- ‘British multiculturalists are feeding Islamic fundamentalism. Muslims do not need to become the majority in the UK; they just need gradually to Islamize the most important cities. The change is already taking place.
- British personalities keep opening the door to introducing Islamic sharia law. One of the leading British judges, Sir James Munby, said that Christianity no longer influences the courts and these must be multicultural, which means more Islamic. Rowan Williams, the former Archbishop of Canterbury, and Chief Justice Lord Phillips, also suggested that the English law should “incorporate” elements of sharia law.
- British universities are also advancing Islamic law. The academic guidelines, “External speakers in higher education institutions”, provide that “orthodox religious groups” may separate men and women during events. At the Queen Mary University of London, women have had to use a separate entrance and were forced to sit in a room without being able to ask questions or raise their hands, just as in Riyadh or Tehran.’ https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/10124/london-mosques-churches
Islamic prayers in Birmingham, England (2016)
Laws
All posts tagged Laws
“The wife of a convicted Islamic State recruiter could be the first person in NSW to be charged for refusing to stand in court.”
This veiled covered woman is “one of the two wives of recruiter Hamdi Alqudsi” and has “caused a stir in court after she refused to stand for the presiding District Court Judge Audrey Balla”. TWO WIVES!?
Her “barrister, told Judge Balla ‘she won’t stand for anyone except Allah’.”
Not only will she not stand for the judge she “also refused to remove her veil, saying she would not give evidence to do so unless all the men in the courtroom looked away.”
The NSW Solicitor-General Michael Sexton SC has been urged to “determine whether Elzahed should be charged under the new disrespectful behaviour in court law.”
“The NSW government introduced the law this year following a number of high-profile cases where defendants — such as extremist Wassim Fayed and Hyde Park rioter Issai Issaka — refused to stand in court.” http://www.news.com.au/national/rush-hour/rush-hour-the-stories-you-need-to-know-today/news-story/84f0fc00a37fcb99df0ab4b8b25486cb
Is there really anyone (other than those of the peaceful religion) who believes this kind of behaviour is justifiable? It could be said that NO ONE BUT NO ONE except a Muslim would dare get by with this behaviour! I am waiting to see what punishment this veiled person (that is whoever is hiding behind the veil) will recieive; if any!
When will Australia and the United States be allowing this? “Nigeria’s National Assembly is considering a change to the country’s constitution that would expand the scope of jurisdiction of the country’s Islamic Sharia courts of appeal. Currently, the constitution limits those appellate courts to matters concerning family law. If approved, the change would permit Sharia appellate courts to take up criminal cases, some of which carry the death penalty, arising from lower Sharia courts. Christian churches in Nigeria say the proposal is a step toward Islamizing Nigeria.” https://www.worldwatchmonitor.org/2016/06/4494845 Be prepared it will happen. 
Just about the time you thought you have heard everything then this. Listen very carefully what is said starting about 40 seconds into the video! This man’s credentials can be read at https://universityrelations.wisc.edu/staff_listing/Mitchell_Everett/. Therefore, if you cannot get your free stuff out to the car at your local Walmart store without being hassled by security call Everett Mitchell.
“Everett D. Mitchell is the Director of Community Relations at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. He is also an attorney, pastor, and community leader.”
“At a recent panel discussing “Best Policing Practices,” Mitchell said that police should stop prosecuting individuals who shoplift from Wal-Mart and Target.”
Mitchell said ““I just don’t think they should be prosecuting cases for people who steal from Wal-Mart. I don’t think that. I don’t think that Target, and all them other places – the big boxes that have insurance – they should be using the people that steal from there as justification to start engaging in aggressive police behavior.” http://www.mrctv.org/blog/wisc-director-community-relations-suggests-shoplifting-not-crime
And this was the city Frank Sinatra sang about?!
“New York City has just enacted strict anti-discrimination guidelines in order to cater to less than one percent of the city’s population that is transgender or “gender non-conforming.”
The new guidelines released by the New York City Commission on Human Rights prohibit employers, landlords, and business owners from:
- “Intentionally failing to use an individual’s preferred name, pronoun or title,” such as using a so-called dead name
- Refusing to allow a transgender individual from using the restroom that he or she feels he or she should be entitled to use by virtue of his or her gender identity
- Enforcing gender-specific dress codes
- “Failing” to provide health benefits that cover “gender-affirming care” and “reasonable accommodations” for individuals undergoing “gender transition”
According to the official website for the city, “Violations of the New York City Human Rights Law could result in civil penalties of up to $125,000 for violations, and up to $250,000 for violations that are the result of willful, wanton, or malicious conduct. There is no limit to the amount of compensatory damages the Commission may award to a victim of discrimination.” http://www.mrctv.org/blog/
Gun control or people control?
I grew up in the USA but now live in Australia. I am however, still an American citizen and therefore feel free to speak on the liberty to own and/or carry a gun. By the way I have a genuine birth certificate that proves I am a 100% American born citizen which is more than the one in the White House does!
Because of the Occupier’s Marxist’s upbringing it is not surprising to read what he is quoted as saying at http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/01/27/obama-gun-control-advocates-should-listen-more/. The Occupier said that “…it’s understandable that people are protective of their family traditions when it comes to hunting so gun-control advocates also need to do a little more listening than they do sometimes in the debate.”
Is that really what this debate is all about, hunting!? Here is the Second Amendment which states that “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
This Second Amendment has NOTHING to do with hunting! It has to do with defending oneself from a tyrannical enemy which may be hunting you and that enemy just may include the Federal Government.
Whatyareckon?
