If either of the major political parties win the election this May Australia will continue to move further Marxist left!
Australian Federal Government
If something different doesn’t occur at the May Federal election this nation, Australia, is in serious trouble. The two major parties, LNP and Labor, are out of touch with reality. What Australia needs is a party that stands for all Australians. That party, in my opinion, is the United Australia Party. Here is a link to Part One of UAP’s Craig Kelly being interviewed by Professor David Flint. https://www.unitedaustraliaparty.org.au/video/part-1-craig-kelly-mp-interview-australia-calling/#fvp_102,2m45s
‘Will our courts defend the people against medical tyranny?
That’s the hope of retired judge Stuart Lindsay who joins us for episode 10 of the Conservative One: Pandemic Unmasked podcast.
Stuart Lindsay is a retired Federal Circuit Court judge who presided in more than two thousand Family Law Act cases and in many cases in other parts of the Commonwealth jurisdiction.
He was admitted to the bar in 1981 and worked as a solicitor & barrister until being appointed to the Federal Circuit Court in 2004. He retired in 2014 to continue working as a barrister.’ The podcast may be hear @ https://www.georgechristensen.com.au/podcast/lindsay
‘Australia has a renowned and glorious history in immunological science. In fact, I would go as far as to say that if there is an immunological “city on the hill,” it was Australia.
From the storied Walter and Eliza Hall Institute to the Garvan Institute, to prominent Australian Nobel laureates and founding fathers of immunological science (Sir Macfarlane Burnett, Jacques F.P. Miller and Peter Doherty) to contemporary leaders of immunological science (Jonathan Sprent, Christopher Goodnow and Jason Cyster), Australia has been known as the mecca of immunological thinking and science.
So it is simply shocking to see the nation’s government behaving in such an immunologically ill-informed and authoritarian fashion when it comes to its handling of COVID immunity.
The recent deportation of the world’s top-ranked men’s tennis player, Novak Djokovic, from Australia for refusing a mandated vaccine he did not need and could be harmed by, was shocking to me as an immunologist.
Why? Because I know with definitive certainty Djokovic, who recovered from a COVID infection in December 2021, has quite powerful and robust acquired natural immunity to COVID — equivalent, if not more powerful than that attained from full vaccination and boosters.
In other words, the recently COVID-recovered Djokovic posed almost zero risk to himself or anyone in Australia — yet that liberal western democratic government condescended itself into terrible authoritarianism, irrationally and unethically excluding an international champion from one of tennis’ most prestigious events — the Australian Open. How deplorable!
Any immunologist worth his or her salt knows the most unusual aspect of the global COVID vaccine campaign is that the vaccine is being deployed on a mass scale in the midst of a pandemic outbreak, when many are already infected — either recently or at the time of their vaccination.
This indiscriminate public health campaign is dangerous. Not only does it expose many millions of already immune people to the risk of unnecessary medical treatment, but it also poses a serious risk of harm to recently infected or convalescent persons, in whom viral antigenic epitopes still persist, and in whom an unnecessary vaccination could induce a hyper-inflammatory response.
That prominent immunologists — especially the contemporary Australian pioneers in immunology — are either unaware of or silent about how our scientific discipline of immunology is being corrupted and abused by governments around the world so they can impose draconian mass mandates upon millions of persons with acquired “natural” or “hybrid” immunity has been frankly disappointing and shocking to me.
But I suppose all heroes have clay feet — and even careful thinkers can think carelessly sometimes.
Still, it is shocking to hear crickets from the giants of the world of immunology — especially those from Australia, which truly is the birthplace of modern immunology — when it comes to the topic of mandated vaccination of the already well immune and recently infected.
What a terrible sign of our time — when neither science and reason nor ethics and the western defense of individuality matter any longer in the face of irrational fear and government edicts.
Djokovic’s irrational and unethical deportation from Australia is a stain on the reputation of the many prominent Aussie immunologists and storied immunological institutes in that country.
The government override of the principles of immunological science and medical ethics, in order to achieve population-level compliance, while the western heroes of immunological science stay silent spells disaster for the integrity of western civilizations and self-governing democracies.
Shame on the Australian government for irrationally deporting Djokovic. And woe onto those prominent expert Australians and Aussie institutions, who actually know better but have chosen not to speak up for the sake of political expediency or personal comfort.
It is, indeed, easier not to rock the boat and not to speak up, than it is to stand in the way of unethical authoritarian conduct by a powerful democratic government gone astray.
But that slope is a slippery one and we are all sliding down it. All it takes for a great evil to take hold is for a few good men to remain silent and not speak their truth.’https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/australian-open-novak-djokovic-immune-covid/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=1674b2e3-2312-478b-af9f-9f656b7c3407
New South Wales along with the other states in Australia are allowing the China virus to control every facet of life. Now, with the schools going back for a new year the hysteria is occurring all over again!
‘Being together in a classroom is the most effective way for students to learn and grow.
Since COVID-19 remains a relatively mild illness for most children, the NSW Government is committed to return to school safely in 2022 and will support this through the following measures:
Watch for symptoms
If your child is unwell – even with mild symptoms – you must keep them home and get them tested.
If children have any symptoms, they should take a PCR (nose and throat swab) test or rapid antigen test (RAT).
If symptoms continue your child should stay home and take another RAT or PCR test in 24 hours.
If that test is also negative, your child may return to school if another diagnosis is confirmed such as hay fever.
- Read more about when to get tested for COVID-19 and the changes to testing.
- Understand more about RATs and at-home testing.
Vaccinations
All staff on school sites must be fully vaccinated.
The NSW Government strongly encourage all students and their families to get vaccinated.
Children aged 5 to 11 can now get vaccinated. Parents are encouraged to book their child in for a vaccination at the first available opportunity.
Once eligible, all adults are encouraged to get booster shots.
- Book a vaccination or booster using the Australian Government’s Vaccine Clinic Finderlaunch.
- Read more about vaccination for children aged 5 to 11.
- Understand the vaccination rules for workers.
Testing
Before the start of term 1
All staff and students are asked to take a rapid antigen test and get a negative result before attending school.
Rapid antigen tests will be provided to all staff and students through their schools. Schools will inform parents on how these kits can be collected.
At the commencement of term 1
For the first 4 weeks, students and staff should take a rapid antigen test twice a week before attending school. Test kits will continue to be supplied by schools.
Students who are household close contacts must isolate at home for 7 days.
COVID-19 positive cases
If your child has no symptoms and there is a positive case in their class, year or other grouping, they can continue to attend school in line with NSW Health advice.
Staff and students who get a positive rapid antigen test must register it through Service NSW as soon as possible.
Staff and students who receive a positive rapid antigen test must tell their school as soon as possible and follow NSW Health advice.
Schools will regularly communicate to parents about the presence and impact of COVID-19 in their community.
Parents should expect to be provided with any impacted year groups or cohorts.
- Read more about self-isolation rules and NSW Health advice on when to isolatelaunch.
- Discover how to manage COVID-19 and access support.
Ventilation
Fresh air is the most effective form of ventilation to minimise the risk of transmission.
All learning spaces in public schools have been checked to ensure appropriate levels of ventilation and air purifiers have been provided where needed.
Using outdoor spaces will continue to be encouraged.
- Read the COVID-19 guidance on ventilation.
Masks
All primary and secondary school staff will be required to wear masks indoors.
No vented masks or cloth masks should be worn. If required, surgical masks will be available at schools.
Secondary school students are required to wear masks.
Primary school students are strongly recommended to wear well-fitted masks indoors.
- Read the face mask rules in NSW.
Activities
COVID-19 will be considered in all risk assessments. Guidance will be provided to schools on applying appropriate safeguards across a range of activities.
Parents will be made aware of the risk of exposure and will need to give their permission for participation in extra-curricular, out of school hours or off-site activities.
Student cohorting
Schools will continue to use cohort arrangements and consider staggered drop-off and pick ups, break times, playground and canteen access.
Depending on the school, cohort size and timetables, cohorts may be based on classes, years or stages.
Visitors
Visitors on school sites should be kept to a minimum to support essential school activities or student needs.
Visitors will be required to wear a mask indoors and will be encouraged to wear a mask outdoors if they cannot maintain physical distancing.
Schools are advised to allow a maximum of 2 parents or carers per student on to school grounds for kindergarten orientation or year 7 transition.
Keeping schools open
Parents are asked to respect the rules at their child’s school to help keep the community safe.
Schools will do everything they can to maintain continuity of face-to-face learning including the use of more casual staff.
Schools will need to make localised staffing decisions to ensure appropriate supervision can be maintained.
Schools will not be able to guarantee particular staff for any cohort and students may not have their regular teacher for a class.
Learning from home
The NSW Government will continue to monitor the situation and where face-to-face learning is not possible, learning from home options will be supported for short periods.
School or childcare centre closure
Some schools may need to close occasionally to deal with COVID-19 outbreaks, deep cleaning or other emergencies like floods or fires.
The NSW School Updates app sends parents and carers notifications about school closures.’https://www.nsw.gov.au/covid-19/stay-safe/advice-for-parents-students?utm_source=servicensw_consumer&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2022-01-21_sfmc_647_con_covid_newsletter&utm_content=01_covid-smart_measures&utm_term=see_all_covid-smart_measures_button#toc-term-1-2022-covid-smart-measures-for-schools
Will the children be better off for all this?
George Christensen is an Australian Federal politician with the Liberal Nationals. He is outspoken on issues his Party would rather have him be silent on. His speaking out certainly does not make him a favorite within his party. Nevertheless, he continues to speak the truth and one truth he is pushing is that of the China virus and the vaccines. He writes ‘Vaccine mandates have questionable legitimacy and fly in the face of half a century of sound vaccination policy. The current ‘vaccines’ on the market particularly the mRNA ones are experimental therapies with no long term safety data.
That’s not the view of a so-called “anti-vaxxer”, but Australian vaccine developer Professor Nikolai Petrovsky who outlines his concerns in episode 8 of Conservative One: Pandemic Unmasked.
Prof. Petrovsky is the Director of Endocrinology at Flinders Medical Centre with a conjoint position as Professor of Medicine at Flinders University. He is also vice-president and secretary-general of the International Immunomics Society.
Active in diabetes, endocrinology and vaccine research, he is the founder of Vaxine, a company funded by the US National Institutes of Health to develop novel vaccine technologies. In 2009 Vaxine won the AMP Innovation Award at the Telstra Business Awards and Australia’s Coolest Company Award from Australian Anthill Magazine.
Prof. Petrovsky has developed vaccines against Influenza, Hepatitis B, Sting Allergy, Malaria, Japanese Encephalitis, Rabies and HIV, has authored over 90 papers and chapters and is a regular invited speaker at international vaccine conferences.’ https://podcasts.apple.com/au/podcast/the-vaccines-are-experimental-therapies-with-prof/id1508102034?i=1000548476821
‘What a mess. Australia has embarrassed itself on the international stage with regard to the handling of the Australian Open.
Defending champion and ATP World Number One Men’s tennis player Novak Djokovic is threatening legal action after his visa was rejected at Melbourne airport.
That visa has now been cancelled by Australian authorities after he was unable to ‘provide appropriate evidence’ for his travel exemption related to vaccination status.
He spent eight hours in detention, despite having already endured a lengthy medical exemption process to allow him to play in the Australian Open without declaring his vaccination status.
“I have no idea what is happening, they are holding my son in captivity for five hours,” said Srdjan Djokovic, Novak’s father, after he was held by Australian Border Force. “This is a fight for the liberal world, this is not just a fight for Novak, but a fight for the whole world.”
Welcome international media re:Djokovic.
Now you see what the people of Australia have had to deal with for 2 years straight.
Mask-Dont mask.Vax-Not that brand tho. PCR-No RAT. Open/close border.
A country full of bumbling politicians who couldnt organise a root in a brothel.— Andrew Bogut (@andrewbogut) January 5, 2022
Novak Djokovic detained in Melbourne 🇦🇺 airport and interrogated for 6 hours like a terrorist, even though he has medical vaccine exemption as requested. Now he’s being denied entry and deported.
Is this the world you want to live in?
Enough is enough!#BoycottAustralianOpen— Dr. Eli David (@DrEliDavid) January 5, 2022
Djokovic awaits deportation in what has to be one of the most ridiculous sagas to play out in the Victorian Covid pandemic.
It is, however, a neat solution to the drama facing Daniel Andrews’ government after his supporters went into a fury online after Djokovic was granted a medical exemption to compete in the Australian Open.
As the exemption was performed by a blind panel of medical professionals, it was impossible to revoke despite the public backlash. Now, Tennis Australia do not have to, as Djokovic is unable to enter the country to compete.
His lawyers intend to challenge the decision, especially as his travel into Victoria was prearranged.
“Today I’m heading Down Under with an exemption permission. Let’s go 2022!” said Djokovic, on January 4, 2022.
Prime Minister Scott Morrison was less enthusiastic about the World Number One arriving in Australia, saying in a press conference, “We await his [Djokovic’s] presentation and what evidence he provides to support that. If that evidence is insufficient then he won’t be treated any differently to anyone else and he’ll be on the next plane home.”
Mr Djokovic’s visa has been cancelled. Rules are rules, especially when it comes to our borders. No one is above these rules. Our strong border policies have been critical to Australia having one of the lowest death rates in the world from COVID, we are continuing to be vigilant.— Scott Morrison (@ScottMorrisonMP) January 5, 2022
But the Prime Minister has been treating celebrities and politicians differently to ordinary Australians for the duration of the pandemic, frequently granting travel exemptions to reality TV stars, big business representatives, and travelling political figures. Some were able to skip mandatory hotel quarantine and isolate at home. The difference with Djokovic is that he has refused to disclose his vaccination status.
In addition, other players competing in the Australian Open are already in the country with the same exemption, adding weight to the argument that Djokovic’s treatment may be political.
“Australian Border Force did not request Victorian government support a visa. Australian Border Force reached [out] to the Victorian government to validate their public statements about their support for his entry, and whether Victoria had further information related to his medical exemption documentation,” said a spokeswoman for the Australian Border Force.
It was later confirmed that the Victorian government did not support the visa claim.
If this was to be the government’s position, why did they allow Djokovic to travel to Australia in the expectation of competing and submit himself to the medical review?
This is how we repay Novak Djokovic‘s generosity to Australia in our darkest days.
Shameful. pic.twitter.com/nHQOV1d6dB— Avi Yemini (@OzraeliAvi) January 5, 2022
The ATP Grand Slam is a privilege to host and a big deal when it comes to crucial dollars to salvage the post-Covid economy. When the Daniel Andrews government and Tennis Australia introduced a blanket vaccination rule on tennis players, they probably did not expect to ban the Men’s World Number One ATP star Novak Djokovic – who is also the tournament’s defending champion.
Djokovic’s exemption was arguably more of a political problem than a medical one, with the Victorian government coming under pressure to punish the tennis star for escaping the state’s harsh medical mandates that have caused mass protests for the last half of 2021.’https://www.rebelnews.com/what_a_djoke_world_number_one_tennis_player_denied_entry_to_australia?utm_campaign=rb_01_06_2022&utm_medium=email&utm_source=therebel
‘Fifty-one million doses of Novavax lined up to be purchased by the Australian government have been in a holding pattern since June.
Although the protein-based, non-mRNA COVID-19, “traditional” vaccine, looks likely to be the best in a series of questionable options, governments have been less than enthusiastic about expediting Novavax or its equivalents to the battlefield.
This strongly suggests that those great defenders of liberty elected to represent us, appear more concerned with protecting Big Pharma’s investments than our best interests.
If the “vaccine” is not Pfizer, Moderna, or Astra-Zeneca, the government doesn’t appear to want to know about it.
Their apathetic response to Novavax raises questions about why global leaders have been so lax in supporting what could likely be the unsung heroes of the CCP-19 pandemic.
When the facts about protein-based vaccines are weighed, it is nowhere near good enough to hear – as we did from New South Wales Health Minister, “Boomer” Brad Hazzard: “Well, we have more than enough “vaccines,” why bother? You get what you get, you don’t get upset!!!” (paraphrased)
With the urgency of the emergency constantly being forced down our throats by legacy media, you are right to wonder why governments haven’t done more to deliver the best and safest possible options in a sea of questionable ones?
We know that Novavax is a potential star.
We also know that governments are aware of its efficacy.
For instance, the non-mRNA option is now slated by the Australian government to be used as a “booster”.
The NY Times has explained:
“Novavax has proven to be highly effective in clinical trials in the United States and abroad. In a trial involving about 30,000 people, the vaccine demonstrated an overall efficacy of 90.4 percent, according to results published Wednesday in the New England Journal of Medicine. Novavax’s efficacy against moderate or severe disease was 100 percent.”
Novavax has also just won emergency approval from the World Health Organisation to “increase the vaccine supply for low- and middle-income countries.”
Reasons for authorities budging and finally approving Novavax included ‘low numbers of vaccines available’ in majority world countries, Novavax can be transported without refrigeration and new concerns over the impact of the (so far relatively mild) Omicron variant.
Novavax is not the only “traditional” style vaccine facing significant obstacles from a torpid bureaucracy clearly infected with the dissonance of “we’re in an emergency, but there’s no urgency to clear these vaccines for use!”
It would seem that the vaccines preferred by people practicing informed consent are not the ones preferred by powerful people bulldozing informed consent.
For example: Director of Endocrinology at Flinders medical centre with a conjoint position as professor of medicine at Flinders University, Professor Nikolai Petrovsky, developer of the Australian made COVAX-19, has been pushing for a piece of the government’s taxpayer-funded support since its inception.
Petrovsky wrote on Twitter:
“Crazy, right? Our Covid-19 vaccine is effective against delta in Phase 3 trials. Now approved in Iran. Fabulous safety. But no support from our govt. Warp-Speed gave US vaccine developers a billion dollars each. We are relying on crowd funding.”
COVAX-19 was the centre of controversy after Petrovsky inoculated himself with the vaccine in 2020.
In October this year, The Spectator recounted how Petrovsky was then fired ‘by his university and threatened with arrest if he sets foot in his office’, because Petrovsky refused the current “vaccines” okayed by the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA).’
The Speccy added:
“The TGA [has] recognised the Chinese Sinopharm and the Indian Covaxin vaccines as effective. Yet the TGA refuses to look at Petrovsky’s Australian vaccine until he pays a fee of $350,000.”
Even more noteworthy:
“Before injecting the vaccine into a single person, Petrovsky injected it into himself to demonstrate his confidence in the product. Compare that with the CEO of Pfizer, Albert Bourla who began dosing people with its experimental vaccine on April 23, 2020. Bourla didn’t get his first shot of the Pfizer vaccine until 21 March 2021…Petrovsky was sacked even though he may well have better immunity than those who are sacking him.”
The article’s author, Rebecca Weisser, suggested two potential reasons for the Canberra cold-shoulder.
First, Petrovsky was one of the original Westerners to state that scientific evidence links CCP-19 to the CCP via a ‘lab leak’ in Wuhan. This was a finding that was bound to make powerful and influential people uneasy.
The second is probably related to the first, Petrovsky won’t get any hearing in Canberra unless it is through referral and the ‘doors are opened by lobbyists.’
This is despite mRNA inventor Dr. Robert Malone backing Petrovsky, who wrote on Twitter in response to The Spectator article: “I consider Nikolai Petrovsky a good personal friend. The corruption is deep and wide.”https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?creatorScreenName=rod_lampard&dnt=true&embedId=twitter-widget-0&features=eyJ0ZndfZXhwZXJpbWVudHNfY29va2llX2V4cGlyYXRpb24iOnsiYnVja2V0IjoxMjA5NjAwLCJ2ZXJzaW9uIjpudWxsfSwidGZ3X2hvcml6b25fdHdlZXRfZW1iZWRfOTU1NSI6eyJidWNrZXQiOiJodGUiLCJ2ZXJzaW9uIjpudWxsfSwidGZ3X3NwYWNlX2NhcmQiOnsiYnVja2V0Ijoib2ZmIiwidmVyc2lvbiI6bnVsbH19&frame=false&hideCard=false&hideThread=false&id=1459254507435610117&lang=en&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fcaldronpool.com%2Faustralian-government-refuses-to-fund-australian-covid-19-vaccine-you-get-what-you-get-you-dont-get-upset%2F&sessionId=bccce1ba51e9eada48df0b342cbd7da68ed0faf0&siteScreenName=caldronpool&theme=light&widgetsVersion=9fd78d5%3A1638479056965&width=550px
I consider Nikolai Petrovsky a good personal friend.
The corruption is deep and wide.https://t.co/xLwu7uJAgZ— Robert W Malone, MD (@RWMaloneMD) November 12, 2021
In a December 20 update, the TGA said it has:
“Granted provisional determination to Vaxine Pty Ltd. The granting of a provisional determination means that the TGA has made a decision that Vaxine Pty Ltd is now eligible to apply for provisional registration for the vaccine in the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods (ARTG).”
However, The Therapeutic Goods Administration noted:
“Provisional determination is the first step in the provisional registration process. Importantly, registration and supply in Australia will only commence should the vaccine be approved as safe and effective by the TGA.”
The TGA did not stipulate reasons for the apparent backflip.
The Australian immunologist’s GoFundMe campaign currently has over 8,300 donors, with over 11,561 signatures on a related Government petition, asking the Australian government, “to act in the interests of Australians and provide the necessary financial support and advance purchase commitments to Vaxine Pty Ltd to ensure the availability of COVAX-19 in Australia.”
The fundraiser setup by Sharen Petrovsky, Vaxine Pty Ltd’s business manager, states:
“You might think that the government would be throwing their full support behind this safe and effective locally-developed vaccine. Unfortunately, nothing could be further from the truth.”
The GoFundMe page blurb continued:
“Apart from a token grant provided more than a year after the pandemic started, the govt has failed to support our vaccine while allocating potentially billions of dollars in support to our wealthy competitor, CSL, who produce the AstraZeneca vaccine that has been linked to deaths from central venous thrombosis.”
A well-versed, anonymous frontline source, told Caldron Pool:
“This is a real Australian Story… I have to say from working on the front line, in my opinion many of these facts [adverse effects] are real, hence the medical staff are waiting for a safe vaccine such as Professor Nikolais.”
They added:
“No one [pushing the mRNA “vaccines”] are prepared to pay out on income protection, especially to many Doctors, Nurses, allied health workers, and carers, who are immobilized and health impaired from adverse reactions due to being forced to have unsafe vaccines.”
Professor Petrovsky’s petition ends on the 22 December, with the GoFundMe campaign already reaching $849,272 of its 1-million-dollar goal.’https://caldronpool.com/australian-government-refuses-to-fund-australian-covid-19-vaccine-you-get-what-you-get-you-dont-get-upset/
‘Many of us have become aware over the course of the pandemic (if we didn’t know it beforehand), that the mainstream media peddles extreme bias and lies, and tries to palm off their fakery as fact. They take us all for chumps, but Australians are far too smart than to fall for that rubbish.
This week, I was once again smeared and verballed by the fake news media who insinuated I had equated Australian COVID-19 quarantine camps with Auschwitz when I was interviewed by Alex Jones on InfoWars.
Let me be clear: At no point did I equate quarantine camps with Auschwitz or, for that matter, anything to do with Nazi Germany. Nor did I “laugh” at Jones’ suggestion that the fencing around the quarantine camp “looks like something out of Auschwitz or something”. I groaned in dismay at the images of the ridiculous security fences running along these quarantine camps (below) which I was viewing at the time.
Media also claimed I had encouraged protests against Australia at overseas embassies which, again, was false. One Labor politician even claimed I had committed treason. In reality I was asked by Jones what I thought of Americans who had been protesting for the rights of Australians in front of Australian embassies.
The other attack point was that I even went on Infowars and spoke to Alex Jones at all. To that charge, let me quote conservative activist Candace Owens (from a post to her Facebook page this week): “Everybody knows that you’re not allowed to talk to Alex Jones… which is exactly why I decided to speak with Alex Jones… I don’t follow rules established by authoritarian cowards.” Amen to that.
After all the fake news media and political hyperventilation about this matter over the course of the past week, I want to put forward a simple point: This is all about trying to turn people’s focus away from real problems and towards imaginary ones. Making me a villain is a good diversion from the horrible reality that vaccine mandates are causing Australians to lose their jobs, and that many Australian families are suffering as a result.
And there’s also the question of what’s worse: that a Member of Parliament sat for an interview with someone who provocatively overreached in comparing the fences of an Australian quarantine camp with that of Auschwitz, or the fact we actually have quarantine camps in our country where people who have simply had contact with someone with COVID-19, can be locked up for two weeks, against their will, with no legal recourse or appeal?
Because I know that Australians are way smarter than the chumps the fake news media takes us for, I’ll let you be the judge of that. Perhaps we should ask quarantine camp detainee Hayley Hodgson:’https://nationfirst.substack.com/p/theyre-pushing-fake-news-on-you
Now, I am not for this young lady lying to the authorities but neither do I agree with the treatment she received. Australian’s will no longer be a free society if something doesn’t change at next years election.
whatyareckon 