Why do Democrats want you to hate Putin? Has Putin shipped every middle class job in your town to Russia? Did he manufacture a worldwide pandemic that wrecked your business? Is he teaching your kids to embrace racial discrimination? Is he making fentanyl? Does he eat dogs? pic.twitter.com/xYEvapjbNT
The World Economic Forum (WEF) is a Marxist organization and Australia will pay a price for kowtowing to the WEF and the UN. These two organizations are at their very heart Marxist with the one goal of world domination. Sadly, the major Australian political parties have swallowed the Kool Aid!
In May, 2022 Australians will go to the ballot box to vote for a Federal government. Both major parties are Leftist, Marxist leaning parties along with the not so Green Party. If you enjoy freedom do NOT vote for the LNP, Labor or Green Party!
The following video is a ‘Special address by Scott Morrison, Prime Minister of Australia with Børge Brende, President of the World Economic Forum at the Davos Agenda 2022. The World Economic Forum is the International Organization for Public-Private Cooperation. The Forum engages the foremost political, business, cultural and other leaders of society to shape global, regional and industry agendas. We believe that progress happens by bringing together people from all walks of life who have the drive and the influence to make positive change.’ Sco Mo was elected in 2019 for not going with the Climate scam but after winning he has turned on the electorate and has endorsed the economic disaster of net zero.
The following is quite long but perhaps as you read it will entice you to follow the link for the rest of the article as it relates to today.
‘The two World Wars of the 20th Century had a profound and lasting effect on the world. As war broke out in 1914, the new inventions in weaponry provided incredible efficiency in killing. The worst capabilities of man were released upon the world.
Humanity would become catastrophically radicalized by competing ideologies. Nations that fell under the spell of communism or fascism would impose a terrible suffering on their own citizens, bankrupting them economically, physically, morally and spiritually.
Both of these ideologies found their philosophical roots in Prussia. As Hegel once mused, “War is progress, peace is stagnation”. Taking Hegel’s master-slave dialectic to its extreme, communism and fascism sought to expand its influence throughout the world, leading to savage political violence, war and genocide.
Nations that enjoyed freedom and democracy were forced to defend themselves against the scourge of these depraved totalitarian regimes. This was always going to end in war and it was going to be extremely expensive. For the kult of Prussia, this was always the plan.
Not only were the origins of communism and fascism Prussian, so too were the original plans for the first World War. The symbolism of the terrorist group that kicked off WWI would also trace its origins back to Prussia. Germany, under Prussian rule, would break treaties, kill civilians and eventually bait America into declaring war in 1917.
This was the Prussian playbook all along. When America entered WWI, the WWI was soon over, but the battle had just begun.
From 1917 until 1945, America and her allies defended against the most diabolically evil in human history. By 1945 the Germans were exhausted and too sick to fight. Suffering from a collective psychosis of hatred and withdrawals from pyschotic drug addictions, it was over.
In the end, Germany was bankrupted and America had racked up unimaginable sovereign debt. Out of the ashes of war, however, there was one group that had generated inconceivable profits throughout the entire period. The globalist corporations.
Throughout the decades of war and misery, Prussia embarked on an ambitious campaign to transfer the seat of power from Berlin, to Washington. This transfer was symbolized by the founding of the Alfalfa Club. As the world plunged into the darkness of war, it also plunged into an ocean of debt that would take generations of “back-breaking taxation” to pay back.
During the same period, lucrative contracts were offered to the largest corporations in the world who would form cartels and monopolies over entire nations. The same corporations would supply the new tools of war to both sides for unheard-of profit margins. Select banks would find ways to circumvent laws and secretly finance both sides. Money poured into these corporations like a waterfall after a storm.
The shareholders, financiers and directors of these corporations all had one thing in common. Their origins and loyalties were all from Prussia and they aligned themselves with Adolph Hitler, Lenin and Stalin as much as they did with America and her allies.
After WWII, in 1947 the State of Prussia was officially abolished. The “kult of Prussia” is not a State, but an army that controls them. Prussia was no longer a nation constrained by treaties, but a complex network of globalist corporations capitalizing from contracts with nations. On the diplomatic stage they became completely invisible.
Today they are the some of the largest multinational corporations of the world. Their sole purpose is to seek to enrich themselves at the expense of We the People.
“We Were Attacked Like Nothing Else….. not since 1917”
‘Last week we added a new category called “Amputations” to The COVID Blog™ because it’s happening with more frequency by the day. We may have to add yet another new category. But there’s no all-encompassing word to describe these passing out episodes. Perhaps, like we call post-injection convulsions “Shawn Skelton Syndrome” since she’s the first observed case on this blog, we’ll call this new category “Tiffany Dover cases.”
Everybody was in shock on December 17, 2020 when Ms. [Pontes] Dover passed out on live TV just minutes after receiving a Pfizer mRNA injection. And to this day, there are no definitive answers as to what happened to her. We don’t even really know if she’s alive today. But now, passing out on live television or in some other video presentation is common.
Only a simpleton would think the Government could or would keep your personal data safe!! ‘A shocking data breach has resulted in 500,000 QR code check-in addresses being leaked to a public website where the data could be searched and viewed.
The data involved 566,318 locations collected by the NSW Customer Services Department in what has been labelled a ‘massive and dangerous’ violation of trust.
Addresses were not limited to NSW, and included other states and territories if those businesses or the parent organisation had registered with the government to comply with mandated Covid-Safe procedures.
Some of this data included the location of domestic violence shelters, secrete defence installations – including a missile maintenance unit – power stations, tunnel locations, and private addresses. Pretty much anywhere that people were required to check in to track Covid – which was everywhere.
It is such a serious event that lawyers have called to prosecute the government department.
NSW Premier Dominic Perrottet has admitted that his state government is to blame for the unthinkable mistake, saying that the list was ‘uploaded in error’.
If nothing else, it is a lesson about the dangers of data and the blind faith that the government has asked citizens to have in its handling of information.
The government is set to introduce its controversial Trusted Digital Identity Bill shortly which will collect, collate, and share a frightening level of personal information about citizens. A leak or act of human error in this system would be a concern for the safety of citizen identity far greater than the NSW data error.
Perrottet said that he was only told about last year’s QR data leak on Monday, even though it happened in 2021. It has been referred to the Privacy Commissioner, but the real question is how a failure of security on this scale could be made without anybody noticing.
“That was worked through [the] Privacy Commissioner. My understanding is they were satisfied that the matter was resolved and that information was taken down. It shouldn’t have happened,” added Perrottet.
The government did not recognise its error, rather a technology security specialist by the name of Skeeve Stevens noticed that the data was publicly available and alerted experts who then went on to officially notify the government that they had a serious data security issue.
While the data was online, any one could have accessed it – including domestic abuses and foreign governments which is of particularly concern to the now-public military installations.
‘A jaw-dropping, peer-reviewed paper shows China’s old-school vaccine produces a far stronger T-cell response to the coronavirus than the Pfizer/BioNTech mRNA jab.
China’s CoronaVac shot caused people to make far more T-cells targeting the coronavirus than those who received Pfizer’s mRNA shot, scientists in Hong Kong have found.
Though it is only one datapoint, the study hints the Chinese shot – which is based on older, well understood principles of vaccinology – may ultimately provide longer-lasting protection than the hastily developed mRNA jabs from Pfizer and Moderna.
The study was published in a peer-reviewed journal called Respirology in November, but has (unsurprisingly) received no attention. It offers a rare head-to-head look at the immune-system effects of the Chinese and Pfizer Covid vaccines, which work in very different ways.
“Humoral responses” are antibodies, the body’s first-line defense against infection; the mRNA vaccines are known to produce supra-natural levels of antibodies, giving rise to short-term protection that fades within months.
T-cells are a part of the immune system crucial for producing long-term immunity and reducing severe disease in people who are infected. The mRNA jabs have been shown to produce relatively limited T-cell protection, but this study appears to have been the first time anyone directly compared them to the Chinese vaccine.
The scientists compared the immune responses in more than 700 people who had received either CoronaVac or mRNA shots, matching them by age and demographic data.
As expected, they found very high levels of anti-spike protein antibodies in people who received the mRNA shot. The mRNA jabs force our cells to make large amounts of the spike protein that sticks out of the shell of the coronavirus. Those proteins then cause the immune system to produce antibodies against it.
The CoronaVac recipients had lower levels of anti-spike protein antibodies. But they also had antibodies to other parts of the coronavirus. Even more importantly, when the scientists ran further tests on a smaller group of about 100 people, they found the CoronaVac shot had sharply increased the level of their coronavirus-targeting T-cells, which last far longer than antibodies.
The new T-cells targeted both the spike protein and another important part of the virus. They included both CD4+ T-cells – which stimulate the overall immune response to infection – and CD8+ T-cells – which directly attack infected cells. Meanwhile, the mRNA jab produced an equally good response in only one of those four types of T-cell.
“The average magnitude of post-vaccination responses was higher in CoronaVac subjects for structural and S-specific T-cell responses,” the researchers explain.
The research was possible because Hong Kong offers its citizens both the CoronaVac shot and the BNT162b2 mRNA jab – the Pfizer/BioNTech shot. (In Hong Kong, BNT162b2 is distributed by a Chinese drugmaker called Fosun, but it is still made by BioNTech and is identical to the shot Pfizer sells elsewhere. A Beijing-based company called Sinovac Biotech makes CoronaVac, which is not approved in the United States.)
CoronaVac’s advantage in producing a T-cell response probably occurs because it presents the body with an invader that is far more like the actual coronavirus than the mRNA shots do.
The CoronaVac shot is a traditional “inactivated virus” vaccine. It contains whole Sars-Cov-2 particles grown in kidney cells and chemically treated so they cannot reproduce. They are then injected alongside an “adujvant” meant to boost the immune response.
In short-term trials, the mRNA vaccines reduced infections far more than the CoronaVac and a second Chinese vaccine called Sinopharm BIBP, which is also an inactivated virus vaccine.
The early results led to considerable chest-pounding about the superiority of Western vaccines and biotechnology in general.
But the real-world data from the last year has made clear that the mRNA shots lose their protective effect quickly. Because they focus the body’s immune response on a small part of the coronavirus, they are also very vulnerable to new variants such as Omicron, even after a third “booster” dose.
In fact, Western countries have faced a much harsher Omicron wave since December than countries such as Indonesia, which used more Chinese vaccines than any country except China (although in the last two weeks Omicron cases have risen sharply in Indonesia).
The Hong Kong study may also help explain China’s apparent reluctance to move forward with mRNA vaccines – either its own or those from Moderna and Pfizer/BioNTech. Fourteen months after Fosun announced a deal to make the BNT162b2 mRNA shot available in mainland China, Chinese regulators have refused to approve it.