https://www.bitchute.com/video/0kDWWs7KMiwK/
China is on the move militarily, medically and politically.
China Virus Vaccine
All posts tagged China Virus Vaccine
Craig Kelly is one of the few Australian Federal politicians willing to speak the truth! Oh, and by the way he is hated on both sides of politics.
‘If (and that’s a very big IF) it is prudent to set out to inject the entire Australian population with one or more of the covid vaccines – what level of information is the public entitled to know about the risks ?One school of thought, that appears to be advocated by Labor’s Shadow Health Minister Chris Bowen (given his name-calling and personal attacks on me for posting factual data from US Center for Disease Control) is that the public should be treated like mushrooms. Just line up, roll-up your sleeve, don’t ask questions, don’t think for yourself – leave all the thinking to us experts, for we know better. The alternate, is that he have a fully informed debate, free from censorship will all the facts in the table, including the pros and cons of the vaccines and the option of Ivermectin. I believe in the latter. That’s why I’m posting a link to this report, published in the International Journal of Clinical Practice which warns that there is a; ‘’specific risk that COVID‐19 vaccines could worsen disease upon exposure to challenge or circulating virus’’. And; ‘’Given the strong evidence that ADE (antibody‐dependent enhancement) is a non‐theoretical and compelling risk for COVID‐19 vaccines and the ‘laundry list’ nature of informed consents, disclosure of the specific risk of worsened COVID‐19 disease from vaccination calls for a specific, separate, informed consent form and demonstration of patient comprehension in order to meet medical ethics standards. The informed consent process for ongoing COVID‐19 vaccine trials does NOT appear to meet this standard.’’https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/ijcp.13795I believe that public needs to be informed of the quantum of this risk with empirical evidence – or honestly told; ‘’we don’t know, and are only guessing what the risk might be’’.’https://www.facebook.com/CraigKellyMP/photos/a.251794581681850/1714483885412905/
How far do you trust the EXPERTS and would you be microchipped if they (the experts) said that was necessary for the health benefit of you and others?
‘People need “immunity passports” if they want the economy reopened. At least, that’s the crazy idea The Washington Post decided to push.
The Post published an insane op-ed advocating for this proposal by Vital Strategies Director of Public Health Law Aaron Schwid and Resolve to Save Lives CEO Tom Frieden.
The two authors argued that “as more and more people are vaccinated, it’s time to carefully design a system of ‘immunity passports.’” As the op-ed stated, “These passports would serve as a form of proof of immunity, allowing people who have immunity to engage in some activities others cannot.” A Big Government tracking system that is necessary to shop or travel. I think we all read about that somewhere.
The authors were giddy that “immunity passports” were already being developed:
Immunity passports for covid-19 — although controversial for scientific, practical and ethical reasons — are already being developed. We need minimum standards to get this right.
They spewed that “we need practical and universal standards to verify who has been vaccinated.” The United States, said Schwid and Frieden, “currently uses a paper-based system (upon receiving the vaccine, people receive a coronavirus vaccination record card with basic information on it) with few security features that could serve as a trustworthy, official certificate.” Oh, but “[n]othing prevents these documents from being lost or stolen, and the opportunities for and consequences of fraud are high.” [Emphasis added.]
Not to fear, said Schwid and Frieden. One option is for citizens to just go “digital” to solve these “security” problems: “Technology can solve some of these issues. Recipients can opt for a digital certificate in some jurisdictions, but this creates its own challenges.” The authors said “[t]he personal data collected raise privacy and security concerns, and the potential for misuse of data could dissuade some people from getting vaccinated.” No, really?
It’s a wonder if microchipping people is part of the authors’ “technology” option.
The op-ed concluded on a chilling note that would make George Orwell cringe from his grave:
As vaccination is rolled out and we learn more about immunity after natural infection, providing the option of an immunity passport to those who choose to receive one can increase freedom of movement for passport holders and accelerate broader social and economic recovery. As universal vaccination becomes available, passports will help everyone, not just the lucky few, move from fear to freedom, [emphasis added.]
Make it stop.
Conservatives are under attack. Contact The Washington Post at 202-334-6000 and demand they stop promoting New World Order propaganda.‘https://papundits.wordpress.com/2020/12/29/nuts-washpost-op-ed-wants-immunity-passports-before-opening-economy/
Will you be getting the China Virus vaccine? My wife says she won’t but I will continue to mull it over in the space called ‘my head’ and when it is available then make up my mind. However, Australia’s Federal ‘Health Minister Greg Hunt says “absolute safety” is the key to approving and rolling out a coronavirus vaccine next year. “We are an island sanctuary so what we do with vaccines, we want to make sure, is about absolute safety and extending the safe Australia concept that we have but doing it in a way that provides absolute confidence to the Australian people,” he told Sky News. The vaccine will be voluntary but Mr Hunt said he believed that Australians will get themselves vaccinated to protect one another. “My hope and my belief is that Australians will help and protect other Australians and themselves through the vaccination program.” Mr Hunt cautioned Australians not to be complacent with safety measures against coronavirus, even as Australia has recorded few cases. “This is still a dangerous, contagious, and deadly disease. Your help can save lives.”‘https://www.skynews.com.au/details/_6214409491001?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Daily%20Sky%20News%20Australia%20%20Newsletter&utm_content=Daily%20Sky%20News%20Australia%20%20Newsletter+CID_11da7aa9c7d9a1d530043c31be155f28&utm_source=Daily%20newsletter&utm_term=Your%20help%20can%20save%20lives%20Hunt%20urges%20people%20to%20consider%20vaccinations
Those people Biden has chosen for positions in his wanna be administration are Leftist/communist/globalists and are out to destroy the middle class and kill the elderly. As to the latter ‘Older Americans, the ones most vulnerable to COVID-19, should be the last in line to receive a vaccine when it becomes available, according to an argument put forth by one of Joe Biden’s top health advisers.
The Federalist reports Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, who serves on Biden’s coronavirus task force, seemed to suggest in a September article that Americans over 75 should wait for the vaccine out of “fairness” to the rest of the world.
Emanuel, who also was an adviser to the Obama administration, has faced criticism for years for promoting ageist arguments. A bioethicist at the University of Pennsylvania, he wrote an article about how he wants to die by age 75 because life is not worth living past that point. He suggested other older Americans should consider “whether our consumption is worth our contribution.” He also wrote a piece in the New York Times encouraging Americans to “Skip Your Annual Physical.”
Now, he appears to be promoting a plan that would deny the coronavirus vaccine to those most vulnerable to die from the virus: elderly Americans. A vaccine could be available within the next several months after two companies announced final testing on a coronavirus vaccine this fall.
According to The Federalist:
In a Science article in September, in which Emanuel argued for distributing vaccine doses overseas out of “fairness” and argued against “vaccine nationalism” in which countries kept “too much” of the vaccine for themselves, he wrote, “we propose using Standard Expected Years of Life Lost (SEYLL) averted per dose of vaccine as the metric for premature death.”
This method renders the lives of people who have already lived beyond their country’s life expectancy as valueless. In the CDC’s definition, the cut-off is even sooner: only deaths occurring before age 75 are deemed “premature” and counted towards “years of potential life lost.” Yes, the very vaccine priority model Emanuel proposes would exclude those over age 75 from receiving a COVID vaccine, at least until availability is widespread and no shortages exist, globally.
It’s not clear if that also would apply to Biden, who is about to turn 78.’https://www.lifenews.com/2020/11/16/biden-coronavirus-advisor-people-older-than-75-should-get-vaccines-last/
whatyareckon 