These Loony Leftist Marxist folk hate with a passion conservative Bible believing Christians and conservative non-believers. If you do not walk in step with their views you are on their hit list. Yes, a hit list! ‘The founder of Extinction Rebellion wants to put a bullet in the brains of business owners and politicians.
Today, I’ll play some secretly-recorded audio of Extinction Rebellion’s co-founder Roger Hallam obtained by Guido Fawkes, saying that his followers should “put a bullet in [the] head” of those responsible for harming the environment.
Extinction Rebellion made itself famous in London in 2019 where over 1,100 arrests were made over the course of eleven days. BBC News reported that the ongoing protests ran a police tab of $12.9 million. The group blocked the subway and tried to grind the city to a standstill.
If Hallam were a conservative, his organization, and the descendants of those in his organization would be canceled for many generations.
Yep, more money thrown into a system already deplete of any intellectual value only to teach more abnormal sexual proclivities.
‘This week, students across England are heading back to school in circumstances none of us could have predicted a year ago. The coronavirus pandemic has upended nearly every aspect of our lives and, while the circumstances surrounding the return to school this year are challenging, it doesn’t mean there’s no room for hope that a better future is on its way.
New regulations for teaching relationships and sex education in English schools are now coming into force and schools have until next Summer to put this into practice. It’s hard to put into words just how momentous and life-changing this will be. Generations of young people will be attending schools that not only accept LGBT people and same-sex relationships, but also celebrate and offer support on the issues that young LGBT people face.
The guidance means that all secondary schools will teach about sexual orientation and gender identity, and all primary schools will teach about different families, with schools being “enabled and encouraged” by the Government to include LGBT families in this teaching. This is about showing kids that families can have two mums, two dads or a trans parent. Or to put it another way: different families, same love.’ https://inews.co.uk/opinion/lgbt-school-curriculum-sex-education-headteachers-supported-614606
Genesis 2:24 Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.
When the Leftist Loony crowd think they are being silenced then there is an uproar. The following two articles are opposites. The first article is from a Leftist organization called The Conversation. The first article speaks on how they believe the scientists are being silenced. The second article is explaining how a scientist was discharged from his university because he dare speak out about bad science.
‘Ecologists and conservation experts in government, industry and universities are routinely constrained in communicating scientific evidence on threatened species, mining, logging and other threats to the environment, our new research has found.
Our study, just published, shows how important scientific information about environmental threats often does not reach the public or decision-makers, including government ministers.
In some cases, scientists self-censor information for fear of damaging their careers, losing funding or being misrepresented in the media. In others, senior managers or ministers’ officers prevented researchers from speaking truthfully on scientific matters.
‘The Heretic: Inside Peter Ridd’s fight for freedom of speech on climate change is an insiders’ account of Peter Ridd’s ongoing legal battle with James Cook University. It tells the story of why Peter spoke out on the bad science surrounding climate change and the Great Barrier Reef, the extraordinary lengths that James Cook University went to silence him, and how Peter fought back in court. The Heretic podcast is now available. To listen click here.’https://ipa.org.au/peterridd?gclid=CjwKCAjw19z6BRAYEiwAmo64LXdKkm0QmK08pMeqAfOLIc7H023xLXxPUtLN6IIIVyZuITN-d-k8KhoCVisQAvD_BwE
The first article is about those who support MORE environmental regulations and believe the Ponzi Scheme of Climate Change! The truth is that when one speaks out like Peter Ridd against the Marxist Loony Leftist environmental Climate Change scam, war is declared against you. Peter Ridd is the one who is truly SILENCED by losing his job and having his reputation soiled.
Genesis 8:22 While the earth remaineth, seedtime and harvest, and cold and heat, and summer and winter, and day and night shall not cease.
The Australian state of New South Wales is the home of Sydney, Australia. The present state government is supposedly a conservative one but the facts seem to prove otherwise. This government has swallowed the Climate Scam poison hook line and sinker! This government is pouring millions into non-reliable renewables such as solar and wind. Nuclear is completely off the table if the Premier has anything to do with it. HOWEVER, when one thought Victoria was the most left leaning state there was then New South sales steps up for the trophy. The NSW Treasury has forgotten what it is supposed to be about and has taken on the role of being ‘diverse’.
Download https://treasury.gov.au/sites/default/files/2019-07/p2019-398635.pdf. Type in hetrosexual and see what comes up! Then type in lesbian. Type in rights and right and read what comes up. Type in other words and read what comes up. This government department has lost its focus.
This NSW government has gone mad and wild. Where are those who are not following the leftist loony path to destruction?
During this China virus pandemic have you ever been told by a politician either on television or in print to wear a mask and to social distance. Well, they must have a rule for us peons and one for themselves!
The man on the right is our local state member in the New South Wales Parliament. He sends weekly updates telling us, the lowly citizen, what rules and regulations we are to follow during the China virus pandemic. Two of the BASIC RULES are wearing a mask and social distancing of one and one half meters. Hey, where’s the mask and social distancing in this photo? I am sure there is a good reason!
Then there is the push by politicians concerning the indigenous people and their wonderful way of life before the awful white man came on the scene. It is an endless message of government that the indigenous people still have a long way yet to catch up with the non-indigenous people in so many ways such as housing, education and health. So, that brings me to this. In our town of Dubbo, New South Wales, the state government is building a new hospital. Now, the government MUST have a lot of money for they paid someone to make a mural of various indigenous bush medicine! Yes, bush medicine on a mural in front of a hospital!! According to Webster’s 1828 Dictionary this is the primary meaning of hospital.
HOS’PITAL, noun [Latin hospitalis, supra.]
1. A building appropriated for the reception of sick, infirm and helpless paupers, who are supported and nursed by charity; also, a house for the reception of insane persons, whether paupers or not, or for seamen, soldiers, foundlings, etc. who are supported by the public, or by private charity, or for infected persons, etc.
Now, think about it! How is it the PC politicians think these indigenous people had such a fabulous knowledge of bush medicine for their health before the terrible white man came on the scene BUT today they need a white man’s place of medicine?! Not only that but the PC politician spends tax dollars to show the terrible white man the terrific medicine the indigenous person had before the terrible white man came on the scene!
All of this can only make sense to someone who has swallowed the PC poison! I have written the local member asking what this mural cost the tax payer but surprise, surprise, no answer yet!
The mural of indigenous Bush Medicine paid for by tax payers in front of the new hospital. Hopefully, the doctors in the hospital will be using the medical science of today.
The point of all this is that firstly, politicians seem to give orders BUT do not feel the need to obey the same. Secondly, if the medicine of the indigenous people was so good why spend the millions on a white mans building called hospitals?
Am I expecting anything to really come of all this? Not really for who in government really listens?
Job 36:22 “Behold, God exalteth by his power: who teacheth like him?”
While the development of a new science is helping mankind, it says something that many scientists did not intend to say. The science is called biomimetics. As the name suggests, biomimetics is based on the idea that if we copy designs found in nature, we can often improve our own technology.
For example, a Japanese company developed special swimsuit material for the Beijing Olympics that provides less resistance in the water. Taking a cue from the swift marlin, the company developed material with imbedded polymers so that it mimics the marlin’s skin’s absorption of water. Schools of fish swim in a beautiful unison ballet without ever running into each other. Nissan Motor Company is studying fish schools to discover what it might do to build cars with better anti-collision equipment. Solar cells and light-emitting diodes certainly could be more efficient. Engineers learned that moths see so well in the dark because their eyes have special convex-concave design. That design means that the moth’s eye surface reflects two to three-tenths of a percent of the light that hits it. Standard plastic film reflects four to five percent of the light hitting it, making the moth’s eye much less reflective.
Yep, in Australia and the rest of the West it seems diversity is the main topic. It seems we have ‘Diversity officers, diversity policies, diversity and inclusion training, diversity on a Presidential ticket. The ABC reportedly now has a diversity “content tracker” to make sure their hosts, panellists, guests represent enough – and appropriate – diversity. And yesterday, we learned that Australian TV networks in general are displaying a distinct “lack of diversity”.
So here’s a little quiz for you. Consider these two separate groups of people. Group A – 6 white men, Group B – 3 men and 3 women of varying skin colours. Which group is more diverse?
If you said B, you just might be a little racist or sexist. The correct answer is “I don’t know yet. I don’t have enough information”.
After talking with the groups for a while you may ascertain the following information:
In Group A’s men, there is a farmer, an engineer, a nurse, a truck-driver, a stay-at-home dad, and an artist. Four of them were born overseas – two in Eastern Europe, one in the US, one in New Zealand. Two of them speak English as a second (or third) language. Three have university qualifications. Two live in capital cities, two in regional cities, and two in remote communities. Three of them usually vote conservative, two of them vote Labor/Greens, and the other is a genuine swing voter.
Group B’s members, on the other hand, are all left-wing voters, they all live in inner-city Melbourne, they are all lawyers, they all barrack for Essendon in the AFL… you get the picture.
Now, which group is more diverse?
The problem with today’s diversity drive, indeed the core of identity politics, is that it reduces people down to characteristics that don’t actually describe who somebody is. Yes, one’s race, family heritage, sexuality, physical ability, can deeply affect one’s perspective on life and politics, but it’s those different perspectives that make for interesting discussion, debate, policy creation, not the personal factors that led them there.
There’s no benefit in making sure your panel, or board, or hosts are all from different ethnic groups, or different genders (of which there are only two), if they all think exactly the same.
Yes, it is important to reflect the racial and gender diversity of society, but isn’t it more important to reflect the ideological and intellectual diversity of society?
Martin Luther King Jr famously dreamed “that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the colour of their skin but by the content of their character.” Today’s diversity experts are turning that on their head, and making immutable traits like race and gender to be the most, if not the only, characteristics worth considering.
Even worse, they seem to be suggesting that within these diverse ethnic groups, there is no diversity of thoughts or ideas or values – everyone in the group is expected to think and behave the same. Remember how US Presidential candidate Joe Biden told voters “you ain’t black” if they hadn’t already decided to vote for him in November. Notice how often African-Americans, or indigenous Australians, are called traitors, coconuts, or an “Uncle Tom”, if they don’t toe the left-wing line. Diversity? Sounds more like racial prejudice.
Some may suggest that Australian TV networks do indeed have a lack of diversity on their news programs, but it’s not a race or gender problem, but rather an ideological problem.
Diversity of experience beats diversity of gender.
Diversity of perspectives beats diversity of sexuality.
Genesis 1:21a “And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their kind….”
‘According to evolution theory, there were no four-limbed creatures living on land until 360 million years ago. That is supposedly when Lungfish appear in the fossil record. Lungfish can breathe air, have four fins arranged rather like legs and can even climb trees. Long ago, evolutionists declared that all four-limbed creatures that live on land, including man, evolved from the Lungfish.
As we look at the variety of land-living creatures, evolutionists are here claiming a great deal of change from our lowly Lungfish ancestry. It is interesting, however, that the Lungfishes themselves have changed very little in the supposed 360 million years of their existence. Lungfish hatchlings today have small teeth, which, as they grow to adulthood, fuse into a bony dental plate. In this adult plate, the individual teeth are fused to one another. There are thousands of well-preserved fossils of both hatchlings and adult Lungfish that supposedly lived 360 million years ago. A study of these fossils shows that even the dental development of Lungfish has not changed since the first Lungfish appeared among the fossils.
White supremacy, hatred and loathing of other human beings is part and parcel of the hellish evolutionary belief system. In Part Two of Evolution = Racism it was ‘…reported in July 2020, The Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS, which runs the zoo) said:
“We deeply regret that many people and generations have been hurt by these actions or by our failure previously to publicly condemn and denounce them,” WCS President and CEO Cristián Samper wrote. “We recognize that overt and systemic racism persists, and our institution must play a greater role to confront it.”
But was it really racism?
At the time of writing, the Black Lives Matter movement has gained widespread traction around the world. Statues of colonialists and slavery advocates are being removed or defaced, and similar apologies abound at all levels. However, although one might claim that actions of slavery advocates were racist and/or prejudiced against other humans (slavery existed in many non-white cultures too), it was undoubtedly evolutionary beliefs that led to the humiliation of this young man. Most scientists of the day had uniformly accepted Darwin’s theory of evolution, and the popular idea that humans had evolved from ape-like creatures. Indeed, the display in the monkey house where Ota Benga was exhibited was called ‘Ancient Ancestors of Man’.
The apology misses the mark, completely
As part of its mission to be more transparent, WCS is making all records and archives related to Benga publicly available.
While being politically correct and being swept up in a cultural tide, they are actually failing to be transparent. Although the zoo apologized for this racist action, nowhere in the zoo’s apologies or statements do they mention the real reason Ota Benga was put on display. It was a belief in evolution, as clearly stated by the main players of the day themselves. All five owners associated with Ota Benga—Samuel Verner, William McGee, William Hornaday, Henry Osborn, and Madison Grant—were well-known evolutionists of their day.
The climate of the day
Note this popular reconstruction of Homo erectus dark skin (current at the time of writing).
In CMI’s groundbreaking documentary The Voyage that Shook the World, we interviewed Darwin historian, Peter Bowler, in Charles Darwin’s old Cambridge office. Bowler, although an evolutionist himself, noted about Darwin:
That by the time he writes The Descent of Man in 1871 it’s pretty clear that he, by that time, shares the growing suspicion or conviction of many Europeans. The non-white races simply do not have the capacity to be elevated properly into civilised human beings; that they are mentally and morally at a more limited level. In a sense they are stuck at an early stage in the biological evolution of the human species.
So their way of life may offer us a so fossilised relic of what our own ancestors lived like in the distant prehistoric past. But now Darwin and many of his contemporaries are beginning to realise that what they needed to claim that they are biologically relics of the past. They are in fact equivalent to earlier stages in the ascent from the apes who have been preserved in isolated locations, preserved with those earlier levels of mental and moral development. [sic]
Note the following timeline prior to Ota Benga’s humiliation:
1833: British Empire abolished slavery.
1859: Darwin wrote On the Origin of Species (26 years after abolition of slavery).
1865: The Thirteenth Amendment abolished slavery in USA.
1871: Darwin wrote The Descent of Man (38 years after abolition in UK and 6 years after USA).
Slavery had been outlawed for more than forty years by the time of Ota Benga’s 1906’s misadventure. In other words, Ota Benga’s humiliation had very little to do with slavery.
The aforementioned Verner (Ota Benga’s captor) was also an academic. Darwin’s views intrigued him when he wrote:
Famous anthropologist adorns the cover of Time with a ‘black man’ wearing a mask of Homo habilis.
Are they men, or the highest apes? Who and what were their ancestors? What are their ethnic relations to the other races of men? Have they degenerated from larger men, or are the larger men a development of Pygmy forefathers? These questions arise naturally, and plunge the inquirer at once into the depths of the most heated scientific discussions of this generation. ‘Pygmies present a case of unmodified structure from the beginning [a view which is] … against both evolution and degeneracy. It is true that these little people have apparently preserved an unchanged physical entity for five thousand years. But that only carries the question back into the debated ground of the origin of species.
Authors Bradford (Verner’s grandson) and Plume cited some of the visitor’s questions to Ota Benga’s display.
Was he a man or monkey? Was he something in between? “Ist das ein Mensch?” asked a German spectator. “Is it a man?” … No one really mistook apes or parrots for human beings. This—it—came so much closer. Was it a man? Was it a monkey? Was it a forgotten stage of evolution?
Clearly, the display was not lost on the public of the day. It was Darwin’s views that caused this small man to be viewed as an evolutionary ‘throwback’.
But, notably, nowhere around the world do we see Darwin’s statue being removed for his offensive ideas that the non-white races were lower on the evolutionary scale.
In fact, many of the racist taunts still being used today have their roots in Darwinian ideology or the idea that black people are ‘closer to the apes’ on the evolutionary scale. For example, see our articles Do monkeys play football? and Ape’ slur against Australian indigenous footballer. Is it any wonder when we still see displays and photos in evolutionary textbooks such as the ones pictured above?
Not the only example
We’ve also previously reported about the killing and removal of various ethnic groups around the world due to evolutionary beliefs. For example, in Australia we cited reports that perhaps the bodies of 10,000 Aboriginal people were shipped to British museums.10
‘US evolutionists were also strongly involved in this flourishing ’industry‘ of gathering specimens of ’subhumans‘. The Smithsonian Institution in Washington holds the remains of 15,000 individuals of various races. And then in April 2019, The State Ethnographic Collections department and the Martin Luther University in Germany, decided to return the bones of 53 Aboriginal people to the Yawuru indigenous group from Western Australia.
The BBC reported:
Aboriginal remains being returned at a ceremony in Germany.
Skulls and bones of Aboriginal Australians were removed by researchers in the late 19th and early 20th centuries and put on show in museums around the world. However, they were displaced by settlers two centuries ago and thousands were killed. For more than 150 years, their remains were removed and sent to museums, universities and private collections in Australia and elsewhere.
But note, never once did the German institutions or the BBC mention the evolutionary reasons for their removal of these bodies from their homeland, except the evolutionary timeline invoked with it:
Australia’s native Aboriginal population has occupied the country for about 50,000 years.
It also reported that:
Germany also has large holdings of African human remains. The country has previously repatriated remains to Namibia, where it killed tens of thousands of indigenous Herero and Nama people from 1904 to 1908.
Today, the remains of tens of thousands of ethnically diverse people remain in academic institutions around the world.
‘Fess up’, Bronx Zoo!
Will the Bronx Zoo and these institutions admit the real reasons for these atrocities? Will they provide a proper apology for the evolutionary teaching that these are sub-humans—mere beasts to be studied and displayed for the advancement of mankind? Sadly these ideas still permeate the evolutionary community literature/images. Racism will continue to rear its ugly head until the underlying root philosophy is addressed. As philosopher Santayana said, “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”
A lesson for the church also
As we’ve shown on this issue, the scientific consensus of evolution was an unstoppable juggernaut. I think of Christian missionaries who went to continents like Africa to preach the Gospel to people like Ota Benga and his kin. They did not have the DNA-science of today that confirms that all humanity is more than 99.99% percent similar. But they stood on God’s Word where it says, “And he made from one man every nation of mankind to live on all the face of the earth, having determined allotted periods and the boundaries of their dwelling place” (Acts 17:26). Evolutionists in Ota Benga’s day would insist that the ‘science’ was on their side, but they were wrong. Christians who are only too happy to embrace evolution should learn from these atrocities of history in the name of (evolutionary) ‘science’.’ https://creation.com/bronx-zoo-apologizes?utm_campaign=infobytes_au&utm_content=Bronx+Zoo+apologizes+for+putting+an+African+man+in+their+Monkey+House&utm_medium=email&utm_source=mailing.creation.com&utm_term=Fortnightly+Digest+-+2020.08.21
Evolution is a teaching from the pit of Hell! The theory of evolution is a fairy tale from Satan’s book on how to miss Heaven and go to Hell. The following is the first part of an article concerning evolutionary belief and ‘…the horrific and inhumane treatment of Ota Benga, a young African man who was taken from Congo in 1904 by noted African explorer and former slave trader Samuel Verner. Samuel Verner was known for his belief in evolution and for his support of white supremacist ideals. On his maiden voyage onboard the Roquelle from Antwerp to Congo, Verner was surprised that dark-skinned individuals were allowed to dine together with Caucasian shipmates. In a letter to his mother, he lamented that, “the helplessness of that race is simply appalling.” So from the very beginning of his journey to the West, Ota found himself strongly influenced by racist evolutionists.
Ota was first displayed as an ‘emblematic savage’ in the anthropology wing at the 1904 St Louis World’s Fair with other pygmies. He was eventually presented by Verner to the Bronx Zoo director, William Hornaday who came up with the idea of using Ota Benga to ‘educate’ the public about human evolution. At this time Ota Benga was just twenty-three years old. His height was only 1.5 metres (4 feet 11 eleven inches) and he only weighed 46.7 kg (103 lb). Ota Benga, which meant ‘friend’ in his native language, was often thought to be just a boy, but he was actually a twice-married father. His first wife and two children were murdered by white colonists, and his second spouse died from a poisonous snake bite.
Ota Benga became a sensation, drawing large crowds to the Zoo including over 40,000 on Sunday, 16 September 1906. Despite criticism, particularly from some church leaders at the time, Dr Hornaday insisted that he was merely offering an ‘intriguing exhibit’ for the public’s education and:
… apparently saw no difference between a wild beast and the little black man; [and] for the first time in any American zoo, a human being was displayed in a cage. Benga was given cage-mates to keep him company in his captivity—a parrot and an orang-utan named Dohong.
Nevertheless, Hornaday’s racist Darwinian ideas were clear elsewhere in his writings where he described Ota Benga as:
“… a genuine African pigmy, belonging to the subrace commonly miscalled ‘the Dwarfs.’”
The other co-founder of the Bronx Zoo was Henry Osborn. Henry Osborn was regarded as the leading evolutionist of his day, and is famed for the discovery of many dinosaurs, including the T. rex. Like Hornaday, Henry Osborn was highly racist as a result of his belief in evolution. For example, before Madison Grant (who was also influential in the founding of the Bronx Zoo) wrote his racist book, On the Passing of a Great Race, Grant shared his transcript with Osborn who made many suggestions. In the preface to the fourth edition Osborn wrote:
[I]n no other human stock which has come to this country is there displayed the unanimity of heart, mind and action which is now being displayed by the descendants of the blue-eyed, fair-haired peoples of the north of Europe. If I were asked: “What is the greatest danger which threatens the American republic to-day? I would certainly reply: The gradual dying out among our people of those hereditary traits through which the principles of our religious, political and social foundations were laid down and their insidious replacement by traits of less noble character.”
Grant’s book, as we know, was largely influential on Adolf Hitler. Hitler called the book, ‘his bible’ for it advocated a rigid system of selection through the elimination of those who are weak or unfit.
whatyareckon 