Rewriting History! Source: Thomas Jefferson’s Home Has Been Taken Over by Leftist America-Haters
Archives
All posts for the month July, 2022
Job 12:25 They grope in the dark without light, and he maketh them to stagger like a drunken man.
Renewable energy rent-seekers and politicos have been gripped by a sense of palpable panic: the mob won’t tolerate blackouts for very long, and repeated power rationing will have the same incendiary effect on public sentiment.
The destruction of reliable and affordable power supplies caused by chaotically intermittent and heavily subsidised wind and solar was perfectly predictable and it was perfectly avoidable.
Think of it as a malignant cancer that spreads and ultimately devours its host. Wrecking the profitability of conventional generators is integral to the model of punitive mandates and ludicrously generous subsidies, which advance the unreliables at the expense of everything else that works. A power pricing and supply calamity soon follows.
The cancer has already consumed California and is well on its way to devouring Texas, now it appears that great swathes of the US will soon experience the same kind of Dark Ages chaos that their…
View original post 793 more words
The globalists have landed.
By Larry Bell ~
Following up on Joe’s “as long as it takes,” response to a press reporter’s question at the June 28 NATO summit in Madrid regarding how long American drivers should be prepared to endure premium gasoline penalties, his top economic advisor highlighted the key reason this pump pain patience is so important.
When asked for comments later that day by CNN‘s Victor Blackwell “What do you say to the families that say ‘we can’t afford to pay $4.85 a gallon for months, if not years,’ this is not sustainable,” White House National Economic Council director Brian Deese affirmed:
“What you heard from the president today was a clear articulation of the stakes.”
Deese then clarified that “This is about the future of the liberal world order, and we have to stand firm.”
Brian Deese has a substantial White House history.
Prior to joining BlackRock as their…
View original post 749 more words
Proverbs 17:22 A merry heart doeth good like a medicine
‘Record Job Growth’
That’s Fast!
Pretty Serious
Confused Screaming
Bull
Brittney Griner
Thomas Sowell
Biden on Gun Control
Back to the Future
That’ll Teach Them
Get Ready
Clarence Thomas, Choir Director
It’s True
What a Dummy
Totally Believable
Gas Prices
No Apology Necessary
Cartoons
Read more excellent articles at The Patriot Post
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
- ‘Using CDC data, no significant differences were found in COVID-19 case growth between states with or without mask mandates, during periods of low or high transmission
- The widespread use of masks did not reduce COVID-19 transmission in Europe, and a moderate positive correlation was found between mask usage and deaths in Western Europe
- An update to a CDC study on school mask mandates, using nearly six times more data, found no significant relationship between mask mandates in U.S. schools and COVID-19 case rates
- In Kansas, counties with a mask mandate had significantly higher COVID-19 case fatality rates than counties without a mask mandate
- One way masks cause harm may be the “Foegen effect” — the idea that deep re-inhalation of droplets and virions caught on facemasks might make COVID-19 infection more likely or more severe’https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2022/07/12/do-masks-make-you-sick.aspx?ui=5a05e186fc85b30f55c28204f849862c04192d97b134e516f76782809875c086&sd=20211124&cid_source=dnl&cid_medium=email&cid_content=art1ReadMore&cid=20220712_HL2&mid=DM1204396&rid=1545629612
‘“DEFINE LIFE”, one particularly obtuse abortion apologist asked on my page.
The 1973 SCOTUS, which set in play nearly 50 years of industrialised abortion taking the lives of over 63 million preborn babies, deliberated on the same question.
They deliberately ignored that Hippocrates (c. 460 – c. 370 BC), the “Father of Medicine”, knew the answer way back then, and the ethical oath all doctors took for millennia which said, “𝘐 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘨𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘢 𝘸𝘰𝘮𝘢𝘯 𝘢 𝘱𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘢𝘳𝘺 𝘵𝘰 𝘤𝘢𝘶𝘴𝘦 𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯.”
They also ignored the fact that, decades before Roe v. Wade, the General Assembly of the World Medical Association at Geneva in 1948 updated the Physician’s Oath to say, “𝘐 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘮𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘶𝘵𝘮𝘰𝘴𝘵 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘤𝘵 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘩𝘶𝘮𝘢𝘯 𝘭𝘪𝘧𝘦 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘤𝘦𝘱𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯, 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘯 𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘵, 𝘐 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘶𝘴𝘦 𝘮𝘺 𝘮𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭 𝘬𝘯𝘰𝘸𝘭𝘦𝘥𝘨𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘳𝘺 𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘭𝘢𝘸𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘩𝘶𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘺.”
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights occurred 3 months later, making that document contextualised by the prior definition of human life.
Instead, the 1973 Supreme Court’s Roe v. Wade decision listed experts who might be considered most qualified to determine when life begins.
In 2019, 3,883 Americans were given the same choices of biologists, religious leaders, voters, philosophers, or Supreme Court justices as the group of experts most qualified to determine when life begins. 62% of the sample identified as “pro-choice”.
80% of Americans selected biologists as the group to answer the question of when life begins. 92% of those said they selected biologists because they are experts in science and they are objective scientists.
The researcher then took survey questions to 5,577 biologists from over a thousand academic institutions in 86 countries. According to the study, the sample of biologists was predominantly:
• non-religious (63%),
• liberal (89%),
• Democrats (92%), and
• pro-choice supporters (85%).
The study found 96% of biologists affirmed the view that a human’s life begins at fertilisation.
Expanding the “qualified experts” to all voters, a 2018 Marist poll found that, regardless of political affiliation, more Americans view life as beginning at conception than at any other point during pregnancy. Of those surveyed:
• 47% said life begins at conception, while
• 15% said during the first trimester,
• 10% said during the second trimester
• 14% said at viability outside the womb, and
• 10% said life begins at birth.
Defining life is hardest for willfully ignorant people who prefer a less scientific answer to better suit their subjective, political agenda – just like the intellectually dishonest, 1973 SCOTUS.’ An Email from https://goodsauce.news/author/dave-pellowe/
This winter our first quarter electricity bill was twice what it was one year ago. These climate scammers are either nuts or just liars!
Renewable energy rent seekers keep telling us that our power bills will inevitably fall because wind and solar power are ‘free’ and getting cheaper all the time.
In the lead up to the Federal election in May, Labor’s Anthony Albanese promised that all Australian households would see a $275 cut to their power bills, as soon as he and his wind and solar obsessed Labor took the reins and put Australia’s ‘inevitable’ wind and solar transition, back on track.
Instead, households and businesses have just been whacked with an annual minimum increase in their power bills of between 18-20% on top of double-digit increases last year and the year before that, and the year before that, with much worse to come.
Australian households and businesses are now suffering power prices amongst the highest in the world; 20 years ago they enjoyed the cheapest prices on the planet. But, chaotically intermittent…
View original post 1,255 more words
Do all that one can lawfully do to stop this madness.
Why Wind Farms are Exposed to Litigation- Lesson 5
Wind Farm Living has collated a series “Educating the Lawyers” and suggest this information may be freely used as needed, e.g. in a letter box drop.
~ DeFrock
Updated 20th June 2022
By WFL
whatyareckon 