
There are two benefits to this answer to Islamic immigration.
- It is less expensive
- Bacon sandwiches

There are two benefits to this answer to Islamic immigration.
“Islam in America: Violent and Bloodthirsty, or Peaceful?”

“My Experience With Islam in America
Islam is supposedly a religion of peace. American Muslims, at least, are supposedly peace loving, Americanized and Westernized people. The vast numbers of Quranic commands to kill non-Muslims are supposedly irrelevant to these American followers of Allah who supposedly put the Constitution above the Quran. Is it so? There are certainly secular Muslims who care more about making money and living like rich people than about what the Quran says. However, there is a vast and growing body of already extant evidence demonstrating that far, far too many Western Muslims, and majorities of Muslims in many nations worldwide, still believe the Quran and thus tend towards violence. To that body of evidence may the following true story provide some further light. The person involved in the record below will remain anonymous, and statements in the comment section speculating on the person involved will probably be deleted. The story will be told in the first person. It illustrates Islam in the American heartland.
The Testimony—What Muslims in America Are Doing
Not that long ago I was in the Milwaukee area, on a public sidewalk, passing out The Testimony of the Quran to the Bible outside of a Muslim gathering at a particular mosque in the region. Recognizing that “a soft answer turneth away wrath” (Proverbs 15:1), I sought to be especially polite and kind to the Muslims there as they left the mosque in multitudes. I was by no means doing anything to whip up the Muslims, as some foolish people in Christendom do at Muslim gatherings. As I respectfully offered them the literature, some of them cursed at me. One of them spat at me. Some of them ripped it up. (Some of them took it also, and I do not know what they did with it—hopefully they read it and God worked in their life toward them rejecting Allah and receiving Jehovah’s eternal Son, Jesus Christ.) One of them told me that there were crazy people there and I might be in danger. After a while, a sizable group of young Muslim men told me that they were going to kill me. They were not kidding, either. As they were approaching me, a private security vehicle with its lights flashing “just happened” to pull up, and it remained on the site the rest of the time I was passing out the Christian pamphlet. The vehicle stayed there for about two hours while the young Muslim men circled around and around in a car to see if the security vehicle was still there or if they could act out their desire to do me serious bodily injury or send me to the grave. This private security vehicle was God’s answer to my prayers, and the prayers of others, for protection before I went. After about everyone had left the mosque, I left also.
Politely passing out that pamphlet to those Muslims was the most dangerous evangelistic endeavor I have ever undertaken. I have passed out tracts to gatherings of people of many different religions. I have preached on the street and passed out literature to gatherings of militant sodomites, in front of drunks, and with various other rabble-rousers. While sometimes these people have made threats (sodomites, for example, have burned tracts, said they would kill me, and done other similar things), none, I repeat, none of these evangelistic opportunities has been as dangerous as politely passing out pamphlets to Muslims in the American heartland. This is my testimony to the character of Islam in America.
Interestingly, I was listening to National Public Radio (NPR) one time—perhaps a mistake in itself—and the radio station wanted people to call in to give their story of their encounters with Muslim neighbors. Everything was supposed to be light, happy, and frothy. I called and told the person vetting the calls what my story was. Not surprisingly, I was not allowed on air. It did not fit the P. C. fairy-tale narrative about Islam.
We should use the freedoms that we have in the United States to boldly evangelize the Muslims that are here—we would not have that liberty in countries where they are the majority. We should also ask God to protect us and take sensible steps to protect ourselves when we do so (e. g., have someone recording the evangelism on a camera, have someone ready to call 911, perhaps even wear bullet proof vests or other protection, although, based on Matthew 5:44, the example in Acts 7, etc. I do not believe it is best to carry weapons for self-defense when preaching the gospel, although carrying them for general protection is certainly Biblical, Luke 22:36-38. If Stephen had used a concealed weapon in Acts 7 things would haven been not a little different!) We should also consider what we are doing to our nation when we bring into our country and make citizens those who believe in the Quran. Muslim immigration can be vastly limited by simply passing a law that states that countries with a high level of support for terrorism cannot send people here (with an exception for persecuted minorities such as Christians). Islam does not even need to be mentioned in the law. By passing such a law, those who believe in the anti-Biblical and anti-American system of Sharia can be kept out to a large extent, while those that are already here can be boldly evangelized.”
http://kentbrandenburg.blogspot.com.au/2016/04/islam-in-america-violent-and.html

http://donboys.cstnews.com/obamas-visit-to-a-terrorist-connected-mosque
“President Obama recently visited a terrorist-connected Muslim mosque; however, he has not visited an Evangelical or Fundamentalist church! That’s interesting since such people had everything to do with founding this nation and Muslims had nothing to do with it. Among other falsehoods, he opined that Islam is “essential to the fabric of America.” He did not try to support his obviously false statement. If every Muslim in America disappeared tonight, it would have little negative impact on our nation.
Even the media have noticed how he panders to Muslims at every opportunity and always defends Muslim terrorists when they kill the innocent shouting, “Allah is the greatest.” Sane, honest people know they are obviously wild-eyed barbarians from the 7th century desert. However, when an American city is smoldering in flames from a terrorist attack, Obama will be forced to discard his pandering to Muslims as quickly as long underwear in a Texas heatwave.
America now has over 3,000 mosques and 80% of them are financed by the radical Wahhabi Muslim sect in Saudi Arabia according to the Jerusalem Post and other sources. No doubt there are some mosques filled with nominal Moslems who are not dependent upon largess from the Wahhabi extremists. Nor are they determined to destroy our government and replace it with sharia law and a world caliphate. Maybe a few.
Obama chose to visit a U. S mosque located in the Baltimore area; however, the mosque is associated with the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA). The ISNA is a front for the Muslim Brotherhood, a global terrorist group. The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) is also an offshoot of ISNA. ISNA has longtime ties to terrorists yet Obama insisted on visiting them even after he was warned about their terrorist connections!
Obama told the audience, “You’re part of America too. You’re not Muslim or American. You’re Muslim and American.” Well, maybe but not if they really believe the teachings they profess. One cannot be a good Muslim and a good American because his allegiance is to the Koran which is based on authoritarianism which is contrary to freedom. He can’t accept democracy because democracy is antithetic to Islam and he answers to Islamic mullahs who interpret the Korean for him. A faithful Muslim cannot uphold our Constitution because Islam requires the system of sharia government which must be implemented.
Every new U.S. citizen must make an “Oath of Allegiance” promising loyalty to the United States Constitution and renunciation of allegiance to any foreign country to which the immigrant has had previous allegiances. But then, Muslims are permitted to lie if it furthers the Islamic cause.
Let me provide some information that will clarify this matter as to being a good American and a good Muslim. For a person to be a good Muslim and a good American he must be willing to:
*denounce all allegiances to his past country.
*demand that no Muslim give a dollar to promote any terrorist activities.
*declare that any Muslim in America has a right to follow any religion, thus acknowledging our freedom of religion.
*decide that it is illegal, immoral, and illogical to have more than one wife–or at least one wife at a time à laHollywood.
Let me suggest that any Muslim has a constitutional right to live in America if he is willing to become an American; however, if he clings to his barbaric anti-America desert religion then he is persona non grata and needs to return to his desert home.
I have been defamed, threatened, and ridiculed for telling the truth about Middle East savages who cling to their Koran with one hand and an AK 47 with the other. They have made it clear to anyone with the IQ equivalent to his ring size that they plan to conquer the world for Mohammed, establishing a world caliphate. So why do civilized people tiptoe around the issue and not admit that we are at war with sixth century barbarians? Why do the media, known as news twisters, refuse to deal honestly with the issue? A religion that is used as a foundation for advocating the overthrow of our civilization should not be welcome. After all, it is not smart to feed the buzzard that is determined to pick out your eyes.
In his mosque speech, Obama cited a long history of Islam in America, and demanded more positive depictions of Muslims in American media. However, no reporter had the courage to ask for proof that Islam made any contribution to America.
Since there are many credible charges that Obama has been a life-time Muslim, it might be the words of a fanatic. He knows the statement is untrue but Islam permits deception, disingenuousness, and dishonesty if it supports and advances Islam.
Obama’s dedication to Islam may have driven him into demonstrative error. Or, he may be a fool and is simply repeating what some other fool has uttered. Or, he might be a fraud in that he knows the claims are false but wanting to give credibility to Islam, he promulgates a falsehood. He is weaving a cloak to hide the naked lies of Islam. My purpose today is to lift the cloak and reveal the unbending, unloving, uncivil, undemocratic, and ugly side of Islam.
A leading Muslim said, “The Islamic civilization was one of the most amazing that history has ever known.” That is wishful thinking and skewed, dishonest history. Such boastful claims are even more solemn, shameful, and scandalous when spoken by the President of the U.S.A.
The following grandiose claims are a pathetic example of desperate Muslim leaders who make false claims hoping to impress the gullible and feeble-minded. I could provide many more such false claims.
Muslims declare that Columbus had a Muslim navigator but he did not. A crew member was a Spaniard who spoke Arabic. Big difference.
Muslims are quick to boast about the “Arabic” system they developed which was a major improvement over the cumbersome Roman system. Just a little problem here: Muslims did not develop that system. They took it from India in about 750 and passed it on to Europeans making life simpler for everyone. Muslims were not original thinkers but they were very helpful in transmitting valuable information and classical books to Europe during the Middle Ages.
The Muslim claim for the invention of glassmaking is totally bogus since glass can be traced back to 3,500 B.C. in Mesopotamia. That was more than 4,000 before Mohammad poked his head out of his desert tent.
Desperate Muslims even take credit for bathing and soap invention! If Muslims would read the Old Testament they would discover the emphasis on cleanliness. Moreover, I have seen baths in Greece, Rome, and all over the Middle East that go back more than 2,000 years. The “Muslim” who allegedly developed soap in the late 1,700s was not even a Muslim! He was reared in a Muslim home but he became a Christian and one of his grandsons became a preacher! Furthermore, soap making goes back to Babylon in 2,800 B.C. Such spurious claims show desperation.
Muslims have long taken credit for architecture especially the pointed arch that is so common all over Europe; however, it is a fact that the pointed arch goes back to the Assyrians–at least 722 B.C.
Deceptive Muslims even claim they were the first to proclaim the Earth is round in the 8th century even though the Bible clearly declares the Earth is a sphere in Isa. 40:22 and Greeks taught a round Earth hundreds of years before Christ. Muslims proved their antiquated views when Saudi Arabia Sheik Abdul-Aziz Ibn Baaz recently declared “The earth is flat. Whoever claims it is round is an atheist deserving of punishment.” Which is it–round or flat?
But it gets worse because in October 2007 on Iraqi TV, a Muslim scientist authoritatively affirmed that the Earth is flat! Moreover, he informed his audience that the Sun is much smaller than the Earth and revolves around it!
Why all this disingenuousness, distortion, and dishonesty? It is because Islam has no credibility with informed people. So, Islamic followers try to prop it up and make it more respectable. Like angry atheists, they believe if they repeat their lies often enough, uninformed people will believe them to be truth. It won’t work.
No, Obama was wrong. Muslims made absolutely no contribution to America’s discovery or development. And many Muslim leaders are doing their best to destroy America as we have known it.
As proved above, Muslims blow smoke when they boast about their accomplishments. What they did give to the world was a backward, barbaric, and bloody religious way of life.
But then, I’m not supposed to mention that fact. Or say that it is untrue that “a peaceful religion was hijacked.”
“The couple at the centre of the ‘gay cake’ case have told how their legal battle with equality watchdogs has strengthened their marriage, as well as their faith in God.” http://www.christian.org.uk/news/ashers-case-has-bolstered-our-marriage-and-faith-in-god/
It seems only Christians are to leave their faith at home. 


These two confronting supporters of “Sameh Bayda, 18, of Guildford” were photographed outside Parramatta court when Sameh appeared “…accused of collecting three documents, two in Arabic and a third in English that was allegedly produced by terrorist organisation Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula in preparation of a terrorist attack.
Court documents state that one of the Arabic documents allegedly provided instructions on how to carry out a successful stabbing attack while the other described how to make an explosive device.He is accused of collecting the documents some time between December 1 last year and January 13 this year
He has been charged by NSW Joint Counter Terrorism Team with three counts of knowingly collect /make document connected with terrorism.”http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/18yearold-charged-with-collecting-documents-to-facilitate-terrorist-acts/news-story/916b5ace575c4c1c3fcaab8e245db9ba?sv=11e808238091e8ff9d35829d4c4f1d30&utm_source=The%20Telegraph&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=editorial
WELCOME TO AUSTRALIA, 2016!
Believe it or not “The Swedish flag has now been banned at a primary school in Sweden. The reason is that the flag may be offensive to certain groups and breaking the law “offensive against ethnic groups.”
The sensational ban is introduced at Söndrum school in Halmstad. Use of the flag is now only allowed on the national day or when foreign students are invited.
In an internal letter to school students and their parents who were sent out just before Christmas, the school principal writes that “no other use of the Swedish flag is allowed”, according to Nyheter idag.
It is also believed “that by using the Swedish flag one may be guilty of violating the racism law.” http://www.speisa.com/modules/articles/index.php/item.574/swedish-school-bans-the-swedish-flag.html
So the Swedish flag is offensive to a Muslim. What else might be offensive to a Muslim?
IS THIS PIG OFFENSIVE TO A MUSLIM because it is a pig or is it becaue it is named Mohammad or is it both?
DOES THIS Bacon sandwich offend a Muslim? Yes it does for “Local Winooski, Vermont restaurant Sneakers Bistro has removed a sign that read, “Yield Sneakers Bacon” citing opposition from a Muslim community member and safety concerns.” http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2014/08/23/vermont-restaurant-removes-bacon-sign-due-to-muslim-opposition-and-safety-concerns/
IS THIS FLAG OFFENSIVE TO A MUSLIM with its sword of death?
Are the be-headings in Saudi Arabia offensive to a Muslim? Warning, this video is very graphic! http://www.liveleak.com/ll_embed?f=b5c8c4a0bf28
It seems like only Muslims and their beliefs and culture are worthy of saving and not to be offended! However, I digress, the banning of the Swedish flag is bad enough but also Swedish Muslims will burn their flag and ask for the flag to be changed as that cross on the flag is offensive to them.

The above article was taken from an article written in September 2011. “An immigrant group based in Bern has called for the emblematic white cross to be removed from the Swiss national flag because as a Christian symbol it ‘no longer corresponds to today’s multicultural Switzerland.’
Ivica Petrusic, the vice president of Second@s Plus, a lobbying group that represents mostly Muslim second-generation foreigners in Switzerland (who colloquially are known as secondos) says the group will launch a nationwide campaign in October to ask Swiss citizens to consider adopting a flag that is less offensive to Muslim immigrants.” http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/2449/immigrants-swiss-flag-cross
Here is a closing commentary on this whole mess we find ourselves in today. This is the second generation Swedish Muslim that is offended by their national flag! They aren’t the newly arrived Muslim immigrant but SECOND GENERATION! They were born and reared in Sweden. How can this be? Is there something being taught in the mosque and the home that makes the young Muslim anti-Swedish?
Secondly, are these offended people born and reared in Sweden true Muslims? It is all too often told the non-Muslim that ISIS is not Islamic. So is there a difference between Islam and Muslim? Therefore is it reasonable to ask, are these offended people in Sweden truly Islamic Muslims? Are those in Saudi Arabia who behead and cut off limbs of people for various crimes, true Islamic Muslims? Are those in Iran that cry death to Israel and the USA true Islamic Muslims? This is not being racist but being truthful and practical.
If Islam is so great WHY aren’t these Muslims rushing to Saudi Arabia, Iran, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Iraq, Afghanistan, Egypt, Libya, and the United Arab Emirates to name a few?! For that matter why aren’t these Islamic nations opening their borders and arms to welcome these Muslim refugees? NO, rather they pour into non-Muslim nations where they CAN BE OFFENDED?
How long will this idiocy continue? Waiter, bring me a Bacon sandwich!

“Islamic Supremacist organizations like ISIS can be graded on the “Caliphate curve”. The Caliphate curve is based on how quickly an Islamic organization wants to achieve the Caliphate. What we describe as “extreme” or “moderate” is really the speed at which an Islamic group seeks to recreate the Caliphate.
ISIS is at the extreme end of the scale, not because it tortures, kills and rapes, but because it implemented the Caliphate immediately. The atrocities for which ISIS has become known are typical of a functioning Caliphate. The execution of Muslims who do not submit to the Caliph, the ethnic cleansing and sexual slavery of non-Muslims are not aberrations. They are normal behavior for a Caliphate.”
“We are not at war with ISIS. We are at war with everyone on the Caliphate curve. Not because we choose to be, but because like Hitler’s Thousand Year Reich or Communism’s vision of one world under the red flag, the Caliphate is a plan for imposing a totalitarian system on us to deprive us of our rights.
The Nazis and the Communists had a vision for the world. So do the Islamic Supremacists who advocate the restoration of the Caliphate. All three groups occasionally played the victim of our foreign policy, but they were not responding to us, they were trying to bring about their positive vision of an ideal society.”
“The original Islamic expansionism was so devastating not because it managed to seize control over the hinterlands of Arabia, but because it conquered and subjugated civilized cities such as Alexandria, Constantinople, Jerusalem, Athens and Delhi. ISIS envisions repeating these conquests and more, but if it succeeds it will not be because of its military strategy, but because it targets have been colonized.
We can destroy ISIS tomorrow, but we will still be in an extended war with a hundred other groups who all have a vision for restoring the Caliphate. This war will never end until we crush their supremacist agenda by demonstrating that we will never again allow such a horror to exist on this earth. As long as Muslim groups hold out hope for a restoration of the Caliphate this war, in its various forms, will go on.” For the full article go to: http://www.breakingisraelnews.com/59588/understanding-the-caliphate-curve-opinion/?utm_source=Breaking+Israel+News&utm_campaign=d81b2aeb22-BIN_evening_1_16&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_b6d3627f72-d81b2aeb22-86688409#8wOXlwBp56pIDhO3.97
“The trouble began on Jan. 12, when 10 U.S. Navy sailors on two small boats evidently mistakenly strayed into Iranian waters in the Persian Gulf. Iran captured the American sailors (nine men, one woman) and held them overnight. This, as Sen. John McCain pointed out, was a violation of international law: ‘[S]overeign immune vessels like navy ships and boats do not lose their sovereign immune status when they are in distress at sea,’ the senator noted in a statement. Under international law, therefore, the sailors ‘are exempt from detention, boarding, or search. Their crews are not subject to detention or arrest.’”
“And the United States government’s response to this calumny? For one, the State Department denied that the Geneva Conventions applied to the captured sailors, because we are ‘not at war with Iran.’ That would come as a surprise to the family members of the scores of American military personnel who have been killed by Iranian explosives in Afghanistan and Iraq. And perhaps more appalling, Secretary of State John Kerry actually thanked Iran for its behavior here. ‘I want to express my gratitude to Iranian authorities for their cooperation in swiftly resolving this matter,’ Secretary Kerry said.”http://www.providencejournal.com/article/20160119/opinion/160119221
