Sky News
All posts tagged Sky News
Piers Morgan begins his stint on Sky tonight in Australia with his pitiful interview with President Trump. President Trump was correct in calling Morgan a “fool” for not knowing the 2020 election was fraudulently stolen!
Sadly most of the news sources here in Australia are just like those in the USA in their cover-up for the dementia geriatric Fake President. Thankfully we have Sky after Dark!
There are those political commentators that claim to be conservative but at the same time spout their hatred for President Trump and for that I don’t trust them and if I can help it I don’t read what they have to say and if they are being interviewed I change the channel. The following article hits a few of those jelly fish Australian make-believe conservatives such as Greg Sheridan who appears quite often on what is supposed to be conservative Sky News after dark. Sheridan and others of his ilk are the worse of the worse for they are Leftist wolves masquerading as conservatives but their speech gives them away.
‘The storming of the Capitol will be written into folklore. I say this not because of the import of the event. It’s hardly a Bastille moment. But because the media is largely in the hands of the Left which will want to exaggerate and enshrine its significance.
I don’t read left-wing media. I don’t have to. I read The Australian. That’s as left as I ever want to go. Well, that’s not entirely true. I don’t want to go any distance in that direction at all. But then what to do? Even Fox News is scurrying leftwards.
Paul Monk in the weekend edition of The Australian, among a number of those penning anti-Trump diatribes, spoiling my breakfast, wrote this: “At Fox news, no less, widely respected anchor Chris Wallace called the assault on congress ‘the rule of the mob versus the rule of law and the Constitution’”.
Doesn’t Monk know about Wallace? Widely respected by whom? He’s the slimiest of fifth-columnist lefties pretending he’s objective.
You don’t have to look too hard to find tendentious reasoning (to put it mildly) among those despising Trump. This is Greg Sheridan on Trump’s claim of massive voter fraud: “There is no evidence for this at all.” No evidence at all for what? You see the sleight of hand. There is plenty of evidence of fraud. Even I saw some of it caught on video. But Sheridan could come back and say, yes, but no evidence of “massive” fraud.
Hmm? How massive would it have to be to swing the election in the few battleground states which mattered? Not very massive at all, is the answer.
This is Sheridan on the Capitol Hill melee: “But this was an attempt at street-fighting fascism. At its worst, America recently resembled Weimar Germany with rival violent street gangs more than willing to fight each other.” Really? Are we really going to go to the rise of Nazism to find a parallel? And then notice these “rival” street gangs.
There have been no rival street gangs. There have been variants of one Antifa/BLM street gang, creating havoc, desecrating, burning and looting, across numbers of cities. Rival gangs my backside!
Sheridan listed a number of Trump’s great achievements — and they are many and great. But he ends this way: “Of course he got a lot of things wrong too…” What things? Name at least one. Don’t leave the Trump-haters hanging. But, of course, he’s out of ammo when it comes to anything substantive. He resorts to this kind of thing: “Trump’s frequently contemptible language and personal behaviour…” Pathetic!
Trump’s presidency was on course to be the most successful in the modern era before COVID provided a cudgel for his ubiquitous adversaries. “Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil walks about like a roaring lion, seeking whom he may devour.” This biblical quote from 1 Peter applies pretty well to the modern Democratic Party and its traditional-media and social-media comrades. And they took their opportunity to devour him when Trump was faced with something almost entirely out of his control. He has been the defining political victim of COVID.
But what of the incident on Capitol Hill? Does Trump bear any responsibility? I think he does. At the same time, let’s not over-egg the cake. He didn’t want violence, counter to what Sheridan and other Trump-despisers insinuate. Why would he? He called for a peaceful protest to steel the gumption of Republicans in the Congress:
We’re going walk down to the Capitol, and we’re going to cheer on our brave senators, and congressmen and women. We’re probably not going to be cheering so much for some of them because you’ll never take back our country with weakness. You have to show strength, and you have to be strong… I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard…. But we’re going to try and give our Republicans, the weak ones, because the strong ones don’t need any of our help, we’re going to try and give them the kind of pride and boldness that they need to take back our country… So, let’s walk down Pennsylvania Avenue. I want to thank you all. God bless you and God bless America. Thank you all for being here, this is incredible. Thank you very much. Thank you.
Does this have the look of an inciter in action? It doesn’t. Why then am I attributing some responsibility for what occurred to Trump? He should know that within any large group of peaceful protesters there are always fools and troublemakers.
In this case, with passions so high, which he had contributed to stoking, and with the stakes so high, he should have contemplated the possibility of things going awry; e.g., that Antifa thugs might take advantage of the opportunity. It’s easy to find reports that this, in fact, happened.
Inviting a large impassioned crowd to descend on a building within which parliament is in progress is fraught with peril. I can’t see an upside. Someone of sense might have told Trump that. Sometimes all of us need telling.
Finally, to perspective; a quality sadly missing from much of today’s commentary, plagued as it is by presentism. This incident does not leave Trump’s legacy in tatters. Nor does it diminish the template he created for prosperity at home and peace abroad. Strong borders, fewer regulations, lower taxes, stronger military, tough love for allies, tough measures against China, innovative and brave initiatives for peace in the Middle East. This template will not appeal to Democrats but it most definitely will inform the next Republican administration. Assuming there will be a next Republican administration.
Donald Trump, properly viewed, was (is for little while longer) a great president. He slipped up at the last; pained by his conviction that the election was stolen. I think he felt personally aggrieved and disappointed. But I also think he thought he was fighting for truth, justice and the American way. Of course, the Trump-haters will only ever point to his personal motive.
It was messy. Nonetheless, the evidence of shenanigans in compiling and counting the votes piled up. As I’ve said, some of it caught on video. Mainstream journalists lacked interest. That says it all. Political hacks to a man and woman. Me, I am with Trump. Deeply sceptical that 81 million Americans (51.4 per cent of vote) voted for a guy in the basement whose mind is failing. Obama managed just 66 million (51.1 per cent) in 2012.
An afterword. Just exactly how much savvy do they have; these so-called conservatives dancing on Trump’s grave? What do they think is now in store for the US and for us all, having played their part in Trump’s demise by four years of merciless sniping?’https://quadrant.org.au/opinion/qed/2021/01/wish-granted-good-and-hard/
This is really a sad story for it seems, all too often the government has funds for the foolish things in life but not for those folk that really matter.
‘We have allowed our farmers on the brink of financial ruin to cash in food vouchers to feed their families while hipsters are handed thousands of dollars to “experiment” with paint brushes. But instead of sheepishly pocketing their cash and disappearing into artistic obscurity, these artists want more money.
And the broader community of artists has become so consumed by identity politics that they now want money to be taken away from organisations with too many white people and too many men and given to those with more “diverse” resumes. Their ideology stems from the entitled belief it is their right to pocket the $177 million annual funding pool given to the Australia Council for Arts. The mechanisms by which we distribute tax dollars are broken. Meanwhile, the Australian Government has kicked 1300 Queensland farmers off household assistance. The $244 weekly payment was helping feed the children of farmers battling one of the worst droughts in living memory. Anyone who says we cannot afford to help these people is a fool. We have the money, it is just going to the wrong people. And if we don’t help them, the economic fallout of towns collapsing will be far worse. Treasurer Josh Frydenberg rightly pointed out that Australia’s measly economic 1.7 per cent growth forecast lost roughly 0.25 per cent to the drought. But while we debate how many dollars to send our farmers lets go over what we supposedly can afford. In August alone, more than $180,000 was given to “emerging and experimental” artists. Sydney musician Gail Priest, who describes herself as a “solo electro-acoustic” performer was given $16,000. “I seek to have a multifaceted practice that explores the aural realm both materially and conceptually,” she writes on her websites. Artist Josh Harle was given $46,507 from the same funding pool but this writer cannot work out exactly what he does. He describes his art as an investigation into “the virtual spaces generated by emerging technologies, our encounters with the world through them, and their social and political impacts”. Cool. Artist Rebecca Gallo got $42,435, Lucas Ihlein got $43,300 and something called Fusebox Festival got $50,800. The Australia Council which gave them the tax dollars was contacted but their spokeswoman Brianna Roberts declined to reveal details of their projects. “We cannot provide more specific details about individual projects for privacy reasons,” she said. No transparency, no accountability. They should be stripped of their ability to decide who gets your money, but instead, artists are making a move for even more funds. More than 700 artists released a letter this month calling for arts ministers around the country to revise funding procedures. They want more “diversity” and more money to come from “Major Performing Arts” projects and instead given to obscure individual artists. “The MPA Framework is a roadblock to Australian culture’s growth and survival,” the letter said. “Currently, MPA funding constitutes 59 per cent of Australia Council grants, a proportion that is ‘ring-fenced’. “The direct consequence of this is severely diminished discretionary funds available to independent artists.” University of Melbourne academic Jo Caust followed up the letter with an article in The Conversation where she argued money should be pulled from Australia’s top orchestras, operas, theatres and ballets. These “traditions”, she says, are too European. Too white. “The MPA organisations include ten orchestras, five opera companies, eight theatre companies, and three ballet companies, “she wrote. “These companies are generally focused on the western canon and follow the European tradition in terms of their cultural priorities. “They tend to be white and male dominated in their leadership – Bangarra is the only First Nations company. The very nature of major performing companies excludes all other art forms, such as literature and the visual arts.” Art is subjective, this writer accepts that. But it is absurd to suggest that money should be pulled from our greatest orchestras and given to someone who describes themselves as an “electro-acoustic” performer. And while the artists tear each other apart over these generous grants lets all spare a thought for the farmers who would have lifechanging circumstances with even a fraction of that money.’ https://www.skynews.com.au/details/5daf94ef1de1c4001ae90b80?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Viewpoint%202310&utm_content=Viewpoint%202310+CID_e1d97ab0f215953a240ca46069646113&utm_source=Daily%20newsletter&utm_term=Entitled%20artists%20squander%20millions%20while%20our%20cattle%20starve
From the Left of Centre online news source at news.com.au “THERE were wild scenes in Parliament today as around 30 protesters shut down Question Time for around half an hour.
Paramedics were called after the activists glued themselves to a rail in the public gallery, chanting, “Close the camps!”, “You are all complicit!” and “Your politics is killing people!”
Screaming activists were pinned to the ground by officials and dragged away, although the sticky situation dragged on as security struggled to detach those more firmly glued to the balustrade.
The group apparently behind the disruption, the Whistleblowers, Activists and Citizens Alliance (WACA), tweeted: “We’ve shut down Parliament.”
Speaker Tony Smith suspended proceedings until all the protesters were eventually removed just after 2.30pm. Guards had to use hand sanitiser to peel them off the rail.” http://www.news.com.au/national/politics/question-time-suspended-over-protests/news-story/d98b916a21959ee9462312b4ce06d41e
“Do what I want or I’ll glue myself to something!” Very mature thinking!
whatyareckon 