- “We have no competing fighting chance against China in 15 to 20 years. Right now, it’s already a done deal; it is already over in my opinion.” — Nicolas Chaillan, former first Chief Software Officer for the Air Force, who resigned in protest over the Pentagon’s slow pace of technological development, citing China’s fast advancements in artificial intelligence, machine learning, and general capabilities in cybersecurity, Financial Times, October 10, 2021
- “By the time the Government manages to produce something, it’s too often obsolete.” — Preston Dunlap, the Pentagon’s first Chief Architect Officer, responsible for promoting technological innovation at the Pentagon, who also resigned, labelling the Pentagon “the world’s largest bureaucracy;” The Japan Times, April 19, 2022.
- “Our lack of adopting these [commercial innovations] quickly creates an asymmetric disadvantage if our adversaries adopt them more rapidly… These differences are extremely relevant for conflicts we may face in the next decade where our adversaries effectively employ commercial technologies. For example, when U.S. troops were stationed in Iraq, ISIS sent small drones, which can be purchased on e-commerce platforms like Amazon, with grenades to kill American soldiers in Mosul… The DoD must add new capabilities like these in 1-2 years rather than 1-2 decades.” — Michael Brown, Director of the Defense Innovation Unit at the Pentagon, testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee, April 6, 2022.
- “[In the PRC and Russia], private companies… work together closely with their militaries to gain experience with new technologies and concepts. From drone swarming to anti-satellite weapons programs, Russia and the PRC have studied our capabilities carefully and are rapidly modernizing its own military capabilities with a priority both on asymmetry designed to neutralize U.S. overmatch and accessing innovations in its commercial sector… Imagine how well our forces will defend against PLA swarms of drones if we have not experimented with this concept,” — Michael Brown, testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee, April 6, 2022.
- “The current sequential process lags commercial product cycles and delivers technology several generations behind which would be the equivalent of supplying flip-phones and fax machines to our warfighters today…” — Michael Brown, testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee, April 6, 2022.’https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/18512/pentagon-losing-to-china
Common Sense
All posts tagged Common Sense
‘A Colorado mother was cut off at her local school board meeting after trying to read out a sexually explicit passage from a book she said was available to children in the school district.
The mother, identifying herself as D. Barnes, spoke at a March 16 school board meeting for Adams 12 Five Star Schools, which serves Denver’s northeastern outskirts. She told board members that she was “very concerned” about the material that children have access to through their schooling.
“I do not favor book banning,” she said to the audience, many of whom had spoken before her either in support or opposition to the district’s policy regarding “gender non-conforming” and transgender students. “But I do want to tell you that pornography does not belong in our schools.”
Barnes specifically took issue with two books: “Gender Queer,” a graphic novel by Maia Kobabe, and “Lawn Boy,” a young adult novel by Jonathan Evison. She said that young children have access to these titles “via online resources that Adams 12 made possible.”
“Alison Bechdel writes ‘Fun Home’ about discovering masturbation soon after her first period,” Barnes began reading from “Gender Queer.”
“I discovered around the same age followed by the further realization that my ability to become aroused was governed by a strict law of diminishing returns, an elaborate fantasy based on Plato’s Symposium. The more I had to interact with my genitals, the less likely I was to reach a point of satisfaction. The best fantasy was one that did not require any physical touch at all.”
She then continued to read a section detailing the use of a new sex toy and various associated quotes.
It was at this point that the board decided Barnes was “out of order” and demanded she stop reading. “This is your first warning,” a board member said.
“This is a book that is accessible in Adams 12,” the mother protested as that board member asked her to refrain from reading further. “This is what you allow in our schools. This is what you allow for our kids to have access to. This is pornography and this is grooming for pedophilia.”
Another board member suggested restoring Barnes’s time so long as she agreed to keep the content “appropriate for K-12.” The apparent irony prompted several attendees in the audience to speak out in frustration.
“But it’s in the library. You made it appropriate,” a man yelled.
Barnes moved on to describe her feelings when she discovered “Lawn Boy” was available to high school students in the district.
“I was livid, I was angry, I was hurt that this was accessible to our children,” she said, arguing that the book should be treated the same way as “Playboy” or “Penthouse,” which don’t deserve a place in schools in the first place, she added.
The video of the four-hour meeting has been on the Adams 12’s YouTube since March, but has recently gone viral on social media after a two-minute clip of the exchange was shared by popular Twitter account LibsofTikTok.
In a statement regarding Barnes’s comments, Adams 12 said the district has just one copy of “Lawn Boy.”
“Members of the community have the opportunity to challenge school library materials currently held in district-managed schools,” the district stated. “At the current time, one copy of ‘Lawn Boy’ is held at one of our high school libraries and ‘Gender Queer’ is not held in any of the school libraries of district-managed schools.”’https://www.theepochtimes.com/colorado-school-board-cuts-off-mom-for-reading-out-sex-scene-from-book-available-to-students_4460490.html?est=8rmYXWc6p2mknR63oGnEWhGKYXrHPGtakMQJcZoyQKTIQcPH3C5J9zsygRpujBc0aA%3D%3D
The speech begins at about 3 hours into the meeting.
‘The purpose of this document is to demonstrate that all of the key narrative points about the virus & the measures imposed are incorrect. Given the sources of these points are scientists, doctors and public health officials, they are not simply mistaken. Instead, they have lied in order to mislead. I believe the motivations of those who I call the perpetrators become clear, once it is understood internalised that the entire event is based on lies. In recent days, news is breaking that antibodies are present in European blood banks from 2019. https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1503112014700285953.html The implications are enormous.
In the first three months of the covid event, I started noticing senior scientific & medical advisors on UK television say things which I found disturbing. Hard to put my finger on the specifics, but they included remarks like “because this is a new virus, there won’t be any immunity in the population”, “everyone is vulnerable” and “in view of the very high lethality of the virus, we are exploring how best to protect the population”. I had been reading extensively about the apparent spread of SARS-CoV-2 in China and beyond, and had already arrived at a number of important conclusions. Essentially, I was sure that, objectively, we weren’t going to experience a major event, based on the Diamond Princess cruise ship, but what was happening was that, in my view, senior people were acting a lot more frightened than seemed appropriate.
It was with this heightened interest that I began close examination of all aspects of the alleged pandemic. I suspected something very bad was happening when the Imperial College (Neil Ferguson) modelling paper was released. This claimed that over 500,000 people in UK would die unless severe “measures” were put in place. Ferguson had over-projected all of the last five disease-related emergencies in UK, and had been responsible for the destruction of the beef herd through modelling spread of foot & mouth disease. I had been reading around all sorts of “non-pharmaceutical interventions” (NPIs) and what this had taught me was that there was absolutely no experimental literature around any of those being spoken of, except masks, which were clearly ineffective in blocking respiratory virus transmission. The non-experts in main media drew on a very limited group of experts and I noticed that none were immunologists.
I had in parallel watched the evolving scene in Sweden & was pleased to note that their chief epidemiologist, Anders Tegnell, seemed to know what he was doing & had dismissed the panic. I knew he’d been the deputy of Johan Gieseke, his predecessor, who was still around in an emeritus role. Gieseke was also reassuringly calm.
The final straw was when on March 23 2020, the British prime minister initiated the first “lockdown”. This was wholly without precedent. I knew Sweden had rejected them as wholly unnecessary & also extremely damaging. From that day forward, the team from the UK strategic advisory group for emergencies (SAGE) put up one or more members every day to appear alongside the prime minister or the health minister.
These press conferences were meandering affairs and it wasn’t clear what purpose they had. The questions asked never sought to place things on context, but instead to always explore the outer edges of possible outcomes and then follow up remarks that we didn’t seem adequately prepared. In retrospect, I think the aim was to make them the only “must watch” thing on TV and with such a large, captive audience, a form of fear-based hypnosis was instigated. We were much later informed by Matias Desmet that this was indeed the aim, and this process is called “mass formation”. https://rokfin.com/stream/9705/Foreign-Agents-10–Covid-and-Mass-Hypnosis
As soon as lockdown was initiated, the focus turned full force onto mass testing, especially testing people without symptoms. I knew this didn’t make any sense, because if a large enough number of people are tested daily, without knowledge of the false positive rate, we would certainly very quickly be panicked into thinking there were lots of people walking around with the virus, unaware they had it and allegedly spreading it to others. Once lockdown was in place, in addition to testing, the press conferences focused on numbers in hospital, numbers on ventilators and ultimately the daily deaths “with covid”. Treatments and improved lifestyle were never spoken of. The first lockdown lasted 12 weeks, with most office staff told to ‘work from home’ while being paid ‘furlough’ (a word never before used in Britain). The “fear porn” continued all the way into high summer, long after daily covid deaths had reached approximately zero, and the introduction of mandatory masking in all public areas in the heat of summer, when they had never been required before, was the last straw for me. It was all theatre and I set out to investigate a couple of core concepts: the “PCR test” and “asymptomatic transmission”. I’m embarrassed to say it wasn’t until the autumn of 2020 that I had clear in my mind, with mounting horror, that the entire event, if not completely manufactured, as being grossly exaggerated, with the intent of deceiving the entire “liberal democratic West”. Scores of countries were economically being squeezed to death. I knew that from a financial perspective, borrowing or printing enough money to subsidize tens of millions to remain as home could not be long sustained without destroying the sovereign currency. Strangely, exchange rates didn’t move much, another clue that powerful forces were managing this event as well as its consequences. Around this time, country leaders started talking about “Build Back Better” and Klaus Schwab’s Great Reset book appeared.
Around this time, I developed the idea of “The covid lies”. It seemed to me that everything we had been told about the virus wasn’t true and also that all the NPIs imposed upon us couldn’t work and so were for nothing more than show. Anyone challenging the dominant narrative was attacked, smeared, censored and cancelled on social media and no reasonable and independent voices were ever seen or heard on TV and radio.
In the second half of the year, the conversation turned to the oncoming vaccines. Having spent 32 years in pharmaceutical R&D, I knew what we were being told was just lies. Its not possible to bypass a dozen years of careful work or to compress it into a few months. What was to emerge was almost certain, to my mind, to be very dangerous. I read my way into this area, and grew more concerned still.
In what follows, I ONLY isolate the major narrative points themselves and show that none of them are true. So not just a little lying here and there. No, the entire construct was false. I will describe all the main ones. After that, I’ll show how they were able to get away with it.
At the conclusion, I believe the reader will share my view that the whole event is manufactured or exaggerated from a mild situation. No alternative views were permitted in the ‘public square’. A group of powerful media organisations assembled in 2019 and founded the Trusted News Initiative. The purpose was both to control the mass media message and crush alternative voices from any direction. https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/08/29/the-trusted-news-initiative-a-bbc-led-organisation-censoring-public-health-experts-who-oppose-the-official-narrative-on-covid-19/
All of it was lies. Not mistakes. Many politicians repeated others’ lines & might offer as defence that they relied on experts to inform them. However, those who promoted them from the public health departments knew they were untrue. What possible motive might there have been to create this state of fear? Who must have been involved to have granted authorisation to do it?
The question of motive has to arise. I have tried to find benign explanations & failed to do so. The conclusions I’m drawn to logically make very disturbing reading. I look forward to discussing this with you and indeed anyone. It’s unlikely I am correct on every point. What I am sure of is that the overall picture is one of extreme deception and a highly-organised fraud. I am not alone in reaching this view. This author steps through what they would do in order to take over the world through a simultaneous “coup d’etat” of the liberal democracies. https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/if-i-were-going-to-conquer-you
However, I’m the ONLY former executive from big pharma R&D anywhere in the world speaking out. I’ve invested 2y pro bono in identifying the key elements of the fraud, in the sincere hope I can connect with upright individuals who can help bring this to wider attention and ultimately, to a halt and to justice. I can describe a global fraud operating for two years at tremendous cost in lives, the economy and the very structure of human societies can only be undertaken by powerful people, organised for a purpose which is not to the benefit of ordinary people.
Best wishes and thanks for reading,
Mike
Ps: though not all central, there is a large number of ancillary points and I have assembled a few here:
- In a series of short films, you will find another team’s interpretation of the same fraud, with remarkable similarities. Note in particular, film 2 (3.5min) on non-pharmaceutical interventions: https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org/media-resources/pandemic-alternative/
- German investigative journalist, Paul Schreyer, shows that this fraud was rehearsed for many years, increasingly with all the stakeholders now running the alleged covid19 fraud: https://wissen-ist-relevant.de/vortrage/paul-schreyer-pandemic-simulation-games-preparation-for-a-new-era/
- Why were autopsies strongly discouraged worldwide in 2020 & still today? To cover up the lack of covid19 deaths. After vaccination, a large fraction of deaths have been judged to be due to the vaccines & lack covers them up, too. https://doctors4covidethics.org/on-covid-vaccines-why-they-cannot-work-and-irrefutable-evidence-of-their-causative-role-in-deaths-after-vaccination/
- On what basis were “cases” determined purely by the result of one test, much disputed as to it’s appropriateness? The Nobel prize winning inventor of the test, Dr Kary Mullis stated definitively that PCR must not be used to diagnose viral illnesses. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rXm9kAhNj-4
- A death from any cause, within 28 days of a positive test for SARS-CoV-2, is recorded as a “covid death”. Its absurd and we have never assigned cause of death like this before, ever. The effect of untrustworthy PCR tests and the arbitrary assignment of a dubious positive as somehow causative of death has been a very effective way to fool and frighten people. Most do not know that there are literally scores of viruses which can infect human airways, some of which in elderly and infirm people, can give rise to severe illness, even common cold viruses.
- Hospital treatment protocols, where I have explored them, look designed to kill. In UK, the pathway starts with everyone being tested with untrustworthy PCR tests and these are applied repeatedly for an in-patient. Given 2% of admissions end in a hospital death, repeated poor testing guarantees a lot of “covid deaths”. A patient “diagnosed” as positive covid is placed in isolation and visitors not allowed until they are moribund. A standard treatment involves intravenous midazolam and morphine from a syringe driver, at doses up to 10x greater than advisable for a patient capable of breathing unaided. This often results in respiratory failure and either immediate death or mechanical ventilation, accompanied by withdrawal of all care, and of course they then expire. Its murder. Again, in UK, we have documentary evidence that the UK NHS stockpiled a year’s supply of midazolam, by ordering it normally, but banning 2019 prescriptions. In no more than two months in 2020, the entire supply was exhausted by April, and another year’s supply was bulk purchased from a generics company in France, cleaning out their stock. Something similar occurred in US hospitals, with ramped cash bonuses for each stage passed, up to & including mechanical ventilation. Mechanical ventilation is rarely appropriate, because covid19 is NOT an obstructive lung disorder. Blood oxygen desaturation is best addressed using non-invasive masks with elevated oxygen levels. We tried this in Italy in Feb 2020 and they then ceased mechanical ventilation within a week, so stark were the differences in outcomes (most ventilated patients died, most masked patients survived). Apparently, the method of treatment they’d been given from “colleagues in Wuhan” was what they called “the Wuhan protocol”. In this, the guidance was that the sooner they sedated & ventilated an agitated patient, the better their chances. This was a lie. Panicked patients needed anxiolytics and an oxygen mask, but they were instead killed.
- I have been incensed by the mis-use of novel, experimental “vaccines” in recovered individuals (they are immune & risks of adverse events are greatly increased, because the body is already poised to attack any cells expressing spike protein). They are also used in pregnant women, who are not at greatly elevated risks from covid19, because they tend to be young and healthy. We’ve NEVER approved the use of experimental agents in pregnant women since thalidomide (1956-62), certainly without “reproductive toxicology”. None of the vaccines have a completed “reprotox package”. I filed a short, expert opinion to court with AFLDS on this topic. {insert}
Finally, the mis-use of these agents in healthy children without question has reverse risk/benefit: they kill far more than the virus could. The whole things stinks of a purpose different from public health, because if it was a legitimate public health effort, we definitely would NOT do any of these things. Officials lied on the national broadcaster, such as the BBC, smearing people like me, who had written the world’s first treatise, explaining some of our concerns. Note that this petition was co-authored by Dr Wolfgang Wodarg, the public health doctor & minor politician who stopped the fraudulent “swine flu pandemic” in 2009. https://dryburgh.com/mike-yeadon-coronavirus-vaccine-safety-concerns-petition/ - Next, two strange occurrences. First, the WHO altered the definition of “immunity”, to exclude “natural immunity”. (https://peterlegyel.wordpress.com/2021/01/15/who-changes-definition-of-herd-immunity/). That meant that only vaccination could accomplish the goal. They eventually changed this back, but for many, the damage was done and non-experts didn’t trust natural immunity, even though it is superior to that from vaccination, because the body has been exposed to all parts of the virus and will therefore respond to any part of it if reinfected. Next, the WHO changed the definition of “pandemic”, which previously meant the simultaneously spreading across many countries of a pathogen, causing many cases and deaths. It was changed to eliminate the need for many deaths (see 45min 50 sec Dr Wolfgang Wodarg, interviewed on UK TV in 2010 after the exaggerated swine flu pandemic, which I now believe was something of a rehearsal for the 2020 covid19 pandemic): https://www.expandingawarenessrelations.com/tag/wolfgang/). This is a critical point, because PCR can be designed against any pathogen and protocols adopted such that a large number of false positives appear. This grants bad actors the ability relatively easily to create the illusion of a pandemic, almost to order. Many people simply don’t believe experts when they talk of “very high fraction of positive test results being false positives”. I assure you there have genuinely been a number of events where the entire suspected epidemic was an illusion, and 100% of positives were false positives. Here is an example which, when I first read it, get me a crawling sensation. I wonder if it was this genuine event that birthed the method for exaggerating (or even fully faking) a pandemic in which are currently living. https://silview.media/2020/12/26/nyt-2007-faith-in-quick-test-leads-to-epidemic-that-wasnt/
- I noticed early on that Gates said “we won’t return to normal until pretty much the whole planet has been vaccinated”. This is a bizarre statement from a person with no medical or scientific training. It is never necessary to vaccinate the entire population, when only the elderly and infirm are at serious risk of death if infected. Note that the median age of deaths from / with covid was the same or even older than the median age of death due to all causes. Blair insisted that vaccine passports would be essential to confidence. Again, absurd, especially once we learned that these vaccines do not prevent transmission. Once this became clear, the case for coerced vaccination vanished and this is the present position. Yet, my unvaccinated relatives may not enter the US. The safest person to be around, if you fear infection, isn’t a vaccinated person, but a person who is fit and well, with no respiratory symptoms.
- The practise of “boosting”, giving people dose after dose of poorly-designed agent, ostensibly to reinforce their immunity, has no immunological basis. No genuine immunity wanes in a few months, sometimes even a few weeks. The perpetrators have exploited the public’s understanding of the annual influenza vaccine and somehow normalised something that is dangerous and ineffective. I also noticed that early on, in discussing immunity, antibodies were the discussion topic. T-cells were an “extremist plot”. This is another absurdity. I can assemble expert witnesses who will attest alongside me that blood-based antibodies are relatively unimportant, potentially irrelevant to infection by respiratory viruses. This is because the virus infects the air side of the airways and blood-based antibodies cannot leave the blood and enter this “compartment”. Blood antibodies and respiratory viruses never meet except under unusual circumstances. On the contrary, T-cells leave the blood and migrate through infected airway tissue, removing infected cells.
- Prof Neil Ferguson (Imperial) has a poor record of modelling & predictions: https://covid19up.org/neil-ferguson-fear-driven-predictions/
- Frighteningly prescient testimony from a former WHO staffer, Jane Burgermeister, in 2010. Her understanding was that respiratory virus pandemics will be used to force near universal vaccination and that this had sinister motives. https://brandnewtube.com/watch/jane-bu-rgermeister-forced-vax-warning-february-15-2010_Con7FXMOCvgW8Or.html I dismissed this the first time I saw it. Many of us turn away instinctively from evil because we cannot or do not want to believe that other humans are capable of that which our logic tells us is happening. I now no longer reject it. It fits far too well with the totally independent Paul Schreyer documentary.
- Another doctor made similar claims, Dr Rima Laibow. This testimony speaks of population rejection, and like Jane Burgermeister, locates the fraud in a conceptual world government. Again, one can reject it, or consider it alongside other pieces of information. https://www.brandnewtube.com/watch/jesse-ventura-meets-dr-rima-laibow_kL2AlR=‘ https://www.reignitedemocracyaustralia.com.au/how-much-was-true/
‘By now you may have forgotten President Joe Biden gave his State of the Union address earlier this week. On Monday, Biden walked across the White House lawn alone and in a mask. On Tuesday, he walked into a crowd of House members rejoicing that no more masks were needed. It was the perfect metaphor for Biden at governance and Biden at speech.
First, forgive Biden for his flubs and twisted words. He is almost 80 and has a stuttering problem. As someone who grew up with a stuttering problem, I’m sympathetic. He is neither Cicero nor Churchill, King nor Kennedy. He is Joe from Scranton. The problem was not the words or delivery. The problem was the message.’https://rightandfree.com/news/2022/03/04/the-state-of-disunion?utm_campaign=RFMain&utm_source=RFMain-20220304&utm_medium=email
Jeremiah 10:2
“Thus says the Lord: ‘Do not learn the way of the Gentiles; do not be dismayed at the signs of heaven, for the Gentiles are dismayed at them.’”
The world is a frightening place without God. This fear can be seen today in fears that modern people often confuse with science.
Several years ago stories of gloom and doom about a greenhouse heating of the earth were starting to fill the media. We at Creation Moments looked at the scientific basis for these claims. We wanted to know if the greenhouse warming of the earth was a true threat or just another fear of a godless people. We then published the conclusion that the thin and conflicting evidence for greenhouse warming most likely came from the heat island effect of growing cities around some of the temperature measuring sites.
Knowing the elegance with which God designed everything in creation, creationists suspected that God probably designed the earth with built-in thermostats that help keep it from warming up too much. When the Pacific Ocean warms more than normal, it sends increasing amounts of water vapor into the air. If heating continues, the water vapor will actually cause the heating to increase until vapor is forced higher into the atmosphere, creating icy cirrus clouds. These clouds reflect enough incoming sunlight to shut down the temperature increase and return things to normal.’https://creationmoments.com/sermons/greenhouse-thermostat-discovered-2/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=greenhouse-thermostat-discovered-2&mc_cid=869a80fb6b&mc_eid=00c1dcff3c
What was a peaceful camp for freedom quickly turned violent when police came to issue infringement tickets for “illegally parked” vehicles.
Tension escalated when police entered the camp to record car registration details.
Officers had largely remained cooperative with the growing gathering of protesters, and with too many people to arrest and too many cars to tow away the police presence focused their attention on the “illegally parked cars” being the issue and informed campers that they would be recording the details of all vehicles on the grounds under the direction of the National Capital Authority (NCA).
Protesters were concerned and suspicious of police intentions after earlier cooperation with the police led to officers blocking cars from re-entering the grounds.
Police mentioned that they may in coming days issue a move-on notice to the protesters, however, numbers continue to grow at the site with waves of the convoy still rolling into Canberra from across the nation.
When I talked to the Police media unit, I was informed that the camp was in fact illegal as NCA permits had not been issued for them to be there.
The police on the ground on patrol said that about a dozen officers would walk through the camp every hour for their safety.
Campers were concerned that the active police presence may escalate the situation and when police started blocking entry to the area, they were fearful that police would evict them from the area entirely.
“They’re saying it’s not the police that’s removing us, it’s the National Capital Authority … We have been trying to meet with them in person, the office is just across the road here, we went there, there’s no one there,” one camper said.
“They won’t return calls, and we’ve asked them to sit in a roundtable conversation with the traditional owner, myself, and the federal police, if we can sit down and talk about even getting a permit just for the time until the end of next week.”
Scenes turned violent when a scuffle broke out after a 65yo woman was tackled and arrested by police.
Police pepper-sprayed the crowd as the crowd sprang to her defence.
“There are women and children here,” said one witness on the scene.
“I saw an old lady getting dragged away, fellas getting stomped on the ground.“
“We were all prepared to take the infringement notices, without a problem, and we’ve been prepping everyone here to be really calm,” said another.
“It’s going to look really bad for you guys because what happened there was unacceptable“.
A man in his 80s identified as a war veteran was injured in the incident.
As he was carried away many from the camp embraced him for standing up to the police.
“Never ever quit, even though I’ve got a crook leg, I’m still walking and I’m still fighting and I’m never quitting. Never live by fear … Hold the line!,” he said.’https://www.rebelnews.com/full_video_police_storm_freedom_camp_in_canberra?utm_campaign=ay_campchaos_030222&utm_medium=email&utm_source=therebel
‘A huge new study has found the risk of serious heart problems called myocarditis in men under 40 soars with each dose of a Covid mRNA vaccine – and is sharply higher than the risk from a coronavirus infection itself.
The findings call into sharp question the efforts by American colleges and universities to make their students receive booster shots before returning to school this January – especially since other studies have shown that the risk of post-vaccine myocarditis is concentrated not merely in men under 40 but in those aged 16-25.
The study, which British researchers released in late December, showed that the risk of myocarditis almost doubled after the first Pfizer shot in men under 40. Then it doubled again after the second and doubled again after the third – to almost eight times the baseline risk.
SOURCE: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.12.23.21268276v1.full.pdf
For the Moderna vaccine, the risks were even higher, reaching 16-fold after the second shot. (The risk of a third Moderna shot could not be calculated because too few people received it.)
Because each Moderna shot contains 100 micrograms of mRNA, while each Pfizer shot contains 30, the findings suggest strongly that the heart risks are dose-related and likely to continue to rise with each additional shot.
The study also contained some evidence that post-vaccine myocarditis might be more dangerous than other forms of myocarditis. It showed a trend towards higher death rates in people hospitalized for myocarditis after vaccination compared to other myocarditis cases.
Both myocarditis and pericarditis are forms of heart inflammation that can be very serious, even deadly. In an appendix, the researchers reported that 263 Britons were hospitalized for myocarditis within four weeks of receiving a Pfizer shot; of those, 38, or 14 percent, died. Only about 9 percent of people hospitalized for myocarditis that did not follow an mRNA vaccination died.
The researchers did not look at other potential cardiovascular risks, such as heart attacks or irregular heartbeats, although American and European databases of post-vaccine side effects contain many reports of those as well.
The findings come even as many colleges and universities – including public schools like the University of Massachusetts at Amherst, large private schools such as Syracuse University, and Ivy League institutions such as Princeton University – demand that their students receive a booster Covid shot before returning to campus.
For nearly all these students, an mRNA shot is the only viable option, as the Johnson & Johnson shot is no longer in common use.
These colleges are likely subjecting their male students to a risk of myocarditis and pericarditis, a related illness, that is much higher than the overall risk of Covid, which is vanishingly small for healthy teenagers and young adults. Many larger universities are likely to have multiple cases of male students hospitalized for myocarditis as a result of the mandates.
The massive study was is based on data from 42 million Britons who received at least one Covid vaccine dose, including roughly 22 million who received the mRNA vaccines.
About half were given the mRNA vaccines, while the rest received AstraZeneca’s DNA/AAV vaccine, which is not available in the United States. The AstraZeneca vaccine, which works similarly to the Johnson & Johnson vaccine, had a lower risk of myocarditis than mRNA vaccines.’https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/more-bad-news-on-covid-vaccines-and/comments?token=eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjo0MjUyOTI1MiwicG9zdF9pZCI6NDY1OTQ4ODIsIl8iOiJVK25PRyIsImlhdCI6MTY0MTUwMjg3MywiZXhwIjoxNjQxNTA2NDczLCJpc3MiOiJwdWItMzYzMDgwIiwic3ViIjoicG9zdC1yZWFjdGlvbiJ9.eJ995DJ1wtrVu2u_IxwMRl3fyozAS6pg_Inr05voriU
‘BAD REALLY SAD NEWS At one meeting in small country town last week where locals sadly shared 12 dead in their wee town within 2-3 weeks of vax or booster, no matter what the government official number is and nothing will convince them it’s coincidence. Another town has Nurses noting they have been ordered to not report deaths/clots connected to vax. Chemists and Drs, Police threatened with punishment if they tout any view except that which is allowed. Hard to believe its Australia isn’t it?’https://mailchi.mp/creationresearch.net/creation-research-news-email-update-15th-december-2021?e=ce21bf0337
‘Many of us have become aware over the course of the pandemic (if we didn’t know it beforehand), that the mainstream media peddles extreme bias and lies, and tries to palm off their fakery as fact. They take us all for chumps, but Australians are far too smart than to fall for that rubbish.
This week, I was once again smeared and verballed by the fake news media who insinuated I had equated Australian COVID-19 quarantine camps with Auschwitz when I was interviewed by Alex Jones on InfoWars.
Let me be clear: At no point did I equate quarantine camps with Auschwitz or, for that matter, anything to do with Nazi Germany. Nor did I “laugh” at Jones’ suggestion that the fencing around the quarantine camp “looks like something out of Auschwitz or something”. I groaned in dismay at the images of the ridiculous security fences running along these quarantine camps (below) which I was viewing at the time.
Media also claimed I had encouraged protests against Australia at overseas embassies which, again, was false. One Labor politician even claimed I had committed treason. In reality I was asked by Jones what I thought of Americans who had been protesting for the rights of Australians in front of Australian embassies.
The other attack point was that I even went on Infowars and spoke to Alex Jones at all. To that charge, let me quote conservative activist Candace Owens (from a post to her Facebook page this week): “Everybody knows that you’re not allowed to talk to Alex Jones… which is exactly why I decided to speak with Alex Jones… I don’t follow rules established by authoritarian cowards.” Amen to that.
After all the fake news media and political hyperventilation about this matter over the course of the past week, I want to put forward a simple point: This is all about trying to turn people’s focus away from real problems and towards imaginary ones. Making me a villain is a good diversion from the horrible reality that vaccine mandates are causing Australians to lose their jobs, and that many Australian families are suffering as a result.
And there’s also the question of what’s worse: that a Member of Parliament sat for an interview with someone who provocatively overreached in comparing the fences of an Australian quarantine camp with that of Auschwitz, or the fact we actually have quarantine camps in our country where people who have simply had contact with someone with COVID-19, can be locked up for two weeks, against their will, with no legal recourse or appeal?
Because I know that Australians are way smarter than the chumps the fake news media takes us for, I’ll let you be the judge of that. Perhaps we should ask quarantine camp detainee Hayley Hodgson:’https://nationfirst.substack.com/p/theyre-pushing-fake-news-on-you
Now, I am not for this young lady lying to the authorities but neither do I agree with the treatment she received. Australian’s will no longer be a free society if something doesn’t change at next years election.
‘We now live in a nation where people can be segregated and discriminated against on the basis of whether they’ve had a medical procedure that has only been provisionally approved by the Therapeutic Goods Administration.
Right now people can be denied service in businesses if they have not been double vaccinated and, worse still, people have lost or are losing their jobs in government agencies and private corporations for not having had the COVID-19 vaccine.
This process of a government official or a private business requesting to see your medical records in order to discriminate against you is a form of apartheid that must end now.
The Human Rights Commission says that the request for private medical data through some vaccine passport system “may have significant implications for privacy and autonomy, freedom of movement and association, equity and discrimination, particularly when it comes to accessing everyday goods and services.”
We need to end this invasion of our medical privacy and end the discrimination.‘https://nationfirst.substack.com/p/end-the-vaccine-discrimination?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email&utm_content=share&token=eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjo0MjUyOTI1MiwicG9zdF9pZCI6NDI4MzI4NDMsIl8iOiJEbU9udiIsImlhdCI6MTYzODQ4MDg0NCwiZXhwIjoxNjM4NDg0NDQ0LCJpc3MiOiJwdWItNDU0MTgyIiwic3ViIjoicG9zdC1yZWFjdGlvbiJ9.aunqFJMW2J8gmlHAXdgoXlWRt2flXCLegdT6sbgvWNk
whatyareckon 