Have you ever been offended? Sure, but I lived with it! Not so with this Muslim?
Source: New Jersey: Muslim police chief to sue town over what he claims were racist comments
Have you ever been offended? Sure, but I lived with it! Not so with this Muslim?
Source: New Jersey: Muslim police chief to sue town over what he claims were racist comments
What politician would think this was a good idea?
Source: Australia to launch mission to bring dozens of Islamic State women and children back to the country
How did we get so many politicians in the West thinking this crazy net zero?
By Dr. Jay Lehr~
Several states and a significant number of electric utilities have committed to decarbonization goals. Net zero emissions is the term most generally used when expressing these goals. Of course decarbonization is a totally false term. It actually means no carbon dioxide emissions, but as always, the term carbon is scarier as most folks relate it to soot. Actually to all the global warming alarmists, which today includes our entire new federal government, net zero emissions means:
All man made greenhouse gas emissions must be removed from the atmosphere by either eliminating their source or cleansing them from the atmosphere through reduction measures such as pumping them underground.
This definition means that greenhouse gas emissions are permitted as long as any emissions are removed from the atmosphere either naturally such as in forests, or carbon capture and sequestration. This concept of net-zero is dishonest because the…
View original post 620 more words
By Joseph Vazquez ~
The leftist Big Tech overlords may finally face a day of reckoning as the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear a challenge to the Section 230 law that governs how tech platforms moderate free speech.
SCOTUSblog tweeted Oct. 3 that SCOTUS granted a writ of certiorari to Gonzalez v. Google, “involving the scope of tech companies’ immunity under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.”
USA Todaysummarized that the case will have “potentially enormous consequences for social media.” It is the “court’s first test of the broad immunity social media companies have enjoyed under a provision known as Section 230, part of the 1996 Communications Decency Act,” Bloomberg News stated.
Then came the typical liberal media “Republicans Pounce” angle from Bloomberg: “Section 230 has become a target of conservatives, including former President Donald Trump, who say it lets left-leaning tech…
View original post 499 more words
Would be FUNNY if not so real!!!!!
Coming Soon to Theaters
We’re Getting Stronger for Sure
Accurate Description of Sean Penn
Migrants Very Unimpressed by CA
Category: Questionable Relationship Advice
The Real Redpill Scene
Woke Businesses, Stand Strong!
Thinking About FBI Raids
When Gen Z Rewrites History
Just Like That
Breaking: Border is (Now) Secure
Beluga Air Migrant Flight Leaves MIA for MVI
Singer Given Medal for Causing AIDs Epidemic
Afraid to Ask
Facebook Despises Your Girlish White Uniform
Hey, Remember Me?
Cartoons




Read more excellent articles at The Patriot Post
Hypocritical journalist!