The LEFT have taken over the West via the ballot box. Elections are either fraudulent like 2020 was or like it is here in Australia where we have a Federal government that received only 32 percent of the vote!
freedom of Movement
All posts tagged freedom of Movement
The Covid “plandemic” was just that; planned! Planned by our governments with the WEF and China’s CCP to take away our freedoms under the guise of keeping us safe! The following is from Page 8 of a paper dated September 19, 2022 sent to me titled REVIEW AT A GLANCE.
‘In fact, Big Pharma and Big Government have big plans for future vaccine shots that
have “dissolvable needles” and quantum dot tattoos along with other amazing technology
like embedding vaccine records beneath the skin of your children with invisible ink .
According to one article: “Along with the vaccine, a child would be injected with a bit of
dye that is invisible to the naked eye but easily seen with a special cell-phone filter,
combined with an app that shines near-infrared light onto the skin.” That article was
written in 2019: that’s just before the COVID crisis. That leads me to another thought:
COVID-19 seems to be a very convenient “accidental lab leak” from China for
introducing new technology .
Under the cover of vaccinating people, we are really preparing to tag and track people.
The once free nations of the West are testing a new authoritarian system of total control
under the guise of public health. Just look at Australia or New Zealand or Canada or Italy
to see how basic civil rights have been suspended indefinitely and a pseudo-medical
tyranny has been installed. The Great Reset is being implemented with the lie that it’s all
about “protecting your health.” Our military and intelligence agencies are not confronting
China — they’re copying China. A totalitarian nightmare is being imported into free
countries through surveillance technologies.’
I do not know what we the average citizen can do other than share the truth as we receive it.
The new King has said he will follow the steps of his mother and not be political but will he?
‘In a 1997 Middle East Quarterly article titled “Prince Charles of Arabia,” Ronni L. Gordon and David M. Stillman looked at evidence that Britain’s crown prince might be a secret convert to Islam. They shifted through his public statements (defending Islamic law, praising the status of Muslim women, seeing in Islam a solution for Britain’s ailments) and actions (setting up a panel of twelve “wise men” to advise him on Islamic religion and culture), then concluded that, “should Charles persist in his admiration of Islam and defamation of his own culture,” his accession to the throne will indeed usher in a “different kind of monarchy.” The whole article may be read at https://www.danielpipes.org/blog/2003/01/is-prince-charles-a-convert-to-islam
‘The Australian Medical Professionals’ Society is a group of doctors wanting an alternate voice to the AMA. They wanted to join the strength of almost 9,000 under the Red Union banner with the likes of the Nurses’ Professional Association and Queensland (NPAQ), Teachers’ Professional Association of Queensland (TPAQ) and the Professional Drivers’ Association of Australia (PDAA).
The AMPS supports:
- The primacy of the doctor/patient relationship with Government bureaucrats being removed from the surgery room.
- Make it easier for doctors to speak out publicly. Doctors are gagged by AHPRA.
- Removal of AHPRA from monitoring doctors on social media and voicing their medical opinions.
- Resisting Government Coercion.
- The ability to speak out about refugee health without fear of de-registration.
- Resisting Government mandates.
- Resisting Government agencies running roughshod over doctors in what they can prescribe and recommend.
The AMPS remains fully committed to defending your right to treat patients as you see fit and respect the enormous amount of medical training undergone to achieve this right. AHPRA and Government must be drastically limited in this space.’https://amps.redunion.com.au/about
Isn’t it funny how Muslims take advantage of the freedoms found in the West but stifle non-Muslims freedom in the countries Islam controls!?
‘The newly formed Muslim Nuance Party, which is running in the forthcoming elections in Sweden on September 11, wants to outlaw Quran burning.
According to the party leader Mikail Yüksel, Quran burning is not a statement, but an action “directly aimed at Muslims”.
With Muslims as its primary focus, Nuance describes itself as a party that prioritizes the rights of minorities. The established parties, particularly Muslim ones, have been accused of failing minorities, according to Nuance spokespeople.
Among other things, the party seeks to the Care of Young Persons Act (LVU) based on claims that Swedish authorities are kidnapping Muslim children. The LVU gives the Swedish state framework to intervene in the care of a young person in case of circumstances that create risk of harm to a young person’s health or development, including honor-related violence or oppression at home, Sputnik reported.
“We want to review the cases where there are requests from the parents if they consider themselves to be unfairly treated”, Mikail Yüksel told national broadcaster SVT.
Overall, the Nuance party said it was particularly focused on three problems it considers most urgent: Islamophobia, integration and housing shortages. The party aims to ensure that Muslims and Afroswedes receive a special minority status in Sweden’s constitution in the same way as Jews, Roma and Sami. The party also claims to be working for Islamophobia to be given a special criminal classification. It is against bans on religious garments at schools (including Muslim veils of all sorts).’https://www.tasnimnews.com/en/news/2022/09/06/2770454/new-muslim-swedish-party-to-give-islamophobia-special-criminal-classification
‘On August 31, while announcing his new initiative to restrict gun rights, Joe Biden reportedly stated that if “brave right-wing Americans,” as he mockingly dubbed them, wanted to exercise rights under the Second Amendment to “fight against the country” that had become tyrannical, they “would need an F-15.” “You need something more than a gun,” he added, later referring to perhaps “nuclear weapons.”
Such is a common trope from the Left, but it completely misunderstands the Second Amendment.
Here is the understanding of the Second Amendment offered by Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story, whose 1833 Commentaries on the Constitution is widely (and rightly) regarded as among the most authoritative treatises about the Constitution’s original meaning: “The importance of the Second Amendment will scarcely be doubted by anyone,” he wrote, because a well-regulated militia, comprised of the citizenry, “is the natural defense of a free country against sudden foreign invasions, domestic insurrections, and domestic usurpations of power by rulers.” (Emphasis added). “The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered, as the palladium of the liberties of a republic,” he continued, “since it offers a strong moral check against the usurpation and arbitrary power of rulers; and will generally, even if these are successful in the first instance, enable the people to resist and triumph over them.”
As Justice Story makes explicit, the purpose of the Second Amendment is three-fold: 1) for defense against foreign invasion; 2) for defense against domestic threats (whether “insurrection,” rebellion, or from just ordinary thugs and thieves); and 3) as importantly, for defense against domestic tyranny by the government itself.
Was he blind to the concern that armed citizens could not “out gun” the military capacity of the government? Hardly. Indeed, he expected the latter would be successful “in the first instance,” but he saw the right to keep and bear arms primarily as a “moral check” against tyrannical government, not a physical one. His description therefore speaks more to the character of the people being willing and able to resist tyranny, not to whether the weapons owned by individual citizens had to be on a par with those of the military itself.
A citizenry habituated to provide for its own defense is also one that has the character to oppose tyrannical tendencies of their government. F-15s and nuclear weapons are not necessary if the people remain vigilant in opposing usurpations of power by their own government. (Though having once been in an F-15 when my brother was an F-15 pilot, that sure would be neat to have!) ‘https://amgreatness.com/2022/09/04/president-bidens-egregious-misunderstanding-of-the-second-amendment/
Gab is one of the few media sources that still hold to the freedom of the press. Well, that’s enough for the US Government to want to cause Gab trouble https://tv.gab.com/channel/a/view/addressing-the-adl-hit-piece-on-630273d3b8daa2282193c7e8.
whatyareckon 