This is my first video uploaded to Rumble. It is an interview Ben Fordham had with One Nation’s Mark Latham concerning the Liberal/Nationals push for 100% renewable energy in the next ten years.
Laws
All posts tagged Laws
My wife and I were expecting this from not only Qantas but most if not all the airlines. What were we expecting? ‘Last night, Qantas CEO, Alan Joyce said the Australian flag carrier was working on their terms and conditions to make ‘No Jab, No Fly’ official Qantas policy.
I’m no anti-vaxxer. I’ve had every Vaccine, and so have my children.
But like many around the world, I’m a little sceptical about the fastest produced Vaccine in history. It hasn’t been tried and tested so no one could possibly know if and what the longterm effects are. And with everything we now know about this virus, I can understand why so many people will reject this injection and want to stop their kids from having it.
The Vaccine is certainly scarier than the virus, especially when it comes to children.
Is mandatory-vaccination even legal?
We currently have ‘No Jab, No Pay’ and ‘No Jab, No Play’ legislation that essentially forces parents to vaccinate their children or suffer consequences that most couldn’t bare, such as no childcare or Family tax benefits.
Whether you agree with that legislation or not, it set the precedence.’https://www.rebelnews.com/this_is_what_you_need_to_know_about_the_qantas_no_jab_no_fly_plan?utm_campaign=rb_11_24_20&utm_medium=email&utm_source=therebel
‘The world is spinning, staggering, and struggling from the Chinese coronavirus now called COVID-19 to conceal the fact that it came from China. The jury is still out whether it was manmade or natural and whether it was released accidentally or used by the Chinese Communist Party as germ warfare. As of today, there have been more than 12 million confirmed COVID-19 cases in the U.S. and more than 260,000 deaths.
However, many of the deaths are suspect since gunshot deaths, heart attacks, etc., were classified as COVID-19. Hospitals are paid much more if deaths are COVID deaths. As always, follow the money. It would be helpful (and honest) if any health official speaking to the media, be required to inform the public if that official holds any relevant patents or any stock in any relevant drug or vaccine company.
It is not commonly known that 56 individual patents were discovered to be owned or shared by one or more members of committees within the Centers for Disease Control. However, I don’t think the CDC sells masks—yet.
There has been much controversy as to whether masks are useful or useless against COVID; however, a Danish study, released November 18, suggests “face masks did not significantly protect wearers from the coronavirus compared to those without masks.” The study, published in the Annals of Internal Medicine, may determine and terminate the mask debate.
The issue is bigger than whether a mask helps protect from COVID or not: does any entity of government have the authority to require masks? The “experts” have been all over the map about this. Moreover, the worldwide lockdowns have been one of the most contentious, challenged, combative, and caustic decisions government officials have made. The charge is made that Socialists in the U.S. government want to destroy the present system to build upon its ashes a utopian society.
Whether true or not, the lockdowns have destroyed most of America’s restaurants and almost crippled travel-related businesses. That is true globally. It seems the cure is worse than the curse by destroying society.
President Trump pushed and bribed health officials and pharmaceutical companies to accelerate efforts to develop a vaccine that would be given freely to Americans. Many billions of tax dollars were spent to accomplish that purpose. We are told that two vaccines are about ready, and both are 95% effective. Another one will be ready in January.
Let me remind you that we have been given medical assurances regarding other diseases with some massive medical failures such as the thalidomide scandal in the 1950s, the HIV-tainted blood scandal in Japan in the 1980s, the swine flu in 2009, and others. WebMD admitted the flu vaccine for the 2018–2019 season was only 29 percent effective and the vaccine for the 2014-15 flu season was only 19% effective.
But you can trust the COVID vaccine.
Only medical morons or political physicians (but then I repeat myself) would assert that any vaccine or drug is always safe for anyone.
Recently, a nurse at Neighborcare Health clinic in Seattle incorrectly administered a flu shot to a lady instead of her quarterly birth control injection, and she was permanently disabled.
I have some pertinent questions: Are these new vaccines safe? Are they effective? Are there any side effects? Do they contain mercury or formaldehyde, or aluminum, or are they made with aborted baby parts? Do I have a right to refuse vaccination if I think there may be more harm in the vaccine than in the disease? Will my government that permits mothers and physicians to kill over a million unborn babies annually, often at taxpayers’ expense, permit me to choose not to be vaccinated?
It is a confirmed fact by the Kennedy Institute of Ethics at Georgetown University that current vaccines “for hepatitis A, chickenpox, smallpox, measles, rubella, rabies, poliomyelitis are all made using a cell line from fetuses aborted long ago.”
So, society killed healthy, unborn babies, but the corollary is COVID victims can live because of their deaths.
The package of AstraZeneca Covid vaccine clearly admits: “MRC-5 (Medical Research Council cell strain 5),” which is “a diploid human cell culture line composed of fibroblasts, originally developed from research deriving lung tissue of a 14-week-old aborted Caucasian male fetus.” The mother was a healthy 27-year-old who aborted for psychological reasons. That usually is a cover for the fact the baby would be an inconvenience to the mother, so get rid of the baby, so mom can fit into her best party dress.
The following vaccines contain these MRC-5 cells: “Polio vaccine (inactivated/IPV) & Oral Polio (live virus) drops; Measles, Mumps, Rubella vaccine/MMR (Rubella component); Diphtheria, Tetanus, Pertussis, Poliomyelitis vaccine (DTaP/TdP); Varicella (Chickenpox) vaccine & Shingles (zoster) vaccine; Hepatitis A vaccine; and Rabies vaccine.”
Bishop Joseph Strickland of the Catholic Diocese of Tyler, Texas, courageously objected to the use of aborted babies to produce vaccines. He wrote, “So sad…even with Covid-19 we are still debating the use of aborted fetal tissue for medical research…let me go on record…if a vaccine for this virus is only attainable if we use body parts of aborted children, then I will refuse the vaccine…I will not kill children to live.”
Very few Baptist pastors have taken such a courageous position.
American, Canada, and the United Kingdom are being ripped apart by the longtime controversy of vaccine safety. There are educated, honest people on both sides of this debate, as well as deep-pocket publishers, pharmaceutical companies, research universities, and medical bigots.
And a few fringe fanatics on the left and right who have more toes than teeth add controversy, color, and conflict to the discussion.
What often goes unmentioned is that the American Medical Association does not insist on mandatory vaccinations! Keep that fact in mind while reading this column. The thought of forcing any American to take a drug, or treatment, or vaccination is nothing short of tyranny, totalitarianism, and a substantial amount of thuggery.
Every American has the liberty to decide what he or she wants to do with their body as long as a pregnancy is not involved. In a day when the argument is made that a woman can decide to kill her own unborn baby, a person can decide what gender he/she/it is, whether one can decide if he or she is black or white; then a substantial argument can be made that I have a right to decide if I am to have a foreign substance shot into my body or the body of my child.
Vaccine fanatics are almost cultic toward those who are critical of vaccinations; they are almost as bad as those who believe one is irresponsible if he refuses to take chemotherapy or radiation for cancer. Admittedly, some anti-vaccine zealots are almost as forceful as their opponents; however, their passion is understandable since it is their children (or themselves) being dragged, kicking and screaming to get the shot that they think may injure or kill them.
From the beginning, everyone must admit that it can often be dangerous when anything is added to a human body. One of American’s greatest thinkers and theologians, Jonathan Edwards, died because of a smallpox vaccination. Plus, there have been many deaths following a flu shot, and others have been paralyzed. No one but a fool or fanatic will allege that vaccinations are always safe.
Peter Doshi is a postdoctoral fellow from Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine who was critical of flu shots in his first paragraph of “Influenza: marketing vaccine by marketing disease” published in the British Medical Journal. He wrote, “Closer examination of influenza vaccine policies shows that although proponents employ the rhetoric of science, the studies underlying the policy are often of low quality, and do not substantiate officials’ claims. The vaccine might be less beneficial and less safe than has been claimed, and the threat of influenza appears overstated.”
Doshi closed his article with, “It’s no wonder so many people feel that “flu shots” don’t work: for most flus, they can’t.”
Even if the new vaccines are successful, the virus is mutating and could even become more lethal, making the much-vaunted vaccines totally unreliable or even deadly. We have been told that there were no major side effects from the top three vaccine makers, though no person on earth can guarantee no long-term side effects. No one.
However, the Observer reported in late October, “In the U.S., there are four companies that are in the final stage of testing their COVID-19 vaccines: Moderna, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, and Johnson & Johnson. All of them have reported side effects in trial participants after giving the shots.”
The AMA’s Code of Ethics states, “Physicians should sensitively and respectfully disclose all relevant medical information to patients.” However, that is not being observed by some health personnel today. I know of patients who have been berated, bullied, and booted from a physician’s office for asking questions about a vaccine’s ingredients and side effects. Of course, patients should leave such a doctor’s office without paying and warn others of his arrogant ignorance and belligerency.
Other medical dummies (M.D.s) have even threatened to report challenging parents to the authorities for refusal to vaccinate a child while some children have been removed from their homes because of an ignorant, immature, and insensitive physician.
I am against using any vaccine on recently ill children or multiple vaccines on small children. Nor should any vaccine be used that contains aborted baby cells, formaldehyde, mercury, or aluminum. Producing vaccines is like making sausage; you don’t want to watch them dump numerous dangerous ingredients together.
The AstraZeneca vaccine is “one of the most closely watched COVID-19 vaccines” and is expected to be available in January. The notice on the packaging of the AstraZeneca Vaccine warns, “The MHRA Urgently seeks an Artificial Intelligence (A.I.) Software tool to process the EXPECTED HIGH VOLUME of Covid 19 Vaccine Adverse Drug Reaction (ADRs) and insure that no details from the ADRs’ reaction tests are missed.” (Emphasis in the original.)
I assume you took note of the EXPECTED HIGH VOLUME of adverse drug reactions.
Most Americans don’t know that if a vaccine kills or injures a person for life, they have no way to hold the maker or health provider responsible. Vaccine makers have federal immunity from prosecution! Wonder why they need federal protection if the vaccines are safe and effective.
To be effective, the Pfizer vaccine must be kept at minus 94 degrees Fahrenheit to remain useable. What happens if a careless health worker inoculates a patient using a sample that has lost its cool? At what temperature does it become ineffective or dangerous? According to the Daily Mail, the vaccine “has no serious side effects,” but no expert knows what happens if a non-frozen dose is given.
Natural News reported, “A new paper published in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) attempts to make the case that people who refuse a future vaccine for the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) should no longer be allowed to work and make a living….” Or even travel to see your grandkids. It is strange that a health magazine is now doing politics.
In a BBC article Will Travel Be Safer By 2022?, travelers are told what to expect when they travel in the age of COVID. Namely, that they will need to present their vaccination record via a “digital tattoo.” When they arrive at their destination, they “would present the customs officers with an entrance visa and a vaccination record. That could be a paper card – or a tiny tattoo on their arm, invisible to the naked eye but readable by an infrared scanner.”
If you take the vaccine to protect your life, you will be setting a precedent to take a little mark on your hand to buy, sell, work, travel, use insurance, etc.
Especially etc.’http://donboys.cstnews.com/is-covid-19-vaccine-safe-and-effective-and-should-you-get-it
If you are not somewhat afraid of a Biden/Harris administration you are not a conservative. If Biden and that other person get the WH in January the world as we know it will change dramatically. Now, ‘The US is entering the Joe Biden era as the formal transition process began after being authorized by the General Service Administration, and after Biden nominating top foreign policy and national security officials.
Chinese experts said China could start contacting Biden’s team and restore bilateral communication channels. A good start would be cooperation on climate change and discussion on reducing tariff barriers.
Analysts said the Biden administration with familiar faces to China will bring a more professional, rational and pragmatic approach to the future China-US ties than the Trump administration.
Although the Biden administration may not consider China a complete enemy, Chinese analysts warned that a change in US president will not change the US view of China as its strategic competitor, and the Biden administration may seek alliances to contain China’s influence in Europe, Asia and the South China Sea.
Biden’s top foreign policy and national security picks include Alejandro Mayorkas to lead the Department of Homeland Security, Antony Blinken as the next secretary of state, Linda Thomas-Greenfield as US ambassador to the United Nations, and Jake Sullivan as national security adviser, CNN reported.
Biden’s cabinet picks are likely to take a more rational and pragmatic approach toward China, given their past experience in handling foreign affairs, Chinese observers noted. Despite the changing geopolitical environment, these veteran US officials are expected to return to conventional Democratic approaches to foreign affairs, which will be much more predictable, some observers said.
Blinken and Sullivan are more concerned about alliance than about the China policy, seeing alliance as a foreign policy priority for the next four years. They tend to see China as a “strategic competitor” rather than an “all-out enemy,” Da Wei, director of the Center for Strategic and International Security Studies of the University of International Relations in Beijing, told the Global Times on Tuesday.’https://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1207932.shtml
A Biden admin will be a rehash of the Obumer years.
Sadly, here in Australia killing the unborn doesn’t get a mention when it comes to voting in state or Federal elections. This 2020 election in the USA has surely shown that ‘Politics is a dirty business. Mudslinging is common. It’s hard to figure out what’s true and what’s not. But one issue, another dirty business, is something that Christians in particular should know the truth about: abortion. And you know who should be pulling together to stump for a candidate who stands against the killing of our most vulnerable human beings? Our faith leaders. But instead, all we see are some of our most well-known faith leaders causing confusion and dissention.
In a recent article by John Piper, he stated that “boastfulness” is a bigger problem than abortion: “I think it is baffling and presumptuous to assume that pro-abortion policies kill more people than a culture-saturating, pro-self pride. When a leader models self-absorbed, self-exalting boastfulness, he models the most deadly behavior in the world.”
No one likes a braggart, but I’ve never seen boastfulness rip a baby limb from limb. Yet I have seen an abortion suction tube do just that. And I have seen a 13-week-old innocent baby fight for his life against that abortion instrument, only to die trying.
What a ridiculous comment from someone seen as a faith leader. And what a ridiculous justification to vote for a party that stands for the expansion of elective abortion through 40 weeks for any and every reason. Pathetic.
Pride doesn’t kill babies. Boastfulness doesn’t tear them apart in their mothers’ wombs. Arrogance doesn’t cause a baby to flee for their lives as sharp instruments seek to rip them limb from limb while they are still alive. No. Abortion does that and abortion alone.
We can’t legislate pride or boastfulness or arrogance. But we can legislate abortion. In fact, we can make it illegal. And that is what is on the line. Life is on the line. The innocent lives of precious babies are on the line. Not pride. Not arrogance.
Grow up. You aren’t voting for prom king. This isn’t a popularity contest.
Additionally, Phil Vischer, the creator of the “Veggie Tales”, released a video implying that a vote for pro-life policies was a wasted vote. I don’t consider Mr. Vischer a “faith leader” by any means, but I did find it quite ironic that the creator of a children’s series doesn’t find a pro-life vote worthwhile. Afterall, don’t you need children around to keep your Veggie Tales empire going? Anyway, not only was the video quite condescending to those of us who dedicate our lives to protecting the unborn, it was full of falsehoods. The video stated that the reason anyone votes pro-life is to overturn Roe v. Wade. That is a false assumption. Roe is one of many, many reasons pro-life voters vote for candidates who are don’t support abortion. The president has much power when it comes to pro-life issues.
Democrats keep touting the false line that under democratic presidencies, abortions are less because of democratic policies. This has zero to do with democratic policies and everything to do with state legislatures. During Obama’s presidency, the state of Texas passed a record-breaking number of pro-life legislation, decreasing abortion numbers across the state by 30 percent. Texas wasn’t the only one. Many states replicated these pro-life legislative efforts during his eight years in office, significantly decreasing abortion rates across the country.
Do you think politics doesn’t have a place in our religious communities? I’d wholeheartedly disagree. Unfortunately, we live in a society where sin has crept in and clouded societal judgement, just like it has throughout history, during the Holocaust and slavery. And abortion. I wish we didn’t have to legislate that killing unborn babies is wrong. I wish our society looked at growing children in the womb as Christ sees them: perfect creations with infinite dignity and worth endowed by our Creator.
Biden and Harris have already promised to work to overturn every state legislative victory that has helped to decrease the amount of abortions. That means no more ultrasound legislation, no more 20-week bans, no more bans of state funding for abortion facilities, no more waiting periods, no more parental consent for abortion, and no more care for infants born alive after failed abortions. No, this is not just about Roe. It’s about so much more.
This is why politics must be a driving force within our faith communities. Not only that, but God calls us to concern ourselves with government. Romans and 1 Peter talk specifically about our role in governmental affairs as Christians.
When people ask me about how I vote, I am not ashamed to tell them that I am a proud single issue voter. I vote on abortion. How someone cares for the most vulnerable among us tells me everything I need to know about every other issue. To me, there is nothing else as important as abortion. Nothing is as destructive. Nothing is as deadly. Nothing impacts us more. It impacts our economy, our social security, the morality of our society, our birth rate, and our overall humanity. If we are willing to violently kill the most innocent and vulnerable among us, why wouldn’t we be willing to abuse and harm others? If we are willing to dehumanize the most marginalized in our society, what makes us think that dehumanization wouldn’t spread to other marginalized groups? The elderly, ethnic minorities, the immigrant, the homeless? What we do to the least of these, we will do to all.
So please stop, Faith Leaders. Stop muddying the waters in order to justify voting for a candidate that supports killing children in the womb. Nothing else is more important. Nothing is more destructive than abortion. Nothing is killing more innocent human beings. Nothing is more dehumanization. And dare I say, I can’t imagine anything that must hurt the heart of Our Father more than the sacrifice of His creation in the womb. Stop using God to justify your immoral vote.’https://www.theclarionsound.com/the-church/abby-johnson-excuse-me-john-piper-but-pride-doesnt-kill-babies/
The Devilcrats, Biden and that other person only see people through colored glasses. Therefore, not yet ‘President-elect Joe Biden has named veteran diplomat Linda Thomas-Greenfield as U.N. ambassador to the United Nations and Shuwanza Goff as deputy director of the Office of Legislative Affairs. By choosing two prominent Black women to join his forthcoming administration, Biden is making good on his promise to choose from a diverse pool of candidates.
The Washington Post reported over the weekend that the former Foreign Service officer would be a notable and high-profile Black woman in Biden’s Cabinet and in a diplomatic government post. Biden confirmed the announcement Monday.’https://thegrio.com/2020/11/23/biden-cabinet-black-women-thomas-greenfield-goff/
‘Alyson Thompson, of Dignity in Dying (formerly the Voluntary Euthanasia Society), said: ‘MSPs returned to the Scottish Parliament in 2021 will be asked to vote on safeguarded assisted dying proposals for terminally ill, mentally competent adults.’
As always in such announcements, no acknowledgment was made that those deemed terminally ill under such laws include those with non-terminal illnesses who forego life-sustaining treatment, and that vanishingly few patients deemed mentally competent in jurisdictions like Oregon undergo psychological evaluation. Or that safeguards are really just malleable criteria open to extension – or that ‘assisted dying’ is in fact assisted suicide.
Given the superhuman efforts made this year to save lives from Covid-19, and the many traumas people have faced in being separated from loved ones, some reticence might have been expected about the timing of the announcement, but no: the pandemic is bluntly stated as good reason to pursue death as public policy. ‘The past few months have thrust the issues of death and dying into the spotlight. It is now at the forefront of people’s minds,’ said campaigners – in line with their sister charity pushing all-or-nothing advance directives at the height of the pandemic.
The Scotsman quoted our CEO, Dr Gordon Macdonald, in response:
‘It is disappointing that ideological pro-killing campaigners continue to push this narrow and dangerous agenda during a global pandemic – a crisis that has already seen many vulnerable groups treated differently, including the elderly people being discharged from hospitals into care homes without adequate testing for Covid-19 and the blanket use of Do Not Resuscitate orders.
‘Changing the law would remove universal protections and send out a message that the lives of the terminally ill and disabled people are less worthy of protection than others. In other countries that have legalised assisted suicide and euthanasia, the law has been extended to include other groups.’https://www.carenotkilling.org.uk/articles/new-scottish-assisted-suicide-bill-to-come-in-2021/
‘The man behind the so-called “Great Reset,” Klaus Schwab,” is no stranger to draconian ideas, but this one really takes the cake.
Newswars reports that Schwab, as part of the broader “4th Industrial Revolution” plan, has suggested risk-assessment brain scans before allowing individuals to cross international borders as well as implantable chips to read thoughts.
Just in case you were worried that no technocratic would-be tyrants out there weren’t taking full advantage of the coronavirus pandemic to establish the most horrific dystopia in human history.
So yeah.
There’s that.
Newswars explains that Schwab has been a vocal proponent for, well just that. He advocates for the globe’s technocrats to leverage the pandemic to set in motion “The Great Reset.”
Chillingly, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau echoed this outwardly draconian plan during a recent UN video conference and at the UN, such globalist technocratic sentiment would be in very good company among a bureaucratic apparatus openly intent on dramatically reforming the global community and reducing the population.
The “Great Reset,” the outlet notes, isn’t only about an economic overhaul, introducing the “Green New Deal,” increasing automation, or lowering energy consumption or living standards.
They’re also talking law enforcement for their post-pandemic new world order.
“That agenda is explicitly detailed in Schwab’s three books, The Fourth Industrial Revolution, Shaping the Future of the Fourth Industrial Revolution: A Guide to Building a Better World, and Covid-19: The Great Reset,” Newsmax explains.
In these words, Schwab notes that using technology for the sake of mass surveillance and monitoring the population “run(s) counter to healthy, open societies,” yet, as he appears to go on to argue, are nonetheless beneficial.
“As capabilities in this area improve, the temptation for law enforcement agencies and courts to use techniques to determine the likelihood of criminal activity, assess guilt or even possibly retrieve memories directly from people’s brains will increase,” he writes of proposed law enforcement measures that draw to mind the chilling sci-fi short story and film Minority Report.
He also proposes measures that would go on simply requiring proof of vaccination to travel.
He also suggests that one day, crossing the border could require “a detailed brain scan to assess an individual’s security risk.”
What free and fair nation in the world would even for a second consider something so brazenly tyrannical?! I’m running out of synonyms for “draconian” at this point.’https://www.teaparty247.org/man-behind-the-great-reset-wants-to-scan-our-what-so-well-be-allowed-to-travel-this-is-bizarre-and-terrifying/
‘The platypus is perhaps the most evolution-defying creature on Earth. It’s not enough that it’s a mammal that lays eggs, has a bill like a duck, tail like a beaver, dense fur like an otter, webbed feet for swimming, hunts with its eyes closed underwater using electroreception, and wields venomous spurs, but now we can add “glows in the dark” to the long list of mind-boggling traits.1
Biofluorescence is a glow-in-the-dark phenomenon in which short wavelengths of light are absorbed and longer wavelengths are re-emitted based on the specific bio-physical properties of hair, skin, scales, or feathers. Biofluorescence has been documented in a wide range of fish, reptiles, amphibians, and birds.2-7 Among mammals, biofluorescence of the fur when exposed to ultraviolet light has been previously demonstrated in several nocturnal taxa including marsupial opossums and placental flying squirrels.8-9 In this new research paper from Mammalia, scientists have documented the fluorescence of the fur coat of the platypus (Ornithorhynchus anatinus) under ultraviolet light. That makes this the first report of biofluorescence in a monotreme mammal.
The researchers analyzed three different platypus specimens in two different museums under both ultraviolet and visible light. Since previous research found no differences between fur coat fluorescence for other mammals in either living or museum specimens, the scientists were confident that their results applied to living platypuses. The top view (dorsal) of the animals showed a strong fluorescent blue color under the ultraviolet light while the bottom view (ventral) contained a blend of greens and blues. Under visible light, the fur was brown. Ultraviolet visual perception capability has been shown to be widespread among mammals, so this type of biofluorescence can be detected by other animals.10
So, why is fluorescent fur important? At this point, the biofluorescence trait is being consistently documented in creatures like the platypus which are active under low-light conditions. The platypus forages for food at night and at twilight. And because the platypus closes its eyes when it submerges in the water, foraging for food based on innate mechanoreception and electroreception systems, it is likely that this trait doesn’t help it to visualize other platypuses underwater. But on land and in the dark, biofluorescence may help platypuses interact with other platypuses, or the trait might be used in methods of visual interaction with other kinds of creatures.
At this point, there is one thing we know for sure: the platypus is a living testament to the failure of evolutionary theory to explain the diversity and complexity of animal life. Because the platypus is so unique, evolutionists are befuddled to explain its origins and are unsure of its place in their mythical evolutionary continuum. Clearly, the platypus and all other plants and animals speak to the fact that a mighty and omnipotent Creator made and engineered them all.
Stage image: Platypus specimen under visible and ultraviolet light.
Stage image credit: De Gruyter. Copyright © 2020. Adapted for use in accordance with federal copyright (fair use doctrine) law. Usage by ICR does not imply endorsement of copyright holders.
References
1. Anich, P. S. et al. 2020. Biofluorescence in the Platypus (Ornithorhynchus anatinus). Mammalia. DOI: doi.org/10.1515/mammalia-2020-0027
2. Pearn, S. M., A. T. Bennett, and I. C. Cuthill. 2001. Ultraviolet Vision, Fluorescence and Mate Choice in a Parrot, the Budgerigar Melopsittacus Undulates. Proceedings Royal Society London B. 268: 2273-2279. doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2001.1813.
3. Weidensaul, C. S., B. A. Colvin, D. F. Brinker, and J. S. Huy. 2011. Use of Ultraviolet Light as an Aid in Age Classification of Owls. Wilson Journal Ornithology. 123: 373–377. doi.org/10.1676/09-125.1.
4. Sparks, J. S., et al. 2014. The Covert World of Fish Biofluorescence: a Phylogenetically Widespread and Phenotypically Variable Phenomenon. PloS One 9:e83259. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083259.
5. Gruber, D. F. and J. S. Sparks. 2015. First Observation of Fluorescence in Marine Turtles. American Museum Novitates. 3845: 1-8.
6. Lamb, J. Y. and M. P. Davis. 2020. Salamanders and Other Amphibians are Aglow with Biofluorescence. Scientific Reports. 10: 2821. doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59528-9.
7. Meisner, D.H. 1983. Psychedelic Opossums: Fluorescence of the Skin and Fur of Didelphis Virginiana Kerr. Ohio Journal Science. 83:4.
8. Pine, R. H., J. E. Rice, J. E. Bucher, D. J Jr Tank, and A. M. Greenhall. 1985. Labile Pigments and Fluorescent Pelage in Didelphid Marsupials. Mammalia. 49: 249-256. doi.org/10.1515/mamm.1985.49.2.249.
9. Kohler, A. M., E. R. Olson, J. G. Martin, and P. S. Anich. 2019. Ultraviolet Fluorescence Discovered in New World Flying Squirrels (Glaucomys). Journal of Mammalogy. 100: 21-30.
10. Douglas, R. H. and G. Jeffery. 2014. The Spectral Transmission of Ocular Media Suggests Ultraviolet Sensitivity is Widespread Among Mammals. Proceedings Royal SocietyB. 281: 20132995. doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.2995.’https://www.icr.org/article/glow-in-the-dark-platypuses-illuminate-the-creator/?utm_source=phplist9201&utm_medium=email&utm_content=HTML&utm_campaign=Christmas+Ornament%2C+Glow-in-the-Dark+Platypuses%2C+and+More%21
Can any thinking person really believe this 2020 election was fair? No Russian collusion so it must have been fair? Right? Well, ‘The vote tabulation company at the centre of several controversies surrounding the legitimacy of the American presidential election shares an office floor with the Tides Foundation.
Tides, which recently changed its name to Make Way, is an extreme left eco-radical charity that directs cash supplied by George Soros to smaller groups and organizations to advance the globalist agenda of Soros.
Dominion Voting has come under fire after their vote tabulation machines created a 6,000 vote swing in a single Michigan state county. The same machines and software were used in every single county in Georgia and in several other swing states that just sent their electoral votes to Joe Biden (for now).
Rebel News was on location inside the Dominion Voting building located at 215 Spadina Avenue in Toronto, and my camera crew and I were actually removed by a building manager.
But before he stopped us for committing the heinous offence of journalism, we learned that Tides and Dominion requested the building manager remove all signage and references to their shared building occupancy. Why would they do that?
The close working relationship that the company and charity have raises even more questions about the security of the American election.
Are the radical employees of George Soros able to access the same desks, filing cabinets, servers, and Wi-Fi of Dominion Voting? Are any extra security protocols taken to ensure no voting data or proprietary information is protected? Of all the office space in the world, why has Dominion Voting occupied that office space since 2013?
Further to the suspect office floor sharing, Dominion Voting also showed their hand when documents surfaced showing they donated between $25,000 and $50,000 to Hillary Clinton’s personal foundation, a charity tied closely to the Tides Foundation. George Soros actually donated over $9.5M to Hillary Clinton’s election campaign.
Rebel News called Dominion Voting and the Tides foundation office several times, and spoke with employees outside of their offices.
In all cases, they either refused to answer or even pick up the phone. We left messages and will update this story if they ever get back to us.
Dominion Voting’s website features a string of denials to the mounting mainstream coverage of voter fraud in the American Election. On it, Dominion states “Dominion has no company ownership relationships with any member of the Pelosi family, the Feinstein family, or the Clinton Global Initiative,” this is despite the fact that they donated tens of thousands of dollars to the Clinton-operated charity.
Dominion also maintains that “assertions of voter fraud conspiracies are 100 per cent false.”’https://www.rebelnews.com/dominion_voting_shares_office_with_far_left_george_soros_linked_group?utm_campaign=rb_11_18_20&utm_medium=email&utm_source=therebel
