After viewing this one would understand why a police officer would shoot first before using a taser. Think about it? How much salary would you need to face this each day?
Communism
Tony Heller said ‘I filmed some Biden supporters today reacting to the opening day of the Democratic Convention.’
‘Everyone knows it: the death of George Floyd was just a pretext. The rioters who continue every night to wreak havoc in Portland, and who are poised to engage in new orgies of destruction all over the country don’t know much and care less about Floyd. They’re quite open about engaging in a “revolution” with the goal of destroying the existing order and replacing it with an authoritarian Marxist regime. But what we are seeing today is not new. Its seeds were planted decades ago. Now the question before us, if we want to preserve the United States as a free society, is what we must do to counter this violent, hate-filled movement.
There will be no easy fix. The Left’s long march through the institutions began in the 1960s and has ended in total victory; only a reverse march through the same institutions will ultimately overcome the catastrophic effects of the Left’s advance. The leftist stranglehold on the educational system is a big part of the problem: the Antifa and BLM barbarians of today learned their hatred at our colleges and universities. Our children have been taught to hate the land of their birth. Who didn’t think this would bear bitter fruit? There was some indignation among conservatives over the 1619 Project, which portrays the entire American enterprise as racist, oppressive, and hateful, winning the Pulitzer Prize, but that was just the culmination of decades of miseducation and propaganda disguised as education. I wrote Rating America’s Presidents: An America-First Look at Who Is Best, Who Is Overrated, and Who Was An Absolute Disaster as an antidote, to remind Americans, or show them for the first time, the heroes who made America great — and the failures and sellouts who got us into this fix.
But the education most of the rioters have received has made them abjectly incapable of thinking rationally and evaluating claims on the basis of their logical coherence and supporting evidence. No amount of careful reasoning, no amount of evidence is going to convince most of the rioters that their rage is based on false premises, because they have been carefully educated throughout their lives to feel rather than think, and to believe that America is a nation of deep injustice with a shameful history and an equally condemnable present. It doesn’t matter that the claims that the rioters and their defenders are making are false. It doesn’t matter that police brutality affects people of all races. It doesn’t matter that thoroughgoing civil rights legislation has made “systemic racism” a thing of the distant past.
There is much more. Read the rest here.’https://www.jihadwatch.org/2020/08/reclaiming-our-culture-from-the-left?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=the_2020_08_23_jihad_watch_daily_digest&utm_term=2020-08-23
How bad can politics in the USA get? Well, ‘The Democratic National Convention (DNC) last week was unusual in that they twice removed “under God” from the Pledge of Allegiance to placate their Muslim and LGBTQ constitutes who claimed the mention of God is “offensive” and “nonsense.”
The Biden-Harris team declared, “there is no vaccine for racism.” Neither is there a vaccine for hypocrisy or lying!
Moreover, no one at the convention thought someone should at least refer to the fact our major cities (run by Democrats) are burning at the hands of BLM and Antifa revolutionaries.
But we were permitted to hear from Donna Hylton, a 55-year-old woman who is one of “America’s most impactful community leaders.” However, Donna was “convicted for the kidnapping, rape, torture, and murder of a 62-year-old Long Island real estate broker in 1986.” The torture involved using plyers on the victim’s testicles. Most honest people would think the DNC should have at least suggested that Donna had been a little violent in her past.
However, the purpose of the convention was to choose and present to the voters the Democrat’s choice of President and Vice-President of the United States. While Joe and Kamala did an acceptable presentation of themselves with their usual careless and vitriolic attacks upon President Trump, their hypocrisy would gag every buzzard east of the Black Hills of South Dakota.
I had to fight my body’s retching reaction whenever Joe and what’s her name used such hallowed terms as moral, decent, values, and principled. Joe’s “decency is on the ballot” and to “tell the truth” would gag a maggot.
Those above qualities are all highly admirable attributes to be acquired; however, they are only notable in people who have character. Unprincipled people never exemplify them. Joe and Kamala have spent a lifetime denigrating and desecrating and dodging those same desirable principles.
However, they tout them during political campaigns since they work with dummies, demagogues, and Democrats. But I repeat myself.
While in law school at Syracuse University in 1965, Joe was caught plagiarizing and admitted taking five pages from a law review article for his 15-page report. He said his “mistake” was neither intentional nor “malevolent.” He didn’t steal a thought or phrase but five pages, word for word. He asked the university for permission to leave the school so he would not be labeled “a cheat.” Of course, he got an F but was permitted to take the class again and passed. Moral, decent, truth? Whatever the university did, Joe was still a cheat.
His lying continued after college when he told a reporter that he was in the top half of his class when he was at the bottom of his class. He said he was involved in civil rights marches then admitted that he did not march. But he admitted that he worked as a lifeguard at an all-black swimming pool. He declared he had been “shot at” during a visit to Iraq then had to admit it was not true. He told of being arrested in South Africa when trying to visit Nelson Mandela but admitted it was not true. Sorry, but it’s a fact that our next possible President is a fabricator. That sounds better than using liar.
He was forced to drop out of the 1988 presidential race after it was revealed that he stole some of JFK’s and Bobby’s speeches. Following Joe’s acceptance speech, even liberals like HuffPost accused him of stealing a Canadian politician’s words! Joe is a slow learner. Maybe a vaccine for lying could help him.
Joe is on the record as saying migrants who cross the border illegally “should have to get in line” unless they are seeking asylum, but he does not believe that today. What does he really believe? Do we believe flip or flop?
Joe teamed with Senator Strom Thurmond in a joint effort to oppose integrating schools in the 1970s. That action horrifies Joe today, but more importantly, it horrifies all on the left. If Joe wants us to know the truth, let us have the truth.
Jill Biden’s ex-husband has accused the potential first lady of having an affair with Joe Biden and says, “They lied about how they met in the 1970s, according to a bombshell new report.” Joe, what was that you said about decency? And, what about “telling the truth?” What about breaking up a man’s home by sleeping with his wife since that is not normally associated with decency, morality, or principled? But then, the way words have lost their meaning and the way unprincipled politicians use anything to make themselves look good, maybe such deception is acceptable in our Brave New World.
A female Democrat in Nevada revealed Biden’s “demeaning and disrespectful” smelling her hair and kissing her head with hands on her shoulders.
The media have been very quiet about the numerous incidents of Biden handsy, handling, and hugging numerous children even in the presence of their parents and recorded on television! One YouTube video presents numerous incidents of him being “Creepy Joe.” One headline screamed: “Dad Confronts ‘Creepy’ Joe Biden Over Child Molestation,” but Joe did not answer his question: “What about the girls you molested on C-SPAN at the Senate swearing-in?” Moreover, the man was removed from the public meeting.
March of 2020 was a bad day for Biden when Tara Reade, one of his former Senate aides, publicly charged Biden with sexually assaulting her in 1993. According to the Business Insider, Biden pressed her against a wall in a Capitol Hill hallway, reached under her skirt, and digitally penetrated her. The report quotes her saying, “she filed a complaint with the Senate personnel office concerning Biden’s alleged ‘sexual harassment and retaliation,’ but didn’t mention the alleged assault.” Biden has unequivocally denied assaulting or harassing Reade.
Seven other women accused Biden of “touching them inappropriately or invading their personal space in ways that made them feel uncomfortable. [They] said Biden’s behavior did not amount to sexual harassment or assault.”
He later said he’s “not sorry for anything that I’ve ever done.” He doesn’t know the difference between right and wrong.
Whatever happened to the Me Too Movement?
Joe’s vice-presidential choice said she believed the women who accused Biden of inappropriate contact, including touching and kissing. “I believe them, and I respect them being able to tell their story and having the courage to do it.” Does she still believe that?
Joe Biden’s son Hunter assured us of his father’s “honesty” and integrity at the convention while introducing his father. But that’s like Italian Benito Mussolini vouching for his German buddy with the bad haircut and funny mustache: “Yea, Adolph is a misunderstood former choir boy who always keeps his word.”
The same Hunter made $1.5 billion on a questionable foreign deal. Joe can settle this fiasco once and for all: tell the whole truth about it, open all appropriate records, and ask for all involved to be candid.
I could go on and on about flip flops and other charges; however, the question demands an answer: Is this man qualified, apart from his famous gaffs, to be the leader of the free world? If not, and it is discovered after he is elected, the office will go to Senator Kamala Harris, a woman of color—as if that matters. Evidently, it does matter to many Democrats, thereby proving they are racists.
Harris was Attorney General of California and had the reputation of sleeping her way to the top of the heap. She was openly the mistress of Willie Brown, former mayor of San Francisco, so our possible Vice-President is a fornicator. More than that, she is an ingrate. After getting to the top with the help of Brown, she now says, “His career is over; I will be alive and kicking for the next 40 years. I do not owe him a thing.” Well, no, I suppose she has already paid him; they both got what they wanted.
That’s why prostitution is still the oldest profession. The quid pro quo works.
Some of the leftist press, seeking to mitigate her fornication, say the charges “are technically true but given Brown had been separated for about a decade, the claims are misleading.” No, the fact Willie was separated from his wife makes no difference at all. They were both fornicators.
Kamala lied about smoking weed in college while listening to the “music” of Snoop Dogg and Tupac. It was untrue because Harris graduated college many years before their albums were released. Senator Gabbard (who was nowhere near the DNC) said, “She put 1,500 people in jail for marijuana violations and then laughed about it when she was asked if she ever smoked marijuana.” Harris has admitted to its use. There is another need for a vaccine for hypocrisy.
Kamala is not a descendant of slaves but of a slave owner! The Jamaica Globe quoted her father, professor Donald Harris saying, “My roots go back, within my lifetime, to my paternal grandmother Miss Chrishy (née Christiana Brown, descendant of Hamilton Brown who is on record as plantation and slave owner and founder of Brown’s Town).” Brown’s Town is an inland town a few miles from the Jamaica coast.
It would seem there will be no reparations for Kamala.
So our possible next Vice-President is not only a fornicator but also a hypocrite. Maybe Dr. Fauci can develop a vaccine for hypocrisy.
Kamala Harris and Joe Biden make a perfect choice for the pot smokers, fornicators, baby killers, open border fanatics, reparation zealots, and Democrats with terminal brain rot.
If the normal, moral, decent, liberty-lovers stay home on November 3, Joe and Kamala will be moving to Washington.
Where can I move?’http://donboys.cstnews.com/joe-and-kamala-there-is-no-vaccine-for-hypocrisy
White supremacy, hatred and loathing of other human beings is part and parcel of the hellish evolutionary belief system. In Part Two of Evolution = Racism it was ‘…reported in July 2020, The Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS, which runs the zoo) said:
“We deeply regret that many people and generations have been hurt by these actions or by our failure previously to publicly condemn and denounce them,” WCS President and CEO Cristián Samper wrote. “We recognize that overt and systemic racism persists, and our institution must play a greater role to confront it.”
But was it really racism?
At the time of writing, the Black Lives Matter movement has gained widespread traction around the world. Statues of colonialists and slavery advocates are being removed or defaced, and similar apologies abound at all levels. However, although one might claim that actions of slavery advocates were racist and/or prejudiced against other humans (slavery existed in many non-white cultures too), it was undoubtedly evolutionary beliefs that led to the humiliation of this young man. Most scientists of the day had uniformly accepted Darwin’s theory of evolution, and the popular idea that humans had evolved from ape-like creatures. Indeed, the display in the monkey house where Ota Benga was exhibited was called ‘Ancient Ancestors of Man’.
The apology misses the mark, completely
As part of its mission to be more transparent, WCS is making all records and archives related to Benga publicly available.
While being politically correct and being swept up in a cultural tide, they are actually failing to be transparent. Although the zoo apologized for this racist action, nowhere in the zoo’s apologies or statements do they mention the real reason Ota Benga was put on display. It was a belief in evolution, as clearly stated by the main players of the day themselves. All five owners associated with Ota Benga—Samuel Verner, William McGee, William Hornaday, Henry Osborn, and Madison Grant—were well-known evolutionists of their day.
The climate of the day
In CMI’s groundbreaking documentary The Voyage that Shook the World, we interviewed Darwin historian, Peter Bowler, in Charles Darwin’s old Cambridge office. Bowler, although an evolutionist himself, noted about Darwin:
That by the time he writes The Descent of Man in 1871 it’s pretty clear that he, by that time, shares the growing suspicion or conviction of many Europeans. The non-white races simply do not have the capacity to be elevated properly into civilised human beings; that they are mentally and morally at a more limited level. In a sense they are stuck at an early stage in the biological evolution of the human species.
So their way of life may offer us a so fossilised relic of what our own ancestors lived like in the distant prehistoric past. But now Darwin and many of his contemporaries are beginning to realise that what they needed to claim that they are biologically relics of the past. They are in fact equivalent to earlier stages in the ascent from the apes who have been preserved in isolated locations, preserved with those earlier levels of mental and moral development. [sic]
Note the following timeline prior to Ota Benga’s humiliation:
- 1833: British Empire abolished slavery.
- 1859: Darwin wrote On the Origin of Species (26 years after abolition of slavery).
- 1865: The Thirteenth Amendment abolished slavery in USA.
- 1871: Darwin wrote The Descent of Man (38 years after abolition in UK and 6 years after USA).
Slavery had been outlawed for more than forty years by the time of Ota Benga’s 1906’s misadventure. In other words, Ota Benga’s humiliation had very little to do with slavery.
The aforementioned Verner (Ota Benga’s captor) was also an academic. Darwin’s views intrigued him when he wrote:
Are they men, or the highest apes? Who and what were their ancestors? What are their ethnic relations to the other races of men? Have they degenerated from larger men, or are the larger men a development of Pygmy forefathers? These questions arise naturally, and plunge the inquirer at once into the depths of the most heated scientific discussions of this generation. ‘Pygmies present a case of unmodified structure from the beginning [a view which is] … against both evolution and degeneracy. It is true that these little people have apparently preserved an unchanged physical entity for five thousand years. But that only carries the question back into the debated ground of the origin of species.
Authors Bradford (Verner’s grandson) and Plume cited some of the visitor’s questions to Ota Benga’s display.
Was he a man or monkey? Was he something in between? “Ist das ein Mensch?” asked a German spectator. “Is it a man?” … No one really mistook apes or parrots for human beings. This—it—came so much closer. Was it a man? Was it a monkey? Was it a forgotten stage of evolution?
Clearly, the display was not lost on the public of the day. It was Darwin’s views that caused this small man to be viewed as an evolutionary ‘throwback’.
But, notably, nowhere around the world do we see Darwin’s statue being removed for his offensive ideas that the non-white races were lower on the evolutionary scale.
In fact, many of the racist taunts still being used today have their roots in Darwinian ideology or the idea that black people are ‘closer to the apes’ on the evolutionary scale. For example, see our articles Do monkeys play football? and Ape’ slur against Australian indigenous footballer. Is it any wonder when we still see displays and photos in evolutionary textbooks such as the ones pictured above?
Not the only example
We’ve also previously reported about the killing and removal of various ethnic groups around the world due to evolutionary beliefs. For example, in Australia we cited reports that perhaps the bodies of 10,000 Aboriginal people were shipped to British museums.10
‘US evolutionists were also strongly involved in this flourishing ’industry‘ of gathering specimens of ’subhumans‘. The Smithsonian Institution in Washington holds the remains of 15,000 individuals of various races. And then in April 2019, The State Ethnographic Collections department and the Martin Luther University in Germany, decided to return the bones of 53 Aboriginal people to the Yawuru indigenous group from Western Australia.
The BBC reported:
Skulls and bones of Aboriginal Australians were removed by researchers in the late 19th and early 20th centuries and put on show in museums around the world. However, they were displaced by settlers two centuries ago and thousands were killed. For more than 150 years, their remains were removed and sent to museums, universities and private collections in Australia and elsewhere.
But note, never once did the German institutions or the BBC mention the evolutionary reasons for their removal of these bodies from their homeland, except the evolutionary timeline invoked with it:
Australia’s native Aboriginal population has occupied the country for about 50,000 years.
It also reported that:
Germany also has large holdings of African human remains. The country has previously repatriated remains to Namibia, where it killed tens of thousands of indigenous Herero and Nama people from 1904 to 1908.
Today, the remains of tens of thousands of ethnically diverse people remain in academic institutions around the world.
‘Fess up’, Bronx Zoo!
Will the Bronx Zoo and these institutions admit the real reasons for these atrocities? Will they provide a proper apology for the evolutionary teaching that these are sub-humans—mere beasts to be studied and displayed for the advancement of mankind? Sadly these ideas still permeate the evolutionary community literature/images. Racism will continue to rear its ugly head until the underlying root philosophy is addressed. As philosopher Santayana said, “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”
A lesson for the church also
As we’ve shown on this issue, the scientific consensus of evolution was an unstoppable juggernaut. I think of Christian missionaries who went to continents like Africa to preach the Gospel to people like Ota Benga and his kin. They did not have the DNA-science of today that confirms that all humanity is more than 99.99% percent similar. But they stood on God’s Word where it says, “And he made from one man every nation of mankind to live on all the face of the earth, having determined allotted periods and the boundaries of their dwelling place” (Acts 17:26). Evolutionists in Ota Benga’s day would insist that the ‘science’ was on their side, but they were wrong. Christians who are only too happy to embrace evolution should learn from these atrocities of history in the name of (evolutionary) ‘science’.’ https://creation.com/bronx-zoo-apologizes?utm_campaign=infobytes_au&utm_content=Bronx+Zoo+apologizes+for+putting+an+African+man+in+their+Monkey+House&utm_medium=email&utm_source=mailing.creation.com&utm_term=Fortnightly+Digest+-+2020.08.21
Evolution is a teaching from the pit of Hell! The theory of evolution is a fairy tale from Satan’s book on how to miss Heaven and go to Hell. The following is the first part of an article concerning evolutionary belief and ‘…the horrific and inhumane treatment of Ota Benga, a young African man who was taken from Congo in 1904 by noted African explorer and former slave trader Samuel Verner. Samuel Verner was known for his belief in evolution and for his support of white supremacist ideals. On his maiden voyage onboard the Roquelle from Antwerp to Congo, Verner was surprised that dark-skinned individuals were allowed to dine together with Caucasian shipmates. In a letter to his mother, he lamented that, “the helplessness of that race is simply appalling.” So from the very beginning of his journey to the West, Ota found himself strongly influenced by racist evolutionists.
Ota was first displayed as an ‘emblematic savage’ in the anthropology wing at the 1904 St Louis World’s Fair with other pygmies. He was eventually presented by Verner to the Bronx Zoo director, William Hornaday who came up with the idea of using Ota Benga to ‘educate’ the public about human evolution. At this time Ota Benga was just twenty-three years old. His height was only 1.5 metres (4 feet 11 eleven inches) and he only weighed 46.7 kg (103 lb). Ota Benga, which meant ‘friend’ in his native language, was often thought to be just a boy, but he was actually a twice-married father. His first wife and two children were murdered by white colonists, and his second spouse died from a poisonous snake bite.
Ota Benga became a sensation, drawing large crowds to the Zoo including over 40,000 on Sunday, 16 September 1906. Despite criticism, particularly from some church leaders at the time, Dr Hornaday insisted that he was merely offering an ‘intriguing exhibit’ for the public’s education and:
… apparently saw no difference between a wild beast and the little black man; [and] for the first time in any American zoo, a human being was displayed in a cage. Benga was given cage-mates to keep him company in his captivity—a parrot and an orang-utan named Dohong.
Nevertheless, Hornaday’s racist Darwinian ideas were clear elsewhere in his writings where he described Ota Benga as:
“… a genuine African pigmy, belonging to the subrace commonly miscalled ‘the Dwarfs.’”
The other co-founder of the Bronx Zoo was Henry Osborn. Henry Osborn was regarded as the leading evolutionist of his day, and is famed for the discovery of many dinosaurs, including the T. rex. Like Hornaday, Henry Osborn was highly racist as a result of his belief in evolution. For example, before Madison Grant (who was also influential in the founding of the Bronx Zoo) wrote his racist book, On the Passing of a Great Race, Grant shared his transcript with Osborn who made many suggestions. In the preface to the fourth edition Osborn wrote:
[I]n no other human stock which has come to this country is there displayed the unanimity of heart, mind and action which is now being displayed by the descendants of the blue-eyed, fair-haired peoples of the north of Europe. If I were asked: “What is the greatest danger which threatens the American republic to-day? I would certainly reply: The gradual dying out among our people of those hereditary traits through which the principles of our religious, political and social foundations were laid down and their insidious replacement by traits of less noble character.”
Grant’s book, as we know, was largely influential on Adolf Hitler. Hitler called the book, ‘his bible’ for it advocated a rigid system of selection through the elimination of those who are weak or unfit.
For more on this tragedy, please read our comprehensive articles on Ota Benga: The pygmy put on display and The man who was put on display in the zoo!‘ https://creation.com/bronx-zoo-apologizes?utm_campaign=infobytes_au&utm_content=Bronx+Zoo+apologizes+for+putting+an+African+man+in+their+Monkey+House&utm_medium=email&utm_source=mailing.creation.com&utm_term=Fortnightly+Digest+-+2020.08.21
If words have meaning what is said in this video is scary! These people are out to not only change America but destroy America.
When Corporations go Politically Correct they generally go broke.
The West is moving faster and faster towards being governed like the CCP.
How many freedoms must we lose before we wake up? The Victorian state in Australia is a case in point.
whatyareckon 