Medical Doctors
All posts tagged Medical Doctors
‘In this first part of our interview, Dr. John Littell, MD, from Florida, tells us about his experience with treating COVID-19, about his perspectives regarding vaccination, especially of children, and about the trends with COVID-19 policy, particularly in Florida. The second part of the interview focuses on the recently held Florida COVID Summit.’https://rumble.com/vox5e5-dr.-john-littell-md-interview-part-1.html?mref=6zof&mc=dgip3&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=covexit.com+-+covid-19+news+%26+policy+analysis&ep=2
This China virus has allowed those elected officials who lean toward the CCP type of rule over the people to move further in that direction all under the guise of keeping the populace healthy and safe! This China virus along with the UN Climate Change Scam is heading the world toward that one world government!
Well, now ‘Authorised officers have raided a surgery in Melbourne, taking confidential patient documents pursuant of Covid health orders according to a rattled Melbourne doctor shocked by the experience.
Seven authorised officers were recorded on a Facebook livestream arriving outside the surgery in the Western suburbs at 1.15pm today after Dr Mark Hobart allegedly refused to surrender private patient information to Victorian health officers.
“I have just been invaded by seven authorised officers from the Department of Health and they have seized my confidential patient files and my appointment book and various other documents. They say they are going to give me an itemised list of what they’ve taken. And there was quite an intimidating experience. I think they’ve gone now…” said Dr Mark Hobart. “They just came here to seize files […] they all just came in and started walking around.”
Dr Hobart said that he was not served with any kind of warrant.
“This means that the government can go to any doctor and enter their premises and seize patient files for no reason. They haven’t given me any reason why they wanted to see my patients’ files,” added Dr Hobart.
A sign affixed to the inside of the surgery window reads:
‘The Victorian Government has banned patients from entering this surgery because Dr [Mark] Hobart refused to surrender your private and confidential patient files.’
Morgan C Jonas live-streamed part of the incident to Facebook.
“I was told by these people that there is no such thing as patient confidentiality under the news laws,” said Dr Hobart, when asked about the status of patient confidentiality.
The authorised officers were allegedly acting under the current Public Health and Wellbeing Act 2008, citing several sections to Dr Hobart while the files were being removed. Dr Hobart is not sure exactly what was taken. He had to hurriedly copy part of his appointment book, which was also confiscated.
Dr Hobart was also issued with a prohibition notice and told to cease training, meaning he is only allowed to speak with patients over the phone. He can no longer treat patients in the surgery or earn an income from his work.
One of the authorised officers interrogated the receptionist at the surgery, asking if she was fully vaccinated – she replied that she was.
“The doctor has to supply that to me. He [Mark Hobart] has to supply proof that you’re double-vaxxed or you’ve got an exemption,” said the authorised officer.
“I don’t feel comfortable with giving out people’s medical information,” replied Dr Hobart.
The staff were distressed at the Victorian government removing patient information without their knowledge. The authorised officers left with their arms full of private medical files.
They were asked if they would like to make a comment for the media, but the authorised officers did not reply.
Dr Mark Hobart is a family practitioner who has worked for three decades in the profession.’https://www.rebelnews.com/officers_raid_doctor_surgery_in_melbourne?utm_campaign=rb_11_10_2021&utm_medium=email&utm_source=therebel
‘Christendom College professor Matthew Tsakanakis endured a COVID nightmare that has left him questioning whether America remains a free country. “It woke me up to a new America that is not the America I knew when I was growing up, when we stood for fighting atheistic Marxism and we’re seeing it here in the United States as it is,” Tsakanikas told Jim Hale of LSNTV. The Professor of Theology stood alongside 19 COVID vaccine victims in front of the Supreme Court of the United States to protest the widespread conspiracy that is preventing COVID patients and vaccine victims from receiving the help they need. Tsakanikas makes an urgent appeal to all Americans to stand up for their God-given rights in this emotional interview.’https://rumble.com/vowivd-matthew-tsakanikas-christendom-college-professor.html?mref=6zof&mc=dgip3&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=LifeSiteNews&ep=2
‘Yet another proud Branch Covidian has passed away from getting “vaccinated” following months of mockery towards the “unvaccinated.”
Richard Rowe, a truck driver who ran for Congress in Florida and lost, “passed away unexpectedly,” his family reported. Rowe’s death occurred not long after he received his injections from Pfizer-BioNTech.
A loud “progressive” who also self-identified as an LGBTQ, Rowe loved to post hatred all over his Facebook page. The 41-year-old was well-known for cursing, wishing death upon his political opponents, and mocking “anti-vaxxers.”
Rowe was also notorious for taking jabs (no pun intended) at Americans who reject vaccination, calling for them to be designated as second-class citizens without rights.
When Rowe got his first shot of Pfizer on August 12, he uploaded a photo with the following caption:
“Yeah, I’m mostly here for personal ego. Already had COVID last year, so not worried about catching it. But I want to maintain my smug sense of moral and intellectual superiority while making fun of Darwin’d anti-vaxxers. It’s actually pretty noble, really.”
Smug definitely captures the essence of who Rowe was as a person. Other accurate descriptors include arrogant and hate-filled.
Are covid “vaccines” turning people into braindead monsters?
Rowe seems to have always been a hateful guy, but the vitriol really escalated after his first Pfizer injection. He quickly became a hate monger on steroids, so to speak, posting comments that would have gotten him banned from Facebook had he been a conservative directing them at liberals.
On October 3, for instance, Rowe went on a rant about the term “bisexual,” claiming that it is transphobic and exclusive. Rowe would have preferred the term “pansexual,” which he said is more inclusive of “trans” and “non-binary” people.
On October 16, Rowe publicly advocated for young children to be indoctrinated into LGBTQ perversion at an early age to combat the normal relationships many of them are used to seeing in children’s cartoon programming.
“Kids are already inundated with sex and sexuality from the minute they turn on that screen,” Rowe wrote, strangely referring to Disney films like The Little Mermaid, Aladdin, and Beauty and the Beast.
“It’s just that we’ve standardized gender binaries and strictly heterosexual relationships so much that we don’t think twice about those depictions.”
On October 7, as well as twice on October 8, and again on October 18 (twice) and October 27, Rowe went on numerous rants against anti-vaxxers who are just saying no to the injections.
On the 7th, Rowe said he doesn’t “give a s***” what happens to the unvaccinated. On the 8th, he tried to argue that vaccine mandates are perfectly normal. Once again on the 8th, Rowe mocked anti-vaxxers using racist rhetoric by comparing them to illegal aliens begging for work outside of Home Depot.
Rowe’s last Facebook message on October 27 tried to argue that Biden has limitless power as a dictator to require that everyone get injected for the Chinese Flu.
“Homosexual culture and the injections are inherently linked because both are integral to the depopulation agenda,” reported The Covid Blog about Rowe’s inclincations.
“But if trends keep moving in the same direction, homosexual culture will be gone in a matter of a few years. Receiving these shots is self-deletion; and LGBT are the most eager to line up for it. And they believe it’s a noble thing to do.”
“There’s no more time to be politically correct,” the blog added.
“Playing along with the homosexual agenda is akin to cooperating with and promoting the vaxx agenda, and thus the depopulation agenda. Which side are you on? Stay vigilant and protect your friends and loved ones.”
More news about Branch Covidians who are dropping dead post-injection can be found at Depopulation.news.’https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-11-08-richard-rowe-dies-covid-vaccines-antivaxxers-die.html
‘A 45-year-old bartender is dead in yet another case of death after social media virtue signaling.
Mr. Jason Bryan Maurer received his first dose of experimental Moderna mRNA on April 2 at the Giant Eagle Pharmacy in Tallmadge, Ohio. He expected side effects because, “Dr. Fauci says yes the first shot is rough.” Several of his friends congratulated him on getting the shot.
Mr. Maurer reported no apparent side effects from the first injection. The second injection came on April 30. Several friends, again, offered praise, including one that said, “girl u gonna get sick as hell for a couple of days, we all did.”
Mr. Maurer posted a very strange update on May 3. He implied that the experimental COVID-19 injections were a good thing because “we still don’t have a vaccine for AIDS.” He concluded the post with, “shut the hell up and get your Covid (sic) vaccine.” Of course, the HIV virus was patented in 1989 and AZT has a skull and crossbones on the label.
Mr. Maurer was the ideal American for the COVID overlords. He registered for the Ohio “Vax-A-Million” lottery that gives people a chance to win money if they receive the experimental injections. Several other states also offer lotteries for vaxxed people.
One of his final Facebook posts mocked Christians. It featured a Bible verse, specifically John 8:31-32 with a man waving a flag that represents homosexual culture (“LGBT”).
Mr. Maurer died on June 5.’https://thecovidblog.com/2021/06/22/jason-maurer-45-year-old-ohio-bartender-tells-world-shut-up-and-get-your-vaccine-dead-five-weeks-after-second-moderna-mrna-shot/
‘In recent years, the peer-reviewed medical journals (known in recent years for publishing articles then retracting them) have veered away from health and medicine and into politics, but then maybe they have the same low level of competency in one as in the other.
Most Americans are impressed with peer-reviewed journals, although scientists in many fields and informed non-scientists are aware that the bloom is off the rose, and such journals are struggling for legitimacy. They have taken many body blows to their credibility, reputation, and subscription lists in recent years.
In 2011, the pharmaceutical company Bayer looked at 67 blockbuster drug discovery research findings published in prestigious journals and found that three-fourths of them were wrong!
The British Medical Journal (BMJ) ran research past other experts in the field and discovered that most of the reviewers failed to notice eight errors that had been deliberately inserted into articles. That is shocking, but it was even worse. The reviewers were told they were being tested. No scientist spotted more than five errors out of the 221 reviewers who responded. The average reviewer found two mistakes.
That’s two errors out of eight!
No wonder every health care system is collapsing with so many incompetents wearing white coats and dangling stethoscopes.
Peer-reviewed published articles in the once venerable Lancet asserted President Trump “provoked” the mob that stormed the Capitol on January 6 and his “turbulent” legacy “imperils the health of Americans and the world.” Well, they did use the word health in the medical article.
Lancet promoted Biden as a “healthy” choice for America and, on May 16, 2020, published an editorial calling for Trump’s defeat in the 2020 Presidential election.
Considering the political, economic, educational, and social travesty in the United Kingdom, it might be better to use print space to solve that nation’s problems. Maybe the JAMA and the NEJM can solve America’s troubles.
Lancet published a “dehumanizing” and “sexist” article describing females as “bodies with vaginas” to appease the fanatics of the trans lobby. Critics called it “insulting and abusive” and a “misguided pursuit of woke points.” A few months earlier, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust told its staff to use terms like “birthing parents” and “human milk” rather than referring to “mothers” and “breast milk.”
Lancet, founded in 1823, is the most respected medical journal in the world but has recently become “woke” and politically correct. Maybe, it would be more in keeping with their purpose if they were honest, correct, and balanced—and dealt with health.
The Daily Mail of September 11, 2021, reported that Lancet, in their March 7, 2020 edition, published a letter to discredit the “conspiracy theory” that COVID was accidentally (or purposefully) leaked from the Wuhan Lab in China. Whether Covid-19 had man-made origins or leaked from the lab in Wuhan was effectively shut down by the letter. Twenty-seven authors signed the letter ridiculing man-made origins, and their prestige carried the day, calming the concerns of most people.
The Lancet’s assurance from the highly respected scientists “effectively ended all debate” about the origins of the global coronavirus pandemic. It was no more an issue. The Red Chinese were not guilty. While the COVID roots were not discovered, its origin was not in China, and it was for sure not a bioweapon. The Lancet letter made that sure.
Well, not really.
The Daily Mail reported another London paper, the Daily Telegraph, revealed that 26 of the 27 scientists who signed the Lancet letter had a conflict of interest (COI) in making that case. All but one of the alleged unbiased authors “have links to its Chinese researchers, their colleagues or its benefactors, a new investigation has revealed.”
Say what! Peer-review is supposed to be honest, forthright, scholarly, unbiased, fair, truthful, balanced, etc.
The Lancet scientists were not unbiased since those 26 scientist-authors had a dog in that fight. The highly esteemed scientists convinced almost everyone that COVID did not leak (or was not leaked) from the Chinese lab, so don’t worry about COVID’s roots. Everyone can go back to watching politicized sports.
Now we know many Lancet authors cannot be trusted. They hid their Chinese connection that would indicate they had conflicts of interest when making conclusions. In my opinion, they are all disgraced scientists who can be bought by the Communist Chinese.
That’s not supposed to happen, not with real scientists.
So, the Lancet’s perceived respectability in the scientific community was enough to convince the non-thinkers that the Chinese are good guys who would not release a deadly virus upon the world to thin the population to a level that would satisfy the environmental fanatics. Nor was the leak accidental.
The impetus behind the infamous Lancet letter was Dr. Peter Daszak, president of EcoHealth Alliance, which channeled $600,000 of American tax dollars into controversial research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. That was a grant from NIH and Dr. Anthony Fauci. Yes, that Fauci. Daszak declared no conflict of interest in the original letter but confessed in an addendum in a later issue of the journal. Since the scandal erupted, Daszak is no longer on the commission looking for the origins of COVID-19.
Daszak received more than $410,000 in annual compensation from EcoHealth and “related organizations” during the fiscal year ending June 30, 2019. However, his non-profit (EcoHealth) reportedly “received $39 million from the Pentagon and $123 million overall from different government agencies until last year.”
This seems to authenticate the I Timothy 6:10 warning that “the love of money is the root of all evil.” That was the “love” of money, not money itself. If we follow the money, we will find the source of the evil.
I’m not convinced the virus was released as a bioweapon, although I wrote about that possibility here. And it could be accurate, but what is definite is the virus was engineered in Red China. Maybe honest scientific investigators could determine whether it was accidental or purposeful, although the Communists are not cooperating with the investigation.
Wonder why?
Emails show Daszak and another scientist conspired (oops, can leftists conspire?) to conceal they were in bed with the Wuhan institute to “avoid looking self-serving.” The Mail reports Daszak told the scientist he would publish the letter in such a way that it doesn’t “link it back to our collaboration, so we maximise an independent voice.”
So much for their independent voice.
Some of the world’s top virologists had raised concerns earlier that the emerging SARS-CoV-2 virus had features that “(potentially) look engineered,” which is what many others have declared. However, Drs. Koopmans and Drosten were participants in a secretive teleconference held in February 2020 with White House chief medical adviser Dr. Anthony Fauci, Daszak, and others involved in efforts to discredit the lab-leak theory.
Note they were not looking for the truth of what happened but conspiring to discredit one possibility that would reflect badly on China.
Wow, it only takes two to make a conspiracy! Is there a conspiracy consisting of corrupt federal health officials and corrupt politicians who will not permit the truth to be known about the origin of the Chinese coronavirus? Peer-reviewed articles can’t keep flawed studies out of major papers, but they can be deadly efficient at silencing heretical, i.e., unpopular, unapproved, and unprofitable views.
Conspiracy is one thing; competency is another. Another possibility is confirmation bias, a potential problem for everyone. Every person must be careful when seeking truth since everyone is susceptible to a confirmation bias, “the tendency to look for and see only evidence that confirms what they already believe.” One tends to see what he wants to see. He sees what he is looking for. He accepts error because it confirms his erroneous ideas.
Some of the 27 scientists “have since changed their stance with some calling for a full inquiry into the origins of Covid-19.” Just a little late. These guys are not the sharpest knives in the drawer because after Lancet published Daszak’s tardy COI, the other 26 did not reveal theirs. Lancet even asked if they would like to confess any conflict. No one did. However, some of them have backed away from the letter and are now calling for further investigation.
No, not the brightest guys or the most honorable guys in the room.
There are many examples in once-respected medical journals of failure to disclose and arrogantly acting as cheerleaders for the radical left on issues far from medicine or health.
The American Medical Association declared anyone who opposes transgender mutilation of children is “dangerous”; Fauci called U.S. gun violence a “public health issue”; The Lancet wrote, “Climate Response Must Break ‘Stranglehold of Fossil Fuels’”; New England Journal of Medicine recommended removing assignment of gender on birth certificates; the Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association argued whiteness itself is a mental condition that leads white people to “hate” and “terrorize.”
Obviously, once-respected medical personnel and journals are lost in deep weeds.
I mentioned the above to support my contention that medical journals are only a little more reliable than National Enquirer or The Sun. But those papers, like all publications, must make a legitimate profit; however, the motive of a medical journal is not profit but public health. One must always consider the credentials of a writer since his motive may be bucks rather than facts.
Robbie Fox, the respected 20th-century editor of the Lancet who was no admirer of peer-review, wondered whether anybody would notice if he were to swap the piles marked “publish” and “reject.” Richard Smith, a former editor of the prestigious British Medical Journal, expressed his opinion of peer-review in his 2006 article, “Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals.”
Dr. Marcia Angell, former editor-in-chief of the prestigious New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), made the case that the problems with scientific research, especially concerning the pharmaceutical industry, go much deeper than peer review issues. In May 2000, she wrote an editorial in the NEJM that asked, “Is Academic Medicine for Sale?” She was concerned “about the increasingly blurry lines between academic institutions (and their research) and the pharmaceutical companies that pay the bills.”
In 2005, Angell wrote The Truth About the Drug Companies: How They Deceive Us and What to Do About It, a book that Janet Maslin of The New York Times described as “a scorching indictment of drug companies and their research and business practices . . . tough, persuasive and troubling.”
Scientists, like those above willing to break with their peers, are more likely to be truth-tellers since few want to be considered odd, strange, or peculiar. In our day, it is obsolete to be absolute because skeptics refuse any authority and refuse to be held to a standard of behavior. The only absolute standard is the Bible, and every issue should be filtered through its many principles, thereby arriving at the truth. Yes, even in science.
I am suspicious, skeptical, and sickened of peer-reviewed journals and federal health officials who have long records of being truth deficient and are often flawed, false, fanatical, and fraudulent! I tend to believe the independent critics who are risking everything for what they know to be the truth.
It doesn’t take much intellectual candlepower to recognize these federal health officials and politicians as unhinged, unconcerned, and unaccountable dictators who scream in their loudest, authoritarian voice, “Take the shot. Put on a mask. Close your business. This is for your own good and for the nation.”
Similar commands still faintly echo from Tempelhofer Field in Berlin, where a little man with a small mustache and a bad haircut spoke to over a million mesmerized people.
Today, a little man named Fauci spouts silly medical bromides with neither a blush nor a snicker as he swaggers through Washington, like the jerk in Berlin.’https://donboys.cstnews.com/peer-reviewed-medical-journals-are-often-flawed-false-fanatical-and-fraudulent
‘They are not even trying to convince us any more. They are now using brute force to coerce us into COVID fascism, including forced injections, so they have no need to even hide their false information.
In Pfizer’s FDA briefing document prepared for the Oct. 25 meeting was an admission that even according to the company’s own unverified and misleading math, there is a scenario where there would be more hospitalizations among children for myocarditis — just one side effect — than from COVID. “Under Scenario 3 (lowest incidence), the model predicts more excess hospitalizations due to vaccine-related myocarditis/pericarditis compared to prevented hospitalizations due to COVID-19 in males and in both sexes combined,” states Pfizer in page 33 of the document.
How in the world could there be any universe where we would approve a shot, much less promote and force it in many settings, when there is a possibility of greater harm than benefit, when the harm is man-made and the virus is left to chance? They know quite well that this approval will eventually lead to soft and hard mandates, which have already begun in California schools.
The document concludes by expressing the same callous attitude toward those raising concerns as toward all their interventions from day one. “However, in consideration of the different clinical implications of hospitalization for COVID-19 versus hospitalization for vaccine-associated myocarditis/pericarditis, and benefits related to prevention of non-hospitalized cases of COVID-19 with significant morbidity, the overall benefits of the vaccine may still outweigh the risks under this lowest incidence scenario.” In other words, sure, we have no clue what’s going to happen, but it’s always better to err on the side of shoving this on children who have a 99.9% recovery rate.’https://www.theblaze.com/op-ed/horowitz-fdas-own-pfizer-approval-document-suggests-myocarditis-from-shot-might-be-bigger-threat-than-covid?utm_source=theblaze-breaking&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=20211109Trending-HorowitzPfizerMyocarditis&utm_term=ACTIVE%20LIST%20-%20TheBlaze%20Breaking%20News
I thought I would introduce Dr. Boys’ article with some info on snake oil! ‘Snake oil is a term used to describe deceptive marketing, health care fraud, or a scam. Similarly, “snake oil salesman” is a common expression used to describe someone who sells, promotes, or is a general proponent of some valueless or fraudulent cure, remedy, or solution.[1] The term comes from the “snake oil” that used to be sold as a cure-all elixir for many kinds of physiological problems. Many 19th-century United States and 18th-century European entrepreneurs advertised and sold mineral oil (often mixed with various active and inactive household herbs, spices, drugs, and compounds, but containing no snake-derived substances whatsoever) as “snake oil liniment“, making claims about its efficacy as a panacea. Patent medicines that claimed to be a panacea were extremely common from the 18th century until the 20th, particularly among vendors masking addictive drugs such as cocaine, amphetamine, alcohol and opium-based concoctions or elixirs, to be sold at medicine shows as medication or products promoting health.’https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snake_oil
Now, Dr. Boys’ writes that ‘With so many deaths, diseases, and disabilities resulting from COVID-19 vaccinations, why have the failed vaccines not been discontinued? Instead of being removed from the shelves, they are being pushed by the world health officials and world governments! Moreover, highly educated medical people and others are ridiculed for asking reasonable questions. Furthermore, if these vaccines are safe, why do the vaccine producers have legal protection from being sued when shots result in disability or death?
As of today, there have been 16,766 reported U.S. deaths following COVID vaccination. And they are supposed to be “safe and effective.” Roll up your sleeve at a Walgreens or CVS and get an injection that may help you. Or, to be honest, it may kill you, disable you, or only cause Bell’s palsy or bleeding problems. Or, if female, it may cause your period to start again at age 80. Or it might make it impossible for young females to get pregnant.
Is the rushed vaccine worth the risk? After all, you may not get infected, and if you do, you probably won’t die. Furthermore, you can still get COVID after full vaccination.
Whatever the situation, you alone are the one to make that decision since it is your life. Additionally, who gave the government the authority to force any American to take any drug or vaccine? If a woman has the legal right to kill her unborn baby, then surely I have a right to full disclosure of all medical procedures and to refuse them for whatever reason.
I don’t need a medical, religious, or philosophical reason not to be injected with an unproven, unreliable, and unnecessary vaccine. I am not a guinea pig.
Free people have a right to refuse any drug or vaccine, especially if it is untested, dangerous, and irreversible. “Yes, but the odds are so great. Only one in a zillion die.” But I could be that one. However, there have been many deaths caused by the rushed vaccines.
No one on earth can say for sure that any vaccine or medical treatment is “safe” or “effective.” If any health care worker tells you otherwise, you should run from them as if your hair is on fire.
That might be less dangerous than getting a dubious, dangerous, even deadly vaccine.
No vaccine maker or drug maker can be held legally responsible if a drug or vaccine harms or kills a patient. Big Pharma is the only entity with such a benefit. If these companies are trustworthy, ethical, and beneficial to society, why did they ask for unusual legal protection?
Why would legislators be so stupid to give them such protection at the expense of innocent people? I believe I already answered that.
Immunity from accountability is not common sense or biblical. No principled person seeks relief from responsibility. In ancient Rome, bridge builders stood under a new bridge at its dedication and lost their lives if they did a poor job. The Jews were held accountable if they dug a hole without warning signs or if a bull, known to be dangerous, was unfenced and harmed someone. Society has always demanded accountability—until now.
Accountability is an attribute of honorable men.
Everyone believes health officials should be super careful in the tests to discover the vaccine’s long-term consequences, especially when it is literally being forced on the world. But no one can speak authoritatively about long-term safety because it was a rush job. Even if there were not thousands of deaths shortly after the shot, no one could guarantee there won’t be multiple deaths next year because of the vaccines.
According to a whistleblower, the actual deaths from COVID-19 vaccinations are not realistically reported by the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) site [at that time]. Instead, there were more than 45,000 deaths! A female whistleblower has sworn under penalty of perjury “according to medical claims submitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), there are ‘at least 45,000’ vaccine-related deaths due to experimental COVID-19 vaccine injections.”
Therefore, the harmful results are far worse than the reported numbers indicate.
In the history of vaccines, medical scientists have always been careful to stop testing if there were deaths, blood clots, miscarriages, enflamed hearts, and other injuries. Under normal circumstances, 50 deaths reported to VAERS would result in a drug being taken off the market immediately. Congress provided VAERS for people to report any adverse vaccine reactions, and all healthcare workers must make such reports. Very few do since “it takes too long to fill out the reports.” Shockingly, a 2011 report by Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare stated that fewer than 1% of all vaccine adverse events are reported on VAERS!
But the actual deaths are many times the reported number based on physician/patient financial claims, according to the whistleblower mentioned earlier.
A group of independent doctors formed AmericasFrontlineDoctors.com to challenge the horse and pony show from the CDC. The physicians state, “A typical new drug at about five deaths, unexplained death, we get a black-box warning, your listeners would see it on TV, saying it may cause death. And then, at about 50 deaths, it’s pulled off the market.” During the 1976 Swine Flu epidemic, America tried to vaccinate 55 million Americans, but the program was halted when the shot caused 53 deaths. The flu shot causes 20-30 deaths a year out of 195 million cases. According to the whistleblower, there have been far more than 12,000 CDC-admitted COVID-19 vaccine-linked U.S. deaths.
Why are COVID vaccines being treated differently from other vaccines?
Obviously, COVID vaccines are getting special treatment. The vaccinations continue even as the global death toll keeps climbing. The pitch is the mRNA vaccines have been held to the same “rigorous safety and effectiveness standards external icon as all other types of vaccines in the United States.” Obviously, that is not true.
Just as a woman cannot deliver a healthy baby in three months, the top vaccine experts cannot produce a safe or effective vaccine in a few weeks.
Dr. Peter McCullough, an epidemiologist, internist, and cardiologist, asserts there have been more deaths from COVID shots in the first six months of 2021 than from all vaccines in the past 31 years. Note, according to McCullough, the vaccines are responsible for these deaths, not an exotic virus. During court testimony, McCullough revealed, “661 people just among the Medicare beneficiaries in Maine died within 28 days of taking the shot. That is primarily among people 65 and older and doesn’t account for any potential vaccine-related deaths among non-Medicare recipients.”
The possible danger from COVID vaccinations came home to me recently when a man I’ve known all his life died a few days after getting the jab. He was 64 years old and a friend of my grown children. He said, “I got the shot on Tuesday and haven’t felt well since.” He died of a heart attack on Saturday. Only a fool or fanatic says there was absolutely no connection.
But we don’t know his cause of death, do we? This has happened thousands of times worldwide. Please remember that we are told to get the vaccination, so we won’t get COVID-19, but we still get COVID, so why get a rushed vaccine that is not “safe” or “effective”?
Joe Biden assured us, “If you’re vaccinated, you’re not going to be hospitalized, you’re not going to be in the IC unit, and you’re not going to die.” Now, everyone on earth knows he was talking through his mask.
Hey, what’s an ordinary citizen to do when he can’t believe the man in the Oval Office?
What’s a non-physician supposed to believe when the world’s top health officials are so adamant about getting the vaccine, and hundreds of independent experts (usually more qualified than the government ones) vociferously tell us the opposite? Especially since there are common, inexpensive drugs that make experimental vaccines as obsolete as an automobile crank.
Keep in mind that you are being “sold” vaccines, even forced to take them. Now, ask what’s in it for the seller? Bill Gates may be the most prominent voice in the use of vaccines worldwide, and he wants to reduce world population growth from 10 to 15% to forestall environmental catastrophe, so I surely won’t take his advice about a vaccine’s effectiveness or safety.
If federal health experts are lying or are incompetent, they pocketed their 30 pieces of silver. The original receiver of 30 pieces of silver “went out and hanged himself.” I don’t expect physicians to do the same, but if they are guilty of crimes against humanity, angry citizens will demand the government treat them as they did a few Nazis at Nuremberg. If federal health officials turn out to be Judas goats, citizens will demand appropriate justice.
These people are so corrupt if a snake bit any of them, the snake would die.
They must be held accountable.’https://donboys.cstnews.com/false-promises-failed-vaccines-fake-reporting-and-future-justice
‘A new study published in the European Journal of Epidemiology proves what we “conspiracy theorists” have been saying all along about the COVID-19 shots: They cause symptoms leading to COVID-19 diagnoses rather than prevent them. The study, “Increases in COVID-19 are unrelated to levels of vaccination across 68 countries and 2947 counties in the United States,” was conducted by S. V. Subramanian, who is affiliated with Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies, and also the Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. The study looked at data from 68 countries and 2947 counties in the U.S. They used COVID-19 data provided by the Our World in Data for cross-country analysis, available as of September 3, 2021. For the county-level analysis in the US, they utilized the White House COVID-19 Team data, available as of September 2, 2021. Comparing countries with various rates of percentages of their population fully vaccinated for COVID-19, they found that “countries with higher percentage of population fully vaccinated have higher COVID-19 cases per 1 million people.” Likewise, in the U.S. the counties with the highest vaccination rates have the highest incidents of COVID-19 cases. COVID-19 vaccines not only offer no benefits, they are killing and injuring people, which is why so many dissenting doctors and scientists today call them “bioweapons.”‘https://vaccineimpact.com/
whatyareckon 