Covid19 vaccine
All posts tagged Covid19 vaccine
‘Last week we added a new category called “Amputations” to The COVID Blog™ because it’s happening with more frequency by the day. We may have to add yet another new category. But there’s no all-encompassing word to describe these passing out episodes. Perhaps, like we call post-injection convulsions “Shawn Skelton Syndrome” since she’s the first observed case on this blog, we’ll call this new category “Tiffany Dover cases.”
Everybody was in shock on December 17, 2020 when Ms. [Pontes] Dover passed out on live TV just minutes after receiving a Pfizer mRNA injection. And to this day, there are no definitive answers as to what happened to her. We don’t even really know if she’s alive today. But now, passing out on live television or in some other video presentation is common.
We included the Dover case in the story of Pakistan police superintendent Malik Imtiaz Mahmood. He collapsed on camera, and died of a heart attack shortly after receiving one of the shots. Comedienne Heather McDonald collapsed on stage last week after declaring she’s triple-vaxxed and Jesus loves her. She confirmed with Dr. Drew earlier this week that she got two Pfizer shots and a Moderna booster three weeks before the collapse. Ms. McDonald also said, “I don’t think I’m getting the fourth booster.” Then there’s the Brazilian television presenter and vaxx zealot Rafael Silva. He collapsed on live TV on January 3.’https://thecovidblog.com/2022/02/16/clara-pfeffer-33-year-old-german-television-presenter-suffers-strange-dizzy-spell-after-promoting-curfews-lockdowns-for-the-non-vaccinated/?utm_source=February+16%2C+2022+email
‘We the people demand answers! We need a Royal Commission into LRAD deployment! How dare these politicians laugh and jeer at questioning the deployment of LRAD!’
‘A jaw-dropping, peer-reviewed paper shows China’s old-school vaccine produces a far stronger T-cell response to the coronavirus than the Pfizer/BioNTech mRNA jab.
China’s CoronaVac shot caused people to make far more T-cells targeting the coronavirus than those who received Pfizer’s mRNA shot, scientists in Hong Kong have found.
Though it is only one datapoint, the study hints the Chinese shot – which is based on older, well understood principles of vaccinology – may ultimately provide longer-lasting protection than the hastily developed mRNA jabs from Pfizer and Moderna.
The study was published in a peer-reviewed journal called Respirology in November, but has (unsurprisingly) received no attention. It offers a rare head-to-head look at the immune-system effects of the Chinese and Pfizer Covid vaccines, which work in very different ways.
“Humoral responses” are antibodies, the body’s first-line defense against infection; the mRNA vaccines are known to produce supra-natural levels of antibodies, giving rise to short-term protection that fades within months.
T-cells are a part of the immune system crucial for producing long-term immunity and reducing severe disease in people who are infected. The mRNA jabs have been shown to produce relatively limited T-cell protection, but this study appears to have been the first time anyone directly compared them to the Chinese vaccine.
The scientists compared the immune responses in more than 700 people who had received either CoronaVac or mRNA shots, matching them by age and demographic data.
As expected, they found very high levels of anti-spike protein antibodies in people who received the mRNA shot. The mRNA jabs force our cells to make large amounts of the spike protein that sticks out of the shell of the coronavirus. Those proteins then cause the immune system to produce antibodies against it.
The CoronaVac recipients had lower levels of anti-spike protein antibodies. But they also had antibodies to other parts of the coronavirus. Even more importantly, when the scientists ran further tests on a smaller group of about 100 people, they found the CoronaVac shot had sharply increased the level of their coronavirus-targeting T-cells, which last far longer than antibodies.
The new T-cells targeted both the spike protein and another important part of the virus. They included both CD4+ T-cells – which stimulate the overall immune response to infection – and CD8+ T-cells – which directly attack infected cells. Meanwhile, the mRNA jab produced an equally good response in only one of those four types of T-cell.
“The average magnitude of post-vaccination responses was higher in CoronaVac subjects for structural and S-specific T-cell responses,” the researchers explain.
The research was possible because Hong Kong offers its citizens both the CoronaVac shot and the BNT162b2 mRNA jab – the Pfizer/BioNTech shot. (In Hong Kong, BNT162b2 is distributed by a Chinese drugmaker called Fosun, but it is still made by BioNTech and is identical to the shot Pfizer sells elsewhere. A Beijing-based company called Sinovac Biotech makes CoronaVac, which is not approved in the United States.)
CoronaVac’s advantage in producing a T-cell response probably occurs because it presents the body with an invader that is far more like the actual coronavirus than the mRNA shots do.
The CoronaVac shot is a traditional “inactivated virus” vaccine. It contains whole Sars-Cov-2 particles grown in kidney cells and chemically treated so they cannot reproduce. They are then injected alongside an “adujvant” meant to boost the immune response.
In short-term trials, the mRNA vaccines reduced infections far more than the CoronaVac and a second Chinese vaccine called Sinopharm BIBP, which is also an inactivated virus vaccine.
The early results led to considerable chest-pounding about the superiority of Western vaccines and biotechnology in general.
The New York Times, Jan. 13, 2021:
—
But the real-world data from the last year has made clear that the mRNA shots lose their protective effect quickly. Because they focus the body’s immune response on a small part of the coronavirus, they are also very vulnerable to new variants such as Omicron, even after a third “booster” dose.
In fact, Western countries have faced a much harsher Omicron wave since December than countries such as Indonesia, which used more Chinese vaccines than any country except China (although in the last two weeks Omicron cases have risen sharply in Indonesia).
The Hong Kong study may also help explain China’s apparent reluctance to move forward with mRNA vaccines – either its own or those from Moderna and Pfizer/BioNTech. Fourteen months after Fosun announced a deal to make the BNT162b2 mRNA shot available in mainland China, Chinese regulators have refused to approve it.
Don’t worry, though, China will no doubt be glad to set up CoronaVac clinics at pharmacies across America if we ask nicely!’https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/no-wonder-china-isnt-using-mrna-shots?utm_source=url
This is the link to Grand Jury Day 3 – PCR Test https://odysee.com/@GrandJury:f/Grand-Jury-Day-3-en-online:7?r=8RX6HARnXSbREAsiYBRJNSbo9RZ9T7j1&t=0
‘Day 2: February 12, 2022, The Corona Investigative Committee, Began proceedings by showing a complete picture of what we are facing, including: “The geopolitical and historical backdrop – the proceeding is meant to create awareness about the factual collapse of the current, hijacked system and its institutions, and, as a consequence the necessity for the people themselves retaking their sovereignty, and the necessity to first stop this plandemic’s measures by refusing to comply, and the necessity to jump-start their own new system of health care, education, economics and judiciary, so that democracy and the rule of law on the basis of our constitutions will be reestablished.”
A group of international lawyers and a judge are conducting a criminal investigation modelled after the United States Grand Jury proceedings in order to present to the public all available evidence of COVID-19 Crimes Against Humanity to date against “leaders, organizers, instigators and accomplices” who aided, abetted or actively participated in the formulation and execution of a common plan for a pandemic. This investigation is of the people, by the people and for the people, so YOU can be part of the jury.’https://rumble.com/vuuqk8-nuremberg-2.0-day-2-historical-background.html?mref=6zof&mc=dgip3&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Lovelife111&ep=2
How many lies does a person tell before it is known he/she is a liar? ‘White House chief medical adviser Dr. Anthony Fauci said COVID-19 booster shots may only be necessary for some people every few years rather than annually.
“It will depend on who you are,” Fauci told the Financial Times in an interview published on Feb. 9, “but if you are a normal, healthy 30-year-old person with no underlying conditions, you might need a booster only every four or five years.”
Fauci had suggested in an interview with NBC News last month that it might be necessary for people to receive booster doses every year.
“We’ve only recently boosted people. We will find out if the booster gives you a degree of durability of protection and actually should be the standard regimen of three doses of an mRNA and two doses of [Johnson & Johnson’s vaccine],” he said last month. “Or—and it’s a big ‘or’ right now—will we need to boost people every year or so?”
According to a study released on Feb. 12 by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the efficacy of mRNA vaccine boosters starts to decline after about four months. The study didn’t include an age breakdown and only focused on individuals who sought treatment when the Omicron variant was spreading.
“There may be the need for yet again another boost—in this case, a fourth-dose boost for an individual receiving the mRNA—that could be based on age, as well as underlying conditions,” Fauci told reporters on Feb. 9.
Recommendations for a fourth dose of the vaccine likely will not be made across the board, he said.
During the Financial Times interview, Fauci, who has headed the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases for nearly 40 years, suggested that the United States is moving out of “the full-blown pandemic phase.”
It came as several Democrat governors moved to rescind statewide mask mandates, although some local municipalities have decided to keep them intact.
Meanwhile, Swedish health officials said on Feb. 14 that they are recommending a fourth COVID-19 vaccine shot for individuals aged 80 and older.
As with the first round of booster shots, those boosters should consist of the Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna vaccines, the health agency said.
The recommendation also covered all people living in nursing homes or who receive assisted living services at home. The second booster shot should be administered at least four months after the first booster jab, the agency said in a statement.
COVID-19 is the illness caused by the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus.‘https://www.theepochtimes.com/fauci-covid-19-boosters-may-have-to-be-taken-every-5-years_4276673.html?utm_source=newsnoe&utm_campaign=breaking-2022-02-14-2&utm_medium=email&est=6EDUorc9WyCslH0uSUt%2F4hXCKGcoALHZO%2FbpizBfbDcVYZ9DcVFY6roWTBevJkhjxQ%3D%3D
‘Several influential speakers and medical professionals told stories of their experiences with the vaccines. Dr. Kent Denmark from Tulsa, Oklahoma was among them. In this video Kent talks about the drastic increase in deaths of airline pilots featured in the obituaries of the October/November issue of the Airline Pilot magazine after vaccine mandates went into effect. Deaths increased from one death of active pilots in 2019 to 6 deaths of active pilots in 2020 and 111 deaths of active pilots in the first 9 months of 2021.‘https://rumble.com/vu8gy3-dr.-kent-denmark-talks-about-increase-in-deaths-of-active-pilots-since-vacc.html?mref=6zof&mrefc=2
The Doctor is a little hard to hear but the statistics are as above.
whatyareckon 