This Australian Senator is an apartheid promoter for that’s exactly what CCP vaccine mandates are all about. Having a Senator like her says a lot about the people who put her in the Senate!
Australian Federal Government
All posts tagged Australian Federal Government
Sadly, what you hear in this video is true. Australians have forfeited many (if not most) of their freedoms for supposedly health safety from their elected politicians. This CCP virus has made Australia ripe for takeover.
When’s a lie not a lie? Ask, Prime Minister Morrison. Now, “Don’t hurt your back doing back flips” ‘Prime Minister Scott Morrison has doubled down on comments made toward Bill Shorten in his last election campaign who he accused of “wanting to end the weekend” with his electric vehicles policy.
Mr Morrison was doing the media rounds on Thursday morning when he was asked by Sunrise host David Koch about his “massive backflip” on electric vehicles before a video was played.
In the clip Mr Morrison criticised EVs and the policy set out by then-Labor leader Mr Shorten, who he accused of trying to force Australians to give up their petrol-run cars.
“It’s not going to tow your trailer, it’s not going to tow your boat. Bill Shorten wants to end the weekend when it comes to his policy on electric vehicles,” Mr Morrison said at the time.
He was asked whether it was a “come to Jesus moment” and what lead him to change his view.
Mr Morrison stood by his comments saying Mr Shorten and the Labor Party wanted to “force” people to do it.
“I still don’t want to do that,” he said.
“You don’t get people to do something else by pushing up the prices of what they’re currently doing. And that’s still what Labor wants to do. They want to put up your petrol prices. They want to increase your cost of living to force you to make other choices.’
The Prime Minister said it was about “respecting” the choices of millions of residents.
But he refused to answer why he had a sudden change of heart on EVs following his policy announcement this week.
Co-host Natalie Barr said it was not a mandate Labor was introducing but a non-binding emissions target of 50 per cent.
Mr Morrison reiterated Mr Shorten was “going to put up fuel prices to force people to switch over”.
“That’s not how we do things,” he said.
“We don’t, we’re not a government that goes around telling people what to do. I think Australians have had a gutful of governments telling them what to do in their lives.”
Mr Morrison is on a media and campaign blitz ahead of the election, likely six months away, where he announced his plan to encourage more Australians to buy electric vehicles.
The Prime Minister pledged he “will not be forcing Australians out of the car they want to drive” as the government looks to accelerate the rollout of 50,000 charging stations to encourage more people to buy electric vehicles.
“Australians love their family sedan, farmers rely on their trusted ute and our economy counts on trucks and trains to delivers goods from coast to coast,” Mr Morrison said.
“We will not be forcing Australians out of the car they want to drive or penalising those who can least afford it through bans or taxes. The strategy will work to drive down the cost of low and zero emission vehicles, and enhance consumer choice.”
“We will do this by creating right environment for industry co-investment in technology development.”
He said the plan was designed to avoid taxes and “offer choices not mandates” as electric vehicle prices slowly fall in line with rising demand.
The plan does not include subsidies, tax incentives, sales targets or minimum fuel emission standards that would make electric vehicles more affordable, industry groups have said.
Mr Morrison hopes Australians will embrace electric vehicles like they have with rooftop solar.
More than 1.7 million electric vehicles are expected to be on the road by 2030.’https://www.skynews.com.au/australia-news/politics/scott-morrison-says-he-does-not-want-to-force-people-to-buy-electric-vehicles-after-heavily-criticising-labors-policy-last-election/news-story/06523bc93eea3c28311e0cab2faf658a?utm_source=SkyNews&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Editorial&utm_content=SN_DAILY_PM_01&net_sub_id=282058248&type=curated&position=1&overallPos=4
‘‘Hide a knife behind a smile’ is an old Chinese stratagem that explains Xi Jinping’s cynical use of the ‘Net Zero’ agenda to encourage us to self-harm.
An important new paper warns that the ‘Green Growth’ and ‘Net Zero’ policies being championed by the UK before COP26 risk handing geopolitical control to China. The paper, by Gwythian Prins, emeritus research professor at the London School of Economics, who has been involved with climate and energy issues for decades, is published today by Net Zero Watch. Professor Prins explains that the West’s decarbonisation plans are doomed to failure because they attempt to defy the laws of thermodynamics:
The story of civilisation is the story of mankind’s shift from diffuse, high-entropy fuels to concentrated, low-entropy ones. Net zero means trying to do precisely the opposite. Seen in this light, it is clear that Net Zero will fail, and in fact we can already see that it is failing.
But Professor Prins warns that the economic and military weakness that is being built in by the futile attempt to ‘decarbonise’ is a gift to the Chinese communists. He displays the evidence that Beijing has no intention of adopting the ‘green’ agenda. His paper deduces President Xi’s ‘green’ strategy, and shows how environmentalism in the west is facilitating his efforts. Professor Prins said:
We need to wake up. Xi Jinping’s strategy is one of ‘ghost attacks’ in a ‘grey war’, in which Free World ‘net zero’ obsessions have become one of his sharpest weapons. He is quite happy to indulge our fantasies.
But it doesn’t have to be like this. The paper ends by describing a Golden Bridge strategy – one which might lead to a high-energy, clean-energy, ‘China proof’ and economically prosperous future for the Free World.
Professor Prins’ paper is entitled The Worm in the Rose, and is published today by Net Zero Watch. It can be downloaded here.
Notes:
The paper identifies six key fallacies that have led the energy policy debate astray:
- Fallacy One: There is a ‘green’ energy transition
- Fallacy Two: Energy is like other commodities
- Fallacy Three: Energy efficiency will bring nett reductions
- Fallacy Four: Renewables are cheaper than fossil fuels
- Fallacy Five: You can legislate around the laws of thermodynamics
- Fallacy Six: The UK has shown world-leading decarbonisation
It goes on to look at the strategic importance of motive power and the futility of battery electric vehicles, the threat of Chinese dominance, and then spells out thermodynamically and economically competent alternative approaches to a future of clean and abundant energy for all.’https://www.netzerowatch.com/the-worm-in-the-rose/
Whatever democracy is supposed to be it isn’t anymore in Australia. The China virus has allowed the Federal and state governments to rip away the freedoms once enjoyed. Once taken they will NEVER be returned! What is surprising and sad is how easily these freedoms were snatched from the citizens. Our political masters are selling us out to the highest bidder.
This is the Australian Federal Health Minister saying these vaccines are a TRIAL! If you don’t take the vaccine you are not anti-vax but you do not wish to be a Guinea Pig! Simple as that!!!
Here in the Land Down Under the all knowing Federal Government has banned using Ivermectin and HCQ but has recently approved vaccines from China and India. Is the Australian Federal Government willingly ignorant or is there another agenda? The Australian Government has banned these two treatments in spite of the fact that ‘There is abundant evidence that hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and ivermectin will cure COVID-19 if simple protocols are followed, making dangerous, rushed vaccines unnecessary. Moreover, any vaccination could be deadly so why are children forced to have them when they are almost totally without risk of COVID.
The abundant positive evidence in the treatment of COVID-19 with HCQ and ivermectin is thrilling, truthful, and troubling. It’s troubling because many federal officials refuse to admit it, resulting in needless deaths.
On March 23, 2020, Dr. Vladimir Zelenko reported he had treated about 500 Coronavirus patients with HCQ and had an astonishing 100% success rate. “Since last Thursday, my team has treated approximately 350 patients in Kiryas Joel [Orange County, NY] and another 150 patients in other areas of New York with the above regimen. Of this group and the information provided to me by affiliated medical teams, we have had ZERO deaths, ZERO hospitalizations, and ZERO intubations. In addition, I have not heard of any negative side effects other than approximately 10% of patients with temporary nausea and diarrhea.”
Wow, that’s impressive; however, the political physicians respond by saying it is “anecdotal evidence, not scientific.” Hey, if I am gasping for breath with COVID, the above is impressive evidence from dedicated physicians on the frontlines who have far more experience than the non-practicing physicians in federal ivory towers. In the same vein, the federal physicians only have at best “anecdotal evidence, not scientific,” for the “vaccines.” No actual scientific proof.
Dr. Zelenko declared, “All I’m doing is repurposing old, available drugs which we know their safety profiles, and using them in a unique combination in an outpatient setting.”
His critics always run to the negative study done by the VA showing HCQ was ineffective; however, for political reasons, the study results are often quoted but not the fact that the protocols were not followed! HCQ must be given early in the disease along with azithromycin (or doxycycline), and zinc be a lifesaver for the elderly. That was not done. Doctors waited until the Angel of Death was standing outside the patients’ rooms before the HCQ (alone) was finally administered in the study. We must discover who is responsible for those orders.
Even Junior High school kids would not be so irresponsible and dishonest.
Critical articles concerning HCQ often mention it was used in various trials that failed, but they think we are too stupid to point out they did not use azithromycin. Other trials did not use ordinary zinc, yet both are required for success.
I have been taking HCQ, azithromycin, and zinc once per week as a prophylactic, but I did not get it from my PCP. During a visit more than a year ago, I said to him, “Because of my advanced age and lung disease making me high risk, I would like a prescription for hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin in the event I get COVID-19. Since it has been used for 65 years for other afflictions, I realize it will be an off-label prescription, so I have put this request in a letter for documentation to be placed in my medical records.”
My young doctor’s immediate reply was, “No, it is a dangerous, a very dangerous drug.” Of course, he spoke before thinking which everyone has done at times. I told him, “No, it is not dangerous, let alone a very dangerous. It is even sold over the counter in all African nations except 6, many South American nations, most European nations, and Mexico.” Evidently, it is not dangerous, although aspirin can be dangerous for some people. Since then, I discovered that my eldest daughter was prescribed HCQ for arthritis a few years ago.
I have also discussed this with some of my friends of 40 years and subscribers who are medical doctors. They have confirmed the wisdom of my request. Furthermore, I have friends and subscribers in Zambia and South Africa taking HCQ for decades for malaria, testifying to its safety. I am taking it now as a prophylactic, and my minor arthritis shoulder pain of ten years ceased within a week of taking only three or four pills that week.
Most people would agree it is wonderful I lost my arthritis pain; however, the nonthinkers suggest that it would be very dangerous to use it against COVID! I hope my critics don’t mind if I receive two benefits from the harmless drug.
Many famous physicians have used HCQ successfully without losing a COVID-19 patient! Also, renowned epidemiologist Dr. Didier Raoult, leader of a French research team, administered HCQ and azithromycin to 80 patients and observed improvement in EVERY CASE except for a very sick 86-year-old with an advanced form of coronavirus infection.
Harvey A. Risch, M.D., Ph.D., a professor of epidemiology at Yale School of Public Health, provided very positive HCQ information in Newsweek. The Newsweek article was similar to his article in the American Journal of Epidemiology. His information justifies the lengthy quote.
“As professor of epidemiology at Yale School of Public Health, I have authored over 300 peer-reviewed publications and currently hold senior positions on the editorial boards of several leading journals. I am usually accustomed to advocating for positions within the mainstream of medicine, so have been flummoxed to find that, in the midst of a crisis, I am fighting for a treatment that the data fully support but which, for reasons having nothing to do with a correct understanding of the science, has been pushed to the sidelines. As a result, tens of thousands of patients with COVID-19 are dying unnecessarily. Fortunately, the situation can be reversed easily and quickly.
“I am referring, of course, to the medication hydroxychloroquine. When this inexpensive oral medication is given very early in the course of illness, before the virus has had time to multiply beyond control, it has shown to be highly effective, especially when given in combination with the antibiotics azithromycin or doxycycline and the nutritional supplement zinc.
“On May 27, I published an article in the American Journal of Epidemiology (AJE) entitled, ‘Early Outpatient Treatment of Symptomatic, High-Risk COVID-19 Patients that Should be
Ramped-Up Immediately as Key to the Pandemic Crisis.’ That article, published in the world’s leading epidemiology journal, analyzed five studies, demonstrating clear-cut and significant benefits to treated patients, plus other very large studies that showed the medication safety.
“Physicians who have been using these medications in the face of widespread skepticism have been truly heroic. They have done what the science shows is best for their patients, often at great personal risk. I myself know of two doctors who have saved the lives of hundreds of patients with these medications but are now fighting state medical boards to save their licenses and reputations. The cases against them are completely without scientific merit.
“Since publication of my May 27 article, seven more studies have demonstrated similar benefit. In a lengthy follow-up letter, also published by AJE, I discuss these seven studies and renew my call for the immediate early use of hydroxychloroquine in high-risk patients. These seven studies include: an additional 400 high-risk patients treated by Dr. Vladimir Zelenko, with zero deaths; four studies totaling almost 500 high-risk patients treated in nursing homes and clinics across the U.S., with no deaths; a controlled trial of more than 700 high-risk patients in Brazil, with significantly reduced risk of hospitalization and two deaths among 334 patients treated with hydroxychloroquine; and another study of 398 matched patients in France, also with significantly reduced hospitalization risk. Since my letter was published, even more doctors have reported to me their completely successful use.”
However, HCQ is not the only drug that is cheap, safe, effective, and available. The June 1, 2021 issue of Desert Review reported incredible success with another common drug, ivermectin, with COVID patients in India’s capital, Delhi. That state experienced a 97% decline in COVID while the state of Tamil Nadu’s cases tripled to the highest in India without it, and their deaths skyrocketed ten-fold! Justus R. Hope, M.D. wrote, “It is an absolute vindication of Ivermectin and early outpatient treatment. It is a clear refutation of the WHO, FDA, NIH, and CDC’s policies of ‘wait at home until you turn blue’ before you get treatment.”
Dr. Brian Tyson, co-owner of All Valley Urgent Care in El Centro, California, and Dr. George Fareed have treated over 6,200 COVID patients and made ivermectin a part of their standard regimen since October. “Dr. Fareed and I have treated over 6,200 patients for COVID and have not lost a single patient who was treated before day seven,” Tyson said in an interview with TheBlaze.
All right, the thinkers will wonder why federal and state health officials push COVID vaccinations with missionary zeal when they are so problematic, especially when there are common, cheap, harmless drugs that make vaccines unnecessary. That, my friend, is the problem: Cheap drugs would make vaccines superfluous. No doubt, there are many answers, such as there are buckets of billions available to the insiders. There are also massive egos involved. So, who will get the glory as well as the gold? If HCQ or ivermectin knocks out the coronavirus, then Fauci’s vaccines are unnecessary. Remember the Salk polio vaccine; how about a Fauci covid vaccine.
After doing COVID research for almost two years, I had a shocking thought today: I have read of no refutations of the major critics of the vaccines, only generalized declarations about the dedication of federal health workers, the great health care system because of vaccine success, the threat of millions of people dying if everyone doesn’t get the jab, etc. Why has no one gone after Drs. Peter McCullough, Vladimir Zelenko Didier Raoult, Harvey A. Risch, Brian Tyson, and others? The reason is those physicians are all heavyweights, and the federal health critics are over-matched and outclassed, so they refuse to confront, contradict, or have conflict with them.
Many state health officials are simply deficient, distant, and even dumb while the average physician who may be expert in surgery, family practice, OBGYN, etc., cannot be an expert in virology, immunology, or epidemiology.
All of us are dependent upon a few highly educated people in a very narrow specialized field to decide about this health issue.
The mainstream media consider Dr. Fauci the font of all wisdom, maybe like the Oracle of Delphi, but the oracle was a sham. It seems Fauci’s purpose in life is to annoy people when he is not involved in bat or puppy research.
He is very successful at that.
Is COVID a sham, a scam, or a scheme? It is for sure a scare. You have the right to decide for yourself after looking at the available information.
I’ve made up my mind, and my life depends on my decision.
The evidence indicates the COVID-19 vaccines are not safe and effective but dirty and dangerous! However, there is impressive proof that HCQ and ivermectin will cure COVID when protocols are followed.’https://donboys.cstnews.com/impressive-proof-that-hcq-and-ivermectin-will-cure-covid-when-protocols-are-followed
‘Conservative radio host Dennis Prager revealed that he has tested positive for COVID-19 and that over the past year he did not restrict his contact with other people, hoping his body would build “natural immunity” to the virus. He took many of the maligned non-FDA-approved therapeutic medicines in the process.
The 73-year-old shared the news Monday while broadcasting “The Dennis Prager Show” from his home.
“My symptoms were at their worst with regard to chills. I didn’t have a lot of fever,” he said. “That was pretty much it and what is important for me to tell you is that what I believe I had decided to do over the course of the last year and a half, I believe have been justified. I wanted to achieve natural immunity which is by far the more robust immunity one can have against COVID or any virus.”
Prager stated that over 15 studies have “demonstrated the power of immunity acquired by previously having the virus” so he started taking therapeutic medicines last year, specifically hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, and ivermectin.‘https://www.breakingchristiannews.com/articles/display_art.html?ID=33971
Our Australian Fedeal Government has outlawed the use of HCQ and Ivermectin! Why? All for our health safety!
whatyareckon 