The world is going or is crazy! Here in Australia both major parties are woke with a few in the Coalition that are standing strong. However, if anyone in the states or anywhere else, thinks the man in the WH won the 2020 election they are not worth listening to. Sadly, if something doesn’t change there will NEVER be an honest Presidential election again! Anyway, here is another email received this cold Australian Monday morning from Rescue Michigan. Thankfully, there are some folk in Michigan that are standing strong against this Left Marxist Wokness in their state.
‘This week was a game-changer.
When Matt Walsh announced that his documentary, “What Is A Woman?” would be screened for free on Twitter, the platform initially censored it.
It blocked users from liking, retweeting, and even bookmarking the documentary.
Then something happened.
That something, I suspect, is that Elon Musk watched the movie.
Because he then removed all censorship and told every parent to watch it.
It’s now been seen 140 million times, making it perhaps the most watched documentary of all time.
It’s hard to overstate how significant this is, because it absolutely exposes the political movement to make children become transgender.
And this is something that millions of people had no idea was happening.
Now people will know it’s happening everywhere.
As it happens, many of the radical Democrats in Lansing put their names on legislation to allow minors to get gender-mutilating treatment by running away from home.
Time to hold them accountable.
I recently made a hard-hitting flier for one such state representative, Regina Miller, and with my local Republican Party we’ve already started distributing it locally:
Of course, Regina Miller isn’t the only partisan extremist in Lansing.
In the week ahead, we’ll be rolling out a program where you can order these fliers for your state lawmakers from us, or even have them mailed directly to voters in your precincts.
‘It is hard to overstate just how sinister the Online Safety Bill is. The gravest threat to freedom of speech since section 5 of the Public Order Act 1986, which criminalised “insulting words and behaviour”? That scarcely does it justice. Let’s settle on the most serious threat since the proposal to force state regulation on the press in the aftermath of Levison.
The Online Safety Bill, which has already had its second reading in the House of Commons, is intended to make the UK the safest place in the world to go online. If you think “safest” is code for “most heavily regulated” you’re not far wrong.
The Bill will empower Ofcom, the broadcast regulator, to fine social media companies up to 10 per cent of their global turnover if they fail to remove harmful content — and not just harmful to children, which is hard to argue with, but to adults as well.
What does the Government mean by “harmful”? The only definition the Bill offers is in clause 150, where it sets out the details of a new Harmful Communications Offence, punishable by up to two years in jail: “‘harm’ means psychological harm amounting to at least serious distress.”
But, confusingly, it won’t just be harmful content that meets this definition that the bill will force social media companies to remove. After all, this relates to a new criminal offence — and content that meets the threshold for prosecution under this new law will, by definition, be illegal. Notoriously, the Bill will also force social media companies to remove “legal but harmful” content — and exactly what that is, is anyone’s guess. I’m sure political activists and lobby groups claiming to speak on behalf of various victim groups will have a lot to say about it.
The bottom line is that stuff it is perfectly legal to say and write offline will be prohibited online. And not just mildly prohibited — YouTube or Twitter or Facebook could be fined of up to 10 per cent of their annual global turnover for a transgression — so in Facebook’s case $11.7 billion, based on its 2021 revenue.
That’s a powerful incentive for social media companies to remove anything remotely contentious — and they hardly need much encouragement. Facebook deleted 26.9 million pieces of content for violating its Community Standards on “hate speech” in the first quarter of 2020, 17 times as many as the 1.6 million instances of deleted “hate speech” in the last quarter of 2017.
More than 97 per cent of Facebook’s purged “hate speech” in the last three months of 2020 was identified by an algorithm and removed automatically. It’s a safe bet that the sensitivity dials on the algorithms social media companies use to censor questionable content will be turned up to 11 if this Bill ever becomes law.’ More of this article at https://thecritic.co.uk/issues/june-2022/why-i-fear-this-censors-charter/
Unsolicited emails can be very interesting. Most of the time the email will tell you what position the sender has politically and religiously. This email from the New Yorker is one example and certainly shows where The New Yorker is politically.