated differently from other vaccines?
Obviously, COVID vaccines are getting special treatment. The vaccinations continue even as the global death toll keeps climbing. The pitch is the mRNA vaccines have been held to the same “rigorous safety and effectiveness standards external icon as all other types of vaccines in the United States.” Obviously, that is not true.
Just as a woman cannot deliver a healthy baby in three months, the top vaccine experts cannot produce a safe or effective vaccine in a few weeks.
Dr. Peter McCullough, an epidemiologist, internist, and cardiologist, asserts there have been more deaths from COVID shots in the first six months of 2021 than from all vaccines in the past 31 years. Note, according to McCullough, the vaccines are responsible for these deaths, not an exotic virus. During court testimony, McCullough revealed, “661 people just among the Medicare beneficiaries in Maine died within 28 days of taking the shot. That is primarily among people 65 and older and doesn’t account for any potential vaccine-related deaths among non-Medicare recipients.”
The possible danger from COVID vaccinations came home to me recently when a man I’ve known all his life died a few days after getting the jab. He was 64 years old and a friend of my grown children. He said, “I got the shot on Tuesday and haven’t felt well since.” He died of a heart attack on Saturday. Only a fool or fanatic says there was absolutely no connection.
But we don’t know his cause of death, do we? This has happened thousands of times worldwide. Please remember that we are told to get the vaccination, so we won’t get COVID-19, but we still get COVID, so why get a rushed vaccine that is not “safe” or “effective”?
Joe Biden assured us, “If you’re vaccinated, you’re not going to be hospitalized, you’re not going to be in the IC unit, and you’re not going to die.” Now, everyone on earth knows he was talking through his mask.
Hey, what’s an ordinary citizen to do when he can’t believe the man in the Oval Office?
What’s a non-physician supposed to believe when the world’s top health officials are so adamant about getting the vaccine, and hundreds of independent experts (usually more qualified than the government ones) vociferously tell us the opposite? Especially since there are common, inexpensive drugs that make experimental vaccines as obsolete as an automobile crank.
Keep in mind that you are being “sold” vaccines, even forced to take them. Now, ask what’s in it for the seller? Bill Gates may be the most prominent voice in the use of vaccines worldwide, and he wants to reduce world population growth from 10 to 15% to forestall environmental catastrophe, so I surely won’t take his advice about a vaccine’s effectiveness or safety.
If federal health experts are lying or are incompetent, they pocketed their 30 pieces of silver. The original receiver of 30 pieces of silver “went out and hanged himself.” I don’t expect physicians to do the same, but if they are guilty of crimes against humanity, angry citizens will demand the government treat them as they did a few Nazis at Nuremberg. If federal health officials turn out to be Judas goats, citizens will demand appropriate justice.
These people are so corrupt if a snake bit any of them, the snake would die.
They must be held accountable.’https://donboys.cstnews.com/false-promises-failed-vaccines-fake-reporting-and-future-justice
‘Contents
Summary……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..3
Vaccine effectiveness…………………………………………………………………………………………………3
Population impact………………………………………………………………………………………………………3
Vaccine effectiveness ……………………………………………………………………………………………………4
Effectiveness against symptomatic disease …………………………………………………………………..4
Effectiveness against hospitalisation…………………………………………………………………………….5
Effectiveness against mortality …………………………………………………………………………………….5
Effectiveness against infection …………………………………………………………………………………….5
Effectiveness against transmission……………………………………………………………………………….6
Population impact …………………………………………………………………………………………………………8
Vaccine coverage………………………………………………………………………………………………………8
Vaccination status ……………………………………………………………………………………………………11
Vaccine impact on proportion of population with antibodies to COVID-19…………………………19
Summary of impact on hospitalisations, infections and mortality……………………………………..26
References…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………27′ https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1027511/Vaccine-surveillance-report-week-42.pdf
