What is wrong wth not only society in general but specifically the University Campus where a professor can condemn by gone days of slavery by white Americans but defend slavery when it comes to Islam? Well, Muslim convert Professor Jonathan A. C. Brown of Georgtown Uni can!
- ‘During his talk at Georgetown University, Jonathan A.C. Brown condemned slavery when it took place historically in America and other Western countries, but praised the practise of slavery as it happened in Muslim societies, explained that Muslim slaves lived “a pretty good life”, and claimed that it is “not immoral for one human to own another human.” Regarding the vexed matter of whether it is right or wrong to have sex with one of your slaves, Brown, who is director of the Alwaleed bin Talal Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding, said that “consent isn’t necessary for lawful sex”.
- No mob of anti-sharia people has gone to Georgetown, torn up telephone poles, set fire to things or smashed up the campus, as mobs did at Berkeley.
- Milo Yiannopoulos has never argued that the Western system of slavery was benevolent and worthwhile, and that slaves in America had “a pretty good life”. He
‘When conservative activist and writer Milo Yiannopoulos was due to speak at the University of California, Berkeley on February 1, a mob of 150 people proceeded to riot, smash and set fire to the campus, causing more than $100,000 of damage. (Image source: RT video screenshot)’
has never argued against consent being an important principle in sexual relations. If he had, then the riots at Berkeley would doubtless have been far worse than they were and even more media companies and professors would have tried to argue that Yiannopoulos had “brought the violence upon himself” or even organized it himself.’ https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9943/free-speech-yiannopoulos
All one can really say of all this is “UNBELIEVABLE”! THE HYPOCRISY AND TWO FACEDNESS OF PROFESSOR BROWN AND THE UNIVERSITY CAMPUS.
and resource allocation. A feminist government ensures that a gender equality perspective is brought into policy-making on a broad front, both nationally and internationally. Women and men must have the same power to shape society and their own lives. This is a human right and a matter of democracy and justice. Gender equality is also part of the solution to society’s challenges and a matter of course in a modern welfare state – for justice and economic development. The Government’s most important tool for implementing feminist policy is gender mainstreaming, of which gender-responsive budgeting is an important component.’ 
which make the Hijab compulsory — despite Stockholm’s promise to promote “a gender equality perspective” internationally, and to adopt a “
missionary kid (MK) for several years while in Bangladesh. Not only was he found to be a paedophile while in Bangladesh but an adulterer as well.
a liberal anti-Christian group that self-proclaims to represent “compassion and empathy,” is offering hugs and kisses in exchange for donations that fund two pro-abortion lawsuits filed against the State of Missouri, the 
Left Loonies overlook the ban of Israeli passport holders from these Islamic countries. Why?
but have lived well over half my life overseas. Nevertheless, I often think back with fond memories to those days spent as a boy in rural Iowa. When a teenager I had a Triumph Cub 
which took me far and wide down many a back road. There are some stories to be told concerning those rides but they will have to wait unti another time. The main purpose of this present post is to tell you a “little” about the community of Dahlonega, not far from where I grew up. Here is a small part of Dahlonega’s story. I trust you enjoy it.
the the unincorporated community of Dahlonega. Built in 1921, the 1,100-square-feet building served area students through the 1958-59 school year. Although it’s been vacant since that time, it served as the township polling place through 1986, and time and money has recently been invested to revitalize the building with a new roof, new paint, and improved interior.
question but that the president, in his sole discretion, can choose to admit or exclude any
Islamic Cooperation? Is there a true count (if any) of how many muslims are migrating into those OIC nations?
