During the latest Ferguson, MO riots four members of the Oath Keepers were requested from infowars.com to protect their journalists while working in Ferguson. You can read the article relating to this at http://oathkeepers.org/oktester/a-snowball-named-reuters/. What I want you to note in this photo is the man on the right taking either photos or video. While others in this man’s Islamic faith are beheading Christians and throwing sodomites off buildings he works the system in good ole Ferguson, Mo, USA! Oh yes, which of these three do you think is the greatest threat to your safety?
Muslims
All posts tagged Muslims
Rep to Staff: Ask Muslim Visitors to Pledge Allegiance
by Reeve Hamilton and Alexa Ura, The Texas Tribune
January 29, 2015
*Editor’s note: This story has been updated throughout.
Freshman state Rep. Molly White, R-Belton, is not in Austin today to celebrate Texas Muslim Capitol Day. But she left instructions for the staff in her Capitol office on how to handle visitors who are, including asking them to declare allegiance to the United States.
“I did leave an Israeli flag on the reception desk in my office with instructions to staff to ask representatives from the Muslim community to renounce Islamic terrorist groups and publicly announce allegiance to America and our laws,” she posted on Facebook. “We will see how long they stay in my office.”
Texas Muslim Capitol Day, which began in 2003, is organized by the Texas chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations and brings members of Muslim communities in Houston, Dallas and other areas of the state to the Capitol to learn about the political process and meet state lawmakers. Texas has the eighth-largest Muslim population in the United States, with more than 420,000 Muslims residing in the state, according to estimates from the Texas State Historical Association.
Enlarge
Post from the Facebook page of state Rep. Molly White, R-Belton, on Jan. 29, 2015.
Even before participants in Thursday’s event — about 100 Muslims, mostly children — could get to lawmakers’ offices, they encountered opposition from a group of about 25 protesters outside the Capitol holding signs. One said, “Radical Islam is the New Nazi.” Another said, “Go Home & Take Obama With You.”
The Muslim group held a press conference on the South steps of the Capitol, where one of the protesters yanked the microphone from an event organizer, shouting, “Islam will never dominate the United States and by the grace of God, it will never dominate Texas.”
As the group of Muslims continued the event by singing “The Star-Spangled Banner,” the interruptions persisted, with the protesters yelling, “Islam is a lie!” and “No Sharia here!”
Mustafaa Carroll, the executive director of the Houston chapter of the Council on American Islamic Relations, called the behavior “very frustrating.” Carroll said this was the first year protesters showed up since Muslim Capitol Day began.
“I’m more concerned with state leaders and what they say than I am about anybody else because they are the lawmakers,” he said.
The Council on American-Islamic Relations has sent a letter to House Speaker Joe Straus asking whether White had violated ethics rules by instructing her staff to ask Muslim visitors to her office to declare their allegiance to the United States.
“Our ethics question is: Has Rep. White violated any House rules in creating such an internal office policy that is selectively being enforced to discriminate against certain religious minorities trying to meet with her or her staff?” the letter asks. “Are House members prohibited from making constituents take oaths before meeting with their elected representatives or House staff?”
In a statement, Straus said: “Legislators have a responsibility to treat all visitors just as we expect to be treated — with dignity and respect. Anything else reflects poorly on the entire body and distracts from the very important work in front of us.” His statement did not address the ethics complaint.
Neither Gov. Greg Abbott nor Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick has weighed in on the matter.
As of mid-morning, the Israeli flag was still on the desk in White’s office. By noon, she had released a follow-up Facebook post that added: “I do not apologize for my comments. … If you love America, obey our laws and condemn Islamic terrorism, then I embrace you as a fellow American. If not, then I do not.”
But at 3 p.m., White released a new statement saying she welcomed “all of my constituents who would like to come and visit our office in the Texas State Capitol.”
“As law-abiding American citizens, we all have the privilege and the right to freedom of speech granted to us by the First Amendment,” she wrote. “… As a proud Texan and American I fully denounce all terrorist groups or organizations who’s [sic] intent is to hurt and destroy the great state of Texas and our nation.”
This was not the first time White has aired her concerns about Muslims on Facebook.
In June, she took to the social network to pledge that “finding Jihadists in Texas and arresting them” and purging the state “of all Muslim, military training camps including Imam’s [sic] who promote, assist and encourage Jihad” would be among her top priorities as a legislator.
In the comments on that post, she warned her followers that “Muslims cannot be trusted no matter how peaceful they appear.”
“If they come here and convert to the American way of life I may be more willing to trust,” she continued. “When they come here to advance their way of life, Islam, then no trust there.”
This article originally appeared in The Texas Tribune at http://www.texastribune.org/2015/01/29/rep-staff-ask-muslim-visitors-pledge-allegiance/.
The Saudi king may be dead but his ruthlessness will continue to live through his son! Wake up Western World!
Remember the frog in the pot who was unaware that the water was slowly boiling to the point when he would soon be dead. That’s exactly what is taking place with creeping Sharia in Australia and other Western nations. We kafirs are in denial all the while the WATER IS COMING TO A BOIL!
Andrew Bolt isn’t afraid to say the truth.
“PROTESTERS around the West, horrified by the massacre in Paris, have held up pens and chanted “Je suis Charlie” — I am Charlie.
They lie. The Islamist terrorists are winning, and the coordinated attacks on the Charlie Hebdo magazine and kosher shop will be just one more success. One more step to our gutless surrender.
Al-Qaeda in Yemen didn’t attack Charlie Hebdo because we are all Charlie Hebdo.
The opposite. It sent in the brothers Cherif and Said Kouachi because Charlie Hebdo was almost alone.
Unlike most politicians, journalists, lawyers and other members of our ruling classes, this fearless magazine dared to mock Islam in the way the Left routinely mocks Christianity. Unlike much of our ruling class, it refused to sell out our freedom to speak.
Its greatest sin — to the Islamists — was to republish the infamous cartoons of Denmark’s Jyllands-Posten which mocked Mohammed, and then to publish even more of its own, including one showing the Muslim prophet naked.
Are we really all Charlie? No, no and shamefully no.
No Australian newspaper dared published those pictures, too, bar one which did so in error.
The Obama administration three years ago even attacked Charlie Hebdo for publishing the naked Mohammed cartoon, saying it was “deeply offensive”.
President Barack Obama even told the United Nations “the future must not belong to those who slander the Prophet of Islam” and damned a YouTube clip “Innocence of Muslims” which did just that. The filmmaker was thrown in jail.
We are all Charlie?
In Australia, Charlie Hebdo would almost certainly be sued into silence, to the cheers of some of the very protesters now claiming to be its great defenders.
Victoria now has absurd religious vilification laws, thanks to Labor, that were first used to punish two Christian preachers who at a seminar quoted the Koran’s teaching on jihad and — complained the judge — made their audience laugh.
Australia also has oppressive racial vilification laws which Prime Minister Tony Abbott had promised to relax but last year decided to keep, saying changing them would become a “complication” in making Muslim Australians side with the rest of us against jihadists.
One more surrender, and did you note how most “serious” journalists brayed for this muzzle? Celebrated when two of my own articles were banned?
But our journalists haven’t really needed a muzzle. They have been only too eager to shut themselves up rather than call out the growing threat of jihadism, brought to us by insanely stupid programs of mass immigration from the Third World.
When Dutch political leader Geert Wilders toured Australia to warn against the danger Islamism posed to our physical safety and our freedom, he was treated as a pariah and the protesters who pushed and heckled his audience were handed the microphone instead.
When jihadists screaming “Allahu Akbar” shot dead US soldiers at Fort Hood or coffee shop patrons in Sydney, ABC and Fairfax journalists pretended they had no idea what ideology could have motivated such slaughter.
When Boko Haram jihadists screaming “Allahu Akbar” kidnapped nearly 300 Nigerian schoolgirls, forcing them to convert to Islam and selling them to be raped, Islamist apologist and terrorism lecturer Waleed Aly refused even to acknowledge on Channel 10 that Boko Haram actually had an Islamist agenda, describing it merely as a group of vigilantes.
And when SBS filmed the then Mufti of Australia, Sheik Hilaly, praising suicide bombers as heroes in the Lakemba mosque just days before the September 11 attacks, it refused to air the footage for fear we might get the “wrong idea”.
This will go on. Be sure of it. Your ruling classes will not easily admit to having made an error that cannot now be fixed. It will prefer oppression to freedom, if that brings at least the illusion of peace — and many may even think they are right.
Hear already the lies.
You are told Muslim groups condemn the killings as unIslamic. Yet the Koran and Hadith preach death to unbelievers who mock Islam, and tell of Mohammed killing poets, singing girls and others who made fun of him.
No greater authority than the Ayatollah Khomeini, the then spiritual ruler of Iran, ordered the killing of writer Salman Rushdie for making mock of Islam in his The Satanic Verses.
We are also told the pen is mightier than the sword, but tell that to the people in the Charlie Hebdo office who found their fistfuls of pens no match for two Kalashnikovs.
Tell that now to even the brave leaders of Jyllands-Posten, who, after years of jihadist plots against their staff have had enough, refusing now to republish cartoons from Charlie Hebdo for fear of yet more attacks.
“It shows that violence works,” it admitted.
Everywhere you will find other papers making the same call.
We are all Charlie?
Bull. Absolute self-serving rubbish. The sell-outs are everywhere and will grow stronger.
The West’s political leaders have already told Muslim leaders they agree that mocking Islam is a sin, and have even passed laws — in France, too — making it unlawful.
They have attacked the very few journalists and politicians who dared warn against the Islamist threat.
Some now back Muslim demands for a boycott of Israel or at least greater recognition for the terrorists who run large parts of Palestinian territory.
Anything for peace, even if it means submission.
And for all the protests this past week, submission is what you must expect.”1
In Australia after the Martin Place siege the tweet “I’ll ride with you” went viral. This tweet was saying the murdering mad man at Martin Place was not a true Muslim. Now, we will hear that these men in Paris too are not true Muslims.
If the murderers of Fort Hood, Martin Place, Charlie Hebdo and the Paris Kosher store massacre are not true Muslims what are they? The cry “Allahu akbar!” is not a Mormon, Baptist, Catholic, or even an atheist cry. How in the world is a non-Muslim going to detect a true Muslim?
What will now happen? One thing is for sure, more of our freedoms such as speech, travel, etc will be slowly taken away because those who are not true Muslims, according to the media, politicians and imams, will continue killing non-Muslims for insulting the Islamic prophet through cartoons, films etc. Wake up and smell the coffee while you still have a head to smell!
Monday December 15, 2014 Muslim Man Haron Monis walked into a cafe in Martin Place, Sydney, Australia taking 17 people as hostages. Early the next morning two hostages and Monis were dead. At the same time the mad Muslim man of Martin Place was terrorizing a Sydney cafe Islamic terrorists were slaughtering over 100 students and teachers in a Pakistani school.
Because a Muslim was the gunman in the Sydney cafe the media began their protection of Islam by saying he was a lone wolf, mentally ill and was not really a Muslim. Whatever! Along with this media onslaught one individual tweeted #illridewithyou. This tweet according to the bbc.com had “40,000 tweets using the hashtag #Illridewithyou in just two hours, according to Twitter Australia; 150,000 in four hours. And it’s been rapidly growing since.” The murderer and his faith followers became the victims that day.
Surely the terrorists who murdered the children and their teachers in Pakistan are not true Muslims either! All the Islamic Council of Victoria and the United Muslim Migrant Association could say concerning the Pakistan murders is they strongly condemned “this callous and senseless act of violence. ICV believes that retributive acts of violence between groups who are in conflict are not the solution to the problem.” It was just an act “of violence” caused by two groups “in conflict”!? What a PATHETIC outcry to such murderous violence!
Why aren’t there thousand of Muslims on the Sydney streets protesting both the Sydney and Pakistani murders like they did the film about their Mohammad? WHERE ARE THEY? WHERE IS THE VERY PUBLIC OUTCRY BY THESE FOLLOWERS OF ISLAM? WHAT HYPOCRISY!!!!
All the tweeting, media protection and silence in the midst of this world-wide Islamic terrorism is reminiscent of the time when a man by the name of Pilate asked the Jews whether they wanted a guilty murderer by the name of Barabbas or a guiltless man called Jesus to be set free? Those political religious hypocrites of that day chose freedom for Barabbas and a cross for Jesus! Not much has changed!
It seems that Islam has a lot of Muslims and non-Muslims proclaiming it is only a few radical Islamic extremists beheading, raping and murdering “unbelievers”. These Islamists and their Islamic fans say the majority within the Islamic faith are moderates! In fact the United States Commander and Chief went as far as to say on CNN that “ISIL is not ‘Islamic”! Is this the rhetoric of those who are simply fools or simply fooled?
Daniel Greenfield recently wrote in Front Page Magazine that “The true moderate Muslims are secular liberals of loosely Christian and Jewish persuasion who have invented and believe in a moderate Islam that doesn’t exist outside of their own heads. This secular Islam, which values all life, is dedicated to social justice and universal tolerance, is a counterpart of their own bastardized religions. And they are too afraid to wake up and realize that it doesn’t exist.”
According to Reuters news the supposed ally of the United States in its fight against Islamic terrorism, Saudi Arabia, has beheaded 26 people in August of this year alone!! This brings the total of those beheaded to 59 for 2014!
What can a person lose their head for in Saudi Arabia? Well, committing adultery or converting from Islam to another religion can cause one to literally lose their head! Is this ally, Saudi Arabia, the face of moderate Islam? Is this the type of government those in Australia, the United States and the UK wish to live under?
Totally following Islam includes Sharia Law. Sharia affects every part of ones life. The following is from Atanswers.com.
“Countries using strict forms of Sharia Law include:
Death for Blasphemy:
1. Afghanistan
2. Bahrain
3. Iran
4. Mauritania
5. Oman
6. Pakistan
7. Yemen
8. Saudi Arabia
9. Gaza
Imprisonment for Blasphemy:
1. Algeria
2. Bangladesh
3. Egypt
4. Iraq
5. Kuwait
6. Libya
7. Malaysia
8. Maldives
9. Morocco
10. Somalia
11. Tunisia
12. United Arab Emirates
Nations that include some level of Sharia (leniant sentences for honour killings, ban on new churches, floggings, etc):
1. Indonesia (Flogging, Caning; Sharia applied strictly in Aceh province)
2. Turkey (Restrictions on alcohol)
3. Brunei (Caning, Alcohol is illegal)
4. Jordan (2 years or less for honour killings)
5. Eritrea (Girls as young as 8 can be married, spousal rape is not recognized)
6. Syria (1 year or less for honour killings)
7. Djibouti (Sharia law regarding divorce)
8. Chechnya (Modest dress enforced, Alcohol and gambling suppressed by local authorities)
9. Niger (girls can be married off before they reach puberty)
10. Nigeria (Sharia is enforced in the northern states)
11. Kenya (Ad Hoc Sharia enforced in the east near the border with Somalia)
12. Gambia (Sharia courts decide all family matters, including for non-Muslims)
13. Qatar (public consumption is illegal during Ramadan, Alcohol heavily restricted, blood money acceptable punishment for murder, “kafala” law which is also shared by all Gulf states but Bahrain is technically slavery)
14. Uganda (Kadhi Courts overseeing family and civil matters)
Most ‘Western’ nations also have parallel Sharia legal systems (for example in Canada polygamy is widely practiced and authorities look the other way, Imams refusing to condemn or work to stop it). Sharia finance is also practiced in many nations around the world. Many other Islamic nations that do not apply Sharia (such as Azerbaijan, Albania, Bosnia, Uzbekistan, and Tajikstan) have large portions of their population who do want it applied or who actively seek to abide by it extra-legally.”
Which of those nations listed above qualify as moderate and if they do somewhat qualify as moderate would a true freedom loving person ever want to live there? It is said that when the Muslim population reaches 2% in a nation they begin to aggressively proselytize. This proselytizing centres on those within other ethnic minorities and those in jails and street gangs. Australia’s Muslim population in the 2011 census was 2%!
In 2012 Muslims in Sydney protested on the streets because of a film about Mohammad. In those protests a photo was taken of a mother standing by while her young son proudly held a sign saying “Behead all those who insult the prophet”. Is this moderation?
In 2002, ten years before the Sydney protests, the Islamic Council of Victoria (ICV) filed a complaint to the Victorian Equal opportunities Commission against two Christian pastors. The complaint was filed under Victoria’s Racial and Religious Tolerance Act accusing Pastor Daniel Scot of vilifying Islam in a seminar where he spoke about the Koran and Jihad. After several years, thousands of dollars spent on lawyers and an appeal the pastors were found not guilty. Are those in the ICV moderate Muslims?
Where are the moderate Muslims? In the UK there is Imamsonline.com which has a you tube expressing their unity against ISIS. It took well over half of the video, 2 minutes and 50 seconds of a 4 minute video, before anyone actually said they were against ISIS! Are these moderates?
How can one tell if a Muslim is moderate? Here are a few suggestions:
A moderate Muslim will allow a cartoonist to make light of Mohammad.
A moderate Muslim will allow a Christian preacher to say publically that God does have a Son!
A moderate Muslim will allow someone not a Muslim to hold a seminar and speak on the Koran and Jihad. A moderate Muslim will allow an author to write a book depicting Islam in an unfavourable way without the author needing to go into hiding.
Are there moderate Muslims? Here is a challenge on how to find out. Rent a hall in Lakemba (a suburb of Sydney) and advertise that you are going to speak on a certain night at a certain time about the true God having a Son. This Son is called Jesus and this Jesus died for our sins, including the Muslim, and that unless all people, including the Muslim, repent of their sins, accepts Jesus Christ as presented in the Bible as their personal Saviour for and from their sins, they will go to a place called the Lake of Fire for all of eternity. Now, if you do all that and keep your head then there just might be some moderate Muslims.
.
Did you read about a federal jury on Thursday, 24th of May, convicting “a Muslim soldier on six charges in connection with a failed plot to blow up a Texas restaurant full of Fort Hood troops, his religious mission to get ‘justice’ for the people of Iraq and Afghanistan”? This soldier faces up to life in prison with sentencing due in July. The incident for which this Muslim was convicted took place in 2011. Happily this was somewhat quick justice compared to the proceedings against the Muslim that shot and killed at least 13 fellow soldiers at Fort Hood. I have been searching for any information concerning this Fort Hood Muslim’s trial and finally some information has appeared. At http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Military/2011/0720/Alleged-Fort-Hood-shooter-Maj.-Nidal-Hasan-faces-March-2012-trial it says that “More than two years after the attack on military personnel at Fort Hood, accused shooter Army Major Nidal Malik Hasan now has a trial date: March 5, 2012.” Now, the United States Constitution’s Sixth Amendment guarantees all persons accused of criminal wrongdoing the right to a speedy trial. It may be argued what constitutes a “speedy trial”? Well, to some two years seems like an awful long time and a delay in a trial can either go for or against the accused. Could the delay in this trial favour the accused? Whatyareckon?
whatyareckon 