“The wife of a convicted Islamic State recruiter could be the first person in NSW to be charged for refusing to stand in court.”
This veiled covered woman is “one of the two wives of recruiter Hamdi Alqudsi” and has “caused a stir in court after she refused to stand for the presiding District Court Judge Audrey Balla”. TWO WIVES!?
Her “barrister, told Judge Balla ‘she won’t stand for anyone except Allah’.”
Not only will she not stand for the judge she “also refused to remove her veil, saying she would not give evidence to do so unless all the men in the courtroom looked away.”
The NSW Solicitor-General Michael Sexton SC has been urged to “determine whether Elzahed should be charged under the new disrespectful behaviour in court law.”
Is there really anyone (other than those of the peaceful religion) who believes this kind of behaviour is justifiable? It could be said that NO ONE BUT NO ONE except a Muslim would dare get by with this behaviour! I am waiting to see what punishment this veiled person (that is whoever is hiding behind the veil) will recieive; if any!
Obama and those with him on the loony left feel climate change is more dangerous to your life and health than those “extremists” who think they are Muslims but are not but want you dead anyway. Enough from me; I will allow Brittany to bring you up to speed.
If the spate of recent terroist attacks in New Jersey and Paris had been committed by those who follow Scientology or Mormonism would there be a parade and a special day declared to honor their religion?! Hold that thought for a moment.
“A Muslim slashed a New York cop with a meat cleaver on September 15. Another Muslim planted bombs in New York and New Jersey; one went off, wounding 29 people in Chelsea on September 17. In response, the city of New York is honoring all the contributions Muslims make to the city. Mayor Bill de Blasio seems to think that his primary responsibility after every jihad attack is to make sure that no one thinks ill of Islam. Stopping jihad attacks? That’s farther down on his list.
The thinking here appears to be that if we welcome Muslims and laud and applaud them, they will not be driven by our unkindness to become “radicalized” and will not join jihad groups. So we should see a dropoff of jihad activity now in New York, with everyone being so nice to Muslims, right?
In this so-called war on terror, who is the enemy? It’s not Islam so-says the politicians and most of those on the left. The politician says it is those extremists who only “think” they are Muslims who commit these acts. Therefore if these extremists are not Muslims what are they? If they are not Muslims what are they “extreme” in? Are they “extreme” in their reading and understanding of the Koran and the teachings of Muhammad or have they converted to Scientology or Mormonism?
So, how do we identify the extremist? Do we wait until they attack and murder or may these “extremists” be identified as they live and move among us?
In these photos which one would you identify as a terroist? Allow me to tell a story. Last year, my wife and I were visiting our daughter in Chattanooga, Tenessee. While we were eating at a restaurant our daughter called and told us to stay where we were as a gunman was out and about shooting military personnel. That gunman was the boy in the red shirt; Mohammad Youssef Abdulazeez. From the photo he doesn’t look like a terroist but he was. Firstly he was a Muslim and secondly he hated America and Americans. Of course after the murder of four Marines and a Sailor the psychobabel began and various explanations made to explain why a boy by the name of Mohammad did what he did.
So, what is the key to beginning to stop these murderous acts of terroism; IDENTIFICATION of the enemy! However, political correctness will keep us vulnerable to more of the same!
“The wife of a convicted Islamic State recruiter could be the first person in NSW to be charged for refusing to stand in court.”
whatyareckon 