Australian Muslims and October 7, 2023

Posted by whatyareckon on October 4, 2024
Posted in: News. Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , . Leave a comment

Should not a Muslim living in a Western nation such as Australia support Israel rather than the terrorist Hamas which murdered Jews on October 7th, 2023? Should not a Muslim living in Australia see Israel, the only democratic nation in the Middle East, as an ally and not an enemy? Should not those Muslim leaders in Australia openly condemn what Hamas did on October 7, 2023?

No, what Muslim leaders in Australia do is condemn Israel! I guess I will have to WAIT a long time for any condemnation from these “Religious” leaders to condemn the murder of innocent Jews on October 7, 2023! SHAME on Australia’s PM for not calling this out!

AS FOR ME AND MY HOUSE WE SUPPORT ISRAEL!

Joint-Statement-by-Religious-Leaders-on-the-Recent-Tragic-Events-in-Palestine-and-LebanonDownload

Australia’s Special Envoy to Combat Islamophobia

Posted by whatyareckon on October 4, 2024
Posted in: News. Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Leave a comment

As Hamas and Hezbollah seek to destroy the nation of Israel the Australian Federal Government appoints a Special Envoy to Combat Islamophobia! Now, what do you really think this is all about? Near the end of the following pdf put out by the Australian National Imams Council (ANIC) one reads “There is much more work to be done, including establishing protective laws to guard against religious discrimination and vilification. This includes addressing the heightened levels of distress and anguish being experienced by some many because of the unprecedented suffering in Palestine and Lebanon and the inconsistent responses of political leaders to such suffering.
ANIC looks forward to working with the Special Envoy to identify and address issues of Islamophobia,
anti-Muslim, and anti-Palestinian sentiment.”

AS FOR ME AND MY HOUSE WE SUPPORT ISRAEL!!!!

ANIC-welcomes-the-appointment-of-Aftab-Malik-as-the-Special-Envoy-to-Combat-IslamophobiaDownload

Choice? What Choice?

Posted by whatyareckon on October 3, 2024
Posted in: News. Tagged: , , , , , , , , , . Leave a comment

The following is an email from one of the few Senators (Ralph Babet) we have in the Australian Federal Parliament that understands what is happening to our freedoms.

Choice? What choice?
Most Australians think we have a real choice when it comes to the government we elect, but many of us know that is not true. Unless of course you consider being given the opportunity to vote for socialism or socialism lite a choice!  Imagine going to the ballot box and believing that the choice of authoritarianism on one hand and gentle authoritarianism on the other, meant you had real options. Spare me.  The idea of a two-party political system is pure disinformation. Speaking of which, if you want proof that the two-party system is really a one-party system cleverly disguised as democracy, look no further than the Labor Party’s Misinformation and Disinformation Bill. The Bill now proposed by Anthony Albanese and his Communications Minister Michelle Rowlands is the same bill first proposed by Scott Morrison and his Communications Minister Paul Fletcher. Fancy that!  In the same way that cockroaches survive nuclear wars, globalist ideas survive federal elections and changes of government.  Speaking of cockroaches, let’s talk about the bureaucrats who actually run our country. You need to understand that most government ministers are not especially smart or capable. Most MPs, if they had to find actual jobs in the actual economy, would be hard pressed to find work as low-level middle managers. Think regional manager overseeing half a dozen 7-11 stores.  Actually, no. More like – and I’m stretching here – deputy assistant to the assistant night manager of a solitary, underperforming store in a rural town no-one ever heard of. Yes, that’s Andrew Giles or Claire O’Neil had they not been voted into parliament.  So the people sitting in ministerial office big chair are not the brightest Australians you’ve ever met. They are good at talking, schmoozing and politicking. But that’s about it. The real smarts are to be found in the bureaucracy – the nameless, faceless, public servants who are more likely to be serving the globalist elites than the public who pay their wages.  These bureaucrats attend globalist functions where they enthuse over how idyllic the world could be if only the public could be massaged and moulded into the right kind of public. They orchestrate the citizen management program. They then return to Canberra where they convince the deputy assistant to the assistant night manager of a poorly performing 7-11 – who by some fluke of the electoral system somehow end up as Australia’s Communicators Minister – that it is vitally important to censor the free thinking of free citizens online.  The Communications Minister – more suited to making a slurpee than running a national portfolio let alone protecting civil rights – is quickly convinced by the bureaucrat’s fine sounding words and high-minded ideals. The next thing you know, your Facebook posts are being supressed and your Twitter account has been suspended.  Labor and the Liberals exist only to echo one another. Liberal or Labor, Scomo or Albo – it’s all the same. Only the colour of the corflute changes. I can give you example after example to prove the point. Consider Australia’s self-sabotaging commitment to Net Zero emissions. Right now Net Zero is considered a Chris Bowen fetish. But we should never forget that it was former Liberal Prime Minister John Howard who signed Australia up to the Kyoto Protocol that required us to reduce greenhouse gas emissions as if human activity was the main cause of climate.  Today the Labor Party insists on wind turbines and solar panels while the Liberal Party insists on nuclear power plants. But both parties are in lock-step agreement that there is a climate catastrophe that can only be avoided by completely overhauling our energy policy.  Or what about the Indigenous Voice to Parliament? Albanese wanted it in the Australian Constitution; Peter Dutton wanted it legislated. Our major parties only disagreed on the instrument, not on the desirability to divide Australians by race.  Should we talk about Digital ID? It’s a Liberal Party idea that never quite got up. Labor succeeded where the Liberals failed and all Australians lost.  Think about the commitment to globalist entities who continually undermine our national sovereignty. Whether it’s the World Health Organisation, the United Nations or the World Economic Forum – both major parties are beholden to them. The WEF serves unelected corporate elites by giving them access to politicians worldwide, and subsequently, access to public money. Australia’s politicians and bureaucrats should be nowhere near any of it.  Both major parties love big government and big bureaucracy. No matter what they say before taking office, neither party ever reduces the size of government or repeals legislation. Both parties have put the nation into serious debt. And both parties have raised taxes and levies.  There was perhaps no more appalling proof that we actually live in a the one party state than during Covid when both Liberal and Labor politicians cheered the trashing of civil rights. Both parties – to their eternal shame – supported mandatory vaccinations, lockdowns, mask wearing and school closures.  Democracy demands a choice, not just the illusion or appearance of choice. At present we don’t have that. Slowly, Australians are starting to realise it, but we must all play a part and wake more people up.  The UAP exists outside of the two-party system because a real democracy demands that voters are given a real choice – a choice about where we are heading as a nation and about the kind of country we want to be.  When you support the United Australia Party you are doing more than supporting sensible policy positions, you are giving Australia the chance to exercise real choice and in so doing, strengthening democracy.  I am ever so grateful for your continued support.
https://stratus.campaign-image.com/images/443466000122206354_zc_v1_1689655168783_ralph_babet_signature.png

The Moderation of a Debate Signals Future Censorship

Posted by whatyareckon on October 3, 2024
Posted in: News. Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Leave a comment

What Kent Brandenburg writes in the following article is sadly the truth of the reality for all of us living in the West.

The moderation of a debate signals a future for censorshipDownload