There’s something sinister here in this vaccine push and people are paying dearly.
Pfizer
All posts tagged Pfizer
‘Bad news about the dangers that mRNA vaccines may pose to the heart and blood vessels keeps coming.
A new study of 566 patients who received either the Pfizer or Moderna vaccines shows that signs of cardiovascular damage soared following the shots. The risk of heart attacks or other severe coronary problems more than doubled months after the vaccines were administered, based on changes in markers of inflammation and other cell damage.
Patients had a 1 in 4 risk for severe problems after the vaccines, compared to 1 in 9 before.
Dr. Steven Gundry [EDIT, see note at bottom], a Nebraska physician and retired cardiac surgeon, presented the findings at the Scientific Sessions of the American Heart Association’s annual conference in Boston last week. An abstract is available in Circulation, the AHA’s scientific journal.
(SOURCE: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/abs/10.1161/circ.144.suppl_1.10712)
Dr. Gundry regularly tests patients for early signs of heart problems, such as inflammation and cellular death. The patients are then given a score designed to predict their risk of developing an acute coronary syndrome in the next five years.
What’s an acute coronary syndrome? Glad you asked. Per the Mayo Clinic:
Acute coronary syndrome is a term used to describe a range of conditions associated with sudden, reduced blood flow to the heart. One such condition is a heart attack (myocardial infarction) — when cell death results in damaged or destroyed heart tissue.
Gundry found that his patients saw an increase in risk from 11 percent to 25 percent, and the risks persisted for at least 2.5 months after the second dose. His takeaway:
“We conclude that the mRNA [vaccines] dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination.”
Which might explain why cardiologists around the world are seeing cases like this:
Just another post-vaccine case of myocarditis, this one requiring a 38-year-old woman to be put on a heart-lung bypass machine to save her her life.
Mild n’ rare, amirite, Dr. Walensky?
Oh well. Can’t make an omelette and all that.’https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/if-you-like-heart-problems-youll
In Queensland, Australia the “CCP” state government has come out saying ‘Those who are fully vaccinated and with proof of a negative test from within 72 hours of travel will be allowed into the state without quarantining, with the state government accepting that it will likely lead to a spike in case numbers.
To help keep a lid on any spread, a government spokesman told The Courier Mail that, from Tuesday, a range of billboards and digital media would feature the message “No jabs? No pubs, no gigs, no footy, no movies and no festivals” for unvaccinated people.
“More and more Queenslanders are getting vaccinated every day, but there is still a long way to go,” he said.
“This campaign will remind people about the rewards of getting vaccinated and direct them to a web page where they can book an appointment. Those who are vaccinated will be able to enjoy more freedoms than those who are unvaccinated after December 17.”’https://www.news.com.au/national/queensland/news/no-jabs-no-fun-queensland-targets-unvaccinated-in-tough-new-ad-campaign/news-story/18b2f19543bce6ae5e568a0d3359644f
Then in the CCP state of Victoria the CCP Premier Dan Andrews the craziness over vaccines for the CCP virus is being considered mandatory for children five to eleven. Yes, ‘Victorian children as young as five could face a vaccine mandate — meaning they’re locked out of the state’s hospitality venues and major events.
The dramatic move would see kids aged between five and 11 would be subject to a ‘no jab, no play’ system when the vaccine eventually becomes available to youngsters.’https://www.news.com.au/national/victoria/news/andrews-government-refuses-to-rule-out-vaccine-mandate-for-children-aged-five-to-11/news-story/8194be19ed48cd5c11244a3f27cd4a1c
If the Federal Government doesn’t step in soon these Marxist politicians will continue their reign of terror.
This Australian Senator is an apartheid promoter for that’s exactly what CCP vaccine mandates are all about. Having a Senator like her says a lot about the people who put her in the Senate!
‘I wanted to tell you what I am doing about ongoing and proposed medical segregation and workplace jab mandates by state governments and private corporations. You might have heard that Liberal Senators Gerard Rennick and Alex Antic and One Nation Senators Pauline Hanson and Malcolm Roberts have announced they are withholding their votes from the government in the Senate until Australians are given protection from vaccine discrimination.
An attempt was made by One Nation in the Senate this morning (Monday) to bring in a bill which would have ended vaccine discrimination. Senators Rennick and Antic as well as Matthew Canavan, Sam McMahon and Concetta Fierravanti-Wells voted for that bill. The bill was sadly defeated. As I am not a Senator, I did not get a vote. However, the One Nation bill is very similar to the one I have co-sponsored with Craig Kelly in the House of Representatives, titled the No Domestic COVID Vaccine Passports Bill 2021. I have already voted for this bill in the House of Representatives (unsuccessfully sadly) and will vote for it again and again and again, if and when the bill is given a chance to go forward.
But here’s what I’m doing now.
Earlier today, I informed Nationals leader Barnaby Joyce (and the Nationals Party Room of which I am a member) that, unless we act to stop state governments and private corporations from discriminating against non-vaccinated Australians when it comes to either employment or clientele, then I intend to not be beholden to party room discipline when voting in the House of Representatives.
To be clear, until federal action is taken against vaccine discrimination, I will be voting according to my conscience (or abstaining from votes) on bills and substantive motions rather than just voting with the government as MPs usually do.
As I was elected as a member of the Liberal National Party, I will continue to support the government with confidence motions and supply as well as procedural motions (except if they relate to ending vaccine discrimination). My support is not guaranteed on bills or substantive motions. When action is taken to stop vaccine discrimination, I will go back to the normal process of voting with the government on most, if not all, bills and substantive motions.
I have no doubt this stance will result in personal attacks on me. But far more important than my political and personal reputation is the prospect of ending the tyranny, the discrimination, the segregation, the job losses and the negative business impacts that are all being wrought (or are about to be wrought) on my fellow Australians.
You can support my stance at www.georgechristensen.com.au/vax
Here’s hoping we see some action soon.
God bless you and your family.
Take care,
George Christensen MP‘https://nationfirst.substack.com/p/-alert-what-im-doing-to-stop-vaccine
Aussie ‘Taxpayers are facing a hefty bill for rare but significant coronavirus vaccine injuries, with at least 10,000 people planning to claim under the federal government’s no-fault indemnity scheme.
Services Australia is building an online portal, to be launched next month, for uncapped claims above $5000 from those who suffered injury and loss of income due to their COVID-19 vaccine, with compensation for medical costs and lost wages to be paid by the government.
Shine Lawyers head of medical negligence Clare Eves said the amount of the claims “could be really significant” for people who experienced rare but serious adverse vaccine reactions, such as stroke and inflammation of the heart.
“Adverse events, even though they happen to a tiny proportion of people, for the people it does impact it’s really quite devastating,” Ms Eves said.
The Therapeutic Goods Administration recorded 78,880 adverse events linked to COVID-19 vaccination, representing a small minority (0.21 per cent) of the 37.8 million doses administered to 18.4 million people, by November 7. The vast majority of those 78,000 adverse events were mild side effects, including headache, nausea and sore arms.
More than 10,000 people have registered their interest to make a claim since registration opened on the federal health department’s website in September, official data shows, meaning it would cost at least $50 million if each claim is approved.’https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/more-than-10-000-australians-have-filed-coronavirus-vaccine-injury-claims-20211115-p598yy.html
‘This one coming from data on more than 4 million vaccinated Swedes
People appear to die at rates 20 percent or more above normal for weeks after receiving their second Covid vaccine dose, according to data from a huge Swedish study.
The figures are buried in a preprint paper on vaccine effectiveness released last month. The headline finding of the paper was that protection against Covid, including severe cases, plunged after six months.
The researchers did not explicitly examine deaths from all causes – which have risen since the summer in many countries that have highly vaccinated populations.
But on page 32 of the 34-page report, a chart shows that 3,939 of 4.03 million Swedes who received the second dose died less than two weeks later.
(SOURCE: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3949410)
Over a one-year period, that rate of death would translate into an annual mortality rate of about 2.5 percent a year – 1 person in 40 – almost three times the overall Swedish average. In a typical year, about 1 in 115 Swedes dies.
Of course, that huge gap does not account for an important confounding factor: younger people, who have a much lower risk of death, were less likely to be vaccinated.
But Sweden also provides detailed data on overall deaths nationally, making a crude baseline comparison possible.
That data shows that from an average of about 1,650 Swedes died every week between 2015 and 2019 between April 1 and early August, the period in which almost all of those 4 million Swedes in the study received their second dose. Death rates hardly varied over those years.
In other words, during the spring and summer, Sweden normally has about 3,300 deaths every two weeks – not just in the people who received vaccines, but in all 10.6 million of its people.
So let’s make an incredibly conservative assumption, one that strongly favors the vaccines. (The next couple paragraphs are a bit tricky, but I hope the payoff is worth taking the time to read and think through them.)
Assume that the group of people who received vaccines were so much older and unhealthier than those who didn’t that they would have accounted for every single death in Sweden whether or not they were vaccinated. In other words, assume that even if the vaccines did not exist, every person in Sweden who died would have been part of that group of 4.03 million people the researchers tracked – while not one other person would have died.
In that case, those 4.03 million people “should” have about 3,300 deaths every two weeks. They CANNOT HAVE MORE – because all of Sweden does not have more.
But the vaccines do exist. Those 4.03 million people received them. And in the two weeks after receiving the second vaccine dose, as a group, the researchers reported they had not about 3,300 deaths, but 3,939.
And 3,939 deaths is about 20 percent more deaths than “should” have occurred in those two post-vaccine weeks. Again, the 20 percent figure understates the real gap, because in the real world some deaths will occur in the 6.6 million unvaccinated people too, so the actual baseline number for the vaccinated group is not 3,300 deaths but somewhat lower.
Unfortunately, the researchers did not report any details on the deaths, so it is impossible to know if they are disproportionately cardiovascular. It is also impossible to know whether one particular vaccine was disproportionately linked to deaths. (Sweden used mostly the Pfizer mRNA vaccine, as well as some of AstraZeneca’s DNA/AAV vaccine, which is not available in the United States, and a small amount of Moderna’s mRNA vaccine.)
Of course, it is just possible the extra deaths are due to chance. Or that the handful of elderly Swedes who received vaccines in February and March accounted for a hugely disproportionate number of the post-vaccine deaths. (Because per-week Swedish death rates are higher in the winter, a large number of post-vaccine deaths in those months would somewhat reduce the strength of the signal, though it would still exist.)
But the caveats aside, the Swedish figures offer a very large real-world dataset apparently showing a notable increase in all-cause mortality directly following Covid vaccination.
They are yet another piece of evidence in an increasingly worrying picture – alongside case and anecdotal reports, a known link to heart inflammation in young men, the updated Pfizer clinical trial data revealing a numerical imbalance in deaths in vaccinated people, and most importantly the general rise in all-cause mortality in many countries.
And all of these red flags come for vaccines that – if the Swedish data are correct – may actually raise the risk of Covid infection after about eight months.
Yes, RAISE. See how that black line drops below the zero level on the top chart? That represents negative effectiveness, which is another way to say people who are vaccinated are MORE likely to be infected than those who aren’t.
And, as the second chart shows, effectiveness against severe Covid infection is also spiraling towards zero.
Yet the Biden Administration and governments across Europe continue to try to force more people to take these vaccines.
Why?’https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/another-major-red-flag-about-covid
whatyareckon 