Genesis 1:25 “And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good.”

‘The sun sets in the Serengeti – that fabulous, rich ecosystem in Northern Tanzania, described as one of the seven natural wonders of the world. Trees are silhouetted on the horizon against the deep orange sky. But some of those trees appear to be walking! They aren’t trees after all – they are giraffes.
The reason they are so distinctive, even in silhouette, is the neck. It has to prompt the question “why?” Evolutionists attempt to answer the question by assuming that the giraffe neck started shorter and that a process of elongation took place. Darwinists are horrified at the thought that we might accuse them of a “Just So” style story of giraffe evolution as they stretched upwards to eat ever-higher leaves. But they still assume that natural selection selected offspring with the longer necks so that they could exploit this aerial food source. I have always found that mechanism one of the weakest of all evolutionary ideas. There are a lot of trees and bushes that are well below their head height, yet still form major portions of the giraffe’s diet. Did Darwinian natural selection get over-enthusiastic? And even if they do feed from higher places, why evolve a longer neck rather than the ability to climb the tree?
When viewed from a biblical perspective, we see them so differently. Giraffes are beautiful. God is glorified by these magnificent creatures, so different from anything else. Let’s thank Him for the sheer variety of His creation.’https://creationmoments.com/sermons/the-giraffes-long-neck/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=the-giraffes-long-neck&mc_cid=ff815afafa&mc_eid=00c1dcff3c


‘There is a lot of misunderstanding surrounding what carbon dating actually is and does. For example, we mentioned in a previous Creation Moment that, contrary to popular opinion, carbon dating is not used to find a date for fossils because such fossils do not usually contain the original material of the organism.
Paul Taylor of Creation Moments has ‘…discussed in previous Creation Moments how those who believe in the Big Bang Theory (let’s call them Big Bang Believers) have a sophisticated model of star formation into which they plug a number of interesting observations which could easily be interpreted in another way. For example, they would claim that certain gas molecule clouds, such as the Eagle Nebula, which contain small, bright stars, are, in fact, nurseries where stars are born. They then make the claim that they have observational evidence for the birth of stars, but this is, logically, a circular argument. The observed nebula is interpreted as the birth of stars only because it is interpreted according to their Big Bang Belief. The nebula cannot then be offered up as evidential proof for the very theory which is used to interpret it.