If you are a conservative they are after you! This is sad and scary!!!!!!
Bible
While Islamists murder thousand around the world this American Muslim just sees what he wants to see.
‘France’s Further Attacks on Islam: For many years, France has been actively repressing Muslim life, but this year, it has taken things to the nth degree. This was triggered when a French teacher who displayed blasphemous cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) was killed. In response, France took many actions against Muslims life including the closing of mosques and the largest anti-Islamophobia organization. Before, the killing, Emmanuel Macron made a speech degrading Islam as a religion “in crisis” and saying there would be more French state intervention in Muslim institutions. The attack provided the pretext, and since then, Muslims have been suffering backlash from the French state. Furthermore, France expects Muslims to accept attacks against them while it has laws against Holocaust denial which are justified under the pretext of fighting anti-semitism. On a positive note, this cause has united the Muslim world around the #boycottFrance movement in retaliation for the disrespect for their religion and hypocrisy.’http://muslimobserver.com/2020-year-review-muslims/
A Muslim is like all mankind and that is they must accept the Lord Jesus as the Son of God and Saviour of sinners. John 3:36 He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him.
Whether the USA has President Trump or not when the schools are teaching critical race theory along with who knows what else the outcome will be disastrous for the nation as a whole!
‘A California elementary school is pushing critical race theory on third-grade students, according to a new report. A teacher at an elementary school in Cupertino allegedly instructed third-graders to rank themselves based on their “power and privilege” during a math lesson.’https://www.theblaze.com/news/california-elementary-school-critical-race-theory?utm_source=theblaze-breaking&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=20210114TRending-DaveRubinDeprogrammed&utm_term=ACTIVE%20LIST%20-%20TheBlaze%20Breaking%20News
Proverbs 30:28 “The spider skillfully grasps with its hands, and it is in kings’ palaces.

‘The instruments that scientists are using to develop fusion energy continue to become more complex and powerful. They are trying to generate the energies needed to cause hydrogen to fuse into helium. This is the same process thought to be going on in the sun. Once the fusion process is started, it will continue on its own as long as hydrogen is available, quickly generating much more energy than was used to start the process. Hydrogen fuel is easily and cheaply generated from seawater.
Scientists have been using lasers to generate the power needed to start the fusion process. In current experimental devices, the hydrogen fuel is held in a hollow glass sphere that is about as big around as a human hair. The sphere must be suspended in mid-air. To reach the 90 million degrees needed to start fusion, 24 lasers with 12-trillion-watt beams are aimed at the sphere.
What do you suppose scientists use to suspend the sphere? They thought of using strands of glass, but then they remembered something even stronger, yet thinner: spider silk. Spider silk has the added benefit of being sticky, so it easily holds the sphere in place.
Despite the impressive technology of fusion experiments, humans often find that they cannot create better materials than those found in nature. God freely gave His creatures a sophisticated array of materials for life. He has just as freely given His Son, Jesus Christ, unto death for the forgiveness of your sins.’https://creationmoments.com/sermons/spiders-help-make-the-sun-2/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=spiders-help-make-the-sun-2&mc_cid=48b356c40e&mc_eid=00c1dcff3c
Here in Australia ‘Now that it’s high summer, you might see a lizard, sunning itself on a rock. Lizards don’t just get their energy from food, but also from the sun. Humans are warm-blooded creatures who generally get their energy from food, not solar-power. However, there are some cold-blooded creatures amongst us.
In the New South Wales parliament, the summer started with Environment Minister Matt Keane who, with little public warning and possibility of public debate, passing legislation for net zero emissions in NSW. This committed public funds—our money—to benefit green spiv renewable funds.
Bankers, lobbyists and Liberal moderate politicians have realised that the public will not only accept this, but actually thank them for it. Thank them for making power expensive and making them richer.
In a recent public statement, Keane was been positively evangelical about the need for the Liberal party to support renewable energy. But there were some very strange things that went along with this. He did not seem across some basic facts about renewables.
Does Keane realise that worldwide over 2,000 HELE coal powerplants are operated at present, or are in the development pipeline worldwide, and mostly in our geographic region? Or to translate, does he realise that Indo-Pacific nations, such as India and China, are investing in this cheap power generation, much of which is fuelled by Australian coal, to electrify a manufacturing powerhouse boom? Whilst at the very same time making any of our ‘clean’ energy commitments meaningless? Oddly, he seems not to have considered this in calculations.
Why is Minister Keane in public critical of energy entrepreneur Trevor St Baker as someone benefiting from these changes? St Baker bought one of NSW’s coal-fired power-stations for a mere $1 million now valued at over $700m – but because the state Liberal government was selling it. This is actually a story about the impropriety of actions of those in state government, in charge of our energy policy. It appears the NSW Liberal government classified the Vales Point power station as ‘worn out’ so it could be replaced, when it was worth alot more than that. Why would they do this? About $700m of public money thrown away. It appears they want to make us pay for a hugely more expensive and inefficient solar energy plants and their power — while ordinary electors have no choice but to pay for it.
Here we reach the intersection of incompetence and impropriety.
Many members of the political and media class of New South Wales are also aware of speculation surrounding factional ideological and personal alliances, astroturfing, and a revolving door between parliaments and plush corporate suites of high paid, high powered consultancy and lobbying roles. Mark Latham has alleged on Twitter a NSW Liberal MP told him that Kean’s net zero legislation “is really about setting up the finances of the Moderate Faction, on a permanent basis”. These cold-blooded animals are indeed solar-powered.
The most serpentine are the green spiv renewables funds. They are profiting by moving us to expensive, unreliable power. Here is their simple 3-step formula.
- Replace-plants. Our coal plants are being torn down so that we have to build new power plants. The more money it costs us to build them, the more the GSRFs get as their cut (as their fees are a proportion of the funds they arranged). For the GRSFs, the more expensive these plants, the better.
- Push-up prices. These expensive solar-power plants also make more expensive and unreliable electricity, and Aussies have no choice but to pay. For the GRSFs the margin gets juicer, on this higher amounts as electricity becomes more expensive.
- Privatise -plants. Next, governments tend to sell the asset to private investors. Investment banks love energy investments because it is very low risk. It is not hard to know that people will buy electricity. Often, these deals are protected even further from risk by government-guarantees. So the funds they arrange to buy these investments are comparatively cheap and then they get access to those juicy margins these new ritzy and expensive plants they have funded us to build.
Replace plants. Push-up prices. Privatise production. That’s the GSRF formula.
For us, it means extraordinarily expensive—and unreliable—electricity. For them, the merchant bankers and their allies, it means easy and growing money whilst doing very little. They are simply taking from us. It’s not unlike the energy a lizard gets from sitting on a rock.
It is cold-blooded. They are being predatory to our polity.
There are clear alternatives to solar-power. HELE Coal-fire is very popular elsewhere and makes a lot of sense with all the coal we export. Highly-efficient nuclear power, is also an obvious option. But these are too efficient and cheap to benefit these serpentine predators.
Now, there’s another feature of serpents. As we are told in the Bible, they tend to twist words–they make bad seem good, and good seem bad. This move to change our electricity production is moving our politics into dangerous territory, where a woke-elite alliance obscures poor policy. The financial-elite profit, while the woke-brigade power their political arguments into the mainstream. The woke-brigade even shaming and standing-over normal people who question it and the financial-elite who profit from it. While the financial-elite are profiteering from us, we are supposed to say ‘thank you’. The woke-elite alliance is doing bad and calling it good.
Expect to see plenty even more ritzy Range Rovers cruising around Sydney with ‘Stop Adani’ bumper-stickers.’https://www.spectator.com.au/2021/01/todays-cold-blooded-political-animals-are-solar-powered/
My last article concerned Wheaton College and its condemnation of the January 6, 2021 violence in Washington DC. In that condemnation they blamed “wicked leadership—especially by President Trump,”. That statement speaks volumes!
Recently I came across an ad for a new book by five Wheaton Professors on the theories of origins. This book was made possible by a grant from BioLogos which holds ‘…that God created the universe, the earth, and all life over billions of years‘. https://biologos.org/about-us/what-we-believe/
It was the BioLogos grant that permitted the writing of this ‘…new book, Understanding Scientific Theories of Origins: Cosmology, Geology, and Biology in Christian Perspective.’ https://biologos.org/articles/5-wheaton-college-professors-release-new-book-on-theories-of-origins
The authors of this book are said to team teach at Wheaton the ‘…Theories of Origins, a general education science course first offered at the Christian college in 1995. Big Bang cosmology, origin of the solar system, Earth history, origin of life, origins of species and evolution, and human origins are introduced by faculty representing physics and philosophy of science, geology, chemistry, and biology. A Bible scholar provides background on principles and methods of biblical interpretation and accounts of creation and the Flood in Genesis.
Faculty enthusiasm and student interest in the course has remained strong despite the changing lineup of faculty with over 1,150 course alumni in its 23-year history. After all, the syllabus “evolves” with every new discovery: The course was introduced at the initiation of human genome sequencing and before the discovery of some 3,500 exoplanets and eleven additional hominin species!’https://biologos.org/articles/5-wheaton-college-professors-release-new-book-on-theories-of-origins
It is apparent from the statements above that Wheaton takes the hypothesis of evolution over the plain literal teaching of the WORD OF GOD! Now, it clear that neither the evolutionist or the Bible creationist was there when everything came into being. However, the creationist has the Bible as well as the evidence of fossils etc. that the evolutionist has as well. Therefore, it is how one looks and reads the evidence for both Biblical creation and Darwinian evolution can be correct.
Wheaton teaches a ‘science falsely so called’ and is not building the students up in the faith of the Word of God when it teaches a theory from Satan’s workbook. As Dr. Floyd Nolen Jones writes on page 22 of CHRONOLOGY OF THE OT that once the student is hooked by the teaching of evolution ‘…gone for the
most part is trust in an instantaneous special creation by God, a literal Adam and Eve, the Fall of
man, and his subsequent need for a Redeemer. The first eleven chapters of Genesis, the seed bed for
all the doctrines that follow in the remainder of Scripture, become little more than a fable or parable.
The rudimentary truth of fallen man’s proclivity toward evil and of eventual judgment against
impenitence, as demonstrated by the world-wide Flood, is lost in the battle for the hearts and souls
of those for whom the ultimate sacrifice has been made.’
Scientists who believe in a literal reading of Genesis are not simpletons. For example Isaac Newton ‘…wrote powerful refutations on atheism while defending the literal six day Bible Creation
account. Moreover, he believed that the worldwide Flood of Noah’s day accounted for most of the
geologic phenomena observed in his day. Newton’s authored two volumes addressing Biblical
chronology, The Observations Upon the Prophecies of Daniel, and the great work, The Chronology of
Ancient Kingdoms Amended, published posthumously in 1728. In the latter, Newton decimated and
overthrew the current dates of Greek, Latin and Egyptian chronology demonstrating the
impossibility of using any of their chronologies as a stable foundation which could be used as a
standard.’ Page 36 CHRONOLOGY OF THE OT
You get the point. Evolution and Biblical creation are not compatible and it does make a difference what one believes. If interested you can find a list of creation organizations at http://www.nwcreation.net/groupcreation.html.
Most conservatives and especially conservative Bible believing Christians would not condone the violence that has been happening around the USA by Antifa and BLM in 2020 or that which occurred in Washington DC January 6th. The simple fact is that the violence and destruction during 2020 was undoubtedly perpetrated by BLM and Antifa but exactly who was involved in the January 6th violence is still not yet truly determined. However, that last fact doesn’t bother those at Wheaton College.
‘More than 255 former and current Wheaton College faculty and staff have signed a statement condemning last week’s attack on the Capitol and specifically decrying “blasphemous abuses of Christian symbols.” The statement also denounces what it calls “wicked leadership—especially by President Trump,” but also by some evangelical leaders.
‘“The behaviors that many participants celebrated in Jesus’ name bear absolutely no resemblance to the Christian teachings or ethics that we submit to as faculty and staff of Wheaton College,” the statement said.
The statement also chastised evangelical leaders who “could have spoken truth to the disillusioned supporters of President Trump,” but instead “wittingly propagated lies, or were unduly silent in a just cause.”
After the election, evangelical leaders like Eric Metaxas, Franklin Graham, and a host of others supported the idea that voter fraud was to blame for Trump’s loss. This aligns with Trump’s narrative, who on the evening of the riot, tweeted: “These are the things and events that happen when a sacred landslide election victory is so unceremoniously & viciously stripped away from great patriots who have been badly & unfairly treated for so long.”
Though many evangelicals have condemned the riots, the Wheaton faculty statement is one of the first, if not the first, official statement to confront evangelical leaders.
The statement also alleged that “systemic racism” was to blame for “differential treatment” given those who trespassed on the Capitol as opposed to those who protested police brutality over the summer.
“These realities are reprehensible,” it stated. “Our Christian faith demands shining a light on these evils and the simultaneous commitment to take appropriate action.”
The faculty statement released Monday differs somewhat from an official statement by Wheaton College the same day.
The official Wheaton College statement decried the “violent attack on democracy,” but did not name Trump or other evangelicals. However, similar to the faculty and staff statement, the college statement lamented “the way perpetrators used the name of Jesus to promote violence, display racist symbols, and attack our nation’s leaders.”’https://julieroys.com/wheaton-faculty-decry-christian-symbols-wicked-leadership-riot/?mc_cid=d5a45ef763&mc_eid=b13d34ad49
Genesis 1:21 And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their kind, and every winged fowl after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
‘What is an Osedax Mucofloris? Commonly known as the BONE EATING SNOT FLOWER, this small creature offers a lot of insight into how the ocean works.’
Please take the time to read this entire article by Pastor Brandenburg. Parler is gone so be sure articles like this will not be allowed once the Marxist/Leftist folk get complete control!
‘The founders declared, “No taxation without representation,” as a clarion theme leading to revolution. No representation meant no vote and no voice, which lead to violent circumstances. Two systems of justice existed, one on English soil and another in the American colonies, so mobs terrified the stamp tax agents, leading to its repeal, then triggered the Boston Massacre and the Tea Party. English elites called these criminal sedition and insurrection. American leaders voiced calm, yet in the end joined in a war for independence. Are there modern echoes in the present United States?
Patrick Henry on March 23, 1775 proclaimed, “Give me liberty or give me death!” I think everyone could agree that the death part of his famous statement meant the anticipation of some type of violence. A little later, the Texans at the Alamo believed that death was preferable to living under tyrannical government, albeit Mexican. “Remember the Alamo” then fueled a Texan war for independence.
President Trump is called a populous president. His support is populous. He was and is a man for the time. Could it have been someone else with a more pristine character resume? It doesn’t seem so. I’m open to an alternative, but I haven’t seen that person in my lifetime.
The never-Trumpers of the Lincoln project, who despise Trump supporters and would relish violence against them, say that his voters were so stupid that they thought he’d be a good leader because they watched him on The Apprentice television show. I’ve never seen more useful idiots than the Lincoln ones.
Many factors led to Trump, but the quintessential motivation was an oppressive political correctness that incessantly violates rights of Americans. This is even seen in the reaction to the events of January 6 in the capitol. Political speech is not sedition and insurrection. Using the term, “fight,” as a euphemism is not a call to violence, just like saying “political target” doesn’t mean you’re going to shoot someone.
Political correctness is a kind of correctness in China, where the government says, this is correct, you disagree, saying, it’s not, and then you disappear for the rest of your life. Political correctness is a pressure to take a position at a cost for not taking it. If you know what’s good for your health, your professional career, and your mere future, this is the view you’ll need to take. Carolyn Glick writes in Israel Hayom that Democrats wish a new era of total political correctness.
President Trump says what many people are thinking in the United States. When I say many, I mean about fifty million or more. He has not “incited violence.” When Trump supporters came to Washington, DC on January 6, 2021, no elected official encouraged them to come to force their way into the capitol building and physically stop the electoral counting procedure in Congress, a violation of the law (read this account and this take). In President Trump’s speech, he didn’t suggest that. The people saying that know they are lying. They are liars.
Democrats riot, protest, terrorize, picket, intimidate, and break the law without ceasing. They not only get no condemnation but instead receive actual support from a vast majority of the media, celebrities, and educators. They use government power to prosecute their political enemies and to crush their businesses and take away their property. Even if they do not win in court, they waste the time and ruin the personal finances of their victims. They tear apart our society. They are never censored. As an example, they use their power to allow men to use the girl’s bathrooms. Opposition is litigated. They are given the widest possible bandwidth to spew the greatest possible amount of vile and deceitful discourse.
Those of the capitol mob were finished with conventional Republican or conservative way of change. They decided to imitate their political opposition and give them a taste of their own medicine. It was so odd and out of character that theories arose among conservatives that it must be someone else, that Antifa or BLM infiltrated the group, posing as them for purposes of discrediting. Can you imagine someone asking, “Can you believe the Democrat party instigated violence and supported burning, pillaging, and looting of public property through their various collaborators, Antifa and BLM?” Laughter ensues. A serial murdering abortion doctor slaughters babies born alive and Democrat lawyers line up to defend him.
President Trump gave a political speech on January 6 (read the transcript here), protected by the first amendment without any mention of violence. None. It’s true he doesn’t attempt to calm down his listeners, tranquilize them. He wants to fire them up, to inspire them. That’s what political speakers do, except for Joe Biden and a few others, but not because they don’t wish they could energize someone. No Republican has encouraged violence in any way. Everyone knows that. The people hearing Trump know that.
The crowd that rushed the capitol was enough of a surprise that the capitol police wasn’t ready for it. It is clear that a smaller faction of the gigantic crowd came to Washington DC prepared to do more than attend a rally. As a template, they had Seattle, Portland, Kenosha, earlier in Washington DC, and urban areas all over the country as an immense sample size compared to their own efforts. Those leftist mobsters took over several city blocks in Seattle and occupied them, fully armed, for weeks and those like them all over the country have incessantly toppled statues and threatened ordinary American citizens during meals and peaceful walks in public places.
What occurred at the capitol is called by the media and Democrats, an insurrection. It was an insurrection like the LA police following OJ Simpson was a “car chase.” No one shot anyone except the police an unarmed Trump supporter, military veteran, and you know the story, she was threatening no one.
I wouldn’t join them, but I get the anger inspiring the capitol hill chaos. I understand frustration of the participants. I’m quite sure that my belief in the future kingdom of Jesus Christ anesthetizes a desire for physical retribution. A true believer opts for a peaceful solution now, starting with the gospel. The party of senseless violence though is the left. They kill millions and urge to kill millions more babies. They are silent while thousands are murdered in America’s cities. They oppose all freedom of speech except for their own demented and reprobate positions.
One can judge true thoughts and standards by the consistency of the condemnation. Unless all violence is condemned, the standard of violence still stands. The left embraces violence. It wants to disarm its opposition. It uses the accusation of not-a-coup to cover its own actual coup. The so-called antifascists are the actual fascists. Who is attempting to take away rights and freedoms? The left, represented by the Democrat party, finances and supports its own violence. It condemns all violence against it. It punches you in the face, puts its glasses on, and says, “You wouldn’t hit a man wearing glasses, would you?”
The mob on capitol hill saw their votes as cancelled. I agree with them. The invention of Democrat ballot harvesting tipped the swing states. They see election laws violated without recourse and even the Supreme Court cowed from dutiful examination. There is no Republican voice allowed in the public school and state college system, the mainstream media, and the tech titans censor it on their government protected platforms. The loss of vote and voice equal violent circumstances. The people taking away freedom through their various means of state and corporate power fueled the capitol mob on January 6, not the president.’https://kentbrandenburg.blogspot.com/2021/01/the-capitol-hill-chaos-votes-canceled.html
Genesis 1:1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
‘For thousands of years, theories that reject the Word of God have followed cultural fashion. It was inevitable, then, that some “biblical scholar” would invent a theory that a woman wrote some important part of Scripture that has been traditionally assigned to a man.
Historical critic Harold Bloom, who teaches at Yale, has proposed that the mythological “J” source of Genesis was a woman. He says she made up the stories of the creation, Noah and Abraham, and invented an impulsive, violent and “impish” divinity. Bloom’s evidence? The account of Eve’s creation is six times longer than the account of Adam’s creation.
Some Christians have been shaken up needlessly by this so-called “scholarship.” Historical criticism rejects the Bible as the Word of God. It says the Bible is man-made and a result of the natural evolution of religion. There is no room in historical criticism for divine revelation. As a result, historical critics cannot arrive at theories that support the Bible as God’s revelation except by accident. Second, the claimed sources of the Old Testament, such as the “J” source, have never been found and are purely imaginary.
As Christians, we should not be intimidated by such claims of “scholarship.” All this scholarship does is discard the God of Scripture and His Word, replacing the true God with imaginary gods and authors. And, as we read in 1 Corinthians chapter 8, “We know that an idol is nothing in the world, and that there is no other God but one.”’https://creationmoments.com/sermons/did-a-woman-write-genesis-2/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=did-a-woman-write-genesis-2&mc_cid=225680991e&mc_eid=00c1dcff3c
