‘Henry Ergas writing in the Australian observed that 75 years ago in 1945 on Australia Day the daily papers began to report on the liberation of the terrible Nazi Death Camps and Auschwitz in particular, where 1.1 million people were brutally exterminated, 960,000 of them were Jews.
Ergas quoted political philosopher Hannah Arendt, a Jew who escaped from German occupied Europe in 1941. She reflected on the nature of the evil that was Nazi Antisemitism. Her attention was upon the industrial scale of the torture and murder, something that could not be explained by the usual evil motives of self-interest, greed, covetousness, resentment, lust of power and cowardice.
This is what follows when an ethnic group like the Jews has been stripped of its status as fully human. When a society starts down the path of thinking of and acting toward a group as less than fully human, something shifts in the culture as a whole. When the loud voices say that a group should be denied association, right to practice their faith, disqualified from employment, when their voice is being silenced, when they are no longer equal before the law, when they are being blamed, they are being dehumanised.
Before long most people will stop thinking of them as true humans and when that happens, they are just a problem needing a final solution, a pest to be exterminated.
The pernicious thoroughness of evil seeks to snuff out every witness to truth and replace it with a persuasive falsehood and in this case it is about what it means to be fully human – what honours, what rights, what expectations are attached to this state of being. Today this includes rights to choose whatever you feel defines you – whether sexuality, gender, relationship status, body alterations, whatever makes you happy. But this happiness is hollow.
In the biblical understanding, people are made in the likeness of God himself – not his physical form but his intrinsic nature. God’s purpose in creating humankind was that they might enter fully into his joy. In a word, God created us for joy – the sublime celebration of all He is and has made in its perfection and wonder. And it is this creative purpose that defines us. We may be alienated from God but the longing for ecstasy remains as the fingerprint of the Almighty on our inner being. This is fundamental to full humanity as distinct from ‘empty’ humanity – a life that lacks this joy and is offered temporal amusement instead. And how much effort goes into keeping people amused instead, perpetuating the myth that that’s as good as it gets.
Losing sight of this elevating purpose, and stripping others of their right to this full humanity is the beginning of the industry of death in someone’s imagination. The offer of happiness may be enough to silence us, to make us pretend we never saw the dangers.
From Auschwitz the surviving voices speak: “Don’t forget Auschwitz. Don’t allow yourself to be silenced when you see any group of humans being dehumanised.” Protect the rights of free speech and the practice of faith and do not allow the elites of our time to intimidate people into silence or compliance by shunning and shaming those who do not conform to their opinions.’ https://familyvoice.org.au/index.php?option=com_civicrm&task=civicrm/mailing/view&reset=1&id=505
It’s hard to believe, or is it? ‘Democratic lawmakers in Connecticut want to create a new state police department to “specialize in investigating far-right extremist groups and individuals.”
In 2017, the state of Connecticut reported 111 crimes motivated by bias against a particular race, ethnicity, or religion. Most of the crimes targeted blacks and Jews.
The new police department aims to stop these crimes before they happen, explains Senate President Martin Looney.
Martin Looney
“Unfortunately, people who entertain hateful beliefs…are protected as long as [those beliefs] don’t result in hate-crime actions. That’s what we’re talking about,” says Looney. “We want to be more aggressive in enforcing our laws and identifying likely sources of potential domestic terrorism acts against religious institutions and ethnic institutions.”
As noted by Senate Minority Leader Len Fasano, a Republican, the proposal is inappropriate in that it fails to mention left-wing extremism. Extremism exists on both sides and is wrong on both sides, and Democrats must acknowledge this fact in order to effectively combat hate crime.
“When they put a right-wing label on extremism, they do that to elicit a political response,” argues Fasano, adding that Republicans are “on the same page” when it comes to protecting the state’s residents from hate crimes.
Author’s Note: The nature of this proposal reminds me of the Thought Police from George Orwell’s famous dystopian novel Nineteen Eighty-Four, a specialized force that goes after people whose thoughts conflict with the views of the government.
Editor’s Note: When the political leadership of a state found an institution whose sole purpose is to investigate people whose views are of the opposing political party, it has, in effect, established a “thought police.” The intention might be purely political, to propagandize the flaws of the right, but the end effects are beyond measure.
I suppose one doesn’t really appreciate their freedom of speech etc. until it is limited or gone completely. The following is ‘Reprinted by permission of FamilyVoice Australia, 4th floor, 68 Grenfell Street, Adelaide SA 5000.’
‘This is the incredible, endearing and heartwarming true story of Wojtek, the Polish bear that went to War.
As I was growing up in London, surrounded by Polish émigrés, I repeatedly heard this wonderful story about Wojtek, a Bear soldier who fought alongside the Polish II Corps.
Being from a very patriotic family, I had the pleasure of meeting many Polish war veterans, and deportees who had survived the Soviet Gulags; it was often they who told me about Wojtek.
The story deeply moved me as I always saw a similarity between the fates of these aging Polish veterans and that of Wojtek the Bear. They had so desperately wanted to go back to their homeland, but the imposition of a brutal Soviet backed communist regime meant that returning home was at best prison and at worst death. And so, these soldiers who had supposedly won the War and helped defeat Nazism ended up being homeless heroes, wandering the World, unable to return home, in a sense, in captivity.’ https://summit.news/2019/12/19/the-incredible-story-of-the-polish-bear-that-went-to-war/
The following video is a parody on the Socialist Marxist proponents who are seeking to destroy everything that has allowed us in the West to be one of the most prosperous generations that have ever lived. However, we do admit there have been some mistakes along the way but it is a fact socialism has never worked. Cuba, the USSR and Venezuela are three examples. Watch, enjoy, laugh and share.
It is HARD to believe this occurred in Australia but it did. I was made aware of it last night on Sky News and the Alan Jones show. Alan had Mr. Williams flown from his property to Sydney to appear on the show and he looked like a broken man. What a disgrace this New South Wales (supposedly conservative) government is! Here’s the story.
The decision ‘…by the animal welfare authorities to impound 1000 to 1200 head of cattle from John Williams properties at Binnaway and sell them on a downward trending market, has shocked primary producers who say the store cattle sold were in good
Cattle impounded from John Williams’ properties at Binnaway were sold in store condition at Thursday’s prime sale at Dubbo, where the market trended downwards. Photo by Scott Moreton.
enough condition.
RSPCA say last week’s seizure was the largest and took place after RSPCA NSW inspectors visited the five properties across 4807 hectares on 10 occassions between June 2018 and July 2019. There are unconfirmed reports of dead cattle found on the properties with numbers estimated between 200 and 800 head.
Contract musterer Scott Moreton took photos of the impounded cattle being offered for sale in tight pens at Dubbo, on Thursday.
“There’s a lot worse looking cattle about the state,” he said. “I’m worried this will set a bad precedent.”
Mr Moreton admitted Mr Williams’ looked “average” when they were on the road six months ago but in the meantime their condition had improved.
“Now that he’s done the right thing they’ve taken them off him. I went to the saleyards to see for myself and got the shock of my life at how good a condition they were in.”
Tamworth solicitor and RSPCA watchdog Judy Scrivener said Mr Williams was a gutted man with no income, no way to pay rates and nothing to feed in spite of $50,000 worth of hay delivered the week before the raid.
“This is more concerning than the Hertslet case,” she said referring to the the Trangie farmer sentanced to jail and fined $107,000 for starving cattle in 2009.
John 15:18 If the world hate you, ye know that it hated me before it hated you.
Leftists can shout the F word and destroy public property but a man in a wheelchair can not be allowed to pray outside an abortion clinic. The killer of babies is safe from arrest but a man praying for the unborn baby isn’t. Hmm, what next?
‘ARRESTED FOR PEACEFULLY PRAYING: Watch the unbelievable and deeply disturbing footage of wheelchair user Christian Hacking being arrested for peacefully praying outside an abortion clinic. He was carried by four police officers to a riot van and was imprisoned for eight hours after he was alleged to have failed to comply with a Public Spaces Protection Order. The good news is the charges have been dropped, but the case raises huge questions over whether praying in a public space now constitutes ‘harassment’ and whether buffer zones around abortion clinics breach freedom of expression, religion and thought. Christian said: “I do not regret what I did, and urge the Church to pray more, not less outside of clinics until the killing stops. Surely we, as a nation, can give women in a crisis something better than abortion. I care deeply about all the families who attend abortion clinics and will continue to do what it takes, no matter what, until this silent genocide of innocent children ends.” Find out more in today’s Daily Telegraph and our press release.’https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rYEA7wdxLfI
Have we enjoyed the benefits of true freedom so long that we no longer appreciate them? This is hard to believe but ‘A majority of Americans believe the First Amendment should be rewritten and are willing to crack down on free speech, as well as the press, according to a new poll.
More than 60 percent of Americans agree on restricting speech in some way, while a slim majority, 51 percent, want to see the First Amendment rewritten to “reflect the cultural norms of today.” The Campaign for Free Speech, which conducted the survey, said the results “indicate free speech is under more threat than previously believed.”
“The findings are frankly extraordinary,” executive director Bob Lystad told the Washington Free Beacon. “Our free speech rights and our free press rights have evolved well over 200 years, and people now seem to be rethinking them.”
Of the 1,004 respondents, young people were the most likely to support curbing free expression and punishing those who engage in “hate speech.” Nearly 60 percent of Millennials—respondents between the ages of 21 and 38—agreed that the Constitution “goes too far in allowing hate speech in modern America” and should be rewritten, compared to 48 percent of Gen Xers and 47 percent of Baby Boomers. A majority of Millennials also supported laws that would make “hate speech” a crime—of those supporters, 54 percent said violators should face jail time.
American hostility to the First Amendment did not stop at speech. Many would also like to see a crackdown on the free press. Nearly 60 percent of respondents agreed that the “government should be able to take action against newspapers and TV stations that publish content that is biased, inflammatory, or false.” Of those respondents, 46 percent supported possible jail time.
The poll was released just two days after two University of Connecticut students were arrested for allegedly saying racial slurs in a viral video. The 21-year-old suspects were allegedly playing “a game in which they yelled vulgar words,” according to the police report. Lystad said such incidents and the rise of social media may be behind the increased willingness of Americans to curb speech rights.
“I think [our findings] are fueled in large part because of a rise of hate speech, but traditionally, hate speech is protected in the First Amendment,” Lystad said. “The Supreme Court has upheld that principle time and time again.”
Lystad launched the Campaign for Free Speech to advocate for preserving free and open dialogue in America. The group emphasizes that hate speech should be denounced, but does not think censorship is the answer. The group plans to push back against efforts to restrict speech at the local, state, and federal levels.
“Hate speech should be condemned, but legally, the answer to speech we don’t like is more speech, not censorship,” he said. “Our primary focus is education, and to help people better understand the First Amendment, free speech, free press, and why it’s so vital to our democracy.”‘ https://freebeacon.com/issues/poll-majority-of-americans-want-first-amendment-rewritten/
What do the Holocaust and the making of Muhammad cartoons have to do with one another? For most normal thinking people they have nothing to do with each other but to the sensitive Muslim, they do!
‘Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan said that the absence of an international policy against the generation of blasphemous content is a “collective failure” on part of the Muslim countries.
Addressing the Senate for the first time as prime minister on Monday 27 August, Imran Khan said his government will raise the matter before the United Nations.
The Senate had passed a resolution to bring the UN’s attention to the matter regarding the announcement by the leader of Dutch Freedom Party and Parliamentarian Geert Wilders to hold a competition of blasphemous caricatures.
“Our government will raise the matter in the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) and ask the Muslim countries to come up with a collective policy that could then be brought up at international forums.”
“This should have been done years ago,” PM Khan said while giving the example of the Holocaust and how four European countries have jail sentences for “anyone who misquotes the figures of Holocaust. That is because they realise that this is something that hurts the sentiments of the Jewish community.”
So, lying about how many Jews were murdered in the Holocaust is comparable to the sentiments of the sensitive Muslim when a cartoon of Muhammad is drawn! How absurd is that?!
Well, the sensitive feeling Muslim did not need to worry for the Muhammad cartoon competition was canceled.
‘Geert Wilders said the controversial contest would not go ahead following death threats and concerns other people could be put at risk.
“To avoid the risk of victims of Islamic violence, I have decided not to let the cartoon contest go ahead,” the far-right opposition politician said in a written statement.