Marxist/Communist/Socialist
All posts tagged Marxist/Communist/Socialist
‘While 2022 isn’t yet over — and there’s still a risk of a false flag event before Election Day — from what we already know about what’s coming, 2023 is going to be a far worse year on several fronts. First, food scarcity is going to get a whole lot worse across the globe. Energy scarcity will reach its peak in early 2023 as the Northern Hemisphere endures a freezing winter. A wave of layoffs are coming for Americans in early 2023, and both inflation and unemployment are going to significantly worsen.
Today’s article and podcast https://www.brighteon.com/87f57936-1a19-4a61-a807-482121ae1f2e focus on eight key predictions for today through 2023, covering food, finance, war, layoffs and more. This information will help you navigate what’s coming.’https://www.brighteon.com/87f57936-1a19-4a61-a807-482121ae1f2e
The Australian so-called political conservatives in the National/Liberal parties are climate scammers just like the Labor/Greens. Here’s why I say that!
‘The NSW Government today promised to support – not tax – farmers to reduce emissions and grow their businesses, ruling out imposing a methane tax on agriculture.
Deputy Premier Paul Toole said a proposal by the New Zealand Government to tax farmers for agriculture emissions from 2025 would only drive up farmers’ costs without giving them the necessary support to genuinely reduce emissions.
“We have a clear policy to partner with farmers to improve their productivity while reducing emissions – New Zealand Labour’s policy is the complete opposite, and has raised fears it will shrink their livestock industry and drive up the cost of food,” Mr Toole said.
“Our Government has worked hard to shift the emphasis from regulation to incentive-based outcomes, putting us on track to halve our emissions while attracting up to $37 billion in private investment by 2030.
“We call on NSW Labor to provide certainty to farmers and consumers that they will never introduce an agricultural methane tax like this.”
Minister for Agriculture Dugald Saunders said the NSW Government is already working with the agriculture industry to reduce emissions in a way that doesn’t involve a great big new tax – and instead rewards farmers for actions that help drive down emissions.
“The NSW Government has introduced a range of measures to assist farmers to tackle climate change, as we head towards our target of net zero by 2050,” Mr Saunders said.
“We have the Primary Industries and Productivity Abatement Program, Biodiversity Credits Supply Fund and we are working on a range of new programs through our Natural Capital program.
“We are also collaborating with Angus Australia, the University of New England and Meat and Livestock Australia on a $19 million research project that aims to identify cattle that have a low methane output through breeding values.
“These sorts of programs will make a real difference to improving our climate and reducing emission, demonstrating you don’t need a great big new tax to reduce on-farm emissions.”
Angus Australia CEO Scott Wright said the announcement was welcome news for NSW beef producers.
“Additional taxes on beef producers are not a solution to the problem,” Mr Wright said.
“Collaborative research to help producers adopt breeding values with regards to lower methane emissions is a real solution. Angus Australia values the long-standing relationship with NSW DPI and welcomes the sensible approach taken by the NSW Government today.”’https://dugaldsaunders.com.au/nsw-government-rules-out-methane-tax-on-agriculture/
Above I highlighted four BIG LIES!!! All this nonsense will have NO effect on the climate. All this nonsense may not be called a tax but it is NOT free from using the tax payer’s money! This is just another political climate scamming program where the politician shakes their fists in the face of God saying we are in charge!! Genesis 8:22 While the earth remaineth, seedtime and harvest, and cold and heat, and summer and winter, and day and night shall not cease.
- Americans may not even know that China has struck the first blow until months after it has occurred… Americans think China’s war planners think like America’s war planners. Unfortunately, the Chinese ones do not. First strikes, despite what former intelligence officials believe, do not have to look like the invasion of Normandy in 1944.
- Chinese doctrine is different, something evident from Unrestricted Warfare, the 1999 book by Qiao Liang and Wang Xiangsui, then two Chinese air force colonels.
- So what would China’s first attack on Taiwan look like? Say, six months before an invasion China, violating the Biological Weapons Convention, could release a deadly pathogen on Taiwan.
- China’s National Defense University, in the 2017 edition of the authoritative Science of Military Strategy, mentioned a new kind of biological warfare of “specific ethnic genetic attacks.” Pathogens can now be designed to infect specific groups and even specific individuals.
- A regime monstrous enough to kill millions around the world [with COVID-19: the Chinese Communist Party pressured other countries to take arrivals from China without restriction while locking down Chinese territory] is surely monstrous enough to release, as the first act in a conflict, a disease on the 23.9 million people of Taiwan. It could take the Pentagon months to realize that China had started a war to annex the island republic.
- I suspect Chinese ruler Xi Jinping would not be overly upset if Taiwan were a smoking radioactive slab as long as it were part of the People’s Republic of China.
- “The biggest problem with the ‘China Hands’ of the U.S. intelligence community is their inability to place themselves into the mindset of the Communist Party and its Central Military Commission, in other words, to think like the enemy. There is still too much mirror-imaging going on…..” — James Fanell, Geneva Centre for Security Policy, to Gatestone, in response to the Culver report, October 2022.
- Americans make assumptions about the Chinese style of warfare; some of those assumptions are almost certainly wrong.https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/18999/china-attack-taiwan
This is no surprise that ‘Environmentalists have captured the Democratic party and, in their push towards Net Zero, are aiding Russia and China, a senior fellow at RealClearFoundation, Rupert Darwall, says.
Furthermore, the push towards Net Zero has monopolized “the money,” as the group includes many Silicon Valley billionaires, intellectuals, and the mainstream media, Darwall told The Epoch Times and NTD’s Paul Greaney in an interview.
In the interview, which aired on NTD’s Fresh Look America on Oct. 12, Darwall said a prime example of environmentalists taking over the Democratic party, and monopolizing the money, is California.
There, billionaire environmentalists have instituted “an aggressive green agenda” that doesn’t negatively impact them but directly opposes the average California voters’ interests, he said.’ More at https://www.theepochtimes.com/democratic-party-captured-by-environmentalists-aiding-russia-and-china-expert-claims_4792707.html?src_src=newsnoe&src_cmp=breaking-2022-10-14-1&est=lZC1f%2Be1o%2BOkU2Rfl5UnWqqRf6sQGkBs2BLJXR2fY1rvvVoyFF9h8jPMxZGkxQu6aQ%3D%3D
This crazy political climate scam concerning burping cows in NZ will be here in Australia soon as our political elites are as far to the Left as Ardern is.
‘Furious New Zealand farmers fear a government move to tax emissions from burping farm animals will cripple the country’s agriculture sector.
Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has boasted that her government will be the first in the world to introduce such a tax.
And Agriculture Minister Damien O’Connor said he was excited for the country to lead the world in reducing carbon footprints by taxing livestock emissions.
But “ropable” armers have slammed the move.
And in Australia the National Party have demanded a guarantee from Prime Minister Anthony Albanese that a similar tax would not be imposed on Aussie graziers.
Decreasing methane gases meant decreasing livestock numbers and that result in higher food prices, party leader David Littleproud warned.
New Zealand Federated Farmers president Andrew Hoggard said it would be “an understatement” to say Kiwi farmers were upset by the plan.
“The message I am getting from farmers is that we must oppose this,” he said.
Ardern’s animal ‘burp tax’ is aimed at fulfilling her promise to reduce methane in pursuit of her carbon neutral by 2050 goal.
She said on Tuesday farmers would be taxed for methane emitted by livestock through burping and farting as well fertiliser-rich urine.
She told a press conference New Zealand farmers would benefit by being the first in the world to pay such a “workable” and “pragmatic” tax.
“No other country in the world has yet developed a system for pricing and reducing agricultural emissions, so our farmers are set to benefit from being first movers,” she said.
The plan is set to come into effect in 2025.
A tax on livestock emissions was first proposed in 2003 by then Prime Minister Helen Clark. The plan was dropped after huge opposition from farmers.
Ms Ardern’s plan gives farmers until November 18 to voice their opposition before it is legislated.’https://www.rebelnews.com/nz_farmers_slam_jacinda_ardern_s_livestock_burp_tax?
