whatyareckon

I have always found it interesting that the climate change scammers seek to tell me what it will be in fifty to one hundred years but cannot tell me within 80 to 95% what the weather will be next week. Oh well, it is true we climate skeptics do ‘…often make sport of the ever-shifting and opportunistic definition of “climate” as opposed to “weather”, by which any unusually warm or stormy events are portents of climate whereas, say, a string of blizzards in May is just the meaningless vagaries of weather. Recently a kind adult patted us on the head and explained that we were ignorant of the scientific basis of the difference. To aid in our education they provided a link to a NASA page wherein there is enough hand-waving to power the next Apollo mission. It declares that: “The difference between weather and climate is a measure of time. Weather is what conditions of the atmosphere are over a short period of time, and climate is how the atmosphere ‘behaves’ over relatively long periods of time.” All of which says precisely nothing, which is why the definitions keep changing depending on the day’s weather. But soon it gets worse because their first example to illustrate climate change is something that hasn’t happened.’ The rest of this article is certainly worth a read and may be found at https://climatediscussionnexus.com/2020/05/13/weather-v-climate/