This video is based on a podcast from the Institute for Creation Research. A Bible believing Christian would have to have a wild imagination to get millions of years out of Genesis Chapters One and Two. Remember, when interpreting Scripture ‘When plain sense makes good sense seek no other sense lest it result in nonsense’.
Proverbs 15:13 A merry heart maketh a cheerful countenance and 17:22 A merry heart doeth good like a medicine
This word ‘merry’ in Proverbs 15:13 and 17: 22 is also translated joyful, rejoice/d, and glad in other passages of Scripture. The Scriptures therefore do promote a joyful, merry heart and life. However, that doesn’t mean that a born again believer should be frivolous, crude, or off colour in what they listen to or in their own speech.
The letter to the church at Ephesus tells us what type of talk should proceed out of a believers mouth. In Ephesians 4: 29 we read Let no corrupt communication proceed out of your mouth, but that which is good to the use of edifying, that it may minister grace unto the hearers. Then in Ephesians 5:3 But fornication, and all uncleanness, or covetousness, let it not be once named among you, as becometh saints; 4 Neither filthiness, nor foolish talking, nor jesting, which are not convenient: but rather giving of thanks.
Now, I say all of this because another ‘Christian’ celebrity has ‘fallen’. 
Fallen from where I cannot say but he was a celebrity and a Christian to many within Christendom. How and why? For some inexcusable reason the churches and Christians in general seem to seek Christians that have something to satisfy some individual need and this celebrity comedian filled that void and was worthy of their attention and money. As history shows, a celebrity status all too often leads to the works of the flesh.
So where to from here? Here are four things that should be occurring within the churches and Christendom.
There are many more things that could be included but these four should be a good beginning. Now, in closing remember Titus 2:11-15 For the grace of God that bringeth salvation hath appeared to all men, 12 Teaching us that, denying ungodliness and worldly lusts, we should live soberly, righteously, and godly, in this present world; 13 Looking for that blessed hope, and the glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ; 14 Who gave himself for us, that he might redeem us from all iniquity, and purify unto himself a peculiar people, zealous of good works. 15 These things speak, and exhort, and rebuke with all authority. Let no man despise thee.
The climate scam continues to roll in spite of its being a lie and its end goal being a Marxist society. Joining in on this nonsense is Qantas airline.
‘Qantas has become the second airline to commit to zero net emissions by 2050 amid mounting scrutiny of the aviation industry’s carbon footprint.
The airline announced today it will cap its net emissions at 2020 levels, and that it will offset all growth in emissions from domestic and international operations from 2020, including across its Jetstar, QantasLink and Qantas Freight operations.
The pledge exceeds that made by global industry body International Air Transport Association – which has committed to halving emissions from 2005 levels by 2050 – and is in line with the commitment made by British Airways owner International Airlines Group last month.
Qantas chief executive Alan Joyce said the company’s 2050 goal will be achieved through fuel efficiency and the use of carbon offset schemes, rather than by people flying less often.
“Concerns about emissions and climate change are real, but we can’t lose sight of the contribution that air travel makes to society and the economy,” Mr Joyce said in a statement.
“The industry has already come a long way in cutting its footprint and the solution from here isn’t to simply ‘fly less’ but to make it more sustainable.”‘ https://www.tvnz.co.nz/one-news/world/qantas-pledges-zero-net-emissions-2050
Now, how in the world is an airline ever going to reach zero net emissions? Here’s one Marxist way.
‘Put simply, offsetting means buying carbon credits equivalent to your carbon impact. This means you compensate for every tonne of CO2 you emit by ensuring there is one tonne less in the atmosphere. And because one unit of CO2 has the same climate impact wherever it is emitted, the benefit is the same wherever it is reduced or avoided too.
When you offset with us you can choose to support projects that deliver value for local communities as well as the environment. That’s because, along with achieving verified carbon reductions, our Climate+Care projects tackle poverty, promote energy independence and improve people’s health and wellbeing.
Whether it’s protecting rainforests in Sierra Leone, providing efficient cookstoves in Kenya or powering communities with renewable energy in China – all these projects generate positive outcomes, backed up with verified carbon credits.’ https://climatecare.org/carbon-offsetting/
China! China is a totalitarian Marxist nation and the biggest producer of CO2 but in this Marxist scam China will be one of the beneficiaries!
Now, who do you think will really pay for Qantas to never truly achieve this ‘stupid’ unrealistic goal? You are right if you answered the ‘consumer’! So, all I can say is if you plan to fly somewhere you had better do it soon!
When Australians voted in 2017 for a plebiscite to make so-called same-sex marriage legal it was not supposed to be used as a weapon against those who believe marriage is only between one man and one woman! Well, that isn’t the way it is and to tell you the truth I am sick and tired how those Christians who took a stand against this sin are being treated. For instance; ‘Tennis icon Margaret Court has once again divided opinion after calling on Tennis Australia (TA) to show her the same respect as Rod Laver when celebrating the 50th anniversary of her Grand Slam next year.
Court won all four majors in 1970 and finished her career with 24 grand slam singles titles — the most in history — but has sparked controversy in recent years with her outspoken opposition to same-sex marriage.
Gay marriage in Australia was legalised after the plebiscite in 2017 but Court disagrees with it on religious grounds because the Bible says marriage should be between a man and a woman.
The 77-year-old has been hounded for her views with plenty demanding the court honouring her at Melbourne Park have its name changed.’
Supposedly funny, ‘Australian comedian and host of Triple M Sydney’s breakfast program Lawrence Mooney said Court’s attitude towards gay people has no place in society.
“You can’t use ‘her views are popular’ and ‘she has a right to use them’ to be homophobic, you just can’t be,” Mooney told Channel 9’s Today program.
“And if you’re homophobic there’s no space for you in public life.
“Discriminating about sexuality is a crime, so it is legislated against.
“Margaret Court’s opinions on same sex marriage and sexuality are abhorrent and she should be hounded out of the sport until she falls into line.
“It’s absolutely abhorrent.
“Margie, catch up to 2019.
“Margaret Court needs to stop discriminating against people.”’ https://www.news.com.au/sport/sports-life/australia-reacts-to-tennis-legend-margaret-courts-callout-of-tennis-australia/news-story/80029e76a08b4e94425bd1b53d714f7d
If a person who do not believe in sodomite marriage used the language that is used against them in this abhorrent issue they would be in jail for a hate crime. The left seem to think hate is fine when directed at those who disagree with them and especially Christians! The Prime Minister is supposed to be a born-again Christian but he is a milk toast Christian when it comes to taking a stand on this issue and many other issues as well.
I believe, Mooney and those like him have the freedom to say what they believe concerning sodomites ‘marrying’ but those who disagree should have the same freedom to say what they believe and that is marriage is not for sodomites!
Is it possible for a nation or a state within a nation to have a two tired justice system and do true justice? That is, one law for those of one ethnic group and another system for the rest of society! Well, as I said yesterday, the Australian Northern territory is seeking to do just that. Here is a video from Sky News Australia informing us about such a move.
I was born white, I live my life as a white person and I suppose I will die white. Does, that make me a white supremacist? Well, here in the Land Down Under; ‘White Australian nurses must now apologize to minority patients for their white privilege before treatment! I would vigorously refuse to do so, so does that prove I’m a racist or a white supremacist?
Does pride in being white make me a white supremacist and if so, is a black person a black supremacist if he is proud of being black? If not, why not?
Being a white Christian does not reflect badly on those who don’t fit that description, just as my love and preference for my wife does no harm and is no criticism of those who disagree. Just because you think your wife is more beautiful than mine and your children and grandchildren are the brightest and most loveable does not make you a bigot. You are simply wrong, since mine are! (I have the test scores and photos to prove it!)
That is called being “normal.” http://donboys.cstnews.com/what-is-proof-of-being-a-white-supremacist
There are those in Australia who say there is no requirement for white nurses to apologise. They say “The codes do not require nurses or midwives to declare or apologise for white privilege.”
YET, ‘The CEO of the Congress of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Nurses and Midwives, Janine Mohamed, says cultural safety involves people learning about their own unconscious biases and how they affect the health care they deliver.’
NOTE the name ‘Mohamed’ and the word ‘biases’! The entire article for the other (unbiased?) side may be read at https://www.nswnma.asn.au/no-need-to-apologise/
If only people would believe God and His Word for it tells us God that made the world and all things therein, seeing that he is Lord of heaven and earth, dwelleth not in temples made with hands; And hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation Acts 17:24,26.
Praise the Lord He has given simple folk like me access to those men and organisations that believe His Word and are able to explain the sciences, such as biology, in light of Biblical creation. This is a portion of an article from the Institute for Creation Research and is just another apologetic for our Creator.
‘For more than a century, biologists have appealed to Darwinian natural selection to explain how living organisms adapt to different environments. But research over the last several decades has consistently dethroned Darwin’s view of natural selection. Rather than corroborating the concept that environments mold creatures through “survival of the fittest,” the research supports the astonishing idea that to a great extent creatures actively sense their environments and adapt accordingly.
Recent discoveries indicate that something radical and impressive is happening. Adaptation is a result of brilliant biological engineering rather than trial-and-error death and survival, which flips the mechanism of adaptation completely on its head. This approach views biological adaptation as primarily occurring through internal mechanisms (the ability to actively sense the environment and adapt) rather than external influence (the environment molds creatures through Darwinian natural selection).
Abundant evidence can be found that creatures actively sense their environments and responsively adapt. Many such adaptations occur within one generation or less, which is far too rapid for Darwin’s notion of trial-and-error natural selection. Here are only a few examples of what studies have shown:
I became a born again Christian at the young age of ten. I attended public school all the way from kindergarten through high school. Thankfully, my high school science teacher did not believe in evolution and spent only one hour on evolution itself. However, she was sick for several weeks and we had two students from Iowa State University fill in and they pushed the theory of evolution as fact. Even now at the age of 74 I remember their trying to make evolution sound true.
Sadly, there are probably not many teachers in the public schools today like the one I had. The two evolutionary students from Iowa State University have filled the positions. But, God is still on the throne and there are some students who are confronted with Bible creation and they get saved and some of them become scientists who believe the Bible account of creation. This is the testimony of such a man.
Have we enjoyed the benefits of true freedom so long that we no longer appreciate them? This is hard to believe but ‘A majority of Americans believe the First Amendment 
should be rewritten and are willing to crack down on free speech, as well as the press, according to a new poll.
More than 60 percent of Americans agree on restricting speech in some way, while a slim majority, 51 percent, want to see the First Amendment rewritten to “reflect the cultural norms of today.” The Campaign for Free Speech, which conducted the survey, said the results “indicate free speech is under more threat than previously believed.”
“The findings are frankly extraordinary,” executive director Bob Lystad told the Washington Free Beacon. “Our free speech rights and our free press rights have evolved well over 200 years, and people now seem to be rethinking them.”
Of the 1,004 respondents, young people were the most likely to support curbing free expression and punishing those who engage in “hate speech.” Nearly 60 percent of Millennials—respondents between the ages of 21 and 38—agreed that the Constitution “goes too far in allowing hate speech in modern America” and should be rewritten, compared to 48 percent of Gen Xers and 47 percent of Baby Boomers. A majority of Millennials also supported laws that would make “hate speech” a crime—of those supporters, 54 percent said violators should face jail time.
American hostility to the First Amendment did not stop at speech. Many would also like to see a crackdown on the free press. Nearly 60 percent of respondents agreed that the “government should be able to take action against newspapers and TV stations that publish content that is biased, inflammatory, or false.” Of those respondents, 46 percent supported possible jail time.
The poll was released just two days after two University of Connecticut students were arrested for allegedly saying racial slurs in a viral video. The 21-year-old suspects were allegedly playing “a game in which they yelled vulgar words,” according to the police report. Lystad said such incidents and the rise of social media may be behind the increased willingness of Americans to curb speech rights.
“I think [our findings] are fueled in large part because of a rise of hate speech, but traditionally, hate speech is protected in the First Amendment,” Lystad said. “The Supreme Court has upheld that principle time and time again.”
Lystad launched the Campaign for Free Speech to advocate for preserving free and open dialogue in America. The group emphasizes that hate speech should be denounced, but does not think censorship is the answer. The group plans to push back against efforts to restrict speech at the local, state, and federal levels.
“Hate speech should be condemned, but legally, the answer to speech we don’t like is more speech, not censorship,” he said. “Our primary focus is education, and to help people better understand the First Amendment, free speech, free press, and why it’s so vital to our democracy.”‘ https://freebeacon.com/issues/poll-majority-of-americans-want-first-amendment-rewritten/
